The Nation: Bombing Haqqani Is A Bad Idea

Partner content from The Nation

Pakistani students shout anti-US slogans during a protest to  condemn U.S. threats in Karachi on Sept. 28, 2011. The United States  stepped up pressure on the Pakistani government, saying it must clamp  down on the Haqqani network blamed for the attack on the US embassy in  Kabul. i i

Pakistani students shout anti-US slogans during a protest to condemn U.S. threats in Karachi on Sept. 28, 2011. The United States stepped up pressure on the Pakistani government, saying it must clamp down on the Haqqani network blamed for the attack on the US embassy in Kabul. Asif Hassan/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Asif Hassan/AFP/Getty Images
Pakistani students shout anti-US slogans during a protest to  condemn U.S. threats in Karachi on Sept. 28, 2011. The United States  stepped up pressure on the Pakistani government, saying it must clamp  down on the Haqqani network blamed for the attack on the US embassy in  Kabul.

Pakistani students shout anti-US slogans during a protest to condemn U.S. threats in Karachi on Sept. 28, 2011. The United States stepped up pressure on the Pakistani government, saying it must clamp down on the Haqqani network blamed for the attack on the US embassy in Kabul.

Asif Hassan/AFP/Getty Images

Robert Dreyfuss, a Nation contributing editor, is an investigative journalist specializing in politics and national security.

The explicit warnings last week from Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and other top U.S. officials to Pakistan about the activities of the so-called Haqqani group in Pakistan and Afghanistan threaten to open a dangerous new front in the war in Afghanistan.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is openly warning that the United States might attack the Haqqanis inside Pakistan directly: "We've made clear that we are going to do everything we have to do to defend our forces. I don't think it would be helpful to describe what those options would look like and what operational steps we may or may not take." And Pakistan, naturally, is warning that doing so would be a bad idea:

ISLAMABAD (AP)—Pakistan's foreign minister on Saturday warned the United States against sending ground troops to her country to fight an Afghan militant group that America alleges is used as a proxy by Pakistan's top intelligence agency for attacks in neighboring Afghanistan.

If President Obama wants to continue to wind down the war, and run for re-election in 2102 as the president who ended George W. Bush's two wars, he'd better avoid an attack on the Haqqanis. Among other things, an attack on the entrenched camps of the Haqqanis could risk blowing Pakistan apart, leading to an outright military takeover in Islamabad, an intensified alliance between Pakistan and China, a sharply escalated Pakistani effort to topple the Karzai government in Afghanistan and even a cataclysmic war between Pakistan and India.

But those possibilities aren't stopping Obama administration officials from making threats. And already the hawks, neoconservatives and militarists in the United States are demanding blood. Let's see if the Republican presidential candidates, who've so far seemed downright dovish when it comes to Afghanistan, join in the bloodlust for calls to go after Haqqani.

Seizing on Mullen's comments, Senator Lindsey Graham—one-third of the Holy Trinity that includes John McCain and Joltin' Joe Lieberman—told Fox News that he's itchin' to slam the Haqqanis, according to The Hill:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) had tough words for Pakistan, warning the nation to stop assisting the Haqqani Network in attacks on American forces in Afghanistan and urging the US to consider steps to end that threat. "We have to put all options on the table," Graham warned on Fox News Sunday.

The Wall Street Journal has also weighed in with its own bombast, and writing in The Diplomat, Jeff M. Smith of the American Foreign Policy Council goes all Curtis LeMay on Pakistan:

It is instructive to remember that there's one diplomatic mechanism with a track record of success in Pakistan. Immediately after the attacks of 9/11, then deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage warned Pakistan's leadership that it would be 'bombed back into the Stone Age' if it did not support America's invasion of Afghanistan. That was the first—and last—time the United States received Pakistan's full cooperation in this war.... Perhaps, at the 11th hour, the Obama administration has realized the folly of this approach and found its own Armitage moment.

Needless to say, the discovery that Pakistan supports the Haqqanis (and the Taliban) isn't news. It's been common knowledge for decades, going back to the 1980s, when the United States, too, supported Jalaluddin Haqqani in the US jihad against the USSR. (Haqqani's son, Sirajuddin, runs the group a generation later, though the old man is still alive and kicking.) For the United States, perhaps the last straw was the recent, stunningly high-profile attack on the U.S. embassy in Kabul this month, but if so, there've been plenty of next-to-last straws for many years now, and it's long been an open secret that Pakistan's ISI backs the Haqqani-Taliban alliance.

Since we're supposed to be getting out of Afghanistan, it might be a good idea to strike a deal with Pakistan, begging that country and its ISI to bring its rambunctious allies into some sort of accord before the US troops presence declines to the point where the United States has zero bargaining power at all. Bombing the Haqqani camps in Pakistan will only makes things a lot, lot worse.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.