Court: Army Corps Not Liable For Katrina Floods

A federal appeals court has ruled the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers cannot be held responsible for the catastrophic flooding that took place in some New Orleans neighborhoods after Hurricane Katrina. The panel had ruled differently in March. Hundreds of property owners had sued the federal government saying a shipping channel made the flooding worse.

Copyright © 2012 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

This week, a federal appeals court said U.S. Army Corps of Engineers cannot be held liable for the catastrophic flooding that took place in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. NPR's Kathy Lohr reports on a setback for hundreds of homeowners who sued.

KATHY LOHR: The Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, known as MRGO, was a shortcut between New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico. The plaintiffs contend the shipping channel was not maintained properly, that it increased the storm surge from Hurricane Katrina. Federal Judge Stanwood Duvall agreed with residents back in 2009, and a panel of the 5th Circuit Appeals Court upheld that landmark decision in March. But on Monday, the same panel reversed itself, saying the government cannot be held liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

JOHN ANDRY: It's a travesty is what it is.

LOHR: John Andry is one of the plaintiffs' attorneys. He says St. Bernard Parish was devastated.

ANDRY: You had 26,000 structures, only four of which didn't flood. And then to have a trial court decision say that the Corps was monumentally negligent and malfeasant, and then have a court of appeal effectively immunize them is worse than disappointing.

LOHR: In the earlier ruling, the court said the government made scientific errors about the risks of not shoring up levees that protected St. Bernard Parish and the Lower 9th Ward. Therefore, the Corps could be held liable for damages. Now the court says the government cannot be held responsible. This time, the court said the decisions were public policy considerations, which are immune from prosecution. Emory law professor Jonathan Nash.

JONATHAN NASH: It's largely the same opinion, but they sort of say, well, we're going to give the government the benefit of the doubt and say that they're entitled to immunity. So the upshot is that that the government gets immunity, which means that the plaintiffs can't collect.

LOHR: Plaintiffs' damages could amount to billions of dollars, as thousands lost homes and businesses. Experts following the case say this decision was a complete surprise. Mark Davis is head of the Tulane Institute on Water Resources Law and Policy.

MARK DAVIS: This is clearly a message that, when it comes to liability suits like this, it's going to be hard to win if this ruling stands.

LOHR: Plaintiffs' attorneys say they will appeal. The US Army Corps of Engineers says it is reviewing the decision and referred calls to the US Justice Department, which had no comment. Kathy Lohr, NPR News, Atlanta.

Copyright © 2012 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.