Supreme Court Silent On Legal Fight Over Execution Drugs

This undated file photo provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows inmate Joseph Rudolph Wood. No one on the Supreme Court objected publicly when the justices voted to let Arizona proceed with the execution of Wood, who unsuccessfully sought information about the drugs that would be used to kill him. i i

This undated file photo provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows inmate Joseph Rudolph Wood. No one on the Supreme Court objected publicly when the justices voted to let Arizona proceed with the execution of Wood, who unsuccessfully sought information about the drugs that would be used to kill him. AP hide caption

itoggle caption AP
This undated file photo provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows inmate Joseph Rudolph Wood. No one on the Supreme Court objected publicly when the justices voted to let Arizona proceed with the execution of Wood, who unsuccessfully sought information about the drugs that would be used to kill him.

This undated file photo provided by the Arizona Department of Corrections shows inmate Joseph Rudolph Wood. No one on the Supreme Court objected publicly when the justices voted to let Arizona proceed with the execution of Wood, who unsuccessfully sought information about the drugs that would be used to kill him.

AP

No one on the Supreme Court objected publicly when the justices voted to let Arizona proceed with the execution of Joseph Wood, who unsuccessfully sought information about the drugs that would be used to kill him.

Inmates in Florida and Missouri went to their deaths by lethal injection in the preceding weeks after the high court refused to block their executions. Again, no justice said the executions should be stopped.

Even as the number of executions annually has dropped by more than half over the past 15 years and the court has barred states from killing juveniles and the mentally disabled, no justice has emerged as a principled opponent of the death penalty.

This court differs from some of its predecessors. Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall dissented every time their colleagues ruled against death row inmates, and Justices Harry Blackmun and John Paul Stevens, near the end of their long careers, came to view capital punishment as unconstitutional.

"They're all voting to kill them, every so often. They do it in a very workmanlike, technocratic fashion," said Stephen Bright, a veteran death penalty lawyer in Georgia, of the current court.

Wood's execution on July 23 was the 26th in the United States this year and the third in which prisoners took much longer than usual to die. Wood, convicted of killing his estranged girlfriend and her father, was pronounced dead nearly two hours after his execution began, and an Associated Press reporter was among witnesses who said Wood appeared to gasp repeatedly, hundreds of times in all, before he died.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she and her colleagues are aware of what happened in Arizona, though she declined to say how the court would rule on a plea to stop the next scheduled execution — of Michael Worthington on Wednesday in Missouri.

"Your crystal ball is as good as mine," she said last week in an interview with The Associated Press.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.