Are Short Shows A Rip-Off?

There was glee and some grumbling when Passion Pit left the stage of Washington, D.C.'s Black Cat the other night. The 40-minute set included a one-song encore, and left many wanting more.

Just how long should a headline act play? When The Beatles played Shea Stadium to a crowd of 56,000 screaming fans, the band played a dozen songs and left the stage in less than 30 minutes. In the late '70s, when bands like Ultravox or Devo would headline a show with one LP under their belt, a 50-minute set wasn't unusual. Truth be told, I always thought that was the perfect length.

These days, it isn't unusual to see sets that are double that. Of course, it depends on the band; a 45-minute set by Wilco would leave a lot of favorites out of the set list. Here's what I'm wondering: Do you ever stand at a show and wish it were over? Do you find yourself thinking, "Please play my favorite and say goodnight"?

What's the optimal concert length for you? Would you rather leave a show wanting more, or err on the side of too much of a good thing?

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and Terms of Use. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.