A Penny For Your Thoughts
Filed under:
Credit: scottpargettphoto
In yesterday's editorial meeting, Alison brought up two interesting and related stories. One centers around efforts by the city of Minneapolis to crack down on panhandlers, using an interesting and controversial set of rules that prohibit a variety of activities, including verbal solicitation within ten feet of a gas station, liquor store, convenience store, or crosswalk. The other story deals with a panhandler in New Rochelle, NY, who was arrested after asking a police officer for money. His loitering charge was dismissed by a judge, who accepted the homeless man's argument that public panhandling is a form of free speech.
On a legal level, the question clearly is, "Where do we draw the line?" Courts have upheld panhandling as a form of free speech, but have also upheld the right of local governments to restrict it to protect public safety and commerce. The concern expressed by some is that if a city comes up with a long enough list of places where a panhandler can't be, it may effectively ban panhandling entirely. So do you think Minneapolis has gone too far, or are they just trying to protect local citizens and businesses?
As we continued our conversation in yesterday's meeting, Luke brought up another interesting question. We all have our own rules and make our own calculations that determine when we give money to panhandlers. What factors go into our calculations, and how reasonable or consistent are any of us? I find that I'm less likely to give money to weightier panhandlers, because I tell myself they aren't as desperate. I steer clear of panhandlers smoking cigarettes, because I deem that an unhealthy expenditure of limited funds. But I don't always follow those rules, and anyway, are those rules fair to begin with? Should I really begrudge a person living on the street a cigarette?
We're very interested in hearing your thoughts on this topic, so let us know what you think. What kinds of judgments guide your decision to give or not to give?
10:26 AM ET | 06- 1-2007 | permalink




