Maria Godoy posts a great roundup on why Congress objects to the Bush administration's bailout plan:
In private meetings on the Hill, Paulson and Bernanke have warned lawmakers about the dire consequences of not acting -- but these economic Doomsday scenarios have not been spelled out to the public.
categories: Understanding The Crisis
Some comments about the article.
Regarding reverse auctions the article says "If the government simply buys the securities with the lowest price, it may end up with $700 billion worth of the worst loans, critics say."
Isn't that the whole point? If the government is going to buy mortgages we want them to buy the worst first.
Those are the mortgages that need to be taking out of the banking system, unpackaged, fixed and resold back into the market as shiny, valuable mortgages.
If there is so much concern that banks and other financial institutions won't have money to lend to good customers, why doesn't the government allow good customers to borrow that 700 billion directly? Why buy "trash" investments from the banks and thus insulate them from their own bad decisions and lack of fiduciary responsibility?
Lost in a galaxy of economic news? Listen to the Planet Money podcast.
Planet Money is a multimedia team covering the global economy. You can follow us on this blog and on Twitter. You can also e-mail us directly and/or join our Facebook group. For more information, see our Frequently Asked Questions and rules for discussion.
Correspondent
Correspondent
Correspondent
Assistant Producer
Contributing Editor
Want to send us a note? Go for it.
Comments
Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register
More information needed to participate in the NPR online community.. Add this information