The Specials
Last Saturday night, I saw Jolie Holland play at the Doug Fir in Portland. I'm a fan of Holland's work, but had yet to see a live performance. Yet this post is not going to be a review of the show; what I want to discuss instead is the idea of special guests.
Holland is currently touring with a handful of talented Portland-based musicians. But her guitarist, bass player, and drummer constituted only a few of the tentacles in what was to become a multi-limbed musical beast. With guest backup singers, as well as an accordionist and trumpet player, very few songs were presented without the aid of a guest.
I've seen the special-guest issue from all sides. When I toured with my band, we occasionally had musicians join us on stage. From a musician's perspective, bringing friends up to play on a song you've played thousands of times -- or to augment a cover tune in the set -- not only kills the tedium of tour, but also infuses the song with a new dynamic, a fresh energy. Guest players add texture to the song you've always wanted to hear in a live setting; sometimes, their contribution helps you fall in love with the song again, or at least hear it in a new way. On the most basic level, it's fun -- the song feels communal and shared.
I've also been a guest, which is a much more precarious position. When my band opened for Pearl Jam, we would often join them on stage during their encores. In these instances, I felt like a homewrecker, intruding on fans' love affair with the band: We were destroying the moment and killing whatever imagined version of the song fans had in their minds. (My image of us as ruinous was largely corroborated on Pearl Jam message boards, though it wasn't a feeling shared by all of their fans.)
I should mention that, on that same tour, we all went to see U2 on a night off. Bono invited Eddie Vedder up on stage to sing a song, and even then, I didn't get the feeling that 100 percent of the U2 fans wanted to see him up there. Which goes to show you that, for the most part, fans want their songs played their way. In other words, no guests, because a guest -- no matter who it is -- changes the song.
As a music fan, I agree. A lot can go wrong from a fan's perspective. If you don't like the music of the guest, then you definitely don't want them on stage with the band you're there to see. And even if you do like the guest's music, it can be the wrong song or the wrong time -- it might be the song you've been waiting years to see performed, and all of a sudden it sounds different. Even worse, the performance can start to feel insider-y: too much about the musicians, not enough about the audience. The more guests there are on stage, the more it's just a big jam session that the audience didn't get invited to.
Then again, guests can bring the magic. They might bring to life a sagging, uninspired show, or they might push an already incredible performance into another stratosphere. Personally, when I'm in the audience, I like one or two carefully chosen guests, usually on cover songs, or maybe taking over a verse or solo on one of the band's own tunes.
There are countless ways -- including bringing on a special guest -- that a band changes a song in a live context. These adjustments might not produce the version of the song we wanted to hear, but if we wanted the predictable version, we would have stayed home and listened to the record.
So, do you prefer special guests, guests under certain circumstances, or none at all?
Carrie Brownstein
5:48 PM ET
|
10-23-2008
|
permalink