Today in "Dogs In Wigs": Cats On a Treadmill.
-- Linda Holmes
2:00 PM ET
|
09- 5-2008
|
permalink
Hole In The Wall: Is this the best new offering of Fall 2008?
Fox
The fall season's new TV shows are starting to make their debuts: this week brought 90210 (unfortunately), and there are more premieres to come. This weekend, Alan Ball (of Six Feet Under and American Beauty) brings his vampire drama, True Blood, to HBO's traditional Sunday-night "good show" slot. (For more about that, check out David Bianculli's review, or hear from Alan Ball himself, about both this project and his upcoming film, Towelhead.)
But if you stick with the networks, there aren't as many new shows as you might expect. While it was easy to focus on the immediate effects of last year's writers' strike — the seasons interrupted at midpoint; the seasons not completed at all — there are perhaps even more pronounced effects just showing up now.
There are only four new network comedies this fall — two on CBS, one on Fox, and one on NBC. That's consistent with the general disappearance of half-hour prime-time comedies, of course.
But there were more than 50 such comedies on the fall schedule five years ago, on what were then six prime-time broadcast networks (before the WB and UPN merged to form the CW). The five surviving networks will air fewer than 20 this fall.
There are maybe 10 new dramas (numbers depend somewhat on how you count, and somewhat on how far into the season you consider "fall"). And there's basically nothing new happening in reality programming (though there are a couple of game shows coming down the pike) — so America's symphony orchestras and major museums had better buckle up for the coming flood of patrons who stayed home only because The Mole was on.
With so few new shows, it gets easier to look closely at the approach each individual network is taking to rounding out its fall lineup. So let's take the quick tour, and then as things premiere in coming weeks, we'll take a few closer looks. (We'll also get to cable, don't worry.)
Networks at a glance, plus what that incredibly awesome guy is doing in that picture, after the jump ...
Continue reading "So: What's So New
About New Fall TV?" »
1:45 PM ET
|
09- 5-2008
|
permalink
Youthful indiscretions: Could this Bogie ever have been Bogie?
Photo illustration by Trey Graham, NPR.
An arresting headline in Variety -- "U.S. short on tough-guy actors" -- caught my eye recently. Anne Thompson cites a bunch of producers lamenting the "boy-men" and "imps" who pass for movie stars these days. Apparently the suits are pining for the tough guys -- the McQueens, Bogies, Bronsons and Waynes -- of yesteryear.
Those guys could carry a movie, say the studio guys. These days, once you get past Tom Cruise, Will Smith, Denzel Washington, Harrison Ford and a couple of others, the real men -- Mel Gibson, Christian Bale, Javier Bardem, Russell Crowe, and Jason Statham are among those cited -- mostly hail from foreign shores.
Now granted, I don't have to scrounge financing for gazillion-dollar action flicks, but I'm not sure I agree with the premise. Vin Diesel has carried his share of action movies, and he's certainly not a boyish man. Mark Wahlberg, now well past his Calvins-model days, may not always be a great judge of material, but credit a guy who can open drivel like The Happening ($30 million in its first weekend) with some box-office clout.
Tim Robbins, Wesley Snipes, Robert Downey Jr. and Edward Norton seem macho enough to me (I mean, they have senses of humor, which arguably the Waynes and Bronsons didn't, but does that disqualify them?)
And the Waynes and Bronsons weren't considered tough guys when they were in their 30s, anyway. So isn't it really about seasoning?
Steve McQueen was a kid when he battled The Blob; he only grew into the grizzled macho stuff later. Matt Damon and Will Smith are about the age now that McQueen was when he did films like Bullitt and The Thomas Crown Affair. George Clooney is the age McQueen was when he did Papillon and The Towering Inferno.
And in previous generations, stars tended to establish themselves first in theater. Humphrey Bogart didn't get into movies until he was in his mid-30s -- which means he didn't have a cinematic youth to live down when he was pushing 50. (And starring, masculinely, in Key Largo and The Big Sleep).
Might not have been the same if he'd been modeling underwear in his 20s.
-- Bob Mondello
12:28 PM ET
|
09- 5-2008
|
permalink