Companies Seek to Promote Free Speech, Yet Still Do Business in China
In the past several months, Internet and telecommunications companies like Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft have taken some pretty intense heat for their interactions with governments in totalitarian countries. Critics say the companies have turned over information about users' activities that allowed these governments to track down -- and jail -- dissidents or have cooperated too much in government censorship.
So I read with interest Rebecca MacKinnon's post at her blog, RConversation, about her involvement with a process to establish "a set of global principles on free speech and privacy protection for internet and telecoms companies."
The list of companies who have joined the process is the real story -- it includes Vodafone and the three above, who "admitted publicly" to taking part earlier this year. (Interestingly, MacKinnon notes, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. is not involved, despite its launch of MySpace in China, where it also has been criticized for too much censorship.)
MacKinnon, a former CNN journalist who is now an assistant professor at Hong Kong University's Journalism and Media Studies Center, writes that the purpose of the principles is not to "impose Western values" on China. Instead, it's to seek a way to help companies in all countries conduct their business "while doing all they can to protect their users' interests against government encroachment globally."
MacKinnon writes that she wishes Yahoo! would apologize to the families of Chinese journalist Shi Tao and other dissidents jailed after the company turned over information about their Internet activities to the government. She says it's unlikely, but she notes that Jerry Yang, one of the company's founders and the new CEO, discussed some of the measures that Yahoo! is taking to protect free speech and privacy at a shareholders meeting earlier this month.
11:37 AM ET | 06-27-2007 | permalink


