The NPR News Blog
 
 

Reports: Saudi Prince Got More Than $1 Billion in Deal

The BBC and The Guardian report today that a British arms company secretly paid more than $1.5 billion over a decade to Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan in connection with a defense contract with the Gulf nation that was the largest in British history.

The reports claim BAE paid the money with the knowledge of British Defense Department officials -- despite their denials that they knew of such an arrangement. The payments were written into the arms contract in secret annexes, described as "support services," according to BBC TV's Panorama.

The Guardian reports that a series of payments was channeled through a U.S. bank in Washington to an account controlled by Bandar, who was the Saudi ambassador to the U.S. for more than 20 years. Bandar has denied that the payments were improper and said that BAE acted lawfully at all times.

The War In Context blog writes that Americans need to pay attention to this story because: " ... BAE North America has directors including the likes of 9/11 Commission co-chairman, Lee Hamilton. With its open access to the Pentagon, BAE should be seen as a supra-national corporate entity that can strut through the corridors of political power with supreme confidence ... BAE is certainly one of the big winners in the war on terrorism."

Last November, The Times of London reported that the Saudi government told British officials that if the Serious Fraud Office continued to investigate the arms deal, it would stop cooperating with British intelligence on terrorism issues and would end the deal, meaning the loss of thousands of British jobs. The Blair government stopped the investigation. The head of the SFO told The Guardian today that he also had made the decision to withhold information about the payments to the prince from an international anti-corruption investigation "to protect national security."

 

Comments

Not surprised. Most of the 'War on Terror' is about wealth transfer (but only at the highest levels...not for the 'grunts' doing the fighting). So when in doubt, 'just follow the money'. BAE isn't the only outfit that gets free passes of inside access, etc. (eg., check out AIPAC affiliations to US govt.).

Ergo, if it's not for 'money', it's for power. I know...just restating the obvious, for most.

Sent by Al Piet | 9:30 AM ET | 06-09-2007

How is this still not a huge story in the US? How does the fact that this person is "Uncle Bandar" to the Bush family not help make it a huge story? The biggest scandals imaginable are all out in the open, and we in the land of the free and the home of the brave stand down.

Sent by Celine Grenier | 3:28 AM ET | 02-14-2008



   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs