See also:
Comprehensive Ron Paul Media Organized Online
http://ronpaul.wetpaint.com/page/Ron+Paul%27s+Winning+Message

Sent by Alex Hammer | 10:20 AM ET | 06-05-2007

There is no precedence for a candidate like Dr. Paul. The age and timing of the internet influence has coincided perfectly with Dr. Paul's Presidential bid. No other candidate has ever represented the classic position of his party while possessing the stellar long term track record to support it. In every category Dr. Paul dominates. Most significant is Dr. Paul's ability to remain viable without the financial war chest required by others. Every person that I have introduced to Dr. Paul's candidacy has responded with effusive approval. Dr. Paul's ascendancy will astonish all.

Sent by E Metzver | 11:47 AM ET | 06-05-2007

They will select him, and he will be the next President of the United States.

Sent by Proud American | 12:28 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Big media keeps repeating that Paul has no chance and is mainly supported by home schooled libertarian gun nuts. This, for those just tuning in, is code for, "Get him out of the debates!" The GOP is spooked because Paul will debunk their "Lower Taxes" myth by going after their real source of funding, The Federal Reserve. Then he'll actually lower taxes. The "Left" stands by in a silent boggled daze, watching Paul conscript their anti-war youngsters. Let's be fair, Paul was there first. Hey MSM, these "kids" today aren't so naive. They aren't buying it. Literally. Blowback! After a couple of decades of bias and outright propeganda, your two headed monster has created a generation of policy wonks. You've programmed the dumb right out of 'em. Better get to work on that Net Neutrality before too many more stray from the flock. Maybe Paul won't get nominated. But the days of drawing distinctions between who would be a good Candidate and who would be a good President are numbered. I suspect your response then will go something like, OMG WTF!!11!

Sent by J. Weatherman | 12:43 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Sorry I don't and most others consider following the Constitution of the US a niche' Nor do I consider telling the truth and not pandering a niche either.

Ron Paul as elucidated policies at several orders of magnitude more depth and description than any other candidate
The "can't win arguement" i logically circular because of lack of exposure which of course means you can't when which of course means you get no exposure .....

Maybe if he got a daily 30 second blurb on CNN's inside Politics like the other "mainstream" candidates , perception (especially the writer of this article and his so called "expert" that offers little if any rationale for his linkage to Rep. Paul) of what constitutes "niche" would be different.

Sent by inido | 1:11 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Shame on NPR. If you ran headlines like "GOP goes "Back to the Future" in upcoming star Ron Paul." or "Will the next president be born of the Internet?", then Ron might have a better chance of having a fair chance at being elected. But your magic crystal ball has already determined that he is a loser.

Sent by Les | 1:35 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Why can't we elect a purist? His intentions to respect the constitution are pure - I vote based on that, everyone ele should as well. If you don't like the constitution work to have it amended.

This is a self-fullfilling prophecy. Media tells enough people he can't win - he can't win.....

But why not just let it sort itself out. It's almost like the media is trying to convince themselves more then the listeners.

Sent by Eric | 1:38 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Saying that a viable candidate, who is in the debates, cannot possibly win so early on, is like saying that we should elect candidates based on what the early polls are saying. It's totally ridiculous. Why vote if the polls can decide for us? Or should I say, the people who control those polls.

Sent by brody | 2:00 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Thanks for all the comments. But allow me to raise a point, that I saw raised on the AllAboutRon Blog today.

In the latest national poll by ABC-Washington Post, Ron Paul (who I agree is a great candidate) is polling at 1 percent. One percent. I could get more than one percent.

And he has been at one percent for six months now. Even if we took the poll error in his favor, he would only be at 4 percent. You can't get elected leader of your party with 1 percent support in national polls.

Do you have an explanation for this discrepency between what we see on the Internet and in the polls? It's not just "media bias." It's too big a gap for that to be the only reason. I would love to read your thoughts on this issue.

Sent by Tom Regan | 2:33 PM ET | 06-05-2007

You can talk all you want. but if you aren't a voting as a registered republican in the primary, nothing you say or feel abour ron Paul will matter

Sent by darkswan | 3:51 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Tom writes:

One percent. I could get more than one percent.

You were born in Canada, right? That's one big strike against you for running against Ron Paul - or anyone else, for that matter. :-)

Sent by andy carvin | 3:55 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Don't be so sure. That's why they have elections. Dr. Paul's message resonates in a very big way and ultimately the message will win the day. I would not sell short Ron Paul!

Sent by Lawrence Lepard | 3:59 PM ET | 06-05-2007

I don't know, Jennifer Granholm, the governor of Michigan is a Canadian/American like me. She was born in Vancouver, but she got votes.

I do agree that darn constitutional amendment means that we can never run for President.

Sent by Tom Regan | 4:04 PM ET | 06-05-2007

You asked for our, the readers, thoughts related to how Ron Paul is doing in the national polls. Here is one such opinion.

National polling is an archaic system that does not reflect the modern distribution of information. This statement can be supported in many ways, but I will focus on one: landlines.

More and more people, especially in the younger generation, no longer have landlines but, instead, rely solely on a cell phone, e.g., I only have a cell phone. It is, I believe, exactly this demographic in which the largest support for Ron Paul can be found. Therefore, the national polls are missing a large pool of support for Ron Paul.

Internet polls inevitably sample a certain portion of the population and telephone polls inevitably sample a different portion of the population. I believe that these two portions are, to a large extent, disjoint. A more accurate picture of the support for Ron Paul can be obtained by averaging the online and landline polls. Since Ron Paul has won just about every internet poll I have seen, this would imply that the support for Ron Paul is much larger than the 1% indicated by the national polls.

A good article related to this topic can be found at:

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-natural-boost.html

Sent by Ada | 4:11 PM ET | 06-05-2007

If you understand how the mainstream media works and for whom they work, you will know why polls originating from them are designed to characterized Ron Paul as having no chance. He is polling 3%-4% in Zogby polls with a 4%-5% margin of error. His numbers have double twice in about a month.

Setting the polls aside, I am constantly put off by claims that 'he has no chance" so early in the process. If you can't attack the man, and you can't attack his policies, and you can't explain the massive groundswell of support, then you dismiss him as having no chance? Why resort to this? What purpose does it serve? Why not write about how exciting this is?

Everyone I introduce to Ron Paul has loved him. Not only will they vote for him, but they will begin to campaign for him. You have seen nothing yet. This will be the biggest grassroots political movement in American history.

btw, thanks for not deleting the comments from Ron Paul supporters.

http://www.citizensforronpaul.org

Sent by Joe Naab | 4:36 PM ET | 06-05-2007

I hope you're wrong. Ron Paul is the only candidate comitted to restoring our civil rights, reducing the power the Executive branch has grabbed, and ending the war. If we don't elect him, fascism wins no matter which candidate taks the helm.

Sent by Angela Thornton | 4:40 PM ET | 06-05-2007

If you ever run for an office other than the presidency, you've got my vote. Unless of course you run in Canada. Then I'm out of luck.

Sent by andy carvin | 4:42 PM ET | 06-05-2007

I've been voting republican since '00, I felt betrayed by '06 on issues of thesecuring the border, small government, and less spending- and I can't wait to vote for Dr. Paul for president.

Sent by Nate | 5:28 PM ET | 06-05-2007

There's only one poll that counts, election day. Using "opinion" polls as an artificial barrier used to eliminate candidates is wrong.Ever ask yourself in what way opinion polls are useful to the voting public? They in no way inform you as to whom the better candidate is. it's obvious what there true purpose is. To shape public opinion. Other than that, the only purpose could be in placing a wager on the winner.

it all goes back to the basic premise of ...
What am I going to do with that information?

They are useless for the purposes of making a reasoned choice about whom to elect.

Sent by indio | 5:54 PM ET | 06-05-2007

The only reason why he is only big on the web is because the media wont cover him at all. The only thing you need is to hear Dr.Paul for 5 minutes after that you will be saying wow i cant believe this guys is saying what i am exactly thinking. ALL IM WONDERING IS HOW THE MEDIA WILL SWITCH HIS WORDS AROUND 2NITE?

Sent by Doug | 6:51 PM ET | 06-05-2007

I am amazed at the blatant disregared for what is undoubtly the best candidate for President Dr. Ron Paul. It is quite obvious that the mainstream media and those so called politcal analysts can not for the life of them figure out the popularity of this fine man. I believe it is because he speaks of things like liberty, freedom, less government, constitutional values, things that these people can not understand. Well, I tell you this, I and many many more are pulling for this candidate because it time this nation became known for it's greatness once again.

Sent by Michael Ivey | 7:29 PM ET | 06-05-2007

The only way Paul has a chance (which is to say, the U.S. has a chance of turning back from this dark path), is if the underground, grassroots support grows virally to the point that the MSM has no choice but to acknowledge Paul as a viable candidate. Here's to that battle, which is why I've done up a little design that might aid (I hope).

Since I think I sense some support for Ron Paul, I'd like to share with you guys a design I did recently - it's taking the whole Che Guevera thing and putting it on its head. Instead of "vive la revolucion!", I'm suggesting something I believe Ron Paul might say, which is "vive la constitucion!" Would love to hear your feedback, and if you like it and want to share it or use it, please let me know and I'd be happy to oblige.

Che Ron Paul: Vive la constitucion!"

Sent by Justin | 9:10 PM ET | 06-05-2007

Dr. Paul's chances to win the GOP nomination rely on how many Democrats catch on early and decide to change parties.
By doing this they can guarantee that our next president is anti-war (although I'm sure they'll find a way to discredit Dr. Paul and you'll see Rudy the fear-monger as the GOP nominee)

Sent by Nate | 9:37 PM ET | 06-05-2007

You know, when Ron Paul, who had a war chest of $600,00 runs against candidates such as Romney who have over $240,000,000 of just personal wealth, not even counting his war chest, you can see what influence money and advertising has.

Ron Paul has to depend upon grass-roots support, which is very evident online.

What I find appalling is the constant drum from the media, that a particular candidate is second tier, or could never win, etc, etc.

The mainstream media ignoring Ron Paul's strong internet support just highlights the media's perception of the internet as a second-tier news source. Clearly, no other forum or media has the potential to be more representative then the internet.

Money and traditional media, these are the critical failings shaping the current debate.

Sent by Arthur | 10:07 PM ET | 06-05-2007

I've been a big fan of Paul's for years... I've been skeptical of his chances until now, but I think the tides have turned. The groundswell you see everywhere is astonishing. It really gives me hope for the future of America (and the world).

Sent by Iju | 12:32 AM ET | 06-06-2007

NPR, defender of "good journalism", has decided that the race for president of the united states has already been decided. Its very comforting to realize that NPR is helping us, the confused voters, who will and will not be president. It is a mistake to call the race this early. It is a mistake to tell other people who will win. The media becomes the voice of the elite and has way too much control over our minds. The Internet today is free and open, thanks to people like Dr. Ron Paul. He loves this country. The odds are against him. Just remember its not about who wins the fight but how we fight it.

Sent by Roste | 1:05 AM ET | 06-06-2007

Be suprised the power of knowledge!

They are Censoring Ron Paul!!! avoided asking him questions on the debate in fair share and then pulled his victory online via "the who won blog" and the online voting section.

On top of it, Ron one at 53% with over 1700 votes

with rudy and Mckain trailing with 400 votes and at 13%

post show they said rudy won the online poll and ron paul only had 2% votes.

Spread the word!. Ron Paul is worth censoring by the biggest news company in our country and around the world? why?

go checkout his youtube videos or his website.

why else?

Sent by rich | 3:02 AM ET | 06-06-2007

National Bolshevik Radio is a dying dinosaur.

The Internet is the future.

Ron Paul will be President

Sent by Eric | 8:07 AM ET | 06-06-2007

I am 58 years old and have never given any money to a politician. Last week I sent Ron Paul $100.00. I hope he doesn't spend any money on the media that hates him. I think he can win with his grassroots support.

Sent by Joe | 2:06 PM ET | 06-06-2007

NPR you're out of touch with America.

George Washington was told that he could not take Trenton or defeat the greatest power on Earth, England, with a pack of raggedy farmers and tradesmen in bare feet.
But he did.

I remember when Ronald Regan was laughed at and no one took him seriously.
They said he was just a goofy movie star. Bonzo's in the White House.
Look who's laughing now.

Ron Paul will be the next President of the United States.
I am certain of it.

I sent him part of my grocery money last week. I too have never given money to a politician before.

But what is more I'm giving what money can't buy.
I'm taking up Ron Paul's message on my own without any support.

This coming Saturday, well over 1000 cyclists are going to go past my house as they participate in the Pittsburgh MS 150.

I am planning a "Ron Paul Rest Stop" and I going to spread the good news about Ron Paul with free lemonade, farmhouse oatmeal cookies, water and Ron Paul flyers( PDF from Ron Paul 2008 that I downloaded & had printed today.

How many other Presidential hopefuls have aproned farmwives flagging down people on the road to give refreshment, rest and hope for America.

Not too many.

Sent by granny miller | 6:42 PM ET | 06-06-2007

Willie Nelson took over the music world in the 70's by uniting the hippies and rednecks. Open your eyes NPR - Ron Paul is absolutely on fire.

Sent by Jack | 8:29 PM ET | 06-06-2007

I am a 56-year-old lifelong Democrat and am astonished to find myself researching and researching a Republican candidate after seeing Ron Paul in the debates. Wow. Please don't sign my real name yet. But this is not spam. I am the real thing. I am suspecting Ron Paul is the real thing too and that I will be supporting him.

Sent by Jan | 9:47 PM ET | 06-07-2007

I'm registered as a green right now but I'm changing to republican so i can vote for Dr. Paul in the CA primary!

Sent by Al | 11:22 AM ET | 06-08-2007

NPR did a disservice to Ron Paul and to many of his potential supporters when they took his words about why terrorists around the world want to attack the US utterly out of context and used them during the hourly news updates on the day after that first debate. After hearing the NPR soundbite, even I, a longtime Libertarian and Paul admirer, thought he sounded wacky. R.P.'s entire answer was completely sensible, though, and those who have since described his support for "entangling alliances for none" as quaint and atavistic are just wrong.

I wish I could help Granny Miller serve cookies and ideology tomorrow.

Sent by Marta | 6:01 PM ET | 06-08-2007

How can anyone really say "historicly" when refering to the net hype that surrounds Ron Paul. Youtube, meetup, and myspace did not exist in the past and their are millions more online now than ever before so I think the rules are changing. Ron Paul should not be written off so easy or soon. His hype is turning in to real $$ now and his support grows day by day. As far as Dean.... well he was just another Democrat and Nader was a 3rd party nerd. Ron Paul R3volution has only just started. Even if he can not get the Republican nomination he has 3 3rd parties offering to draft him, perhaps the first time ever 3rd Parties could unite around one candidate.

Sent by James | 6:39 PM ET | 06-08-2007

I listen to NPR regularly and have heard nothing about ron paul. This is disappointing. I believe Ron Paul can do more for america and americans than any of the candidates. and yes like many others, I have introduced Dr. Paul's policies and ideas to other people and they strongly suppor Dr. Pauls candidacy.

Sent by Ron Paul FOR PRESIDENT | 12:46 AM ET | 06-09-2007

Hmmm... some good comments here, that seem to prove the NPR article wrong. Here's another vote for Ron Reagan -oops, Ron Paul.

Sent by Thomas Newcomer | 5:13 PM ET | 06-09-2007

I believe Dr. Paul will be our next president,republican or other.When people hear him and research his record he `wins hearts and minds'.People LOVE Dr. Paul

Sent by walter | 6:35 PM ET | 06-09-2007

"The Web loves libertarians."

This is the second or third time I've read this line of tripe. You might as well say "grocery stores love Democrats" or "apartment buildings love Republicans" or "fast food loves Methodists".

It's an incredibly ridiculous generalization, that can't possibly be substantiated because it is false. Statements such as this are offensive because they show an assumption that the readers are stupid enough to believe them.

Another one that I read to rationalize Ron Paul's extreme popularity was "computer geeks and tech-heads tend to be Libertarian, so this explains the spamming of Internet polls and comments." Now how come none of us had ever heard that computer geeks and tech-heads tend to be Libertarian prior to Ron Paul's Presidential campaign? Do you know why? Because it is yet another false generalization that can't possibly be substantiated.

I'm not a Libertarian; I'm an anti-fascist, and I see Ron Paul as the only candidate for President who genuinely is concerned about saving our Republic, restoring our rights, and restoring sanity and normalcy to our country.

Ron Paul's explosive popularity on the Internet is simply due to the fact that he is not being censored and ignored on the Internet as much has he is by the mainstream media (including NPR and PBS). If he were not being ignored and censored by the mainstream media, he would be a huge hit in other areas as well.

It's that simple.

So please, stop insulting our intelligence with articles such as this.

Thank you,

Sent by Paul Chambers | 1:49 AM ET | 06-10-2007

NPR... shame on you! It is becoming very obvious that most of your money comes from corporate America. It also shows how scared big money has become of the powerhouse, Ron Paul.

I am a 33 year old mother of two who has never before sent my hard-earned money to a politician, until now. Watching the foundation of my country being destroyed, our constitution shredded, and our freedom and liberty stolen has me very scared for the future of my children.

Ron Paul is the first political candidate of my voting lifetime that gives me hope. His message is pure, his track record is impeccable. I weep for our country if he doesn't get elected or if the election is stolen from him.

Sent by Andi | 7:46 AM ET | 06-10-2007

Wonderful comments all! As someone who normally would vote democratic I thought I would add my voice here for Ron Paul! I love everything I have heard so far and wish he would be covered fairly in the main stream media. I mentioned his name to my news junky dad and he hadn't even heard of him. Keep spreading the news!!!

Sent by Heather Ann | 3:44 PM ET | 06-10-2007

Quite a light article... At any rate, revolution and reform originate with the people. Ron Paul's message resonates with those who have heard it -- and I think those who haven't are prepared for it. These kind of events are infrequent and certainly not predictable, but the rumblings are interesting.

"Do you have an explanation for this discrepancy between what we see on the Internet and in the polls?"

The internet provides far more information than is afforded by typical audio/visual media. The internet polls simply reflect what happens when the message actually gets out (i.e. web surfers (at least this one) are not just viewing TV and then voting online).

So perhaps the phone-based polls give us a picture of what ignorance looks like -- and the internet polls reflect a striking contrast.

Sent by Tim, Melbourne, FL | 6:34 PM ET | 06-10-2007

Here' what happen at the Ron Paul Rest Stop
http://grannymillerblog.blogspot.com/2007/06/ron-paul-rest-stop.html

Sent by granny miller | 7:26 PM ET | 06-10-2007

I believe that that the reporting emphasis by news media, even NPR, actually the whole idea of being influenced by other peoples opinions - "the Polls", shows at least a lack of originality and possibly even a more sinister origin. Either way, they don't want to or can't deal with what the candidate is saying and whether the candidates history backs it up.

Sent by Jim Morris | 1:44 AM ET | 06-11-2007

Do you guys even realize that around around 75 percent of americans have access to the internet? How many people do you know that have an e-mail address? How many people do you know that don't?

The only reason Ron Paul only seems popular on the internet, is because mainstream media is basically burying him. They trying to tell us who is popular rather than reporting who is popular.

Obama for example has been much more popular then Clinton on the internet for awhile, yet Clinton always had a significant lead in the "polls". Now Obama has passed clinton and my guess is will continue to expand his lead.

Ron Paul will do the same on the republican side. His popularity on the internet isn't an anomoly, its a precursor to what is coming.

On a side note, I do believe Obama would beat Ron Paul in a general election.

Sent by Jason | 4:05 AM ET | 06-11-2007

How about listening to your own interviews NHP... http://www.nhpr.org/node/13016 One of his best yet!

Sent by DCZE | 5:42 PM ET | 06-12-2007

I posted my response using a URL for Ron's interview with NHPR. I double checked and surprise surprise... you get to it anymore! it's been pulled. Guess it generated too much interest which is a SAD state of affairs out there! It's still listed in the archives but you can't access it. THAT is B.S.

Sent by DCZE | 5:56 PM ET | 06-12-2007

I will vote my conscience instead of the worst of three evils. Paul will get my vote whether he can get the nomination or not. And I will send him a check!

Sent by C. Loew | 10:40 PM ET | 06-13-2007

I have worked for many statewide campaigns and one national campaign. If you want your position heard, if you want to get people excited about your candidate, then you must raise money. I believe Ron Paul's message could resonate with the West and South, but Internet blogs and comments like these do not reach enough voters today. Sorry. If you want Ron Paul to be the next President, send his campaign a donation now. Without money--and lots of it--he will NOT win. (Please no lamenting about how money hurts politics. It doesn't. It's how you pay for fliers, pushcards, phone banks, TV and radio commercials, quality people to run your campaign, etc. We can debate about "special interests" later.)

https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/

Sent by Ellsworth Toohey | 2:00 PM ET | 06-14-2007

The great thing about America is that anything can happen! Dr. Paul could win the nomination, it would shake the foundation of the Republican party, but it's possible. I am an independent, that has strong Libertarian leanings, but progressive values, I just don't think that government can fix all problems. I would disagree with Dr. Paul on some issues, but he is the closest I've ever come to thinking there are no deal breakers or litmus tests he fails with me. The mainstream media needs to quit hand waving him away, he is a force to be reckoned with!
Boycott China!

Sent by Brian Guenzel | 1:01 PM ET | 06-15-2007

I can't wait for this guy to be MY Commander & Chief!!!

Sent by Nathan LaHue, Concord NH | 7:26 PM ET | 06-15-2007

It is exciting to think a candidacy based on truth and genuine policy discussion can attract support in the face of the "media clip mentality". I didn't think it possible. Go Ron Paul!!!

Sent by carter | 4:53 PM ET | 06-16-2007

To all the 'nay sayers' out there!

Dr. Ron Paul possesses integrity, consistency, and the intellectual honesty that makes him the only worthy candidate for president in 2008. It is outrageous to me that all the republican candidates, except Dr. Paul, endorsed a preemptive strike against Iran with nuclear weapons, if felt necessary. They represent an extension of the Bush-Cheney war mongering and continue to defend a colossal mistake. Furthermore they seem to want to escalate the conflict. Dr. Paul's staunch opposition to this stance and his compelling arguments against such flawed foreign policy and his profound insight into the reasons for the proliferation of terrorism make him the ideal person to fight the "War on Terror." He is truly the defender of the constitution and a patriot and is the only individual who can reverse the downward spiral of this great nation. It is therefore not surprising that so many Americans stand behind him and will prove that we still have a democracy and power does not rest with corrupt politicians and the corporations that finance them.

Sent by Dev Vaz | 12:50 AM ET | 06-17-2007

IT's going to take getting his name out. Get some bumper stickers,buttons {I did =$30} Send something into the campaign {I did $100 and now $100 a month} I am 54 yr life long grandmother/life long democrat and now 100% on board Dr. Paul's campaign. Donate something anything Ann

Sent by Ann Kobialka | 1:39 PM ET | 06-17-2007

the only way that I could see Ron Paul having any support would be if he joined the Unity08 party. He is too smart and principled for the republicans.

Sent by Tim Schaiberger | 4:22 PM ET | 06-18-2007

Sure the web loves Ron Paul, but do you know anyone who actually browses the web?

Sent by Dave S | 1:58 PM ET | 06-21-2007

I've never been this enthused about a political candidate before. I'm part of the do-nothing generation and I am talking to my friends and family, handing out fliers, promoting the campaign at my house and on my car, donating, and trying to find more ways to get Ron Paul's message out. I agree that it seems unlikely that Dr. Paul will get the nomination but I really hope he does and I know he won't if everyone who feels like I do doesn't try to get him elected. I really don't know how long this country is going to last if keep the same foreign policy and same money habits.

Sent by Tom Snyder | 10:24 AM ET | 06-25-2007

As a member of the "silent majority" I will vote for Ron Paul even if I have to write in his name. He seems to be the only candidate of substance from any Party.

Sent by Dan E. | 12:45 PM ET | 06-25-2007

If supporting and upholding The Constitution, Bill of Rights, and our unalienble Rights are strange to Americans- it is a tragic moment for this country.

Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist. He believes in Sovereignty for our country and individual citizens. If these ideas seem alien - it says way more about the broken condition of America than it does about Ron Paul as a plotician.
Were the Founding Fathers extreme? Is the idea of being responsible for your own life and destiny without government intrusion extreme?

Ron Paul is a visionary and has passion for freedom and a vision for America that was meant to be honored and acted upon. Freedom cannot "given" ot taken away by tyrannical governments. it is our unalienable right..
The rest of the politicans are straight out of The Manchurian Candidate. I seriously pray and envision for him to win.

Sent by Melissa | 6:55 PM ET | 06-27-2007

You People just don't get it - it has nothing to do with the Liberarians - they are only a small percentage of the internet. The secret, if you can't figure it out is that Americans are sick and tired of fake politicians - they are sick of the Clintons and sick of the Bush's - no more dynasties. What they want is honest, upfront, not afraid to speak his mind and someone who won't flip flop. Can you actually think of another candidate but Ron Paul that fits that description.

www.ronpaul2008.com

Sent by Joe Lawson | 9:04 PM ET | 06-29-2007

Ron Paul is blocked because he is considered a danger to both Repulicans and Democrats. Even Bill Maher loves the man. Republicans attack him because he is a threat to large corporations using legislation to fatten their wallets at our expens. Democrats attack him because he would truly lower taxes and put a huge dent in entitlements

Sent by Michael Bass | 3:44 AM ET | 06-30-2007

NPR, please provide more coverage of Ron Paul.

Sent by Devoted Listener | 4:15 PM ET | 07-05-2007

I don't think that Ron Paul is a doomed candidate. He is honest, unselfish, dedicated to the people, consistent, and actually cares about the constitution--the entire basis for our nation. Why is such a tremendous candidate a fringe candidate? I believe he threatens the current power structure, which includes the media corporations, and that is why he is not getting the attention he deserves. It doesn't take a genious to figure that out.

Sent by Nicole | 4:43 PM ET | 07-05-2007

What would happen if the politicians of the new "European Union" told an Italian (or any other National of the Member States of the EU) that:
1. the European Commission and the European Parliament has replaced the Republic of Italy (and every other European government);
2. s/he is no longer a National of the Republic of Italy; but
3. s/he is an "EU citizen"; that,
4. s/he is no longer "an Italian" but "a European"?

Sound familiar?

Let's return to the de jure Constitutional Republic of the United States of America; and our de jure state consitutions.

The current, de facto, system is rotten to its core.

Sent by Greg Chapman | 11:49 AM ET | 07-13-2007

Ron Paul is the first presidential candidate I've ever felt passionate enough about to donate money to, to discuss with friends and family, and to write to the media about. He is the only candidate that even comes close to representing my ideals and even though I don't agree with everything he stands for he is getting my vote in the primary and a write-in if he isn't the nominee.

Sent by ezra | 6:40 AM ET | 07-17-2007

Hey NPR, it would make sense for you to do an interview with Ron Paul! Saying that he is popular on the internet but not capable of being elected, only perpetuates the hopelessness that is rampant in this dying democracy. The internet is one of the few communication mediums not completely overrun by corporate crooks, lets give it a little more consideration please.

Sent by glenda, queens | 5:13 PM ET | 07-22-2007

Jimmy Carter was a dark horse candidate. Paul CAN win if the media gets out of his way.

Sent by Jody | 6:21 PM ET | 07-25-2007

I'm voting for Ron Paul. I do disagree with him on one issue. I see access to health care as a human right. The Constitution says we are entitled to 'life ' to me that means health care for every citizen. It doesn't say life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as long as you don't get sick.

The free market or for profit medicine doesn't work. Even in a more prosperous society, as Ron Paul proposes, there will still be people who are denied health care. For profit health care companies are legally bound to maximize profit for their shareholders. It's a conflict of interest between the consumer and the shareholders. As long as the conflict exists the best health care will continue to be denied to Americans and many will go without. Is there a resolution to this conflict?

The reason I'm voting for Ron Paul, despite this difference of opinion, is because I believe he would allow the citizen's of each state to make their own decision on the matter of universal health care.

I also believe the Constitution was written to serve the citizens; we are not here to serve it. Sometimes change can be a good thing.

Sent by meg | 6:51 PM ET | 07-25-2007

I find it amazing how the posted comments have been more informative, and factual than the initial article. The media should focus their reporting on the politicians stance on the issues instead of standing in the polls. Not only does poll reporting do nothing to help voters make informed decisions, but it's becoming a thing of the past. Most people I know don't have a land line phone, and the ones who do screen their calls.
Ron Paul is popular because he's right, and has an unwaivering track record to prove it.

Sent by Rod | 12:54 AM ET | 07-26-2007

This was not reporting. This was opinion pushing and another opportunity to show that America has lost its way.

What's the point of an "Election" if the almighty media has decided for us all??!!

Sounds like freedom of "Pressure" rather than freedom of press.

Sent by Georgia For Ron Paul!! | 8:44 AM ET | 07-26-2007

Now here is a candidate that has my attention. Any politician that is not taking advantage of his political position deserves the attention of the American people. America needs a leader willing to take action for what is best for the U.S., not what is best for our elected officials. We need a leader that is willing to fix America first. America needs change and Ron Paul appears to be the man who can provide the initiative for change.

Sent by Jacqueline Olsen (Jacky O.) | 9:02 AM ET | 07-26-2007

Dr. Paul is not in this election for any personal gain. He is trying to restore our country to its constitutional moorings. He truly is the freedom candidate and everyone wants to be free!

Sent by Darden Brock | 9:57 AM ET | 07-26-2007

I am currently registered Democrat in CA, but am switching my to Republican to vote Ron Paul in the primaries, I wish I lived in Iowa or New Hampshire.

I also would like to see more air time for Dr. Paul's message. However, with regards to the debates, I'm not sure how much it would matter. I am going to guess that the majority of American voters don't watch the debates, there's no way they could have in '04 (if they did I may be more frustrated than I already am). And we've got to be careful about quoting poll statistics, the Gallop polls are unquestionabley run with staunchly Christian agendas. Moreover, the current debate template needs to be changed. We shouldn't allow Guiliani to disarm Paul's well reasoned argument regarding 9/11 with an ignorant incorrect sound bite.

In short, I want Ron to win, it seems he would be the freshest face and mind to take the presidency in about 2 decades.

Sent by E.L. Gulbranson | 10:32 AM ET | 07-26-2007

This list of random voices is truely inspiring and our collective voices should give us hope. Dr. Paul's truth is our truth and everyone who hears the whole story from the source will agree if they are honest with themselves. The other candidates have to retell thier lies enough times to make them seem like the truth. Dr. Paul just has to get the word out.

As Emerson said, "To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men, -that is genius."

Sent by brian | 1:34 PM ET | 07-26-2007

I have been voting republican since 1980 starting with Reagan. but with the current admin. in the whitehouse now, I no longer call myself a republican. they have truly abandoned our true principals. But, i can't wait to vote for congressman Ron Paul. And i think more and more of the younger voters will soon see what a jewel they have in Dr Paul. He truly stands for whats right for the U.S., and that's the Constitution. God help people to wake up!

Sent by kenny | 3:11 PM ET | 07-26-2007

Meg's comment shows how wide Dr. Paul's support can be. He can appeal to universal/single payer health care supporter since it should be left up to the 50 states to try out 50 different solutions to see what kind of system works best. Vermont and New Hampshire could go head-to-head with an universal system and a free market system, but for the states to truly to be allowed to experiment the federal government needs to get out of the way.

Sent by hardy | 4:03 PM ET | 07-26-2007

The media bias always seems to say "You're interesting but you can't really win". As a Ron Paul supporter the way to combat this is to donate to the campaign. These donations can not be your normal donation either. People must go that extra mile and donate just a bit more. This is the only way to combat a media that trys to make up our minds for us. Eventually if done properly the msm(npr included) will not be able to right Ron Paul off. Extra time and extra money will get attention.

Sent by James | 4:25 PM ET | 07-26-2007

I agree with James, we must donate and spread the word. Ron Pauls only chance is a massive groundswell of grassroots support. Just as he transcends political party lines, his message reaches beyond Christian advocacy groups to the liberal environmental organizations and binds everyone between. From members of the ACLU to subscribers to "Focus on the Family"; all wake up to the common bond and the call of the message that they are all human beings with natural rights and that "we" instituted the government to protect those rights, not trample upon them. Read, talk, donate... do whatever you can but let us not snuff out the truth that resonated within us all!

Sent by Josh Ayre | 6:11 PM ET | 07-26-2007

Did you see in the latest FEC reports which candidate recieved the most donations from members of the military and from Veterans ? It was Ron Paul. In fact he got over 10 times what Rudy Guliani got. Details are in the FEC reports. I would think respectable news organizations covering an election with a war going on would report on who's plans the military likes.

Sent by Mark Byrne | 6:29 PM ET | 07-26-2007

I would like to see a Paul / Gravel ticket. The two rebels of the two parties uniting the majority of independent, intelligent citizens to reclaim our country, and save our future.

Sent by Leif | 1:14 AM ET | 07-27-2007

It is nice to see that NPR finally gets it. People want to hear about Ron Paul. I called NPR and emailed NPR months ago about Ron Paul and with others NPR is finally doing it. Ron Paul is the only candidate, democrat or republician that speaks the truth. He is the only one who answer questions with a direct answer. What a concept!

Sent by Rick Theile | 8:19 PM ET | 07-27-2007

Ron Paul dazzled me years ago when I saw him grilling Alan Greenspan during some testimony to Congress - it was amazing to see an elected official who actually understood the real important underlying issues and had the courage to address them, instead of spouting forth the calculated catch-phrases for the media.

By no means do I agree with his every view, but since he is a principled federalist, I have no concern that he would try to force them upon me through the federal government. State governments are more responsive to the people than the federal government is, or can possibly be; and a move towards federalism would be an improvement for people of all political stripes.

Fortunately for me, I live in an open primary state, so I can vote for him without the need to register Republican - though I would gladly do so just for the chance to put one more vote next to his name.

Win or lose, every vote for him sends a message to the establishment that needs to be heard. No vote for liberty is a wasted vote.

Sent by Lucy | 3:07 PM ET | 07-30-2007

I suspect NPR knows Dr. Paul would support a withdraw all funding to public radio and that is why they do not cover him more.

I love NPR and I have donated previously however the lack of coverage of Ron Paul's campain has greatly reduced the stock I held in NPR.

Sent by Shawn Reed | 5:05 PM ET | 07-31-2007

Agreed @ Shawn. I would gladly donate more to NPR should the government stop funding them. It would actually be better that way as they would genuinely be "public radio" and the government would not have control over them. I personally believe that under the Bush administration NPR has been coerced, and changes were made to suit the Neocon agenda.

Sent by Paul | 5:52 PM ET | 08-01-2007

Hey, NPR, wake up.

1. You're supposed to be smarter than the corporate media.

2. If Ron Paul gets elected, I'll have so much more money after taxes that I'll be able to increase my annual donation significantly. Then, you won't have to rely on the government or the corporate sponsors. Wouldn't that be fun!?

Sent by Dave Henning, Chandler, AZ | 3:47 PM ET | 08-07-2007

I am trying to live on a social security check. I am in a senior aresidency center i which we receive sharply reduced rents and utilities. I also get food stamps. Still I manage to get by and support one dog and one cat. I very much want to vote for Dr. Paul, although I am a lifelong Democrat. I have never voted in a republican primary. Living the way I do can I still do that and not feel like a hypocrite? Would Dr. Paul's election be a threat to my ability to continue to survive? William Randolph Fuller.

Sent by Willliam Randoph Fuller | 1:08 PM ET | 08-08-2007

Perhaps you are worried about funding?
Ron Paul can and will win the Republican ticket. Then he will win the presidency. These things almost seem a foregone conclusion, anybody who handicaps will recognize the momentum here. This man has a message that everyone has to swallow on something but all are willing to do so! We need a foundation to build on, the constitution is the best place to Re-Start!
REBOOT the COUNTRY!
Vote for Ron Paul!

Sent by Rahn Skipper | 6:09 PM ET | 08-20-2007

Regardless of your opinion of him, the guy has done a good job leveraging the Internet. There's actually an index charting this stuff at www.spartaninternet.com/2008 and Paul is outpacing the rest of the Republican pack.

Sent by Adam Jones | 8:46 AM ET | 08-24-2007

Paul doesn't have a chance as long as the mainstream media crops him out of group photos, keeps him off to the side at debates, gives him few substantive questions at debates, etc. Let's face it. Most people are swayed more by Obama Girl and Giuliani Girl or the handsomeness of Romney than they are by real ideas and issues. Many Americans no longer vote in elections because they've lost all hope of finding a candidate of true integrity like Ron Paul. I'm so disappointed in NPR for marginalizing Ron Paul, when he's the best hope for this country and he speaks truth. I thought NPR was a better source for news than FOX News, but I guess I was wrong.

Sent by Joe Alvarez | 8:43 AM ET | 09-13-2007

I read about dr. Paul for at least 6 years in American Free Press patriot news paper.He does indeed follow the constitution.I know he's my man to be the next president.I already gave to the cause.

Sent by james fisher | 6:11 PM ET | 12-12-2007

Darn, I really wanted to vote for Ron Paul, but reading your article, it seems like he has no chance of winning. I guess I won't waste my vote then.

C'mon NPR, are we really all slaves to the polls?

Sent by Steven C | 9:25 AM ET | 12-19-2007

I am sick and tired of the ELITE people in Washington making the rules of the game for themselves. After having Bush in office for the last 8 years I had it SET in my mind that there has to be a change in parties for this country to exsits, for which it was founded. Please remember the reason this country was founded, it is different today but it all has the same princple.

Get a grip people our country is controled by people we never heard of, the elite bring up people under them so that they can stay in power. Even though Ron Paul is a republican i actully think he can change this country around. I hope to GOD that he is not just blowing smoke up our a** just to gain out our confidence.

Bush is a lawless, out of control puppet, with a licence to kill type of guy. We should never allow someone in office that has a vested interest in any global business or comodity such as oil. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!Your choice should be made on what the individula brings to the table, can he or she make our country better for the people????? For myself I will not even consider anyone Bush tries to indorse, and you can take that to the bank!

Sent by Damian | 12:18 PM ET | 01-08-2008

We also have to get around vote fraud to get Paul elected. I am very disappointed in NPR for showing that they are buying the other medias view. I never thought I would hear or not hear it on NPR.

Sent by Lisa | 1:47 PM ET | 01-23-2008

I actually fell in love with NPR last year (and Obama groupie at the time), when I heard somewhat unbiased, hard-to-get news, starting June '06. Then, it happened. "Un-biased" news from NPR Reporting on Top-Tier candidates Giuliani and Thompson, and a prediction on the defeat of Republican Congressman Ron Paul. Worse yet, was the January-complete-lack-of-mention of Dr.Paul in an effort to suggest he was out of the race. Well, if you haven't heard, the GIANTS [Yahoo video has Dr. Paul rooting for them) wWON the Superbowl and NPR is about to get an upset in November as well. We hope you raise your money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, cause I still love ya, but I just can't support ya. I'll tune in to the burning of ROME, while I donate the $5 I can afford to "the future of our youth", Dr. Paul.

Sent by Paul Ronian | 7:16 AM ET | 02-07-2008