QB Vick Charged with Sponsoring Dogfighting
I just don't get it. When young professional athletes have so much to look forward to in our sports-crazed culture, why do some of them endanger opportunities that most of us would give our right arms to have?
The latest athlete to face charges of wrongdoing is the Atlanta Falcons' super-talented quarterback, Michael Vick. And the charges against him involve something that is a hot-button issue for many people -- deliberate cruelty to animals.
The Associated Press reports that an indictment handed down Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Virginia charges Vick and three associates with "'knowingly sponsoring and exhibiting an animal fighting venture' and conducting a business enterprise involving gambling, as well as buying, transporting and receiving dogs for the purposes of an animal fighting venture."
As NPR's All Things Considered reports, what makes this case particularly gruesome are the accusations of how some of the dogs who didn't "perform" up to expectations were allegedly killed -- by hanging, drowning or being shot. One of the men is accused of consulting with Vick before electrocuting a dog after it was doused with water. If convicted, Vick could face up to six years in jail and $350,000 in fines. He could face disciplinary action from the NFL even if not convicted in court.
Washington Post sports columnist Michael Wilbon writes that Vick's situation is a lot worse than those of other NFL players who have recently gotten into trouble with the law, such as "Pacman" Jones of the Tennessee Titans and "Tank" Johnson of the Chicago Bears. He is one of the league's best-known players, and his actions affect the reputation of the entire NFL.
But you know what? As I listened to sports talk shows Tuesday night, there were more than a few callers who said "Let Vick play!" even if he was guilty. One caller said he didn't care what NFL players did off the field as long as they performed well on it.
So should a player's off-field behavior have a bearing on how you see them as a player? Does the nature of an offense make a difference? I'd love to hear from you on this one.
11:33 AM ET | 07-18-2007 | permalink


