Are We Hearing from the Right People About Iran?
Boy, there sure seems to be a lot of chatter in the media these days about bombing Iran. Perhaps that's why I'm having that feeling of deja vu all over again — the feeling I got in the weeks before the attack on Iraq in 2003. It seems possible that the groundwork is being laid for an attack on Iran.
So I find myself wanting more comprehensive information about the situation. NPR's six-part series about Iran's relationship with both the West and its neighbors in the region has been a good place to start.
Meanwhile, Washington Post columnist/blogger Dan Froomkin is calling on journalists to talk to more than the usual suspects. He argues in a piece for the Nieman Foundation's Nieman Watchdog that reporters are relying too much on the same people who said invading Iraq would be a good idea. He suggests that they interview some of the experts who believe there are many downsides to attacking Iran. (Most of the experts surveyed for Foreign Policy magazine's Terrorism Index, for example, were not in favor of military action in Iran.)
Froomkin says the media should be talking to people like Paul R. Pillar, formerly the CIA's top Middle East analyst and now a Georgetown University professor; Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations; and Shaul Bakhash, George Mason University professor and former Iranian journalist, to a name few.
5:43 PM ET | 08-22-2007 | permalink

