People Say Media Are Sloppy, Biased ... But Doing OK
To paraphrase Sally Fields, you sort of don't like us, you really, really sort of don't like us. The news media, that is. OK, maybe that's going too far. You still like us, but you're feeling more than a bit iffy. And you're really grumbling if you read or listen to us online.
According to the latest Pew Research Center survey, "Views of Press Values and Performance: 1985-2007," a majority of you think that we're biased and inaccurate, and more than a few of you see us as uncaring about the people we cover and too critical of America. I won't go into all the percentages -- you can read them on the report summary.
But you still think we're very professional and doing a good job keeping politicians in line. Go figure.
The real news to me is the growing divide between Democrats and Republicans about the media. Conservatives have long considered the traditional media too liberal, but the gap is growing. No doubt reporting on the war in Iraq and Afghanistan is influencing this divide. (For instance, more than twice as many Republicans as Democrats say news organizations are too critical of America -- 63 percent vs. 23 percent.)
Jay Rosen over at PressThink tries to shed some light on the debate and concludes that what really undermines the news media's better instincts is not being liberal or conservative but being addicted to "savviness."
Deep down, that's what reporters want to believe in and actually do believe in -- their own savviness and the savviness of certain others (including operators like Karl Rove.) In politics, they believe, it's better to be savvy than it is to be honest or correct on the facts. It's better to be savvy than it is to be just, good, fair, decent, strictly lawful, civilized, sincere or humane.
The idea that many important journalists have replaced tough reporting with an adoration of "savviness" is a very interesting one. Your thoughts?
5:07 PM ET | 08-14-2007 | permalink

