White House Looking to Expand Eavesdropping Powers
Stampede! Stampede!
That's how critics of President Bush are describing his effort to push Congress into passing legislation expanding eavesdropping powers before lawmakers go on vacation Monday. They say this "stampede" bears resemblance to the one on Capitol Hill after the Sept. 11 attacks, when Congress passed terrorism bills without bothering to read them.
So why is the White House seeking expanded powers now? While no official has said it directly, various media sources are reporting that a judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act panel recently rejected a Bush administration request to intercept certain e-mails and telephone calls of suspected terrorists overseas on a legal technicality involving the way data moves through the United States.
So the administration is using that to argue for a complete overhaul of the 1978 act that would give it greatly expanded powers. The White House and its supporters warn that if it doesn't happen before Congress' vacation, the country will be in grave danger ... like right NOW!
The Democrats seem willing to pass some form of legislation, but the stumbling block is that the White House had wanted the bill to allow the attorney general -- now Alberto Gonzales -- to OK eavesdropping without going to the courts (as long as the target is "reasonably believed to be outside of the United States") and be able to compel U.S. telephone and Internet companies to cooperate.
The Democrats (especially Sen. Patrick Leahy, the head of the Judiciary Committee), who believe that Gonzalez has repeatedly misled them about intelligence matters, aren't going to buy that at all. The White House has tried to soften the legislation by making the national intelligence director part of the approval process and permitting the FISA court to review certain activities.
The Los Angeles Times offers this approach to the problem: "Hurry up and wait." Fix the technicality hindering intelligence gathering, but wait until after Congress returns to debate broader changes.
12:04 PM ET | 08- 3-2007 | permalink

