Music Industry Plays Tough in File-Sharing Suit
It's not often that a radio piece makes me really angry. But that's exactly how I felt when I heard a Marketplace report about the way the Recording Industry Association of America targeted Tanya Andersen of Oregon in its quest to sue people who are illegally downloading music. The problem? Andersen said she didn't do it and could prove it. But that didn't seem to make a difference to the RIAA.
Andersen's case illustrates what many see as the RIAA's "scorched earth" policy to curtail file-sharing. Her lawyer told Marketplace that after Andersen decided to fight back against the erroneous accusations, someone from the RIAA's law firm called her apartment manager and threatened to get him in a lot of trouble if he didn't give out Andersen's personal information.
For its part, the RIAA says people accused of illegally downloading files frequently say they have been wrongly targeted. Mitch Bainwol, the head of the RIAA, says people can be "creative" with the way they portray the facts.
However, Andersen's fight with the RIAA, which dragged on for a couple of years, ended when a federal court told the group that it had to prove Andersen had made the downloads. The association then dropped the suit, leaving her with thousands of dollars in legal fees. But as Marketplace notes, the courts may be losing patience with this tactic. A judge recently ordered the organization to pay a Texas woman's $68,000 legal bill.
Now Andersen has turned the tables and is suing the RIAA, accusing the group of "fraud, malicious prosecution, libel and slander, invasion of privacy, deceptive business practices, misuse of copyright laws and colluding to engage in widespread extortion and racketeering."
1:41 PM ET | 09-18-2007 | permalink

