The NPR News Blog
 
 

Censorship at the Smithsonian?

Some scientists say that officials at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History watered down sections of an exhibit on the Arctic before its launch in 2006 to avoid criticism from global-warming skeptics.

The Washington Post reports that it has obtained documents that show the museum's director, Cristian Samper, ordered changes to the exhibit to include "scientific uncertainty."

Scientists at other agencies collaborating on the project expressed in e-mails their belief that Smithsonian officials acted to avoid criticism from congressional appropriators and global-warming skeptics in the Bush administration. But Samper said in an interview last week that "there was no political pressure -- not from me, not from anyone."

The Post provides some examples of the changes made. Originally the exhibit's introductory panel said, "Over the past 50 years, the average temperatures across the Arctic have risen by nearly twice as much as the global average." After Samper asked for changes, the entrance panel read, "The Earth's climate is changing -- and it always has."

In the interview with the Post, Samper said he felt the exhibit indicated a degree of certainty beyond the contemporary science. He also acknowledged that he took a cautious approach because the exhibit had the words "climate change," which are "politically sensitive."

 

Comments (Send a comment)

Sections of the Smithsonian's Natural History Museum of Natural History's exibit on the Artic pertaining to Global Warming have been watered down? Well maybe that's appropriate in an abstract conceptual sense. After all, thanks to Global Warming the polar ice caps are also being watered down.

Sent by John R. Otten | 5:19 PM ET | 11-16-2007

The second version is not so much "watered down" as it is a general statement about climate. I'd like to see more of the revisions. I'm less worried about them "watering down" the message about global warming, than I am about how accurate and relevant the information being presented is. There is altogether too much political shenaniganer-y going on with this global warming issue.

Sent by Jody Sol | 7:16 PM ET | 11-16-2007

That's right folks, if you're in a position of power and your beliefs don't match the facts... change the facts!!! There's nothing wrong with distorting objective information to conform with your subjectively held beliefs!!! See how successful the Bush Administration is? They do it all the time!!! And don't you want to be just as successful and well respected as they are?!?!?

Sent by hiwattage | 11:12 AM ET | 11-17-2007

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.



   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Recent Comments

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs