Border Residents Have Different View of Fences
"Strengthen the borders" has become as popular a slogan for politicians as "no new taxes," "support the troops" and "I'm leaving to spend more time with my family."
While some welcome the increased security measures, many of the millions who live along the U.S.-Mexican border feel they have no voice in decisions that affect them: new fences, new crackdowns, closed borders ... before Washington discusses any other options.
NPR's Ted Robbins reports for All Things Considered that some of these border residents (known as the Texas Border Coalition), who believe the "racially heated national media" are distorting the situation along the border, gathered recently in El Paso, Texas. They want to convince the nation that border security does not mean the issues of human rights and trade are no longer important.
Brownsville, Texas Mayor Pat Ahumada, for instance, calls the border fence the government wants to build in his town "wasteful and inefficient." He also doesn't think it will work. "Somebody wants to get into your house, they are going to get into your house," he says. Ahumada believes a wider Rio Grande will keep out more illegal immigrants than a high fence.
Coalition members plan to issue a report to argue their case that will include, among other things, these two statistics from a recent report: that the border town of El Paso was recently ranked as the second-safest city in America, while Washington D.C. was ranked the second-most dangerous.
8:27 PM ET | 12- 6-2007 | permalink

