NPR: Ron Paul Newsletters Become Campaign Fodder

Ron Paul Newsletters Become Campaign Fodder

Dave Weigel, the associate editor of Reason Magazine, warned back in May of 2007 that if Ron Paul started to generate any kind of a buzz in the Republican presidential primaries, someone would bring up the newsletters.

In the 80s and 90s, Paul was involved with newsletters (Ron Paul's Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report) that regularly made racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic remarks. They were first reported by the Houston Chronicle in 1996, and have been circulating around the Internet ever since.

Recently New Republic reporter James Kirchick wrote about the newsletters, and talked about them today with Alex Chadwick on Day to Day.

When Paul was first confronted with these comments, Ed Morrisey of the Captain Quarter's blog said he explained them this way: "They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them . . . I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn't come from me directly, but they campaign aides said that's too confusing. 'It appeared in your letter and your name was on that letter and therefore you have to live with it.' "

In response to the New Republic article, Paul's website contains the following statement: "The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts ... This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. ... For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name."

Kirchick wrote in his piece, anticipating the "I didn't write it" explanation: "But, whoever actually wrote them, the newsletters I saw all had one thing in common: They were published under a banner containing Paul's name, and the articles (except for one special edition of a newsletter that contained the byline of another writer) seem designed to create the impression that they were written by him - and reflected his views. What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics."

3:21 PM ET | 01-10-2008 | permalink

Comments

This is a complex issue to bring up. Ultimately I believe that an individual has the right to believe what he will, even if it is hateful, and to speak his beliefs, even if they are hateful.

The only question this brings up for ron paul as a candidate is, will he them work to diminish the rights of minority groups? Given what we know about his economic and political sensibilities I doubt it.

He is still extremely plain speaking though, perhaps to a fault.

He is still, also, the only suitable candidate for president, currently running, which is still, terrifying.

We could have avoided this if people had had the fortitude to elect Nader in 2000

Sent by Jody Sol | 3:40 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Dr. Paul is not a racist. He has taken responsibility, but also states they aren't his words. HE is the most consistent moral politician in Washington. Just because he is not a "front runner" and he is the only Republican speaking against the war James Kirchick is trying to make him look dishonorable. Well Mr. Kirchick, you can't put a viel of lies over my eyes. And NPR.. You don't give Ron Paul the credit he deserves. Do you ever think that if the media gave Ron Paul a chance to show the U.S. the depth of his knowledge that he might be known? That he might touch the hearts of these people that claim they want change? I love you NPR, but am extremely ashamed.

Sent by Matthew Good | 3:45 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Instead of merely claiming that Ron Paul is anti-semetic or homophobic, why don't you show us some examples of his being so. These claims, without any examples, end up sounding like baseless attacks - typical of those who claim that someone with a political viewpoint different than their own is "anti-semetic."

Sent by Juan Rodriguez | 4:01 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Yet another reason to be thankful that Mr. Paul is not getting traction in the Presidential campaign, aside from people on the fringes of the Republican party!

Sent by Michael | 4:07 PM ET | 01-10-2008

'They' are obviously getting nervous! People are waking up and removing the wool from their eyes. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." We are at step 3.

Sent by Josh | 4:56 PM ET | 01-10-2008

I don't believe the claims that he is a racist. There is no evidence. Ron Paul has proven that he values the constitution above all else: that means equal rights for all.

If this is all the dirt that they can dig up on Ron Paul: that someone else wrote something under his name, then I'd say he's doing pretty good.

Sent by James | 5:05 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Thought you might like to hear about this

Sent by Frost | 5:29 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Dr. Paul seems to have stood up and done his best to set the record straight. At this point he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

The columnist's approach, holding Ron Paul up to judgment irrespective of his apology and explanation, is something that is likely to return to Kirchick in an area where he is unready to be examined and judged to a like standard. Generally it is preferable to give the benefit of the doubt for just this reason.

Sent by Robert | 5:37 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Ron Paul's actions are intolerable. These words, whether his or not, should have been denounced from the beginning. If not, they become his.

It is a Democracy to allow him to say what he wishes. It is inexcusable to give him a job where he can put his views into action!

Sent by BillW | 5:43 PM ET | 01-10-2008

I believe Ron Paul, I don't agree with him on everything, but it is clearly a smear attempt. This guy decides to publish it on the day of the New Hampshire primary, they have been anti-Paul on that website since day one, and it is obvious that they are willing to do anything to destroy the thought of a true conservative educating and catching on with the masses.

I hope Ron wins, his message is a message of hope and real change, not just pretty speeches about change that you would get from an Obama, or fear tactics of a Giuliani. He'll be fine, the guys not a racist, not a bigot and was simply used for name recognition in letters from the past.

Sent by Gsalou | 5:47 PM ET | 01-10-2008

NPR never claimed Ron Paul was anti x y or z. It just reported the facts regarding the newsletters and RP's association with them. The article also printed some of RP's comments regarding this. If people would just slow down and think instead of running off with assumptions the world will be a better place.

Sent by Ron Poor | 5:49 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Maybe someone should send in the facts about TNR?

"TNR has a long and checkered history of pro-fascism, pro-communism, and pro-new dealism. Founded to promote the rotten progessive movement of militarism, central banking, income taxation, centralization, and regulation of business, it naturally hates and fears the Ron Paul rEVOLution. The mag is also famous for having published a slew of entirely made-up articles by Stephen Glass, which it passed off as non-fiction. Through the 1950s it was an important magazine, of sigificant if baleful influence, but it long ago declined in circulation and significance, like all DC deadtree ops. Long close to Beltway libertarians, for whom its politically correct left-neoconism is fine and dandy, TNR once published a cover story literally comparing Ross Perot to Adolf Hitler when he was running for president. That is the publication's style--hysterical smears aimed at political enemies."

Sent by Josh | 6:00 PM ET | 01-10-2008

So... If Ron Paul didn't write the words he denies he wrote, yet were sent to press and were written by "someone else" - then, who is that "someone" else and why is their name missing from all the news accounts about this...? Does Mr. Paul know who wrote those words and put his name on the article(s) without his knowledge...? Is there a reason this "person" hasn't been outted as the real author of the articles Mr. Paul denies writing...?

Sent by ScootCoot | 6:04 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Every Black, Hispanic, Asian, Caucasian, Native American, Homosexual, Christian, Jew, Muslim, Atheist, or any other category the establishment would like to attach on us human beings ought to vote for Ron Paul and give his campaign support. Why? Because Ron Paul believes that each individual person should have the opportunity to live out a unique life of liberty and freedom which our Creator has endowed us with. Other candidates are interested in controlling us as a collective group of consumers and worker bees supporting the Nanny State. Dr Ron Paul is the antidote to that sort of twisted and sick thinking.

Sent by Matt | 6:38 PM ET | 01-10-2008

The real outrage I would like to see NPR have the guts to cover is why Ron Paul was excluded by Fox from the NH debate. He was ahead of Giuliani in both Iowa and NH, and raised more money than any of them, including more from military donors... and Fox refused to supply a reason for the exclusion, even to its own subsidiaries.

Now THAT would be balanced journalism, counteracting the commercial media, on a controversial topic - something NPR ought to do well.

Sent by manfmnantucket | 6:49 PM ET | 01-10-2008

"NPR never claimed Ron Paul was anti x y or z. It just reported the facts regarding the newsletters and RP's association with them. The article also printed some of RP's comments regarding this. If people would just slow down and think instead of running off with assumptions the world will be a better place." Well thats just it, they are not reporting facts. They are reporting assertions made by a someone with an agenda to derail RP's campaign. This is old news and has been throughly debunked on wikipedia. This is what is called 'Yellow Journalism" and shame on NPR for not researching this beforehand. Furthermore, it is a deliberate smear attempt because RP has the highest amount of African American supporters among Republicans.

Sent by Josh | 7:05 PM ET | 01-10-2008

He's responsible for every word published in his name.

It's the old "ignorance of the law is no defense" thing--if it was done on your watch and you're the responsible person for the overall publication, it's on your head. The buck stops there.

By not stopping it, approval is implied.

Sent by Journalist | 7:09 PM ET | 01-10-2008

If you're afraid of allowing people to speak their minds, live in freedom, and be responsible for their own words, then don't vote for Ron Paul. That is, if you're obsessed with controlling minds, as opposed to allowing reason and dialogue to win out over intolerance and bigotry, then Dr. Paul is not your man.

No-one who looks at his record could for a minute believe that Paul is prejudiced toward any category of citizens, much less a racist or homophobe. As Matt so aptly stated, anyone concerned about a candidates treatment of minorities would do themselves a huge favor by supporting this last of the great statesmen, Ron Paul.

Sent by Matthew | 8:01 PM ET | 01-10-2008

NPR...if you do not LISTEN to Ron Paul's message and KNOW that he speaks the TRUTH then I wonder how you can claim to be the news source that I have listened to for more than 25 years now.

Put this dirt in its place and give Paul a boost instead of a jab from it. He is the ONLY candidate telling the WHOLE TRUTH about the government of our country. Money and Power run everything and the only ones really making money are those who benefit from the extraordinary debt that the majority of us are paying. $9T or is it $53T...either way we owe more than own and NO country in history has survived this. Look at the history...it is a fact AND our FOUNDERS wrote the CONSTITUTION to prevent the debt that the government and the Federal Reserve Bank have created. PLEASE NPR.

Sent by Jonathan Fraser | 9:55 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Ron Paul won't get anywhere with his campaign anyways, so who cares? anyone who runs a newsletter and doesn't keep stuff like that from being published (whether his words or not) is not a very responsible person. whether Paul is a racist or not doesn't really matter, this makes him look pretty irresponsible to me. responsibility is a pretty important trait for a national leader to possess.

Sent by N | 9:57 PM ET | 01-10-2008

I find it horrifying that so many are this uninformed about a candidate they support. I am neutral as to whether or not Dr. Paul is a racist, bigot, humanitarian, the real deal etc. However, that anyone who supports him was unaware of this controversy is unconscionable. This story is not new. It has been circulating for some time, with the evidence to back it! It is wonderful to be enthusiastic about a candidate, but before throwing support to any candidate voters have a responsibility to do their research. Don't make a decision based solely on what they say in their ads or debates!

I have a lot of respect for the type of politician that Dr. Paul is, whether or not I agree with him 100%. It is refreshing to see a politician on either side buck their party's line. This country needs more of that!

Sent by Kerry | 11:31 PM ET | 01-10-2008

This man is so honest that he accepted moral responsibility for something printed under his name & he was not aware about it.Dr Paul MADE me a new person through his actions.
SHAME ON YOU NPR circulating false allegation instaed of mentioning Dr Paul as the tax payers best friend, his message of liberty, putting money back into the people's pocket by abolishing the IRS.....etc etc etc.
Anybody who red a simple thing obout Dr Paul wont believe for a second these baseless allegation.
What do we benifit from 20 years false allegations?
Let me tell you, during this election I saw the dark side on NPR, like the rest of the networks.

Sent by resimc | 12:01 AM ET | 01-11-2008

NPR what is wrong with you?

Sent by kakel | 12:16 AM ET | 01-11-2008

To quote Peter Segal of Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me, "...Democrats or Republicans or whoever the people who support Ron Paul are..."
It seems as if many bloggers here are Ron Paul supporters themselves. I like Ron Paul out of all Republicans, but when I heard this story and saw the blogs I changed my mind. Ron Paul may not have written those words, but it was in HIS newsletter, which HE publishes and edits. If I owned a newsletter I would make sure that NO RACIST COMMENTS WERE PUBLISHED. If he makes the excuse that he can't look over everything in a newsletter, can we trust him with looking over foreign policies in the White House?
Oh, and about the claim that the publisher is anti-Paul, SO WHAT? Does it matter? If I saw the comments in those newsletters, I wouldn't waste a second to let the world know.
To new bloggers: If you make anti-Paul arguements and you see that many people disagree, don't be suprised. Ron Paul has a powerful web presence, so just leave them alone and let them have their "moment".

Sent by EB | 12:18 AM ET | 01-11-2008

Yeah, "Ron Paul" didn't actually say any of these things. They were just on a newsletter that he publishes, under his name and made to appear as if they were written by him. Holding him accountable would be akin to holding the President accountable for everything he says in his speeches, even though his words are actually written by speech writers.

If you are afraid of a politician who is afraid to speak his mind about his beliefs that 95% of black men are criminals then maybe you really shouldn't vote for Ron Paul.

Sent by Gil | 2:15 AM ET | 01-11-2008

I'll preface this by saying that until this information surfaced I was an advocate of Ron Paul's to some extent. I believe that lately this country's current administration has passed laws and various government acts that have stomped all over our constitution and left us at the brink of a fascist state. The idea of bringing back a strict constitutionalist administration is compelling and I believe may be the right way for our country to halt it's downward spiral. Until recently I thought that Ron Paul might be able to do that.

However, It appears that this presidential candidate has a very unfortunate past. Not only was he the only US congressman to vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but that vote was followed by dozens of racist, sexist and homophobic comments for which there is just no excuse.

Sent by Shiona | 9:32 AM ET | 01-11-2008

"I didn't write it" is as lame as "I didn't inhale it".

Sent by Jane Bartolo | 10:04 AM ET | 01-11-2008

This post makes me wonder - who actually wrote these newsletters and why did Ron Paul lend his name to such a publication? Furthermore, why didn't he monitor the content of these newsletters for which he so graciously lent his name? I'd love to see a follow up post addressing these questions.

Sent by Ed P. Gackston, III | 10:08 AM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul's "explanation" is the same old line we've heard from politicians, athletes, etc., more times than I could count. They utter the phrase "I take responsibility," but it's a meaningless sound bite because at the same time they say "but I didn't do anything wrong and I shouldn't have to face any consequences for it." I don't believe for a minute that he didn't know what was being said in his own newsletter--but if it is true, then he was inexcusably negligent.

Sent by Jay | 10:52 AM ET | 01-11-2008

TOP SHELF, NPR, TOP SHELF. Your manufacturing of news reminds me of a quote in the movie Cold Mountain: "They made the rain and when the storm came they said *@%# IT'S RAINING!" Rest assured when someone starts upsetting the establishment apple cart, the roaches will come out of the woodwork to destroy those who dare challenge their ill-gotten gains. I will say Ron Paul should (and has) taken moral responsibility for allowing his name to be affiliated with the venomous words in question--that does not mean he should be villified as the author of them (especially that these views are anathema to his character). Has anyone ever HEARD RP spew this trash?? I think not! You know, often times (especially of late), I ponder if the Germans in 1933 were as apathetic to the foreboding storm that a minority voice surely tried to articulate. When the purge of this nation arrives (and it's coming), I'll remember those who willfully steered the masses into complacency.

Sent by Thomas Braun | 11:32 AM ET | 01-11-2008

Shame on Npr for reporting anything about Ron Paul that may be construed as negative, even if it is factual. Where are we living? Nazi Germany. Has this really become a country where the media feels obligated to report factual information about presidential candidates? That is truly bone chilling.
And I agree with everyone who mentioned the timing of this news release. Npr and other news organizations should have waited till Mr. Paul was elected before discussing his racist ideals. How irresponsible. Daniel Shore would be rolling over in his grave if he weren't still alive.
Oops, I'm late for my Illuminati meeting, gotta go. It's in the back room of the Yeshiva on 22nd st, that's where we orchestrate and run everything in case you were wondering. Oh no, I hope no gentiles are reading this, I wasn't supposed to tell you guys.

Sent by gil | 1:01 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Mitt Romney's religion is clearly documented as being outrightly racist up unitl 1979. John McCain made racist disparaging remarks about people from the Middle East during the debate last night. Where is the outrage for these things?

Dr. Ron Paul mistakenly trusted someone to write things for his newsletter over a decade ago, and the very media that's been purposely ignoring him for months, suddenly can't stop talking about him once they have something hurtful to say.

I thought NPR was different than FOX. I guess not. How disappointing.

Sent by A Former NPR Donor | 5:34 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Yeah, great way to focus on the important issues you guys. Did you even notice the racist rhetoric coming *directly* from the mouths of the other candidates in last night's debate? Maybe it's not important because those racist comments were directed toward Muslims and we all know that all Muslims are terrorists, right?

I mean, what is wrong with you guys? Are you freaking blind? You have these childish, giggling, joking candidates that are running for the highest office of the greatest military power in the world and they are actually making racist comments on camera yet you guys are preoccupied with these newsletters? When Ron Paul has never displayed any sign of racism in any of his debates, interviews, books, Congressional record or beliefs!! Wake up!

Sent by DefendTheConstitution | 5:40 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Paul lent his name to a small newsletter for a short time that he did not edit, while he was out of politics and concentrating on delivering babies. I look at it as running an unmoderated blog in the days before the internet. The writing style was not Ron Paul's. In his newsletters since being back in Congress, he is clearly in charge and they are wonderful to read. Clearly Paul is the most vehement anti-racist, anti-sexist, pro-individual, & pro-gay rights person in Congress. The New Republic did not even contact Ron Paul to talk to him about their story & they did not seem to know that it had been discussed several times over the years & dismissed as not reflecting Ron Paul's beliefs. The New Republic, if you will remember, compared Ross Perot to Hitler! Ron Paul is a good man being smeared for political reasons.

Check out this website for the CNN interview with Ron Paul about this where all is explained:
Hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/01/hotline_after_d_323.html

Sent by DenisL | 5:42 PM ET | 01-11-2008

What is wrong at NPR - I used to have respect for you but now I know the truth !
You are no better than FOX news. Boy did you pull the wool over my eyes for sometime . Ron Paul has the best ideas of any canidate and is not a neocon like the rest of the Rep party . I am a liberal democrat but this year I will support the only canidate ( except for Dennis K ) that has the guts to tell the American people the truth . This issue on the papers is a bunch of BS - who really cares - How many people died because of what someone wrote ?????????
Give me the names of all the dead people - those letters killed . Mean while we have a bunch of nut cases who have no problem watching our Military get killed everyday in a land far far away ? what the hell is wrong with this nation and when did NPR become one and the same as FOX ABC CBS and NBC ???????

Sent by Sam | 5:55 PM ET | 01-11-2008

John McCain says he is "the most honest man in congress." No one has ever heard a single word or phrase uttered from Paul that reflects a racist way of thinking. Nor has anything authored and signed by him ever shown to be reflective of this attitude. Those of you so convinced that the great "dark side" of Ron Paul has been exposed only show your own racist prejudice. Sure, pat yourselves on the back.

Sent by dan | 5:56 PM ET | 01-11-2008

When you start getting hit with flack, you are right over the target. Ron Paul must be right over the target!
This is all they can do? The NeoCon Media has been exposed for what they are and that is not fair and balanced new reporting! We know they will try to slander the good Doctor more and more. We shall over come. We shall stop this ponzi scheme called the federal reserve. We shall take our country back from the theives.
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!

Sent by Doug Elam | 6:14 PM ET | 01-11-2008

If you want to see what Ron Paul has to say about this issue, go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u39z38xjraw This is a perfect example of dirty politics.

Sent by crldrummer | 6:20 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul is as pure as the driven snow. I hear and understand him and know he has integrity. I see a future great President in him. Nothing you write will change that.

Sent by MarkD | 6:20 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul is a threat to the military, medical, and banking industrial complex. If you also believe he is a racist then Ron Paul is threat to minorities, gays, jews, and really rich white guys. Some may also say that he is a threat to women because he is against abortion....Wow Liberty is hard!

Sent by Rand Thinker | 6:25 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul is the only candidate who is trying to save this country and give our children some hope for the future. How sad if this will get in the way of the important movement he has started. I look at Ron Paul and I see a person who will fight for the rights of any individual. We all have the choice to believe what we want to believe. I would be proud to have Doctor Ron Paul as President.

Sent by Lars | 6:32 PM ET | 01-11-2008

NPR never and I repeat NEVER talks about Ron Paul as a candidate and this is how you finally decide to bring him up? This is petty crap. Why don't you go dig in the closets of YOUR candidates' closets for a change, you liberal rejects! And to think I have been listening to NPR for years as well as supported KUT in Austin this past year and for what? For this? This isn't real news...get with the program.

Sent by Jessica | 6:33 PM ET | 01-11-2008

> Kirchick wrote in his piece,
> anticipating the "I didn't write it"
> explanation:

He "anticipated" this?

How impressive, since this is what Paul said over a freaking decade ago.

What's even more impressive is that this supposed bigot Paul hasn't even made a single utterance of racist statements ever in public.

We're all beginning to see what is behind the media's curtain.

Sent by Richard Wicks | 6:37 PM ET | 01-11-2008

While every American has the right to know about these newsletters, every American also has the right to hear Dr. Paul's explanation of them. James Kirchick did not address Paul's explanation in his article, a fact which immediately raised red flags. Upon further investigation into the matter,I discovered that the New York Times removed an article from publication on December 27th, 2007 which also called into question Dr. Paul's reputation. The article was removed as a result of "questionable claims". A week and a half later, these same accusations mysteriously appear in the 'New Republic', a magazine which has few qualms over voicing neo-conservative opinion. Is it just a coincidence that James Kirchick appeared on several news networks on the morning of the New Hampshire primary? Seeing that Ron Paul represents a strengthening movement to restore traditional Republican policies over those of President Bush and other high-ranking officials, it takes no stretch of the logic to conclude that this was a pre-conceived attack on the presidential candidate's otherwise flawless reputation of strict adherance to the Constitution.

Sent by Brice | 6:37 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Megaphone software notwithstanding, RP HAS taken responsibility for the newsletters. He has never been 'caught' making any racist remarks. The facts of a libertarian principle are clear. Everyone is equal. What the candidate has said is that his heros are Martin Luther King and Ghandi. Those are the unequivocal facts. This twenty year old smear is a sign of desperation. Hey NPR why don't you cover the issues?

Sent by Arnold Benedict | 6:38 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Please at least mention Ron Paul, even once? It's pretty sad when Wolf Blitzer of CNN ends up being more fair to the lesser-known candidates than NPR. Shame, shame, shame that you only now start taking notice. If nothing else, there is a news story in how ardent and active his supporters are.

Sent by Andrew Hakso | 6:38 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Perhaps the ugliest tradition in American politics is rehashing old embarrassments on the day of an election.

Sent by Scotch Moose | 6:42 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul was busy delivering babies and focusing on his medical practice when this stuff was published. He's agreed over and over again that it was negligent to let other people hijack his good name and publish under his banner- but we're not talking about an international publication that anyone was reading. It's good to report the facts, but let's also put it in perspective. This was an error of judgment, but he's not a racist.

Sent by Nathan | 6:44 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The media is at it again. Why does the media try so hard to discredit Ron Paul? Well, I'm not into conspiracies but I do understand capitalism. Drug companies have become some of the biggest buyers of adverts & spend 35 Billion annually in the US on 'Direct to Consumer' advertising, which represents half of their yearly expenses on promotions. Well, Ron Paul's Voted YES on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Jan 07) & YES on allowing re-importation of prescription drugs. (Jul 03). Such political stances in a president could cause a dramatic reduction in profits for the big drug companies, & the advertisers they use. Drug companies as a result would drastically reduce the amount of money they could afford on advertising resulting in literally billions of dollars in lost revenue for the Mass Media. So could that have anything to do with the general disregard toward Ron Paul from the MSM? If you ran a media outlet and there was a candidate running who's election would cost your company a fortune in revenue you wouldn't want your employees saying anything good about that candidate either.

Sent by John Not | 6:45 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul's appearance on CNN with Wolf Blitzer was effective. Paul explained himself well, repudiated the ignorant views of the "newsletters," and outlined his stand against the institutional racism of the US justice system. For his part, Blitzer seemed to concede that Paul had nothing to do with the newsletters and that they didn't resemble anything Paul has ever said.

Sent by Charlotte | 6:46 PM ET | 01-11-2008

From the UK, NPR is the Judas of your greatest most honorable statesman since
JFKennedy.

I hope the 20 pieces of federal reserve paper was worth betraying a worldwide revered man

history will rememeber such anti freedom
shills

Sent by bob | 6:48 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Read this, then decide:
http://stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-am-mexican-american-i-worked-for-ron.html

Sent by Michael | 6:53 PM ET | 01-11-2008

This issue was discuss quite a bit over the summer, primarily among Ron Paul supporters online. So an issue that's been around since the early 1990's and was vetted last summer, makes it out on all the national media the day of the New Hampshire primary? That smells bad.

A warning to the media. Russia, Korea, Iran and other countries who usually take flack for their media bias and censorship, have been vigorously (and truthfully) reporting problems with the American media's coverage of Dr. Paul.

Congratulations, you've just lost all credibility on an international scale and hurt chances of exanding a free press to the rest of the world.

Oh, and by the way. Do you think it's possible that a congressman critical of pretty much all of the misplaced power, corruption, lobby influence and the monetary, military and health care industrial complexes just might have an enemy or two that would seek to discredit him by putting out slurs in his name?

This whole affair reminds me of the passage in Pauls letter to Timothy, which states, "These people will speak lies disguised as truth. Their consciences have been scarred as if branded by a red-hot iron."

Sent by Pete Mackin | 7:00 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I'm glad Giuliani doesn't have this kind of dirt on him. Otherwise, I'd have to vote for a democrat.

Sent by truther | 7:08 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Every presidential candidate deserves to be attacked and vetted, and Ron Paul has handled this quite well. What's amazing is that the guy is over 70 years old and this is the best dirt anyone can find on him?

If you actually read the comments in the journal, and not just Kirchick's politically motivated headlines, you'll see the comments were actually quite benign. Considering Paul didn't even write them, they have even less weight.
The fact that he's getting attacked strongly suggests that he's a real factor in this race for the White House.

Kirchick has made a great career leap by attempting to destroy the career of another, and that's rather disturbing. But other than that, Kirchick's articles against Paul are a good example of what the free press is all about. We need folks like Kirchick to educate voters on all aspects of a candidate... no one should be exempt! Kirchick has the right to say what he thinks, and I have the right to discredit him... I can dig it.

lache pas,
LeBoeuf

Sent by Dr. Steven F. LeBoeuf | 7:10 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Just so you understand, Dr. Paul is not just running for office, he is leading a Revolution. We chose him because he is the most honorable man in Washington. The smear campaign is pointless. We know the character of the man we choose. He will free thousands of minorities when he pardons non violent drug offenders who have been enslaved to work for pennies for multinational corporations in prison factories. google RonPaulforpresident and you will see young Ron with Rosa Parks. The demeanor of the picture tells the real story. Ron was with someone he admired. Dr. Paul's message of freedom is being heard around the World. He has said, "not even an army can stop an idea whose time has come!"

Sent by Elaine McKillop | 7:26 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Excellent.
Ignore his results in the NH election on the Morning Edition while reporting that Thompson won 1% of the vote and then add a contribution to the media's smear campaign against him.

NPR always seemed to me to be the last refuge of journalism with integrity in the USA, how sad it is to realize I was wrong.

Sent by Dee McDuff | 7:26 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Don't you have anything good to write about Ron Paul. This is post looks like Link Bait or Fodder.

Sent by nannyjane | 7:28 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The problem here is that Ron Paul DOES speak so plainly. When accused of being racist, his response makes perfect sense & proves he isn't. But Americans are terrified of being accused of racism, and the hard left insists you take unreasonable measures to show the public that you aren't. Hence, insisting he gives the $500 back to that wingnut in Flordia. No doubt, the thought police in America today is the hard left, which intimidates the soft center.

Sent by Colt-1 | 7:29 PM ET | 01-11-2008

For the first time in my 55 years, I feel like an invisible American. I served in the Air Force for 20 years. I am a parent, a homeowner, and a patriotic citizen. I have never been arrested, and never intentionally spoken against America. These are times that could be discouraging. The local media has picked up on Dr. Paul. Today's print edition of the Washington Post coverage of the Fox debate included pictures of 6 of the participants (none of Dr. Paul. Also, on page A16 there was an entry titled "Ron Paul's Appeal". Also, if you search Google News, there is extensive coverage of the Ron Paul Newsletters and implicit racism.

I joined the largest Ron Paul meetup in Texas to find out how the local (Texas) newspapers and supporters are dealing with this new notoriaty. I figure that the people of Texas know his record best. Just a thought. While I don't believe we should act as "web nuts" I wonder if it would do any good for all of us in the DC area to send the Washington Post a picture of Dr. Paul...just in case they don't have one.

Sent by Dianne | 7:31 PM ET | 01-11-2008

"It's the old "ignorance of the law is no defense" thing--if it was done on your watch and you're the responsible person for the overall publication, it's on your head. The buck stops there.

By not stopping it, approval is implied."

Oh really? I suppose if you had your credit card stolen from you (identity theft), and you didn't stop it, you must approve of it being stolen? Nice.

Sent by Jeff | 7:31 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Did you all read Dr. Paul's comments? He says explicitly they are not his words, nor does he support these ideas. Why does NPR choose THIS as news, when it should be more discerning and report on the bigger picture. OH, I know! It is GOVERNMENT radio, and if Paul gets elected, well, you can say goodbye to your job there!
NPR: radio for the establishment.

Sent by Chris | 7:35 PM ET | 01-11-2008

For anyone reading the comments to this and all other blogs mentioning the old Ron Paul newsletters, do not be shocked about the accusations that simply bringing up the newsletters is somehow despicable. Those who did not know of Ron Paul before the current campaign may be unaware that in his 1996 run for congress a single issue of these newsletters was released by his political opponent Charles Morris.
It was only one of the longer list of newsletters that New Republic has released this week (the rest have not been aired in the nedia until now).

Ron Paul supporters who have followed his career have obviously forgiven him for the language of the original newsletter especially after in the 2001 issue of Texas Monthly he took "moral responsibility" for what was published in his name while claiming that it was written by an "unnamed ghostwriter who did not represent his views." For the enthusiasts who continued to support him, the issue was closed and he was forgiven (although they may never have doubted him). It was also easy for most people to accept this explaination since it is entirely possible that a single article of this nature could appear in a single newsletter under his name if he was not in direct control of editing at the time.

What inclines readers to view the current situation in a different context is that the seriers of newsletters published in his name over a period of time pepperd with similar incindiary "racist" or "bigoted" statesments establishes a pattern that is harder for most people to dismiss as a simple mistake.

For Ron Paul supporters who have already forgiven him (or for those who believe what was said wasn't really that bad - most likely a select few) the recent release of these documents in the news reminds them of the earlier use of a single newsletter as a direct political attack by his former political opponent. Many of their fist reactions is to see this as the same old thing. Their animosity towards the "main stream media" and belief that the MSM has selected prefered candidates and discourages positive coverage of all others (especially Ron Paul) also leads them to believe any publication that exposes the newsletter is directly attacking Ron Paul's campaign.

Ron Paul supporters are also likely to be exhibiting attribution biases with the positivity effect while evaluating Ron Paul's responisbility while opponents will likely evaluate with the negativity effect.

Sent by josh_08 | 7:40 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Sounds like NPR needs to take off their tin foil hats. Of speculating whos a racist.

Why would paul suggest that he wanted a vice president like walter williams who happens to be black?

Why would Ron Paul repeal the war on drugs and pardon millions of non violent drug users? Which over 70 percent happen to be black?

Why would quote Dr martin luther king, ghandi and rosa parks if he was racist?

ANSWER THAT!!!

How come John Mccain calls people "gooks" then makes statement at the debate about trading burkas? and gets away with it?

Sent by MediaSmearCampaignFAIL | 7:51 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Ron Paul could not have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He was not in office then.

I deplore the fact that he failed to prevent racist comments from going out under his name, but I support him anyway.

Like the rest of us, he's a fallible human being. It's the biggest mistake he ever made, and he put a stop to it a long time ago.

There are worse stories about all the other candidates, and many of them are likely to be true. Judge them on their whole records and the consequences of their actions.

I still think Dr. Paul comes out on top.

Sent by Wesley J. Pinchot | 7:52 PM ET | 01-11-2008

'"I didn't write it" is as lame as "I didn't inhale it".'

To those who have posted statements along these lines...stop and think for one minute. HE DIDN'T WRITE IT. THEY AREN'T HIS BELIEFS. HE'S NOT MAKING EXCUSES. THERE'S A MASSIVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING A BIGOT, AND NEGLECTING TO PREVENT BIGOTRY (IN ONLY A FEW INSTANCES!). HE ACCEPTED FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLECTING TO PREVENT THEIR PUBLICATION. The man is actually owning up to a mistake he made, unlike most other politicians who would try and justify their misdeeds (*cough* Giuliani).

Don't be fooled by such a blatant smear attempt. You're only perpetuating the corruption and propaganda that runs so rampant in our political system.

Sent by Ian C | 8:00 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Anybody can see the timing of this was designed to discredit Ron Paul with the black vote in SC. This crap was planted to discredit Ron Paul years ago. The power broakers in this country knew this man would become a threat someday and they planned for it. The more I hear and read of this man the more I love him. God bless you Ron Paul and help save the country from what it's become!

Sent by Joe | 8:07 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Obviously, Ron Paul is racist bigot. At the very least he has to approve the writing, how could he not ? when someone either work for you or close associate and uses your good name to send/publish racist articles about Blacks, Jewish,gays and other minoritys you can't just say " I don't know about it or did not approve it" not just once, but number of times that this man writen these articles. Thank you NPR for exposing this Evil Man!.

Sent by Haji .K | 8:12 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Show me one instance where Paul has legislated in the past 20 years in favor of racism! Show me one ACTION in his life that say he's a racist! No, then shut your stupid mouth. This is about stopping the revolution to bring back freedom for All men under the constitution.

Sent by Chris | 8:15 PM ET | 01-11-2008

National PUBLIC Radio.

Ron "Free Markets" Paul.

Let's just say the two would have a difficult time coexisting.

Sent by Martin | 8:19 PM ET | 01-11-2008

why not tell people about Ron Paul's other writings:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html

I think they would be more interested in in these.

Sent by dominic | 8:29 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Nice job NPR, I thought it's not biased and it's not corporation run media but here it goes with the flow of messed up media.
You can't stop Ron Paul REVOLUTION. I think someone should dig up his old speeches too which he gave to STOP Fed to take Gold standard OFF US currency. Would someone do it? any media? suckers. American people need to use their brain, google Ron Paul, hear him talking, get to know the guy, you 'll see how media is playing it's game. I bet you, if you have a properly functioning brain, whatever he says 'll make sense to you and you can easily distinguish between what's right and what's wrong.
Dr. Ron Paul for President :)

Sent by mana | 8:50 PM ET | 01-11-2008

TO THE COMMENT I PASTED BELOW FROM JOSH at 4:56 ET...

I must say you are entirely correct. Sadly, there are few of 'us' Americans out there but fortuntaly it's growing. I am talking about those that are willing to take time and reserach about the 'they'.

As cited below 'they' are getting nervous. I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist but Ron Paul is NOT 'one of them' the gov't will do everything in their power to not elect him. Sad thing is, he won't get elected. America has been 'dumbed down' thus naking Paul look like a quack.

With that you must google or wilkipedia CFR - Council on Foreign Relations. Though, it's not 'as' secretive of a comittee, you'll be introduced to the absurd and friegtening details of what we assume is really going on in the gov't. Here you will also find a citing of Ron Paul where is quoted in congress. AGAIN, what he says is accurate not a fisaad.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations

'They' are obviously getting nervous! People are waking up and removing the wool from their eyes. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." We are at step 3.

Sent by Josh | 4:56 PM ET | 01-10-2008

Sent by Alissa | 8:51 PM ET | 01-11-2008

So, Dr. Paul served as flight surgeon in Vietnam during the war, worked in county hospitals and delivered 4,000 babies into the world... and one is supposed to actually believe that a person can experience this in their lifetime and end up a racist or a bigot... You know, I really think that anyone who takes the time to try and reconcile these two thoughts might just realize that they are incongruent. I will say that it is in some sense good news... now I know the NWO is really scared. So, which do you prefer Chertoff's national ID or true freedom as put forth by our founding fathers via Ron Paul? People, I suggest you think long and hard, because after this election, there will be no turning back.

Sent by Chris | 8:53 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I've got to agree with Gil's humorous comment. How is reporting something that a candidate allowed to happen considered bad and dubious? It's only the Paul supporters screaming that this news is just the media's attempt to push complacency. From what I've seen, Paul's supporters are the most complacent of them all. Whether he said those racist words or not, allowing them to appear in HIS newsletters was nothing but irresponsible. And Paul supporters will be the first to tell you that Bush is irresponsible. Seems to me that they've all been bitten by the very thing they believe Paul will surely rid the world of: brain washing and complacency.

Sent by Nate | 8:55 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I was undecided as to who I was going to vote for, however after reading the past 2 days on this subject/person alone and a lot of the comments many from people who just don't bother to research anything, I have decided that I'm going to vote for Ron Paul. He wasn't even on my list before.

I'll tell you why. Many things on both sides don't match-up or make sense. So I looked a little further and found his earlier writings, some congressional speeches, and interviews. I could find NOTHING to suggest he agrees with what was written, nor has he shurked his responsibility, either then or now with this situation. He's the most conservative constitutionalist running for President that I've ever seen... and , no one can seem to answer this... If he's such a bad person then why or how is he a 10 term representative? Surely you're not going to suggest that the majority of people in his district are all those things that people are calling him, are you?

Guilt by association doesn't sit well with me and considering the life he's led and all that he's accomplished and tried to accomplish. He's the only candidate that has constantly stood up in congress and fought for our rights and freedoms time and time again, without fail, without even bending... he stands his ground and votes NO if it goes against the Constitution.

The more and more I see the "masses" going against him the more appealing he seems to me and the more gut feeling I get that tells me "He's the man for the job" and my gut hasn't failed me yet in all of my lifetime.

Sent by Dee | 8:58 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The mainstream media received their marching orders from their Zionist masters to smear Ron Paul and suppress his Peace message and silence his call for Freedom and Prosperity.

They deceived us into a two unjust wars for Israel with their lies and need to stop Dr. Ron Paul pointing at the blood on their hands.

They want to stop him exposing their ongoing efforts to get us to fight a couple more unjust wars for Israel in Iran and/or Pakistan.

Let us take back our country. Let us support Ron Paul???s effort to restore the constitution and lead us into a world of freedom prosperity and peace.

Sent by Joseph | 8:59 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Someone is worried about remarks that were not made by Paul decades ago, but are not concerned with McCain, Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee and Thompson bashing Muslims and Islam, as recently as the debate last night? Am I missing something? I'm far more concerned about the hateful things that the other candidates are saying right now. I remain a committed supporter of Ron Paul. This is a coordinated and sleazy attempt to sling mud selectively.

Sent by Liz | 9:04 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I have really been struggling with these articles that were published and after careful consideration of the facts presented. James Kirchick is absolutely correct in his assessment. RP is a candidate that we would not want in the Whitehouse. The articles do have strong racial overtones and gay hysteria. Ron Paul did not pen them but he might as well have.

America cannot tolerate, must not tolerate a President that would stop the war on drugs. Why would any reasonable person want a President to pardon these common criminals? We also must not tolerate a President that would prevent a constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman and by proxy of the amendment declare gays as criminals. These dregs of our society deserving of the same punishment as those incarcerated on drug related charges.

Thank you James Kirchick for your reasoning and logic for bringing these issues out into the open. Well done Kirchick, well done. Your bold vision of America is what we need. I now fully understand what you believe as truth. Racism and gay bashing must continue, it would be a tragic mistake to elect Ron Paul.

Sent by Devils Advocate | 9:15 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I highly doubt that Ron Paul is a racist. I am very wary of whatever the media says about Ron Paul since FOX's unfair and blatantly corrupt way of suppressing his message by not allowing him to partake in the Republican forum on Tuesday, January 8, 2008.

I put the media above nothing after that debacle, and would do not doubt that they would try ANYTHING, desperately trying to create discord against Ron Paul. If they aren't trying to shut him up, they are trying to discredit him.

Sent by David Levin | 9:19 PM ET | 01-11-2008

the letters were debunked in 1996, you may wish to do some checking-

Sent by debunkedjunk | 9:23 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I am not a Ron Paul supporter, but like everyone else, I have been forced to watch hours of footage of him on the internet. I have seen footage as far back as the 80's. Nothing that I have ever watched made me think he was a racist. In fact... I can't even imagine words like that coming out of his mouth.
He just doesn't talk like that. This is just dirty politics!!

Go Fred for 08 !!

Sent by Fred08 | 9:35 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I am really dissappointed in NPR. I find it ironic that the media reports and circulates this report, that is more than a decade old. However, in the Republican debate performance, Ron Paul is not mentioned (to my knowledge) by Fox News, CNN and New York Times even though he performed well, and in some polls performed the best.

I do not understand that why when there is some trash on Ron Paul, all media is speaking. However, when he performs really well in debates, you never hear anything. Looking at the news sources, one would assume that Ron Paul did not even speak.

I find this disturbing, and I recommend everyone to look at Paul views (www.ronpaul2008.com). His views overall are refreshing.

Looking at the big picture, I think Ron Paul is the best choice for president, too bad that most americans look at one news source (most likely a tv channel) and will never hear of Ron Paul positions. (other than he is anti-war, and the two decade old remarks).

Sent by Sal | 9:35 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I imagine the CIA or whatever faction of CFR groups decided to seed Paul's name with bad karma by publishing these newsletters early on, in case Paul ever posed a threat to the corrupt elites who own our government.

Sent by Karl Olson | 9:36 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Lets all take our head's out of the sand, and look at all the comments that are at this very moment being posted under the NPR banner at the top of the website. Based on the logic being used against Ron, the producers of NPR should never be allowed into elected office.

Sent by ken | 9:37 PM ET | 01-11-2008

So I suppose Ron Paul is also responsible for the silver coins issued with his image that were confiscated earlier this year by the Gestapo, excuse me, I meant FBI.

Sent by Paul Marat | 9:38 PM ET | 01-11-2008

He isn't a racist. But the new meme will be, "He is incompetent" or something to that effect. Ok then, why don't you measure that oversite: not editing a newsletter while he ran a medical practice vs. this:

http://judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007

The other candidates are so corrupt and comprimised that it is absurd. Laughable.

Sent by chris S | 9:38 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Gil, you are hilarious. That was pretty funny even if it missed the mark completely. First of all, this article is pretty objective. The only bad journalism here is of course, Kirchik's brand, which involves shrewdly-timed attacks using decades-old ammunition. Second, why is it so hard for people to believe that a truth-based anti-federal-government movement would attract a few radical conservatives and conspiracy theorists who were probably jumping at the chance to pen their views, and found a forum to do so under the name of a champion of the first amendment. Every movement born of unrest and dissent attracts a few undesirables who are a bit skewed from the intended direction. Paul takes the blame that it happened on his watch and under his name, which is more than you'll ever see any of these corrupt politicians in Washington do. He will NOT, as a defender of free speech, however, lead a witch hunt for the individuals actually responsible for the comments, as someone suggested he should do earlier. His principle and character will simply not permit it, however much he happens to disagree with their opinions.

Sent by Kent Swartzendruber | 9:40 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Like you said this is old news. If you can't see the politcal timing of this, you aren't paying that close of attention. To me, it shows that they want his ideas shut out. If he is so irrelavant the why does everyone keep talking about him?

Sent by David Monk | 9:44 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The weak minded are easily led by the bridle of emotion.

Ron Paul is not Racist in action or deed.

The ???Who??? has not been answered at this point. It is Grey. Ron Paul has many, Known to be of his person, essays on line and speeches on the floor of congress. Why not use these as reference of character; a heavy weight of Individual Respect will be found in counter form of the accused Racism.

I am disappointed with the mentally minuscule and the infirm of reason.

As a metaphorical example of foolery: To take a "Could Be", from a small percentage of available information and conclude an ill result, even though there is much greater to "It Is Not So"; Is an irrational weighting of Emotion.

Do Not, So Easily Be, Led.

I suggest you familiarize yourselves with the Accountable Actions Known To be Of Ron Paul; Not Accusations of trivial measure. The Accusations are ethereal and very circumstantial; Educate On Actual.

I Vote For Virtue; I Vote For Ron Paul !!!

Sent by Brad | 9:46 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The Paul-Wing is now born.Quertion,How many biack babies has DR, Paul delivered?

Sent by MARK from ALABAMA | 9:49 PM ET | 01-11-2008

LOL @ truther...seriously, I almost missed the sarcasim there...if that bigot "burka" McCain can win the NH primary...I don't doubt the American public is naive enough to swallow this load of dung.

Sent by Ryan | 9:55 PM ET | 01-11-2008

The letters were not debunked in 1996. In fact, it appears only ONE letter was in question then, and Ron Paul DEFENDED it, as did his campaign manager. TNR uncovered ADDITIONAL newsletters. Ron Paul defended at least one in 1996, in multiple media outlets, but this week claimed to have never seen them. That's dishonest. Ron Paul has defended these newsletters for years. Today, he's changed his tone and says he doesn't recall them and never saw them.

If you look at his press release, he says he never "uttered" those words and never "edited" the newsletter. He never said he didn't write them. He seems to forget that he was on record with a number of news outlets in 1996, defending at least one of these racist newsletters. Not only that, but some of those newsletters are written in first person, with Ron Paul's comments about his wife, his children and his grandchildren.

Sent by Hugh G. Knutts | 9:55 PM ET | 01-11-2008

It's amazing that even blatant proof like this, people still defend Ron Paul, claiming him to be a moral man. And they say that WE are brain washed? Give me a break!

Sent by One of the dumb blacks, as Ron Paul would say | 9:59 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Interesting how many keep parrotting the comments it was his newsletter, he edited it and he published it, That is not true and though this was done by some cowardly writer, who should take credit for his writings today, I hold Dr paul accountable for allowing the use of his name. On the other hand I have yet to see any example of the slightest racial incling from Dr. Paul who has delivered minority babies at no cost to the parents,who couldn't afford it. In addition I have seen no other candidate vow to release non violent drug offenders from prisons who have hurt no one but themselves and of course whose population in jails dwarfs white prisoners. For this alone the Minority communities should embrace him and assist him in defeating this so called war on drugs. Although many may disagree with me prohibitions do not work and so many are now addicted to legal drugs and walking our streets alcohol, valium, vicodin, oxycontin, silvia and the list goes on; even drinking Scope and snorting sure in Walmarts has been recorded. So the war on drugs is a failure and benefits only lawyers, judges, prisons and those who make money in the system while destroying families. I embrace Dr Pauls message and see no racism in the man whatsoever. I see plenty of bad and scary attributes from all of the other candidates and not a single one of them address the real issues coming up. The 70 trillion in future obligations for the baby boomers, the coming depression and the economic failure of this nation. Besides all you hear is how the Islamo facsist want to kill all that are not like them; so can some one tell me why they are not bombing the chinese or the Russians; they are not muslim. No it is because of our foreign policy and always was.
Good luck Dr. Paul, you are still the only one who cares about Americans much more than you care for yourself. God bless
PS I hate NPR, you bunch of socialists!

Sent by Ray | 10:05 PM ET | 01-11-2008

seems like most of the people here back up ron paul. something is wrong with voting machines :[

Sent by luis | 10:10 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I just watched Noam Chomsky's movie the other night very interesting watch it if you haven't. The point I want to make is that he sights the extreme bias that NPR can have and gives many examples.

It is sad what passes for journalism these days, it's like what bushco did with the war, just keep telling the lie over and over and eventually people start to believe it. However anybody who has studies the facts of the war has no doubts about all the lies that were told. The same is true of Dr Paul This man has more information and writing available to the public (and the press) than any other candidate so it is easy to see the lies with a minimum of research. What has been attributed to him is simply incongruent with the body of his work. It would be like saying bush was against the war.

Paul T

Sent by Paul T | 10:16 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I decided to do some research on my own about this, as it seemed unthinkable that an accomplished public figure could have escaped scrutiny in this situation. I went to his campaign website. I quickly forgot what had led me there. My attention was captured by some of his writings, some of which I found disturbing. One in particular surprised me, accusing the "elitist, secular Left" of conspiring to kill Christmas. It did not smack of measured reasoning. While not outrageous, they are a worry, perhaps because they are on his website at all, and indicate that he feels no need to be more selective. If this is, in his opinion, his best stuff, putting his best face forward for a presidential bid, what is he least proud of? There are other documents that I found odd, but this was the most recent and therefor at the top of the page. I will be educating myself about all the candidates, but he has moved to the top of my list.

Sent by Dee | 10:17 PM ET | 01-11-2008

You are wasting our time with the BS. Dr. Paul treats all people the same.

Sent by steven orrange | 10:45 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I don't believe that I'm on "The Fringe". I've been a conservative Republican for over 30 years and never once made a racist remark. My lovely wife, the best woman I've ever had the opportunity to meet, is mulatto. I believe racism to be one of the despicable things a human can be. I also give my support to Ron Paul and will continue to do so because he is alone in Washington DC representing me and all Americans, regardless of their beliefs. He, almost alone, is championing the idea that our Government was created to protect the Rights of the people, period! Read the Preamble to the Constitution, it says right there what job the Government was created to do. Can you name any other elected official in DC that is doing that job? So, I will continue to support Ron Paul until the last vote is counted (and I do hope the votes are counted). I also have seen the error of my ways and will make attonement. At the end of this election cycle, I will then give up 30 years of being a true-blue Republican and switch allegiance to either the Libertarian Party or the Constitution Party, because I now see that both the Repubs and Demos are the "Bought and Paid for Parties". I will never again have anything to do with them again and will give my time and money to supporting those running for election who are true to the Constitution of this great Republic.

Sent by Steven J. Grycel | 10:47 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Newsletter with his name on it that he didn't run or edit? Why does that sound familliar? Oh yeah, the blimp and the moneybombs. Ron Paul is not a racist.

Sent by Leanne | 10:58 PM ET | 01-11-2008

how is it that you folks at npr receive our federal tax dollars, MY federal tax dollars, yet right here you state "All comments will be read, but not all will be posted." So...you reserve the right to censor my views based solely upon whether or not you deem them to be politically correct? That's disgusting.

Why don't you also run a story about why FOX news didn't allow Dr. Paul to appear in last Sunday's forum? Why don't you give Dr. Paul one ounce of at least neutral publicity? Why was it that - the night of the Iowa Caucus - Robert Siegel & Co. only mentioned Dr. Paul in derisive sneers?

Oh wait...yeah, the Constitution (if properly followed with Ron Paul at the helm) would never allow for the US Congress to appropriate US taxpayer funds for NPR...you'd all be out of work...how convenient that you attempt to smear him!

Sent by Steve | 10:59 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I have been a libertarian all my voting life (15 years) and we do not believe in any sort of violence; except of course, self defense. We do not adhere to any sort of violence. Our heart beats to the tune of the constitution and individual liberties. The main point being that we DO NOT BELIEVE IN HARMING OTHERS, and if someone harms any other person, that person will pay a just punishment. That is the true Libertarian belief. Just so everyone understands? Live and Let Live.

Sent by Kirk Roberts | 11:13 PM ET | 01-11-2008

"All comments will be read, bit not all will be posted." It appears to me that NPR is posting a wide range of comments and opinions on this. I'm sure the comment above is so they can avoid posting comments with obsene language.

In regards to the comments about tax dollars, well, they're MY tax dollars as well and I like having them spent on NPR.

Sent by don | 11:32 PM ET | 01-11-2008

I'm Jewish, I support Ron Paul, and I find these remarks very disturbing. I back him anyway, because when you get down to it, there is really no question what he will do once elected. No powerful corporate interests are bankrolling his campaign, and he has no history of voting any other way than for limited government and individual freedom, all within the confines of the Constitution. I don't really believe he is an anti-Semite or any other type of racist, but even if he does hold those disgusting beliefs, he has the credibility of 20 years'-worth of good work in Congress. He still gets my vote.

Sent by Mason | 11:41 PM ET | 01-11-2008

Yawn....snore....

Sent by Winston Parsons | 11:41 PM ET | 01-11-2008

NPR:
I was disappointed that you never mentioned Ron Paul, ever.
Like every media outlet, it seemed your goal was to treat him like he didn't exist.
Regardless of where you want to pin blame, we all know these are not his opinions. They have not ever been reflected in his words, actions, or behavior.
He has, however, presented brilliant ideas in regards to our country, and cured the apathy of hundreds of thousands of people, remarkably, mostly young people.
The fact that you never found THAT noteworthy, is shameful.
I don't feel betrayed by Ron Paul, I feel betrayed by what I thought was a trustworthy, unbiased, news source. You are not. I will no longer be donating or tuning in, back to AM 1080 for me.

Sent by meg | 11:55 PM ET | 01-11-2008

NPR, I have been a listener for about as long as I can remember. I feel like I grew up with you. I have been a consistent contributor during pledge drives for years. No more! Your coverage of Ron Paul has been FOX Newslike. Unfortunately, I now consider you part of the mainstream media.
So long,
James Austin
Flagstaff, AZ

Sent by James Austin | 12:13 AM ET | 01-12-2008

How can anyone run for President of the United States and not mention the overwhelming power of the Israeli-First, Jewish extremists in American politics and media. Everyone in Washington, D.C. and in practically the entire world knows that the political fundraising process, Presidential policy and Congressional process is firmly under the control of the Zionists who are using the United States as its worldwide hitman, a role that is doing us irreparable harm. Jewish extremists are the political fundraisers and power brokers and they also dominate the mass media, the single greatest influence in politics.

Sent by bob D | 12:16 AM ET | 01-12-2008

The ironic thing is that if Ron Paul really were a racist, he'd be way more popular. Appealing to the white communities latent and overt racism has always worked for Republicans, in the 1988 George H.W. Bush's campaign WON on racist campaigning. Segregationist Strom Thurmond only recently left the Senate, voted in endlessly by the whites of North Carolina. Segregationist nostaligist Trent Lott is still in the Senate, thanks to the crackers in Mississippi.

Racism sells in most Republican fiefdom's. What does NOT sell to the republican base is a promise to free and pardon and restore voting rights to millions of African-Americans convicted of peaceful drug offenses. That is truly the greatest thing to restore families in the African-American community that any man or President could do for the black culture and race in the USA.

For the factual record however, Ron Paul has never been accused of saying a racist remark to anyone in his 20 years in Congress. There are no witnesses anywhere who have ever heard Ron Paul utter a remark that was racist in any way. He has never said a racist word in the Congressional Record nor has anyone ever recorded a racist remark from Dr. Paul.

No one in the Black Caucus in Congress has ever heard Ron Paul utter a racist remark.

No black person has ever made the claim Dr. Paul was ever unkind or racist in any way, and this man has led a very public life from 1974 to 2008, 31 years!

If you have watched Dr. Paul, you know he has never adhered to any racist beliefs, actions, words or statements, and no one has ever heard him utter anything like a racist remark.

After 31 years, if no one can say they heard it, or videotaped it, or were victim of it, then it doesn't exist. The "racist" label cannot apply.

Not only is Dr. Paul no racist, but quite the contrary, he is truly the presidential candidate that cares most deeply about African-Americans, moreso than any other candidate, without question.

Currently there are 600,000 African-Americans in US jails and prisons for crimes under the draconian drug laws, laws that Dr. Paul has always opposed, voted against and condemns today in his Presidential bid. Dr. Paul is well aware in his television speeches that African-Americans are being punished and targeted in the federal drug war.

Dr. Paul would pardon all non-violent drug offenders, release them from prison, restore their voting rights, and stop jailing any further African-Americans for their lifestyle. Over an 8 year Presidency, Ron Paul would save up to 4 million African-Americans from the awful fate that awaits hundreds of thousands of African-Americans each year!

Consider not just four million black men and women spared excruciating jail sentences for their non-violent association with drugs, but their family members, an additional 15 ??? 20 million African-Americans, would not have their families torn asunder by these pernicious and unconstitutional drug laws that act as a toxic combination of the Jim Crow laws of the old south melded with the Inquisition and the witch-burnings.

Ron Paul will keep black families together by ending Prohibition and the federal war on drugs. Ron Paul as President will liberate and emancipate more African-Americans than even Lincoln did in 1863, in a way that Barack Obama, Hilary Clinton, John McCain, and all the others cannot and will not.

Sent by Marc Scott Emery | 12:18 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I use to listen and watch Fox programing, that was my morning drive time and television viewing. Now I prefer NPR and PBS. Perhaps that should change also. Advertising dollars are important, donations are important, but is federal funding worth giving a boot steep behind Fox news? Please do not make me a breif visitor to your programing. Let the people choose where they put their vote and what type of media they want with their own money. Kinda of a scary concept, but in a free society it can work. Choice can help with your work, we have paid our tax dollars and made donations. So get to work or I will leave.

Sent by Paul Dakota | 12:45 AM ET | 01-12-2008

This blogger? Here's his story. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p hp?storyId=9920267 A born and raised Canadian trying to mix himself up in American Politics

Sent by Valeria | 12:48 AM ET | 01-12-2008

NPR,
Judicial Watch recently published a top 10 list of the most corrupt politicians in 2007. I think you'll find more than flimsy associations if you pursue those story lines. I am surprised that this decade old accusation that Ron Paul immediately addressed when it was brought to his attention would even constitue news at NPR. My wife and I make annual donations to our local idea station in Richmond VA. I need to reexamine what constitutes the definition of a worthy non profit organization before I take out my check book.

Sent by David | 12:56 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Frankly, if given the choice between a candidate who used to be a little liberal with the free speech issue or a bunch of elitist warmongers, it's still Ron Paul by a mile.

Sent by DRUMS of WAR | 1:04 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I've been a faithful listener to NPR, and I had to recheck the website title when someone mentioned your name.

What kind of idiot are you letting write your articles? Let's see some evidence! Give us some quotations of Paul being racist. It's funny that the only citation you gave was of Paul taking responsibility for not being watchful enough.

I've consistently looked to NPR radio for great coverage and good analysis, but this is ridiculous. Let's see some proof instead of some bozo's ranting.

Sent by Matthias | 1:08 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I'll take Dr. Paul's record over NPR's any day of the week. Puhleeez, 10 year old story, and no mention of Dr. Paul's voting record. Maybe you should go with the byline Balanced and Fair, I don't think it taken yet.

Sent by James Nolan | 1:26 AM ET | 01-12-2008

It is sad that this controversy, and not the important ideas regarding the war, the economy, and civil liberties that Dr. Paul has brought to the table are the current subject of discussion. These newsletters are regrettable, small-minded expressions of opinions Ron has to my knowledge never endorsed. He was wrong to have let them be published,doubly so because several of the statements in question are diametrically opposed to what Ron has said for years, which is that we all should be treated as individuals under the law, not as groups, and that individual rights are paramount in a free society.

But think of how far we have come in this country in just a few short years in terms of race relations, the number of minorities entering the professions, politics, the economic rise of the black middle class, etc.

It wasn't too long ago that such bigoted bluster passed for reasoned discourse, to say nothing of policy (see FDR's internment of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps, or Truman's military segregation.)

Fifteen years ago, the kinds of inaccurate statements found in some of the newsletters would be considered in many circles to be just so much "bar talk," today this kind of statement is considered horribly, viciously racist.

Yet Dr. Paul took responsibility for the newsletters, and repudiated those words, and that kind of thinking a long time ago.

I daresay, none of us are angels, but many of us could learn from Ron Paul.

Sent by Vince Daliessio | 1:37 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Wow, now the only thing I fear more than our government is Paul supporters. Talk about tin hats!

Sent by Kerry | 1:44 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Dr. Ron Paul is the TRUTH and FAIR !! Also the unfairly treated Black,s only Hope!!! He wants too get drug laws repealed so all can get out of jail for non violent crimes NOBODY else but DR PAUL cares SO YOU decide ??? And he is not a CFR member nor pro CFR!! So line up for your microchip if you don,t vote DR.Paul He defends FREEDOM!!! Our next true VOICE in Office GO RON GO

Sent by Butch | 1:46 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Sadly,even if these accusations are true,he is still the best candidate for President.A vote for any other candidate ,with the exception of Dennis Kucinich and perhaps John Edwards,is a vote for more of the same."plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose"

Sent by B.McManus | 1:58 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Who is your keeper? Why do you report like this...like Fox News Neo-Cons. Let's stick to the ISSUES. Why don't you report regarding the election fraud in New Hampshire? Oh, maybe because that sort of thing is old news. Ron Paul 08!

Sent by truthdseeds | 2:01 AM ET | 01-12-2008

So let me get this straight. Ron Paul is a man who preaches racism and homophobia yet for some odd reason his politics and political positions do not reflect his ideology? Is that right? So when he states that he is not against gay marriages because he believes in individual should have the freedom to marry who they want to, where exactly does the homophobia come in? I'm confused. Can one of you Neo-Con shills help me out?

Sent by Mark S. Gonney | 2:34 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I have been an avid listener to NPR for many, many years???.actually since the desert storm farce???exclusively, but throughout this entire 2008 election coverage you have lost me. Regrettably I have witnessed your predisposition for less than a handful of presidential candidates???the rest, either getting mere lip service or nothing at all.

Then???on top of that - you have totally dropped any objective coverage of the war in Iraq and attempting to convince us daily that ???the surge??? has worked???yeah right! Oh???I forgot ???polls show that the economy is the ???top concern???.

The facts are that NPR???s top stories spotlight on the same plastic packaged establishment bunch that big corporate media like Fox, ABC and CNN have attempted desperately to force down our throats. Oh???shucks, I slipped once again ??? these are the ???front runners??????oh yes, ???the top tier candidates??? ??? how could I have been so remiss and think for myself without your help? Of course we know what you say is accurate because of the ???scientific political polling??? you give us.

NPR please listen carefully ???

HILLARY CLINTON and JOHN McCAIN are not candidates for CHANGE!!

They are the worst examples of the entrenched morass called Washington DC.

Hear us ???We want change ??? real change and the candidates who actually offer that ??? like a Ron Paul and others you haven???t given time of day. I am really outraged when I have hardly heard Ron Paul???s name on NPR let alone given any fair coverage of his campaign, his philosophy and accomplishments ???and then yellow-press only?

This politically motivated smear attempt on Ron Paul by media is just the last straw for me. Keep your melodramatic teary eyed candidate, keep your Mr. 100 year Iraq ??? keep your opinions, keep your polls???I???m checking out.

Don???t expect anymore funding coming from me and the next sound you hear is me turning my radio off??????CLICK????????????????????????????????????!!!

Sent by TAO | 2:51 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Researching Congressman Paul these past few months, it just seems that his inborn character is that of a person who sees the good in everyone, therefore, trusts everyone. He did mention in an interview that at the time the newletters came out he was just to busy to edit every single article, after all putting out the newsletter was a side interest not his profession. I applaud Dr. Paul for his integrity and courage to apologize and take responsibility for the articles.
Now, lets move on and get him elected as the next President of the United States!

Sent by Linda Takano | 3:09 AM ET | 01-12-2008

If we're to believe our upstanding media outlets, then surely Ron Paul is the most racist Republican candidate running in this election--that much is clear. My one question...where were media darlings (and ostensible racial freedom-fighters) Giuliani, McCain, Romney, and Thompson the night of Sept 27, 2007? I can assure you that they were not in attendance at the All-American Presidential Forum that was held at Morgan State University. Had they attended this debate that was geared towards a black & brown audience, they might've heard a white man, Ron Paul, share his ideas on how we might achieve liberty, freedom & respect for ALL citizens of this nation.

Shame on you NPR!

Sent by Thomas Braun | 4:47 AM ET | 01-12-2008

It breaks my heart to see Dr. Paul go through this abuse, but he is the first really moral Republican I have seen run for the party nomination in my lifetime. I will do whatever I can within my humble ability to help.

Sent by Dave | 4:51 AM ET | 01-12-2008

This is a world that slanders truth for a living--the elite do this for no other reason than to plunder the wealth of the masses for themselves..it is their manifest destiny. Can indiscretion be found in Ron Paul for failing to edit a newsletter that others published in his name? Was Martin Luther King Jr unlawful in his acts of civil disobedience? Was it blasphemous for Jesus to counter the Sanhedrin? The authors of the affirming answers to all of these questions are all the same. Am I suggesting that Ron Paul is comparable to leaders such as MLK or Jesus(?)--only to the extent that his pursuit of truth drove the deceivers of this world to action.

Sent by Thomas Braun | 5:02 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I would believe these accusations if people were coming out of the woodwork to back up those claims.

So far there is not a one.

Ron Paul remains the only candidate on either side whose policy on the War on Drugs is in fact anti-racist as that misguide policy systematically goes after blacks.

Sent by Jason | 5:17 AM ET | 01-12-2008

yet another attempt to discredit Dr. Paul.... If we were in the business of bringing up dirt on everyone ALL of the other candidates have a much deeper suitcase of problems, corruption and mistakes.... this is just another ploy of our "IN DIRE NEED OF REPLACING" media, to eliminate RON PAUL.... this did nothing but bring his supporters closer together... and raise awarness for future media attacks during the campaign trail..... AMERICA NEEDS AN OVERHAUL & RON PAUL is just the mechanic we need!......

Sent by shane | 5:20 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Is this what NPR focuses on regarding Ron Paul? How about his message of freedom, peace and prosperity backed by his unequaled record of congressional voting consistency?
NPR, you're pathetic !!!

Sent by JG | 6:25 AM ET | 01-12-2008

"America cannot tolerate, must not tolerate a President that would stop the war on drugs."

The War on Drugs is just yet another shining example of exactly the sort of expensive failed government policy that Ron Paul would eliminate.

When I watch the other candidates speak, I see their lips moving, but nothing that comes out of their mouth makes sense. Ron Paul is the only logical choice.

The media is obviously censoring Dr. Paul. Thank God for the internet.

Sent by independant in MN | 7:23 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Ron Paul is a race-baiiting bigot. We all knew that. He's an ultra-conservative Republican.

Sent by Mark Freeley | 7:30 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Racism, sexism, and all other forms of groupism. Ron Paul is against them all. Do your homework - and read the dang Constitution. That's what this revolution is all about.

I made it easy for you:

http://www.geocities.com/johnfkosanke/USConstitutionBasic.html

Sent by John Kosanke | 7:51 AM ET | 01-12-2008

The Neo con's (E.G: The New Republic) strategy is to trash honest people so that voters focus on their victims and not on them. Why did Fox News not invite RP to their debate the day just before the debate? Why did the New Republic waited to publish this article the day of the primaries in New Hampshire? When they fear any candidate might have a chase to win or to have a message they think is dangerous, they trash them. They did this with Mc Cain on the elections of 2000, accusing him of not caring for the POW, yet this guy was a prisoner of war for 5 years and had a broken back. Again with Kerry and the swift boats. At least Kerry was in Vietnam in battle and Bush a chicken hawk that had volunteered in the national reserve so sporadically that his commander didn???t even remember seeing Bush. And now Ron Paul, whose voting record speaks by itself, voted against the Patriot Act, against the Iraq war, against any unbalanced budget, civil rights champion, etc is being trashed by them. Their motus operandi is throw us much mud as you can that some will stick.
And yet we don???t seem to learn from these old tricks. I find it very bizarre that just when Bush is visiting Israel and the day before the elections in New Hampshire all of a sudden the Iranians are attacking us. Now the commander of the boat says he???s not sure the threat came from the Iranians in the radio.
America wake up, the only way to stop these coward neo cons is not falling for their tricks. When will we learn?

Sent by Lucia Schmitz | 8:11 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I've got it! There is no doubt in my military mind: Ron Paul can't disclose the guy 's identity who really wrote the newsletters, 'cuz they were under heavy enemy fire in 'Nam see and they did the bayonet slice on the palm blood brothers vow so even though it means the Presidency he can't betray his friend because he's so moral and loyal, see...

Sent by bobbyusbombs | 8:43 AM ET | 01-12-2008

You know you've got a great candidate when the best his detractors can come up with is quotes from a fifteen year old newsletter taken out of context and written by someone else.

Ron Paul's entire platform is a constitutional federal government and everyone here knows it. To pretend that Ron Paul is a racist is absurd. If you no longer want to have a Constitution -- if you would rather that federal politicians make up laws as they go along -- be forthright enough to admit it. Trying to associate constitutionalism with racism is pathetic.

Sent by Zephram Stark | 8:52 AM ET | 01-12-2008

That is my point exactly- that the media has been either silent or insulting on Ron Paul, now...he is in the media. The Washington Post (and others) may be going too far. (see the letter in the Post January 12, 2008 section "Free for All)")

As a little background- I am not a teanager, a conspiracy theorist, nor a "web nut." I am a 55 year old veteran, an employed taxpayer, and a family oriented person with children and grandchildren. My sons have never been arrested, much less for killing a dog or carrying a weapon on a commercial aircraft. My family has not been clouded with rumors of multiple indescretions. I have not had to promote a fund for "legal defense". I do not spend money that I do not have. I plan and manage debts that I must endure, for example to buy a home.

Neither, to my knowledge has Dr. Paul. My point was that the media has ignored his accomplishments and selected dubious soundbites to cast discredit on his positions. I ENCOURAGE everyone to read Dr. Paul original words. His statement on September 12, 2001 and his statement on Racism in 2002.

The reason I want to talk to people in Texas, is that they are more familiar with his long, steadfast record. The voters have reaffirmed their support by keeping him in office. Their meet-ups have thousands of members. I also watch a meetup in South Dakota, because they are in the "heartland".

I read the international news. In Great Britain, there seems a reoccurring theme that Dr. Paul cannot even get his news in the paper or out in front of the people

While I live near DC and the Pentagon, I feel in some ways that the coverage available locally is even less balanced than that of other parts of the country. I encourage supporters to stay involved, and fight for fair reporting.

I feel a strong need to continue in any way I can to support Dr. Paul, his message, and the constitution. V/r Dianne

Sent by Dianne | 9:16 AM ET | 01-12-2008

looks like national id cards are on the way, its stalled in congress, head of homeland security says its what americans want, and said only terrorist and other crooks would be the ones who would oppose this.. lmao let me ask , does this man speak for YOU.. time to wake up and see whats going on , I think america is in the wrong hands, time for all ( TRUE AMERICAN PATIOTS TO STAND UP AND TAKE ( YOUR ) COUNTRY BACK, WE CAN DO THIS IF WE STAND TOGETHER, GET THE WORD OUT, VOTE RON PAUL 08 )

Sent by truamerican | 9:23 AM ET | 01-12-2008

A week ago David Frum wrote a promotional piece in the National Post (Canada), later reposted at AEI's web site, promoting Mayor Guiliani and pretending that Dr. Paul doesn't exist.

Even more egregiously, on Thursday the Economist posted an article once more promoting their horse (McCain) and put up a chart of all the Republican candidates except Paul.

So while the neo-cons and heavy right wing is trying to ignore him, the core establishment left-wing and American liberal press is trying to smear him.

I smell two different kinds of fear. Fascinating.

Sent by John M | 9:57 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I have to admit I'm surprised to hear about these newsletters and was really hoping that something like this wouldn't come up in connection with him BUT it's going to take a hell of a lot more than some news story to change my opinion of him. As RP says: it just doesn't sound like him! Period.

Sent by Don | 9:58 AM ET | 01-12-2008

with all the Paul supporters adamantly stating that Paul did not write those newsletters I'd like to ask a few questions: 1) how do you know he didn't? just because he says he didn't means nothing, you do know that people can lie, don't you? 2) who did? 3) why would anyone write a newsletter in Paul's name that wasn't sanctioned by him? 4) if it WAS sanctioned by Paul, why didn't he keep those words out of it? if he's this irresponsible with a simply newsletter, how would he ever be a responsible president?

Sent by Nate | 10:09 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Wow...I believe Reagan was called a racist at one time. The reason twenty year old newsletters are so important is because they potray Ron Paul as being racist and he has a clean record. These people have been writting these stories since the beginning of the campaign. Why? Because Ron Paul's message if heard would carry him to the White House. The media and sitting government doesn't want that.

Sent by Bob | 10:20 AM ET | 01-12-2008

These open a box where we, young savvy Americans will do the investigative job of digging into Mitt, McCain and Huckabee past.
This is going to get very interesting, pulling out Mistress, unethical business dealing as well as kick backs transactions not to mention racism comments as well.

Be prepare the fun is just starting, they want to play dirty then the young well educated college students which support Ron Paul will be a force to reckon with.

Sent by roger | 10:24 AM ET | 01-12-2008

The sad truth is people will believe whatever they want...that is why we have today's media, to wrap it up in the flavor u want to believe...tabloid journalism for those that need it. The graet thing about America, is that when the economy goes to the dumps...we will still choose a politician for president instead of someone that speaks the truth. Everytime a good man speaks truth to power, you have a poliical machine to bring him down. Sad but rue....seeing is believing...I doubt Ron Paul ever said those things...and I'm sure fringe groups have indeed become part of his supporters (a little minority at that), but the real issue is the fact that ron paul sppeks truth to us, and most of us don' want to listen. We want the cake, and eat it too...sad days for america approaching if we don't think, before we act.

who do I like so far? Edwrds, Ron Paul, obama....I've never voted, or supported any of the clowns calling demselves my representatives, but this year...I see america belonging to oher people (a little minority at that),that considers us "Consumers" and not "CITIZENS"...so there's my 2 cents, which is the worth of the dolla today...now go shopping folks!

Sent by Rocky Nunez | 10:25 AM ET | 01-12-2008

NPR has been a source of news for me for a long time and I was very distressed to see this piece on Ron Paul. Why not focus on the issues before us now and inform you listeners about his positions?? All of the candidates have made mistakes but not all of them own up to them. Why is the media so hostile towards Ron Paul? This I can't figure out and I can't believe that NPR would participate in the smearing of this man who as far as I can see is the most honest and open of all the candidates.

Sent by Emily | 10:32 AM ET | 01-12-2008

John McCain was racist in the SC debate, read it here:
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1084.html
Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that "there's not a dime's worth of difference between" Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, banning books like "America Deceived' from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason.
Support Dr. Ron Paul and save this great nation.
Last link (before Google Books bends to gov't Will and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

Sent by Mike W | 10:39 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Freedom starts with being able to speek your mind. The fact that Ron Paul's newsletter offered an outlet for some ratical viewpoints is good. I would much rather people put their beliefs out there to be challenged and tested, rather than censor every thought and word in fear of reprisal. Sure, the comments were hateful but so were the LA riots.. People have to be able to express anger and dissappointment, put it out there and allow the light of reason to illuminate the truth. Courage people!!

Sent by DD | 10:45 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Fringe Republicans hardly describe the draw of Ron Paul. Dr. Paul goes beyond
the left right paradigm , why else would
Kucinich want him as running mate.

Sent by Roger | 10:45 AM ET | 01-12-2008

how friggin' boring.
and how friggin' predictable.
how did i know months ago - that as soon as Ron Paul showed any signs of traction in this presidential race - he would suddenly become responsible for every offense ever given to the Blacks and the Jews ? however - the good news is - very few people are taking this meaningless trash seriously this time. now if we can just figure out a way to get the votes which have been cast for Ron Paul to be actually *counted* and actually *reported* (unlike what just took place in new hampshire - search you-tube for "Alex Jones Bev Harris") we might just end up with a president who is actually good for the *people* of this country - including every honest decent hardworking person - regardless of skin color or religion. isn't that what this country is supposed to be about ?
charles ranalli
albuquerque
"not-a-bigot"

Sent by charles ranalli | 10:48 AM ET | 01-12-2008

This kind of bias is not what I have been paying for. Donations that used to go to NPR will now go to Ron Paul.

Sent by Randall Johnson | 10:51 AM ET | 01-12-2008

For all of you people out there who wish to believe that Ron Paul is a racist go ahead and believe. Your belief doesn't make it true or factual in any way. For the people who are actually looking for facts, look them up. Ron Paul is the most transparent politician in Washington. His complete voting record is available on-line, and once you read it it will be clear that he votes for the freedom and liberty of all people.

Sent by Brad Smith | 10:57 AM ET | 01-12-2008

First issue... is he a racist? I don't think so. He has denouced what has been said in the questionable newsletters and there's no other evidence to support the claim.

Second issue... should he have paid more attention to what was being said in his name 15 years ago? Most definitely yes. And he has taken responsibility for this.

Does this mean we should discount all his ideas and say he doesn't deserve to be president? I think not.

What other candidate wants to take on the drug laws that are so unfair to minorities.

He's said if was president he'd pardon all nonviolent persons put in prison for drugs.

I think that speaks volumes about this issue.

Sent by Jed | 11:05 AM ET | 01-12-2008

After reading all of Ron Paul's newsletters posted in TNR, I feel certain Dr. Paul had written many if not all of them. It contains his sharp rhetoric rabid Ronulans cherish as well as personal references like "in my OBGYN practice..." and other tell-tale slips that clearly points to Dr. Paul as the sole author of these letters. For Dr. Paul to deny authorship let alone raise the absurd notion he was not aware of these newsletters is insulting to the general public.

This is the same Dr. Paul who champions personal liberty, individual rights, and personal responsibility. Dr. Paul would not be dumb enough, careless enough, and thoughtless enough to let anyone write anything under his aegis without his knowledge. In the least, as Tucker Carlson stated, it???s extremely negligent and that alone should raise red flags and alarm bells that there is something extremely aberrant with him and now his campaign.

I believe that Dr. Paul???s movement toward liberty, fidelity to the Constitution, and his philosophy of fiscal responsibility will go on and transcend him, even going as far as saying a future President will have been inspired by Dr. Paul, and it is good that his movement go on, but Dr. Paul's presidential bid is essentially toast.

Dr. Paul's speaks of motivation for terrorists to do what they do, I believe we have now glimpsed Dr. Paul's private motivation to some of his personal crusade and much of it is fueled by anger, if not by hatred.

Sent by Jae | 11:11 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I must say that NPR has disappointed me. Silly me. I listened to the reports of the primary results anticipating a fair and balanced coverage. What I am getting is the same crap I get from the other news organizations. Then I heard the station breahttp://www.npr.org/blogs/news/2008/01/ron_paul_newsletters_become_ca.htmlk and was brought back to reality. Commercials. Commercials for companies that will NOT be helped by Ron Paul.

So much for unbiased reporting. Change your moniker to reflect your sponsors. NFR, National "Fox" Radio.

Shame on you all.

Sent by Chris Watson | 11:21 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I don't think he is at all that he is rastist. He has shown time and time again for the past 30 years in politcs that his voting record has never limited the rights of minority groups. His policy is more concerned with constitutional facts and not limiting the freedom and liberty of the "individual." It is unfortunate that people judge before they do thier homework, and before long people call it truth. If you want to find out something about someone, get the records strait. This news is old hat and has already been hashed over several time indicated the same results. Ron Paul is not rasict and he is the only one fit to be president.

Sent by cory | 11:22 AM ET | 01-12-2008

I am a big supporter of you NPR, but this article makes me very sad. You're supposed to be the most unbiased thing out there due to the fact that you're run on donations and member ships of your listeners. I guess that's not the case anymore.

And for those that are swayed by these ridiculous accusations let me tell you this: I have been listening to Ron Paul for a really long time, and have never heard him say such hurtful things. As he explained the letters printed under his name were between when he was in office. I don't know about any of you, but I think running a clinic is probably a more than full-time job and when you trust people to write under your name you don't think they'll write anything like this. He didn't read those newsletters every tie they came out, would you? And for those who say he needs to talk responsibility, he did, 15 years ago! When he was informed of the letters he took moral responsibility for not paying closer attention for what was being written under his name.
Don't be so quick to judge people because of some bad press, there's probably a good reason for it. For instance, TNR did have an article out that compared Ross Perot to Adolf Hitler, and this Ron Paul article did come out the day of the primaries. Seems like TNR is running they're own personal agenda.

Sent by Becky | 11:32 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Apparently this is the only dirt they can find to smear Ron Paul... Pa...lease! He said he didn't write them he has never used such language and this is a closed case! It's old and irrelevant news...

Sent by Tone | 11:36 AM ET | 01-12-2008

And what about the racist, homophobic, extremely sexist institution that Mitt Romney is a member of... the Mormon Church?

If we're going to dig up dirt, let's dig up everybody's.

Sent by An American | 11:44 AM ET | 01-12-2008

Actually...to be fair, you should invite a gay Ron Paul supporter on your show. I found this interesting little gem while looking for information on James Kirchick...http://gays-for-ron.blogspot.com/2008/01/jamie-kirchick-i-dont-think-ron-paul-is.html

Sent by D. Stewart | 11:44 AM ET | 01-12-2008

What's interesting is not the story itself, but to watch the media, working as one, pushing a 15-year-old story that's been readily available to them for years, as "breaking news."

When our information sources are ultimately controlled by five mega-corporations, they can whip up a story out of thin air and tell us exactly how we feel about any given candidate. Just think if this piece was about the fact that Giuliani is considered a fraud and a coward by NY firemen? You people would automatically be up in arms about that, wouldn't you? What if the corporations decided to whip up a story about Hillary's extremely shady past with Bill (complete with body count)? Gee, then you people would be outraged about that. How about Marge Shoedinger? She actually filed charges against GW Bush and accused him of rape and brutality, and then she "committed suicide". Let the corporations break that story ...

You see, when our information sources are bought and sold, a few people can calmly decide what you'll spend your time and energy on. They can withhold terrible truths, and they can turn trivialities into grand melodramas--as you see here.

So they've handed you 15-year-old photo copies, and now you lab rats can get outraged on cue, and respond according to the program, and only think about what you're instructed to think about.

Meanwhile of course, the overtly racist war on drugs is a legalized form of genocide, and Paul is the only viable candidate who will speak out against it. The war on terror promises to destroy our economic freedom as American citizens, as well as rob of us our civil liberties, and Paul is the only candidate who will speak out honestly on that issue too.

Paul supporters: Don't get sidetracked by this crap. Use it to illustrate the appalling propaganda machine we've got for a free press, and use it to illustrate the fact that the other candidates, even Obama, are proposing to keep locking up blacks by the hundred-thousand for victimless crimes--while the CIA ushers the drugs into the country.

Sent by HR PAINE | 12:05 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Not excusing his negligence here. I do not believe he wrote that but I do believe he bears responsibility for allowing it to be published.

However, we can't accuse Paul of being a racist without also discussing the racist comments by McCain and Thompson at the SC debate. McCain's "burkas" comment reminded my of his hating "gooks" comment in 2000. Thompsons "virgins" comment was extremely offensive to Muslims and all of us.

They simply do not deserve a pass here.

At least Ron Paul has never SAID anything like McCain and Thompson said the other night.

Sent by letma | 12:10 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I have been listening to NPR for as long as I can remember. Since most people have no idea who Ron Paul is and what he stands for will read this article and come away with a false impression. Anyone that has seen an interview and that has taken the time to educate themselves on his platform find these claims of Ron Paul as a ugly smear campaign. I guess it is only natural for the folks at NPR pile on the establishment dog pile. I think it would be only fair to ask Ron Paul to speak on NPR not only to explain himself, but to explain that the accusations are ludicrous based on his platform.

Sent by Tim | 12:22 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I would give Ron Paul the benefit of the
doubt and I am not a Paul supporter. It sounds like a smear campaign. Have you noticed all the other candidates are also getting attacked also. They really do not have to much to smear on Mr. Paul, so they have to run with this racist newsletter. Ron Paul is a THREAT to the government DUH!!!! Let's be fair
here. Let's hear about Hillary racist
comments, the "N" word (their all over the internet) and John McCain calling the vietnamese "GOOKS." The asian population was pretty
pissed at WARPIG MC CAIN until he had to apologize. SO LET'S HEAR THESE STORIES.
I give RON PAUL a pass on this one cause
I don't believe it. No one trusts the media except the sheep.

Sent by Tara | 4:31 PM ET | 01-12-2008

So many "feelings" by Paul-ites, but so few useful "facts." As an outsider who doesn't really care, and has been mildly amused by Dr. Paul's entertaining candidacy, here's the only conclusion I can see from the evidence: They are his words, published with his full knowledge and approval, and under his name. Whether he actually wrote the words himeself, or made them his words by giving them editorial authority, they are his words. If someone else wrote the words, then name the person, and disavow the person, but to try to say now that they are "not my words" is disengenuous at best, and deceiptful at worst. Ron Paul obviously approved of them at the time, or else there would be a clear paper trail of public disavowals at that time. I would want to know if Paul's speeches or other writings from that time contradict those views, or affirm them. I will accept that he has changed his views since that time, but it is past credulity to ask me to believe that he somehow did not endorse the racist and prejudiced views published under his name in the past. He should be honest about them and accept the consequences.

Sent by Christian M. | 4:49 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Of the field of candidates, I have chosen Ron Paul and will not filp flop on my decision. But it is good to know that the bad guys have to dig back ten years to find some dirt on him, given that with the rest of the candidates you need not look past ten days. My stance is solid. Even if Ron Paul in the greater scheme of things happened to be personally racist, I know that he is politically Pro-Constitution. If that were the only thing going for him, versus the rest of the candidates he would remain my first choice.

Sent by Charles S. | 5:17 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I've met racist Republicans, and racist Democrats, but I have never met a racist Libertarian or found anyone who had a libertarian philosophy that could even be racist. Ron Paul fights for liberty for everyone, even those that do not value it.

Sent by Ken Proctor | 5:40 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Caught in the act of being a racist!

http://athensforronpaul.com/archives/204

Sent by Michael | 5:53 PM ET | 01-12-2008

It's really surprising that it took them this long to find any dirt on Dr Ron Paul. I'm sure if they put as much effort on all the other candidates as they did to Dr Ron Paul, they would have loads from each.

Sent by Mike | 5:55 PM ET | 01-12-2008

There is a great article about whether Dr. Paul is a racist or not and I suggest everyone to read it.
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1107.html

Sent by Eric | 6:05 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Better than accuse Dr. Paul of saying these things see why these things exist...see for yourselves what the Gov says about crime...be it by race, type etc....maybe some of those statements be them "racist" or not are true none the less. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm

Sent by leslee | 6:40 PM ET | 01-12-2008

John McCain For President!

When the British soldiers were shooting at us George Washington as a Commander in Chief was always on the Battle Front, on the line of fire, bullets were flying near his head, the sound of Cannons going off and dead soldiers all over the field.
A brave man George Washington was.
John McCain on his own words tells America how he will conduct this wars.
Check it out and feel free to tell everyone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wru8NRLdFE

Sent by Roger | 7:13 PM ET | 01-12-2008

To all the Dr. Ron Paul supporters,
Congress is in need of New People with the right ideas.
Ideas that Protect and Defend Our Constitution, so lets start thinking on running for Congress (house or Senators) and start replacing the well establishment in congress.
Ron Paul supporter from all corners of this beautiful land using this powerful group force as Dr. Paul message is can united start selecting a candidate among you to run for a Senate seat with a strategy in mind to eventually replace the majority of senators which based on their vote are chipping our constitution and tramping our rights.
This is a long term strategy that it must start taking place now otherwise it we will have the same flavor we currently are having.

United, this new youth can make a different! Not just by supporting Dr. Paul but by running for a Congress seat (House or Senator).

http://forpresidentronpaul.blogspot.com/

Sent by Roger | 7:14 PM ET | 01-12-2008

NPR is owned by News Corp. Why does anyone believe trash from them?

Sent by easyness | 7:21 PM ET | 01-12-2008

If Dr. Paul did these terrible things why does he still have a lifetime membership in the Libertarian Party? You all keep this stuff up and you will have another war monger neocon for president and thousands more dead G.I.s. Stop this nonsense...

Sent by Tomas Estrada-Palma | 7:30 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Sorry, but calling Ron Paul a racist doesn't make him a racist. Where's the beef...er proof?

Sent by Steven C | 7:32 PM ET | 01-12-2008

DR. RON PAUL MONEY BOMB JAN 21st. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY. SPREAD THE WORD AND DONATE. BECOME A PRECINCT LEADER. DON'T FORGET THE BLIMP WWW.RONPAUL2008.COM

Sent by stephen | 7:38 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I am an Afro-American. I had never before heard of Ron Paul, only that he doesn't get much coverage and says different things. After reading the comments I have become very interested in him. After examining what he stands for and that he is for civil liberties for all, it is clear that he is probably the only candidate running that is Not racist.
I will now be voting for Ron Paul!

Sent by blakmira | 7:40 PM ET | 01-12-2008

The whole Ron Paul "racist" issue is nothing but bull. Dr Paul has already stated he didn't have anything to do with those articles. Dr. Paul is a libertarian, which by definition discounts racisim. Give me a break.

Sent by Steve G | 8:00 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Racism is the modern day witch hunt. It is a means to disparage any opponent because it is impossible to prove a negative. Those who will cling to this notion that Ron Paul is secretly a racist do not yet understand the game that is being played on and within our society. It is a divisive hoax.

If Ron Paul states, as he has, that he is not a racist, why is that not good enough? If he had racist beliefs, why would he not state them? Ron Paul has many unconventional and unpopular views and he has withstood plenty of criticism and scathing attacks to present his uncanny truths to the public. I believe that if he held unpopular racial views, he would likewise explain his rationale to the public. But this is not the case. If you look at Ron Paul's ideology it is very clear that it is based on very logical and a well thought out line of reasoning. His ideas of individuality and collectivism and racism as he has expressed them are perfectly sound and entirely in line with his life and conduct.

Ron Paul is not a racist, he is a hero and a man of principle. I can't say the same for most of the witch hunters in our society, some of which are the same people pointing the finger at Ron Paul. The government, the media, the schools, and institutions, and all the people in them who have supported and encouraged the idea of racial preference over merit, those who would attempt to equal the score through handouts to some groups, and those who would criminalize victim-less behaviors that penalize some groups more than others - they are the true racists.

Some people may not be ready for the message of freedom and self-responsibility. Perhaps they would rather find and drown the witch than look at what is happening in our society and government. Perhaps the people would rather bicker endlessly about divisive issues that won't matter one wit in comparison to the totalitarian system and economic collapse that will sneak in the back door.

Please don't ask Ron Paul to continue addressing this issue unless it is to restate his opinion that racism is a form of collectivism and that rights are derived from individuals. Ron Paul is entirely beyond the confused collective -conscience held by our society. He is imparting to us the most important message of all, freedom for all individuals of whatever background or skin color. Let the critics come out of the woodwork. I've noticed that Ron Paul does a pretty good job of making them all look silly and small minded.

Sent by Lee Reynolds | 8:40 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Kirchick exposed himself on Tucker Carlson's show. Google it and ask yourself if Kirchick was talking about your best friend or neighbor would he be convincing? NO! His goals are very transparent.

Sent by Jeff | 8:41 PM ET | 01-12-2008

it is the entrenched powers trying to neutralize someone who is awakening the masses - plain and simple.

Sent by John | 9:00 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I can't believe people still bring up these obscure articles.

Ron Paul is not a racist. He is the last hope for America.

Sent by Ryan | 9:36 PM ET | 01-12-2008

Kirchick is as much a true journalist, as Frank Luntz is an honest pollster.

Shame on NPR for not researching this more, or perhaps giving Ron Paul some equal coverage of all the good he has done.

NPR would never have reported this if it was one of the Democratic candidates running.

I have already informed my local NPR station I will no longer be making a yearly contribution due to their obvious slant. They are no better than FOX in my opinion now. It is sad that the only decent news I can get in the USA is the BBC.

Sorry Car Talk guys.

Sent by Ryan - Seattle, WA | 9:37 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I think it's a travesty that such a great person like Ron Paul is being veiled behind the big media curtain when the man is making literal history in the Republican party with the amount of donations from everyday people like you and me. Money talks and at this point there are a LOT of people screaming on his behalf. Whether you like him or not, Ron Paul is genuine and you can take what he says to the bank unlike the other class act politicians. I think he's the best person out there to fix the mess this country is in. I want a chance for peace and I want to feel hope again, so I'm giving my vote to Ron Paul until the very end.

Sent by Tim | 10:14 PM ET | 01-12-2008

I have heard this same story over and over and over again. Ron Paul states that his role models are Ghandi, Rosa Parks, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Why wuold someone be so inconsistent and be racist 15 years ago and not be today. You either believe in the racists garbage and want to purvey it at every opportunity or you fight it. Ron Paul has fought it every step of the way with his Libertarian philosphy that espouses individual rights over collective rights. These newsletters should never have been printed and my guess is that Ron Paul looks back at this and wish that he would have had better control over what went out under his name. And you could be extremely critical of him for this. However, the fact remains that Ron Paul could not have written these articles and further, is distressed by the information. The only thing he can do is to come out, tell the truth about them, and inform the public that he does not own the comments and that it goes against his very being.

Knowing how sensitive Ron Paul is to the feelings of others, this controversy has to be hard for him. Heck, Ron Paul's messages are often speckled about the feelings for others. "How would we (Americans) feel if they (foreigners) occupied our country" or his message to restore personal liberty to the average American who cannot purchase Washington's influence. Ironically, Ron Paul is probably the only candidate on the Republican side (Gravel and Kucinich for Dems) that really cares about the people. NPR should be ashamed for propagandizing this issue. FOX News claims to be "Fair and Balanced" and now NPR does a hit piece without representation from the Ron Paul organization.

When this country goes down the tubes because of our far reaching war machine or our FED policy of easy money, just remember that Ron Paul warned the American people. His is the only sane voice in the Republican Party and shame on NPR for not interviewing him at any time...giving significant time to all the other candidates...but attacking Ron Paul with more negative time than ever offered during a regular interview. An you at NPR have used my contributions for this type of news. You, my dear NPR, I am afraid you are part of the media problem! Why not interview Ron Paul and get his word on the information instead of just other sources. Shame on you!

Sent by libertyguy | 10:41 PM ET | 01-12-2008

NPR, I am saddened by your bias. You're no better than CNN! I guess Brittany Spears gossip will be on your main page soon, eh?

Sent by Greg | 11:44 PM ET | 01-12-2008

NPR may be reporting the "news", but I think that they are now acting like the neocon media. Shame on you NPR! I have been listening for years and if this is your shoddy journalism, I now have to rethink all the other news you have reported for it's integrity. NPR now stands for National Propoganda Radio!!

Sent by libertyguy | 12:14 AM ET | 01-13-2008

According to Angry White Man, an articulate attempt at a very cheap smear by The New Republic (Motto: Sticking it to the truth for quite some time), Dr. Ron Paul is, or at least was, a racist.

America's political tone of voice, especially concerning issues of race, religion, gender, and sexual orientation changed dramatically over the last thirty years.

If anything, Paul was writing to the libertarian mind in the parlance of the time. The libertarians of the 70's and 80's were not pursuing speech sensitivity training, but rather constitutional government. They wanted to prevent expensive illegal wars, fascism, and usury; not poor adjective selection.

The Paul we see now is the same Paul as back then. But like any reasonable man, he has evolved to meet the logical sensibilities his position has demanded of him, while avoiding the political and philosophical nonsense of today. The rhetoric is actually quite tedious and often counter-productive, encouraging silly articles like James Kirchick's recent smear.

Nothing about Dr. Ron Paul even insinuates that he has a bit of racism in his character. He has faithfully served a diverse population, and has been respectful in his rhetoric while keeping a constitutional and kind philosophy towards government and personal behavior.
First found at:
www.rorychristopher.blogspot.com

Sent by Christopher Hoops | 12:47 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Well if Ron Paul isn't elected president of this hole in the ground, I am just going to fasten my life preserver for the sinking of the U.S.S. Constitution.

See you at the bottom all you anti-Ron Paulies!!

All you middle class, have fun picking beans with the Mexicans when this bankrupt country drowns. The more you have, the more you have to lose.

Ron Paul rules and you all are fools.

Sent by Torqued | 1:26 AM ET | 01-13-2008

But does anyone actually have the man himself on video saying something racist or anti-Semitic? The answer is NO. Can you be both a civil libertarian who sees people collectively instead of what group they belong to? NO, you can't.

Sent by Jon | 1:47 AM ET | 01-13-2008

"Not only was he the only US congressman to vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but that vote was followed by dozens of racist, sexist and homophobic comments for which there is just no excuse"

Hey Shiona, Ron Paul was not in Congress in 1964 to vote for or against the Civil Rights act. He was first elected in 1976. Actually, Barry Goldwater did vote against it on state's rights or Federalism principle.

Sent by Shiona

Sent by Michael Neitzel | 1:54 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Google Hillary Racism, Obama Racism, Huckabee Racism, Guliani Racism, and on and on and on... Every candidate is attacked like this. Most people have given up reading the non-sense because most of us see through it, the rest would just prefer to wallow in mud. Go ahead google any candidate you want and I guarantee someone attacked them as a racist. No truth to it. People are cruel for their own selfish gain. I would almost bet the person holding the newsletters wrote them and waited to try to use them for blackmail. Some people have conscience, character, or integrity.

Paul lent his name to a small newsletter for a short time that he did not edit, while he was out of politics and concentrating on delivering babies. I look at it as running an unmoderated blog in the days before the internet. The writing style was not Ron Paul???s. In his newsletters since being back in Congress, he is clearly in charge and they are wonderful to read. Clearly Paul is the most vehement anti-racist, anti-sexist, pro-individual, and pro-gay rights person in Congress. He ran as a Libertarian Presidential candidate for gosh sakes. The New Republic did not even contact Ron Paul to talk to him about their story and they did not seem to know that it had been discussed ad nauseum several times over the years and dismissed as not reflecting Ron Paul???s beliefs. The New Republic, if you will remember, compared Ross Perot to Hitler! Ron Paul is a good man being smeared for political reasons.

Check out this website for the CNN interview with Ron Paul about this where all is explained:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd1LOzDLgkg

Learn why we need Ron Paul and freedom candidates.

Talk by Naomi Wolf (a great liberal writer)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjALf12PAWc

Napolitano - Unconstitutional Patriot Act
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SU0zuUzrSg

Ron Paul Republican Bruce Fein supports impeachment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ymlViJ7DvI

A Liberal re-thinks Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DueIGWpXjrU

H.R. 1955 - Thought Crimes Law in U.S.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGKbvGlaCZ4

Illegal Executive Orders
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFWIHbf50EI

How to End the Iraq War Now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLcUS9c9Kbo

The issues in these links above are far more important than the same old typical, petty, political slander.

Sent by Voltaire | 2:15 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Yet another attack by an establishment mouthpiece, this time NPR aka National Petroleum Radio aka "left" mainstream establishment status quo radio. Congressmen Paul WILL pay for this foolish newsletter but that doesn't make him a racist. Sadly, what it DOES is represent an attack on the only REAL candidate by another faction of the mainstream establishment, this time from the faux left. NPR is in the business of yellow journalism just like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC and BBC.

Sent by Healthmann | 2:16 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Historically Rebels of the Status Quo have always met with opposition (often violent) and Ron Paul is no exception.

This issue was brought up in the past and was denounced partly due to the fact that the writer of these articles had an entirely different writing style than Mr. Paul.

Why don't you do a little bit of research, instead of just joining the chorus of establishment lackies who continually mug sling and attempt any way they can to discredit this man of unmatched integrity and lifelong defender of civil rights.

Don't listen to the lies! Don't let others form your opinions for you! Research Ron Paul for yourself!

http://www.RonPaul2008.com

Sent by Nathan A. | 2:26 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Historically Rebels of the Status Quo have always met with opposition (often violent) and Ron Paul is no exception.

This issue was brought up in the past and was denounced partly due to the fact that the writer of these articles had an entirely different writing style than Mr. Paul.

Don't listen to the lies! Don't let others form your opinions for you! Research Ron Paul for yourself!

Sent by Nathan A. | 2:27 AM ET | 01-13-2008

People speak the way they write. They speak and write what they think. No one has ever come forward to say: "Oh, yes, Ron Paul is a racist. I worked for him for "X" years and you know sometimes in the office he would say about (fill in the blank) that they are lazy, untrustworthy, etc. etc. etc.

So where are the people who have seen or heard Mr. Paul act in a racist way?

They don't exist, because he never has expressed racist views and is not a racist.

Is he guilty of bad judgement and being a bad manager? Yes.

For Ron Paul to allow racist rants and kooky conspiratorial nonsense to appear in his newsletters without properly editing what goes out under his name is troubling.

I know Ron Paul believes in absolute freedom for individuals including freedom of speech, but that doesn't mean that he needs to provide a forum for people whose views are so noxious that his good judgement will later be called into question.

I'm still voting for Ron Paul in the GOP primary because I believe he is the best candidate in the field on either side.

Hillary, Guiliani and the rest of others have done things to our constitution and institutions that are far more damaging than Ron Paul letting nut jobs like Gary North and others contribute to his newsletters.

Sent by Mark | 2:33 AM ET | 01-13-2008

You should talk to Dr. Pauls constituants in his congressional district that he has represented for 20+ years. Many of his opponets brought these disgusting articles up and Ron Paul dis-spelled them then, as he has now. They found that they trusted this man's honest word and believed in him.

Kirchick has been outted as a hack with an agenda. He is with the gay right group, Log Cabin Republicans and they are supporting Rudy G and his "fear fear fear, kill the terrorist before they kill us" platform.

Funny thing, I see no more mention of John McCain's recent remarks about "gooks" and spending the next 100 years in Iraq. McCain himself called Ron Paul, "the most honest man in Washington DC", that's before they were running against each other though.

Ron Paul gets more donations from the military than ANY other candidate, I'd like to see McCain explain that one away. He tried to mislead folks about this in the debates, just like he does with his immigration policies.

You may not understand or completely agree with some of Dr. Paul's campaign issues, but you can abslolutely believe in his honesty and integrity, his impeccable 20+ year congressional voting record proves that. Paul's campaign has been fighting an uphill battle with the smearing and very marginal coporate media coverage. For him to have raised the amounts of money that he has is a very important story by on it's own merit. On Dec 16 he raised $6 million dollars in one day, from no special interest, just common Americans like you and me. He finished up the 4th quarter with $20 million! Faux, ummm, excuse me, Fox News has completely cut him from the New Hampshire debate (The NH GOP protested by withdrawing their sponsorship). After extreme pressure they were forced to include him in the South Carolina debates where Fox even did not mention "the racist Paul papers" at all, he would have had another open forum to further explain the papers away as nothing more than a political smear job. Also, Fox News (Rupert Murdoch) decided the American people did not need to hear Dr. Paul anymore, so the cut all of Ron Paul completely out of it's re-airing of the debate! Even if you don't like Paul, you must admit this to be a travesty in the corporate media. If anything, Ron Paul brings some extremely important issues to the table that others would wish Americans would ignore. Our economy and the Iraq war are breaking the back of this country, but we just keep whistling as we walk by the graveyard. NPR has also not been fair to this good man. I will say that Bill Moyers' Journal gave Dr. Paul a fair interview a few weeks ago.

I would like to urge the readers here to at least take a look at Ron Paul's core values and his message, I am sure you will be in agreement with some of what I have written here. www.WWRPD.org and listen in to www.RPRRadio.com

Thanks,

Michael St. John
Fort Wayne, IN

Sent by Mike | 4:45 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Lew Rockwell: Cowardly Animal and Bigot

There is no one who has done more damage to the Ron Paul campaign than Rockwell. It???s almost too late for apologies and repentance. If social ostracism is the only remedy, he should be banished.

http://www.nolanchart.com/article1117.html

Sent by Westmiller | 4:58 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Zzzz...
Give me solutions to this country or give me DEATH!!!

Sent by Leonardo | 5:25 AM ET | 01-13-2008

If you are a person who actually believes that Ron Paul said those things then you are an idiot. It is funny how people are so easily fooled. Ron Paul has never done anything in his life to indicate that he is racist. He apologized as soon as he found out about it 20 years ago and he is apologizing for it today.

Sent by John Ellsworth | 6:38 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Those letters are inconsistent with his voting record in congress. He always favors rights of the individual. Let's not also forget he constantly tells us of Mises and his economic theory. Mises was a Jew. If Ron Paul were so anti-semitic, racist, etc., why on earth would he model his presidential economic policy after one of jewish heritage?

Sent by Jeffrey | 7:33 AM ET | 01-13-2008

I believe Ron too. With hundreds of people working for you its probably an impossible task to supervise them all. BUT for the doubters....look for ONE piece of evidence , ONE instance where Ron Paul HAS said anything like that in public. And you will probably come to the same conclusion as me.....its just another smear campaign....they are afraid of him.....hes getting TOO popular.

Sent by Ed | 8:27 AM ET | 01-13-2008

100% unabashed hit job, media parrots need to change the newspaper in their cage.

Sent by John C | 9:26 AM ET | 01-13-2008

Being an ashamed former supporter of NPR, I thought I'd give a brief comment to what I think of them: I'd never give them another red cent. In recent attempts I've tried to listen to them, I hear small amounts of worthy information. They seem to be a mouthpiece for the government. When I hear hosts or reporters sharing meaningless, pretentious banter, I am insulted that they waste time on the airwaves. They aren't called National Propoganda Radio for nothing. They have an Agenda and I expect it's to keep its listeners baffled and dazzled.

Sent by April | 10:52 AM ET | 01-13-2008

I wish these newsletters didn't exist. But I believe Ron Paul when he says that he didn't write them. I do not believe anything that comes out of the other candidates' mouths. Paul has no connection to the military industrial or banking complexes, two organizations that have harmed our nation far more than any other group, racist or not.

Sent by Alexia | 12:31 PM ET | 01-13-2008

Racist = Sending a majority black and hispanic enlisted force to go kill a bunch a non-whites in a far off country at their own peril. Ron Paul did not vote for that.

Sent by Seth | 2:02 PM ET | 01-13-2008

"Ron Paul has proven that he values the constitution above all else: that means equal rights for all."

So? Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and even he thought blacks were inferior to whites.

Sent by Dave | 2:47 PM ET | 01-13-2008

If NPR was the other person on a phone call...I just hung up. And I am now tearing up that donation drive check.

Pathetic reporting. More like attacking.

Sent by Freedom2Learn | 3:01 PM ET | 01-13-2008

NAACP responds

http://dissentradio.com/radio/07_08_29_linder.mp3

Sent by NAACP | 4:20 PM ET | 01-13-2008

Don't believe this pure propaganda that Ron Paul is a racist. It is nothing more than smear from those that would no longer be able to take advantage of the power and money they enjoy now if Paul was to become president. They are scared! Racism is 100 percent contradictory to the ideals that Ron believes in (which coincidently are not new and not his). Ron Paul has started the revolution that needs to happen in order to save our nation from those in power that are selfishly in it for themselves, their families, and their friends (instead of the American people!).

My personal hope is that a good looking, well spoken, and likable personality will be running on this agenda in four years. Unfortunately, this type of candidate is what the status-quo American goes for! Obama would be a hit amongst all if he supported the liberty cause. I do not support Obama's "what else can the government do for you" angle. As JFK said in 1961, "ask what you can do for your country."

Sent by Jam Dallen | 5:43 PM ET | 01-13-2008

This is a no-brainer.

The headline of the newsletter is "RON PAUL'S Freedom Report." The thing was all of four pages long.

Are we supposed to believe that a dozen racist remarks got in there by accident? Are we supposed to believe someone with a Doctorate doesn't read four pages of his own newsletter before it gets distributed.

PLEASE... this man is not only a liar, he thinks the rest of us are stupid.

Sent by Tony V | 8:09 PM ET | 01-13-2008

This rehash from the republican propaganda machine which detests Ron paul for his candid stance against unnecessary wars and big government

Sent by fadhil | 9:29 PM ET | 01-13-2008

I started e mailing NPR baout some bias in election coverage & I thought it was just FEW reportors' fault but today I realized its a policy of NPR to do what FOX can't do anymore (since FOX is publically hostile to Ron Paul.
Check this link

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18050278

& see how Andrea Seabrook (NPR) interviewing Adam Davidson who said that the most radical idea in election 2008 is HUCKABBE'S IDEA (?!?) of abolishing the IRS & he must give him a credit for that, so it was not Ron Paul's platform to abolish the IRS since he run for election a year agao but its Huckabee's now.
I started the realize the true face of NPR.
If I could have thrown a chair at my radio I would have ( a borrowed statement).

Sent by resimc2 | 11:01 PM ET | 01-13-2008

Mr. Kirchik took snippets from newsletters under Ron Paul???s name that he didn???t write, that he addressed, disavowed, and took moral responsibility for years ago. Well, it strains credulity that Kirchick is concerned about Ron Paul being a racist. I think he would be sounding the racist alarm when looking at the other candidates??? more recent comments and associations-

John McCain ??? His racist comment- All they want to trade is burkas- referring to Arab Muslims during the last debate. How about John McCain calling Vietnamese people ???gooks??? in his last campaign.
Rudy Giuliani ??? How about John Deady speaking for the Giuliani campaign ??? All Muslims need to be pushed back into their caves??? His new co-chair in South Carolina, Arthur Ravenel, Jr. ??? he called he NAACP the National Association for Retarded People.

Huckabee ??? Racist and crazy comments about watching for Pakistani???s crossing the Mexican border with misiles on their shoulders after Butto???s assassination. Plus Huckabee defended his remarks with a lie about the number of Pakistani???s coming across the border. It???s been fact checked with Homeland Security. Huckabee???s visit and sermon at Cornerstone run by anti-Catholic extremist, John Hagee, who said in his book ???Jerusalem Countdown- the Catholic Church conspired with Hitler to exterminate the Jews.

Fred Thompson ??? Iranian sailors getting their virgins remark at the debate. George Allen is backing Fred Thompson. How about Thompson???s chauvinist remarks, "Fred Thompson said, repeating remarks earlier in the week, no woman is up for the job of president just yet. 'This year, it's a man, and next year, it's going to be a man,' said Thompson. 'I can see no one else who's qualified to be president of the United States.'" and how about him referring to his wife as his favorite possession. Geez, and his racist comments -saying immigrants are partly to blame for the sub-prime mortgage crisis - "A lot of them couldn't communicate with the people they were getting the mortgage from,"- spoken to a group in Iowa.

Romney ??? Who endorsed religious discrimination in government by stating he would never appoint a Muslim. Calling the Big Dig in Boston a ???Tar Baby??? an old racial slur ??? J.C. Watts complaining about Mitt???s lily white campaign???

Clinton ??? How about her comment regarding MLK and how it was really President Johnson who gave black people their civil liberties ??? How about her racist joke about Ghandi running a gas station in St. Louis at a fundraiser.

Obama ??? How about the Pastor of his church, Jeremiah Wright, in Chicago who makes remarks like "White America got their wake-up call after 9/11

How about the MSM accusing New Hampshire primary voters of being racists to defend their polls? If the MSM goes any lower, they???ll have to jump up to touch bottom. If Mr. Kirchik is worried and distraught about racism he should take aim at his own profession???s behavior in this presidential race.

I defy anyone to find one instance of a racist remark passing through the lips of Ron Paul or to show him a member of any church or group that espouses racism or bigotry. Ron Paul???s LONG standing position against the war on drugs, the war in Iraq, and his LONG standing defense of civil liberties prove he isn???t a racist. We know which Americans are filling the prisons, fighting the war, and have their civil liberties violated on a regular basis in disproportionate numbers, espeically when they go to the polls to vote.

Sent by MTE | 12:33 AM ET | 01-14-2008

It was not a "few" newsletters published for a "short" time. It was twenty years' worth of newsletters, some of which ended with things like "Carol and I and our children and grandchildren wish you a merry christmas" - clearly written by him or to sound like it was by him. Think, folks - why would a ghostwriter put words into his mouth that he would find abhorrent? He may or may not have written it, he may or may not have read it. But even if he didn't write it, he allowed these "ghostwriters" to use his name to spread virulent, disgusting, hate-filled rhetoric, over his name, meaning, in effect signed by him. That is every bit as bad as actually being the writer. No matter where you turn on this, it is appalling. This man should be President? No way, no how.

Sent by Wagonmaker | 12:34 AM ET | 01-14-2008

Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment.

Sent by wanda gag | 12:51 AM ET | 01-14-2008

Another thing, as for poor judgment -

Clinton voted for the Iraq War resolution, White Water, Travel Gate...

Thompson flew around the country to his campaign events in a jet owned by a former drug dealer.

McCain - Keating 5 scandal

Giuliani - recommended Kerik, now under 14 criminal indictments, as director of Homeland Security among other things

Huckabee- release a serial rapist from prison who raped and murdered again.

Romney- appoints as national security and counterterrorism adviser to his campaign -Cofe, vice chairman of Blackwater, USA

Obama - association with Tony Rezko, a long time donnor, awaiting trial for extortion, money laundering, and fraud

Ron Paul -didn't pay enough attention to a newsletter going out under his name.

I'm voting for Ron Paul.

Sent by MME | 1:00 AM ET | 01-14-2008

Please read this and decide for yourself.
'NAACP President: Ron Paul Is Not A Racist'
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134.html

Sent by Brad | 1:44 AM ET | 01-14-2008

As I wrote earlier, in a comment that was never posted, the reason this blogger says Ron Paul is anti-Semitic is a very ordinary denunciation of AIPAC made in one of the newsletters, which Paul himself, its generally agreed upon, probably never even wrote.

Further, and more importantly, it is an extreme view that being anti-AIPAC translates directly to being anti-Semitic, one which would be contested by many level-headed people, and this reporter's failure to qualify his comment, or offer up evidence of this alleged anti-Semitism, shows how biased or inept he is.

Sent by Matt | 8:53 AM ET | 01-14-2008

Simply put, almost all of the quotes from the newsletters Kirchick uses are NOT racist, homophobic, or anti-semitic. Yes, some of them are insensitive. The real racism is in how Kirchick and other naysayers are interpreting and applying the quotes he has dug out. The whole deal isn't about TRUTH in any stretch of the imagination; it's about political damage through allegation. The same old story . . .

Sent by Milton Q. Mudburn | 9:08 AM ET | 01-14-2008

These controversy about these newsletters has been around for some time. I read them on the internet at least 9 months ago. The real question for me is why are New Republic, NPR and other media are bringing it to the forefront, now instead of 9 months ago when the campaign began? The only logical reason for the media's manipulation of this controversy is that they were saving this story to stop the candidate they could not control. I had hoped NPR was NOT part of the new American version of Pravda. I was wrong

Sent by Dena | 10:47 AM ET | 01-14-2008

The man took the blame for the letters and has said that the words were not his opinion of Blacks, Jews Or Gays. His Liberterian values lay waste to the alligations. To Dr. Paul everyone is equal and has the same rights. If you have a problem with Dr. Paul just be honest with yourself, and be honest with us and tell us why Freedom, Liberty and being treated like an adult dosent work for you. For me, I LOVE America and want to keep it. You would have to be in denial or to caught up in your life not to see were going in the wrong direction. Dr. Paul is the only candidate talking about the real problems in America. No hidden agenda, dosent have a puppet master, dosent worship money and just wants to get America back on track. A true American, a hero, my hero! Thank you Dr. Paul you have made me a better man, so I know you can the same for America!

Sent by Adrian Veloz | 3:22 PM ET | 01-14-2008

Here is some good ammo for those who think Ron Paul is a racist:

'NAACP President: Ron Paul Is Not A Racist'
http://www.nolanchart.com/article1134.html

In case someone who is supporting Hillary or Obama unjustly pulls the race card on Ron Paul, be sure to direct them to the following indictments:

HILLARY:
Hillary in tight with Byrd, former KKK member and Senator Byrd???can???t vote for her:

http://skepticalbrotha.wordpress.com/category/robert-c-byrd/

I found amply evidence to link Hillary and Byrd???more on Byrd here and you can also check Wikipedia and its references for confirmation:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/18/AR2005061801105_pf.html

Besides the revealing tutelage of Senator Hillary Clinton by the former KKK member Senator Byrd, it is also of great concern that the Clintons??? had strong ties to another racist and segregationist, Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright. For most of his life and public service, Fulbright was a supporter of racial segregation. He signed The Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court's historic 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision. He subsequently joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as voting against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

On the occasion of the 50th anniversary dinner of the Fulbright Program held June 5, 1996 at the White House, President Clinton said, "Hillary and I have looked forward for sometime to celebrating this 50th anniversary of the Fulbright Program, to honor the dream and legacy of a great American, a citizen of the world, a native of my home state and my mentor and friend, Senator Fulbright."

OBAMA:

Nice article written by an African here on Obama:

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/rush/070221

There is a lot more explaining for Hillary and Obama than Ron Paul. I encourage you to make this information regarding Senator Byrd and Fullbright known as a matter of fairness to those engaged in political conversation???especially if they try to use the very weak argument against Ron Paul to which the head of the NAACP attests that Paul is no racist.

Sent by Brett | 3:55 PM ET | 01-14-2008

Amen! Ron Paul had to know the sentiments and extremes of these groups and aids that were rallying the troups for his political career. Any political strategy would have to involve him, or his approval. If he didn't know than he is an incompetent wimp that would be a dangerous cipher ,if elected. If he knew then that says it all: He is what he is.

Sent by Joe Clarke | 4:25 PM ET | 01-14-2008

This election showed the real face of NPR & the list of news manipulation by NPR is more than I can count (to make it short).Just listen to this link & see how rediculous NPR is. (andrea seabrok interviewing Adam Davidson).

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18050278

Sent by resimc | 4:35 PM ET | 01-14-2008

It is really tiresome to hear the superficial thinkers who are so easily led around by the politicians passing such stupid legislation as the civil rights acts of 1963 and 1964. I fought against those acts at the time to no avail. Dr. Thomas Sowell one of our truly great Black educators is on record as saying that Blacks were making more progress before the civil rights acts than they have since. A sense of entitlement never helped anyone. Dr. Paul will get my vote, write in or otherwise, because of his message whether he let some dumb things out under his name in the past or not. To do otherwise is like throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Sent by Bill1 | 4:36 PM ET | 01-14-2008

While Ron Paul is popular on the web, he barely gets a mention on TV or radio or any other form of advertising. He's still an unknown to the masses; his message is not being heard, shared or understood. When he joins a debate, they are making him sound like a radical extremist running on a conspiracy theory agenda; he's not going to get the support he needs if that's all the coverage he's going to get. He needs to put out a real campaign with well-laid plans and a message that will gain the support of the masses. The current candidates - as flaky as they may be - are all looking down on him because he's not a real threat to them; he's a "curiosity". Ron Paul touched a nerve in all of us, opened our eyes to the faults and corruption surrounding us; he's making us aware that we've been betrayed by our glorious leaders for their own personal glory instead of the benefit of our kids, country and future.

Until Ron Paul makes his case for the presidency and honest, truthful change for the way this country should be run - he will not be listened to or taken seriously. I'm not a Republican and I don't like Dr. Paul policy on abortion; but I still support him for his courage and changes he would like to impose. We need someone like him that can make tough decisions and hopefully turn the country around from an impending social and economic doom.

Sent by Nick M. | 4:55 PM ET | 01-14-2008

To all those that oppose ron paul, are you ready for the government chip? its stalled in congress as I type this, its called the national id card, the head of homeland security said; Americans want this, and anyone that opposes this is either a terrorist or a crook, let me ask you friend, does this man speak for you? are you ready for the mark? I think we know who the beast really is now( our government )its finally reared its ugly head for all to see, time to change things people, vote for the only hope we have( RON PAUL 08 )

Sent by steven | 5:03 PM ET | 01-14-2008

NPR states in its article that Ron Paul's newsletters, "...regularly made racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic remarks." This is simply not true. The newsletters with questionable remarks were written only when Ron Paul was not in office -- when he was delivering babies in his medical practice. I suggest that NPR print a retraction for the comment and apologize to the Paul campaign for it's sloppy journalism. I am going to stop my regular donations to WHYY TV in Philadelphia.

Sent by K-Man | 5:05 PM ET | 01-14-2008

This is a Hit Piece.

See this:

NAACP President: Ron Paul Is Not A Racist

By Paul Joseph Watson

Linder joined Alex Jones for two segments on his KLBJ Sunday show this evening, during which he commented on the controversy created by media hit pieces that attempted to tarnish Paul as a racist by making him culpable for decades old newsletter articles written by other people.

"Knowing Ron Paul's intent, I think he is trying to improve this country but I think also, when you talk about the Constitution and you constantly criticize the federal government versus state I think a lot of folks are going to misconstrue that....so I think it's very easy for folks who want to to take his position out of context and that's what I'm hearing," said Linder.

"Knowing Ron Paul and having talked to him, I think he's a very fair guy I just think that a lot of folks do not understand the Libertarian platform," he added.

Asked directly if Ron Paul was a racist, Linder responded "No I don't," adding that he had heard Ron Paul speak out about police repression of black communities and mandatory minimum sentences on many occasions.

Dr. Paul has also publicly praised Martin Luther King as his hero on many occasions spanning back 20 years.

"I've read Ron Paul's whole philosophy, I also understand what he's saying from a political standpoint and why people are attacking him," said Linder.

"If you scare the folks that have the money, they're going to attack you and they're going to take it out of context," he added.

"What he's saying is really really threatening the powers that be and that's what they fear," concluded the NAACP President.

Sent by Sara T. | 5:07 PM ET | 01-14-2008

search "mccain racist" to find racist thoughts and words witnessed by press members on mccain's bus from April 2000. verifiable racism from his own mouth. Unlike the non-racist Dr. Paul.

Sent by Bill | 10:20 PM ET | 01-14-2008

Test email. I won't waste much time typing now as I'm censored not to mention a multitude of other violations of my rights by our establishment on all front and branches who woke up and read a few paragraphs( in plain English) only to realize , they have no idea of what is going on.

And let me remind them ; the poor and the middle class are the MAJORITY.

Thank you,

Nancy

Sent by Nancy Edwards | 11:30 PM ET | 01-14-2008

here is the proof of Ron Paul Racism
check this link

http://www.stumbleupon.com/demo/?review=1#url=http://www.dynw.com/ronpaulisracist/

Sent by resimc | 4:46 AM ET | 01-15-2008

I think staying in iraq, is racist...

Sent by steven | 2:12 PM ET | 01-15-2008

Thank you for making me feel good about my decision to cancel my premium membership with NPR last year.

The hundreds of dollar$$$ I used to donate to this station have been diverted to Dr. Paul's campaign.

Heckuva job, NPR.

Sent by HPS | 2:30 PM ET | 01-15-2008

Ron Paul's comments referenced in the NPR article by Ed Morrissey of the Captain Quarter's blog originally came from an interview with Ron Paul by S.C. Gwynne, entitled "Dr. No", in the October 2001 issue of Texas Monthly magazine. Ron Paul's statement in the NPR article above was his explanation to Gwynne for why he (Ron Paul) had never before denied writing the newsletters himeself. For the previous 5 years, since 1996, when the newsletters were first exposed to the general public, Ron Paul had never said someone else wrote the newsletters. Instead, he took full credit for writing the newletters himself and refused to apologize for their racist content even when pressed for an apology by the NAACP.

It wasn't until 2001 - 5 years later - during the interview with Gwynne for Texas Monthly that Ron Paul first publicly denied writing the articles. When the interviewer asked him why he'd waited so long to say that he never wrote the articles, Ron Paul gave the lame excuse quoted by NPR that his campaign managers had told him what to say.

Whether he wrote the articles himself or not, claiming "moral responsibility" is not the same as apologizing. I believe he still hasn't apologized for the articles that he claims "moral responsibility" for.

My understanding from other articles he's written - "Government and Racism" and "What Really Divides Us" - is that Ron Paul believes the true "racists" are people who defend racial diversity by supporting desegregation and respect for minorities. These two articles defend the statements of Don Imus (insulting a college women's basketball team) and Trent Lott(supporting the segregationist platform of Strom Thurmond), and they call anyone who was offended by the comments a "collectivist". According to Ron Paul, the "collectivists" are the true racists.

When Ron Paul told Wolf Blitzer that he (Ron Paul) is not a racist, and that only "collectivists" can be racists, never Libertarians, what he means is that anyone supporting desegregation and human rights for minorities is a racist, and anyone supporting segregation and disrespect for minorities is practicing their rights under the constitution.

Racist or not, I don't agree with him, and thank GOD, he doesn't have a chance to be president.

Wake up people. Ron Paul is a humbug.

Sent by Alice | 3:51 AM ET | 01-16-2008

Ron Paul always kind of reminds me of the Wizard of Oz.

Remember when the Wizard says to Dorothy, "I'm a good man, just a very bad wizard"?

Ron Paul seems to me like a good wizard, but not a very good man.

Sent by Alice | 4:18 AM ET | 01-16-2008

Alice you seem to be still in Oz, Wake up dear, Do you honestly know how many of your rights have vanished, Well lets see, if you protest the war: They could take your property, Wisk you away to an unknown location, Torture you, Hold you as long as they want, And you have no right to council, They can enter your home without a warrant, Do secret searchs, They are listing on your phone calls, Looking at your emails, They know what you look up on the net, What books you read, and many more abuses of power, these are laws simler to what hitler passed just before he became dictator, and did you know your about to get the mark that the bible talked about, you know the one 666 , the beast, Its right now stalled in congress, Its called the national Id card,(yes a chip with all the information they have gathered on ya), The head of homeland security said: Its what Americans want, Anyone that would oppose this is either a terrorist or a crook, Let me ask, Does this man speak for you Alice? are you a terrorist or a crook? Will you take the mark? If you dont believe me just look it all up, and here you go and attack the only guy standing up for your rights, god your a pitiful excuse for an american, my guess is your completly uninformed, your just another lap dog ....... , vote for america, vote for the only man who will give your rights and your country back, vote RON PAUL 08

Sent by steven | 8:29 AM ET | 01-16-2008

I can not read or write so none of this makes any sense to me.
I will vote for Ron Paul. I like him because he does not dye his hair & has no cosmetic surgery in his past.

Sent by flybenji | 10:48 AM ET | 01-16-2008

Steven, many of the things you mention above are true. But I don't believe Ron Paul is the answer.

Everything I said in my above post about Ron Paul taking full credit for writing the newsletters, and refusing to apologize for their content from 1996 to 2001 is true. Read the 2001 Texas Monthly article (Dr. No) and check it out for yourself. And keep in mind that only a very few racist articles had been uncovered at that time, unlike the recent uncovering of a barrage of racist articles.

Another thing to check out: Ron Paul IS opposed to The Civil Rights Act. Just google Ron Paul, Civil Rights Act, and read his speech. Yes, the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964, long before Ron Paul entered Congress, but laws can be changed, and many of Ron Paul's constituent base would like to do just that!

The typical Republican thing: follow the leader and believe whatever he says, no matter what.

Sent by Alice | 4:26 PM ET | 01-16-2008

Alice,

It makes me sad to see how the media has spun Dr. Paul's record with regard to race, civil and human rights.

He swore he'd never betray our Constitution, and there's this concept called "inalienable rights." That means these rights are granted by GOD, not man, and thus no human can take them away.

If a State takes it upon itself to "grant" something it will have no problems taking that same thing AWAY someday should the State find it convenient. Which would suck.

It's sad that when RP votes against a bill or amendment people think it's because he doesn't like the topic or the people who presented it. Nothing could be further from the truth. He votes in ways some see as strange because the Constitution tells him what to do, not his personal preference or public pressure.

Ron Paul's constituent base is NOT a bunch of white hoodies. His county is about half minorities! And they keep electing him, HMMMMM.

Sent by HPS | 6:56 AM ET | 01-17-2008

The more stories I hear about the GOP presidential race, the more you'd think I'd be used to NOT hearing coverage on Ron Paul. In Melissa Block's half-hearted attempt at reputable journalism, she reported on the indecision many SC GOP voters are experiencing (Thurs 1-17)--nary a mention of Ron Paul (who has more cumulative votes than either Fred Thompson or Rudy Giuliani). Let's stop the charade of making NPR out to be an unbiased news agency. Your irresponsibility reflects the fact that you are bought and paid for by the highest bidder. Why don't you just tell us who to vote for and be done with it? God Bless AmeriKa!

Sent by Thomas Braun | 5:13 PM ET | 01-17-2008

So Alice, what is the answer?, I dont know about you but, I love my country and hate seeing whats its become, you know the whole world is watching what direction we take, The things that made America so great was those freedoms that your willing to give up so easy, Ron Paul may not be perfect, and we all dont aggree with everything he says, but I think he stands far above the competition, and to be honest I dont think we will ever get another chance like we have, Im 48 with 4 kids, I've got to think about their future, I want them to have a country thats not corrupt to the core, so they can at least have chance at the American dream, I see Ron Paul as our last great hope, men like him dont come around often, Alice your country is calling you, answer that call, vote for the only REAL choice we have, let me just add this, if there where no televisions, no radios, and no computers, how would you know who to vote for?, now you see how powerful the media are, dont let them tell you who the man is, I think you know who the real man is, Alice, vote for RON PAUL 08,,

Sent by Steven | 5:20 PM ET | 01-17-2008

Alice, by the way im a democrat...

Sent by Steven | 8:02 PM ET | 01-17-2008

kirchick is a hack,and every news source takes his hit peice and runs with it as if its been written in stone.I did not expect NPR to regurgitate this hit job from the new republic without reviewing kurchicks credibility which is none.shame on you NPR you have lowered yourself to the ilk of fox news

Sent by ron | 4:13 AM ET | 01-19-2008

Let's drop both sides of this issue and focus on the mechanics, here.

The American Public is trained to hear the media taint one an 'anti-semite' and that psychological instruction results in criminal discreditation of anyone under that attack.

The wholesale 'anti-semitic' label requires no examination of what has now escalated to a thought crime on our soil.

It is a real crime in Germany to be convicted of any views which challenge or question the establishment.

That's Power.

Empower yourself, and empower your nation. Do not fear and do not feel bullied. Request a discussion and repeal being short-changed with label.

Sent by concerned american | 6:03 AM ET | 01-26-2008

Ron Paul is the only honest and genuine candidate out ther.It seems other candidates are talking about the economy. I beleive Dr.Paul was talking about it from the begining.
Seems all these so called candidates flip and flop all over, depending on which state their in.
Ron Paul states his case and does not flip at all.
He is also the only candidate that attended the march for life in D.C.
Or have conservatives changed their views on this stance.
Ron Paul in 2008

Sent by Bob Brereton | 11:17 AM ET | 01-28-2008

RON PAUL IN 2008

Close the borders
Balance a budget
End foriegn aid
Personal freedom

McCain for President of Mexico
Rommney is a business men - what does that do for us, what he will outsource more work.
Huckelberry? Hucklebee? Whatever.
Guilliani - he is top tier?
Whats happening in Louisianna? Not official yet.
Something is going on down there? Who actually won. It was a week ago and no mention anywhere.
OOh it is being contested as is New Hampshire.

Go Ron Paul.
Why were none of the other candidates in D.C for the march FOR life!
Ron Paul attended.
Conservative right better check on your candidates.

Sent by Susanne Brereton | 11:24 AM ET | 01-28-2008

Nothing like a bunch of Ron Paul fans following their supposed messiah of politics. Pretty sad if you ask me.

Sent by Ashworth | 11:23 AM ET | 02-13-2008

E-mail this Page

Recipient's e-mail address:	» Up to twelve addresses, separated by commas.
Your e-mail address:
Your name:
Personal message (optional, 600 characters max):
Your NPR member station:
Are you a member of your local NPR station?	Yes No
Would you like to receive information from your local NPR member station? (see NPR's privacy policy)	Yes No
Please send me updates from NPR.	Yes No

(Information collected by NPR will be used solely for internal NPR or NPR member station purposes and only if you selected 'yes' above. See NPR's privacy policy for more information.)

Tom Regan

Blogger

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.