The NPR News Blog
 
 

Columnist Argues the Farrakhan Litmus Test Must Go

Marjorie Valbrun, a columnist for TheRoot.com, remembers when Louis Farrakhan gave a first controversial speech at Madison Square Garden in the fall if 1985. The media sought out every black prominent political leader they could find and asked if they would denounce him. Valbrun said "something was wrong with this picture."

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan listens to the applause of the crowd before delivering the keynote address at the Nation of Islam's Saviour's Day convention February 25, 2007 at Ford Field in Detroit, Michigan. The title of the speech was 'One Nation Under God: The Confusion, the Guidance, the Warning.'

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images


"Bullying black leaders to represent the entire black race and to speak and think as one, while also treating every loud-mouthed, controversial black leader as if they represent the opinions, political views and personal aspirations of every black American, seemed to me to be a journalistic and political double-standard that was rarely, if ever, applied to white leaders and politicians."

And 23 years later, she argues, things haven't changed much, as witnessed in the exchange Tuesday night between NBC debate moderator Tim Russert and Sen. Barack Obama over remarks made by Farrakhan in support of Obama. (As Valbrun correctly points out, Farrakhan did not officially endorse Obama -- in fact, he specifically said he didn't want to say anything that would hurt Obama, understanding how his remarks would be used -- but said Obama was the "hope of the entire world that America will change.")

"Why is it that only after they repudiate Farrakhan are they then deemed not to be closet black militants?," she writes. Neither Farrakhan ("Most blacks in this country could give two hoots what the man says or thinks"), nor Al Sharpton nor Jesse Jackson have the influence over black Americans that white Americans think they do.

And she says that white politicians are not held to the same standard. For instance, when talk show host Don Imus made racist remarks about the black female basketball players at Rutgers University.

"Reporters did not run out in droves to ask white politicians to reject Don Imus after he made his remarks about the black female basketball players at Rutgers University. White politicians did not eagerly line up to do so. Nor did they repudiate fellow white politicians who did not. A few, and only a few, said they would no longer go on the Imus show. (Tim Russert, who appeared often on the Imus show, was not among those who said they would no longer be a guest.)"

Valbrun says considering that it's been 23 years, and that very few black Americans look to Farrakhan for "direction on how to vote," it's time to put "put the Farrakhan litmus test to rest -- for good."

 

Comments (Send a comment)

Pity the plight of the liberal candidate: Ozzy Osborne bites off the head of a bat while offering his endorsement.

Yeah, what's Barack to do? Tell the liberal community he can only accept certain endorsements? It's not as though the liberal community is of a single mind. Even Alice Cooper claims to be a conversted Christian. Except who can forget Alice Cooper's most famous lyrics of the past?

I bet given half a chance that Mike Tyson will come out in support for Barack Obama.

The rub is that once a candidate takes one liberal endorsement, the candidate is pretty much stuck with all the liberal endorsements.

fred camorra call

Sent by fred camorra call | 10:18 AM ET | 02-28-2008

Should every conservative politician be asked to denounce Ann Coulter?

Sent by Mike Fleissner | 12:30 PM ET | 02-28-2008

The really ironical thing about this is, Hillary refuses to denounce or reject a Texas supporter of hers, who said she wouldn't vote for Obama because he was black. Said Hillary, everyone has the right to express their views! See http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2008/02/good-for-the-goose.html

Sent by Ken Shear | 4:10 AM ET | 02-29-2008

Comments made about Obama and his pastors'
relationship with Min. Farrakhan... For the full
comment...
http://elections.jta.org/2008/02/27/the-farrakhan-moment-reactions/

As a young informed African American voter I am
ashamed and feel belittled because of the Farrakhan litmus test that is always given. We need to quitplaying this same old game about Farrakhan. Mr. Obama said he doesn't support the words of Farrakhan and that he and his pastor don't always agree on his support of the Minister. What it sounds like to me respectfully is that you all want him to make a big deal about this like you all are doing and have done for years. It's like Mr. Obamas' answer isn't good enough. Not to mention, Farrakhan has done great work
in the black community and his accomplishments should not be down played because you all don't agree with his stance. We as young informed African American voters from all walks of life are not going to be duped. To focus a debate on a man and his words and what other's think about him is a constant snare at American poltics today.

The young informed voter is well aware of the scare
and spin tactics that media, organizations and other's run. If this is the way Clinton or McCain can win then I see it's business as usual! Good old fashion American politics. We all are disgusted by any act of racism, discrimination, or bigotry. But to continue to play the Farrakhan card especially during this time in America's history is a sign of the tricky and cunning practices that have always been invoked. Especially when a person of color (to be more direct a black person) is running for a public office. The Farrakhan litmus test is sure to be given. If you show to much admiration or if you partially agree you will be scrutinized at a staggering pace. If you denounce and disagree you are admired and considered a friend. Well, I've stood on my soap box and I optimistically wonder what the outcome will be?

Shalom Shalom,

Bro. Lamon

Sent by Lamon | 1:43 PM ET | 02-29-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.



   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs