NPR: No More Money for You!

No More Money for You!

Drastic times call for drastic actions, and BUILD PAC, the political action committee of the National Association of Home Builders, says it's cutting off contributions to congressional candidates — incumbents and challengers alike.

The reason is visible in almost any neighborhood: The housing market's on the skids. The essential number for home builders, new housing starts, fell 25 percent last year. It was like getting blasted back to 1980.

BUILD PAC's 160-member board said it took the move after watching Congress and the Bush administration fumble the problem for six months. They said the freeze will last "until further notice."

The freeze-out goes against a PAC's raison d'etre. Typically, they're scrutinizing the candidates like judges at the county fair, weighing which pol merits how much money. In fact, in 14 years working this beat for NPR, I can't remember another example.

And BUILD PAC is a serious player in Washington. In 2006, it ranked third in contributions, distributing $2.9 million. (Republicans got 73 percent.) This cycle, it had only given out $865,800 as of Dec. 31 (55 percent to Republicans). It had $1.4 million in the bank.

But unless the housing market comes zooming out of this dive and association members start making money again, BUILD PAC may have much less than usual in its kitty for candidates.

- Peter Overby

6:40 PM ET | 02-12-2008 | permalink

Comments (Send a comment)

Special Interest/PAC Money is Nothing More Than Bribery

Members of Congress have managed to create a seemingly lawful system whereby they can legally accept money from lobbyists or other persons who represent special interest groups that are actively involved in trying to influence those same politicians in future votes. The special interest groups that contribute large sums of money to political campaigns want and expect ???their politicians??? to enact (or help in some way) legislation that favors the group that provided the money. In America today, we are living under a political system that not only allows, but encourages and condones the legalized bribery of members of congress. That is why I believe ???America has the best congress that special interest money can buy.???

Compare these two examples:

1. If a known drug dealer gives a police officer in a narcotics enforcement unit a $1,000. ???Contribution??? for the policeman???s ball and says ???I hope you consider looking the other way when I???m selling drugs on the corner.??? Whether or not the police officer takes any kind of official action that benefits the drug dealer, if he accepts the money, he commits the crime of bribery, right?

2. If a lobbyist or member of a special interest group gives a member of congress a $1,000. ???Contribution??? for his campaign and says: I hope you consider our position on any upcoming votes that affect us.??? Whether or not the congressmen or Senator takes some kind of official action that benefits that person or organization, if he accepts the money, isn???t that still bribery?

Neither of these public servants should be taking money from people or organizations to influence their decisions they will make during the course of performing their official duties. Shouldn???t both situations be considered illegal conduct by those involved? Well, not if you are a member of congress. Bribery is defined as ???a corrupt activity in which a person offers or receives goods, money, services, etc. to sway a person???s opinion, action, or decision.??? Merely accepting the goods, money, services, etc, is a crime. It is immaterial whether or not the person receiving the benefit, does anything. In the case of members of congress, however, receiving money is only considered to be bribery if the briber explicitly says to the politician (the one being bribed): "I'm giving you this money as payment for a yes or no vote on the house floor tomorrow."

The reality of political life in America today is that politicians are being bribed every day by special interest groups that want them to legislate in a way that benefits them and not the American people. Americans are bearing the brunt of this horrific situation in ways that affect us all every day of our lives. The current campaign finance laws are built on a legal fiction. The legal fiction is that campaign contributions from special interest groups are considered to be legal and within the law even though they are actually bribes. Money given to members of congress by special interest groups is nothing more than "legalized bribery." Through bundled contributions and PAC giving, industries, labor unions, and other special interest groups pay to persuade lawmakers to vote their way on the issues.

No matter how it is said, Special Interest dollars buys votes and it also buys elections. The real scandal in the nation???s capitol is that this everyday bribery remains legal. Candidates who please their special interest money donors through their votes, are usually rewarded with more bribes, I mean more campaign contributions. This legalized bribery system has created a ???Privileged Oligarchy??? made up of selected members of congress and big donor elites from wealthy special interest groups. This oligarchy is currently governing this country and making decisions that oftentimes are not in the best interests of the American people, but rather in favor of the special interest groups.

Our elections should be about what American citizens want, not about what big special interest donors want.

I will support any legislation that defines the receipt of special interest money by members of congress as bribery and therefore illegal.

I also will support legislation that removes the monetary limits on individual contributions to campaigns, as the US Constitution does not give Congress the authority to set such limits because it limits the citizens??? free speech rights.

I support the continuation of legislation requiring the full and immediate disclosure of all contributions to Federal election campaigns. No exceptions or loopholes allowed.

Although I do not fully support the concept of government financing of campaigns, the following two pieces of legislation, currently introduced in both the Senate and House of Representatives, are a step in the right direction and I would support them as well. They are H.R. 1614 ???The Clean Money, Clean Elections Act of 2007??? and S.936 ???The Fair Elections Now Act.???

By:
JOHN W. WALLACE
Candidate for Congress
New York???s 20th Congressional District
www.johnwallaceforcongress.com

Sent by John Wallace | 12:32 AM ET | 03-03-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

E-mail this Page

Recipient's e-mail address:	» Up to twelve addresses, separated by commas.
Your e-mail address:
Your name:
Personal message (optional, 600 characters max):
Your NPR member station:
Are you a member of your local NPR station?	Yes No
Would you like to receive information from your local NPR member station? (see NPR's privacy policy)	Yes No
Please send me updates from NPR.	Yes No

(Information collected by NPR will be used solely for internal NPR or NPR member station purposes and only if you selected 'yes' above. See NPR's privacy policy for more information.)

Tom Regan

Blogger

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.