Ohio Debate Tougher, But No Knockout Blows
The judges' scorecards are in. And the winner is ... it's a tie.
That's the general take-away from political commentators and pundits after last night's Democratic debate in Cleveland. Ohio. Most observers felt that the debate was polite but tougher than last week's debate in Texas. But neither candidate was able to land a knock out blow, and that is more of a problem for Hillary Clinton than Barack Obama.
The Los Angeles Times writes that the "moment of truth" that Clinton needed never came. While she was able to nudge him throughout the evening deploying "everything in her arsenal," Obama "played out the clock" and "while he did not walk away unscathed from the debate, the damage Clinton inflicted was minor."
"No runs, no hits, no errors," said veteran Democratic political strategist Bill Carrick, who is not aligned with either candidate. "They both drew blood, but they did it cautiously. That was perfectly fine for Obama, but Hillary needed something more dramatic. She didn't get it."
The Boston Globe reports that at times last night "Clinton's frustration at her position was evident." San Francisco Chronicle blogger Carolyn Lochhead said Clinton "again failed to knock front-runner Sen. Barack Obama off stride..."
An analysis of the debate by The Associated Press said the candidates had "some testy exchanges" but that it was "a mostly somber and policy-filled debate that seemed unlikely to alter the political calculus of the race."
6:00 AM ET | 02-27-2008 | permalink

