FactCheck.org: Clinton Exaggerated Foreign Policy Experience
Hillary Clinton has made her foreign policy experience one of the main planks in her campaign to be the Democratic presidential nominee. But FactCheck.org report that her claims of extensive experience in foreign policy matters are not as extensive as she claims.
Officials from Bill Clinton's administration are largely divided as to the extent and effectiveness of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy role as first lady. For example, Richard Holbrooke, a former assistant secretary of state and ambassador to the U.N., claims that Clinton's "intense efforts" in Macedonia "contributed to saving many lives." On the other hand, Susan Rice, also an assistant secretary of state during the Clinton administration, argues that Clinton was never asked to do any "heavy lifting" and says that Clinton's role was more about "gentle prodding or constructive reinforcement." That Holbrooke and Rice would remember Clinton's role differently is unsurprising: Holbrooke is a foreign policy adviser to the Clinton campaign, while Rice has the same role with Obama's campaign.Indeed, the New York Times recently reported that, as first lady, Clinton did not hold a security clearance nor did she sit in on meetings with the National Security Council. We examined some of the specific examples of Sen. Clinton's experience and found that most of them are weaker than advertised.
FactCheck.org looks at Clinton's claims about: her role in opening the Macedonia border in 1999; her role in the Northern Ireland peace process; her March 1996 visit to war-torn Bosnia with singer Sheryl Crow and comedian Sinbad; a conversation she had with her husband -- President Bill Clinton -- about the genocide in Rwanda; and a speech about women's rights in China --- and finds that while she was involved in these areas, the level of her involvement is exaggerated - more than a bit in some cases.
12:00 PM ET | 03-15-2008 | permalink

