The NPR News Blog
 
 

In 2004, MacAuliffe Warned Michigan Not to Move Primary

Four years ago, Terry McAuliffe, top Clinton campaign aide, was the chairman of the Democratic National Committee -- the position now held by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean. And he had a problem with Michigan. How do we know this? He wrote about it in his book "What a Party!: My Life Among Democrats: Presidents, Candidates, Donors, Activists, Alligators and Other Wild Animals"

As Mark Nickolas note in his blog "Political Base," Sen. Carl Levin told McAuliffe that he was going to take Michigan "outside the primary window." McAuliffe told Levin that ""I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules." The story continues on page 325.

"If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses," I said. "We will have chaos. I let you make your case to the DNC, and we voted unanimously and you lost."

He kept insisting that they were going to move up Michigan on their own, even though if they did that, they would lose half their delegates. By that point Carl and I were leaning toward each other over a table in the middle of the room, shouting and dropping the occasional expletive.

"You won't deny us seats at the convention," he said.

"Carl, take it to the bank," I said. "They will not get a credential. The closest they'll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it."

We glared at each other some more, but there was nothing much left to say. I was holding all the cards and Levin knew it.

MacAuliff'e position has changed. He's now in the position of Levin, arguing that despite breaking the rules, delegates from Michigan (and Florida) should be seated at the Democratic National Convention.
-------
UPDATE: The current DNC chairman, Howard Dean told "Meet the Press" on Sunday that the Florida and Michigan delegates should be seated, but he "signaled no intention to intervene in the dispute."


"They're very important states, but that doesn't mean they're more important than everybody else," Dean said.

Dean signaled that he will not try to influence the deliberations of the party's Rules & Bylaws Committee, which has scheduled a meeting for May 31 to discuss Michigan and Florida. Under consideration will be challenges from the two states, seeking reinstatement of half their elected delegates and full slates of superdelegates.

"I don't know what the solution is going to be. The rules committee is going to start working on that now," Dean said. "Nobody will be satisfied with the outcome because nobody is going to get everything they want."

 

Comments (Send a comment)

What is being demanded now is not just the opposite position for MacAuliffe. Both candidates agreed that Michigan (and Florida) would not be seated or counted. Now MacAuliffe is not only arguing from the opposite position to what he held before, but from the opposite position to what Clinton has already agreed for this particular election. Sen. Clinton has changed her mind about what will work best for her and wants to change the party's rules long after the race has begun. This fact is not a good talking point for MacAuliffe.

Sent by Gary | 3:29 PM ET | 04-27-2008

Rules are rules. If you break them for Florida and Michigan then the next time it will be another state that will break the rules and there will be nothing you can do about it, because if you let one get away with it then you have to do it for everybody.

Sent by ysha | 3:55 PM ET | 04-27-2008

It simply once again confirms that Clinton and her team are pathological liars. It astounds me that anyone could want to see her elected. Twenty years of the Bush-Clinton oligarchy is enough!

Sent by Kevin L. | 4:03 PM ET | 04-27-2008

Gary,

So why was Obama's name on the Florida Ballot(he without sin cast the first stone)...Obama lacks definitely lacks credibility relating to his objections about Michigan and Florida...he's looking a bit hyprocritical on this issue...maybe his supporters and campaign doesn't think people will remember that fact, by the way, didn't Obama also run TV ads in Florida...his campaign is looking as slippery as a snake.

Sent by ard | 5:29 PM ET | 04-27-2008

As far as I know, ard, all of the candidates names were on the Florida ballots. Clinton also ran television adds as well as held a fundraiser in FL just before the primary. I agree with MacAuliffe BEFORE Clinton started losing: rules are rules and as long as everyone agreed to them before signing on, they should stand. I think it's unfortunate that these rules were established at all, but they should be changed before the next election, not this one.

Sent by sem | 5:54 PM ET | 04-27-2008

To "ard" - I don't know what "objections" you refer to regarding Sen. Obama and the Michigan & Florida primaries. He has said very little on the matter. He made an agreement with the DNC (as did Sen. Clinton) and he has kept that agreement. It has been Sen. Clinton who has raised objections (along with many Republicans, pretending to be Democrats, who want to see disarray among Democrats and would much prefer to face Clinton in November).

Sent by Gary | 7:29 PM ET | 04-27-2008

HOWEVER MC CRAFTS HIS POSITION ITS OUT
OF PURE POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY-HYPOCRITICAL.

Sent by JGUZMAN | 7:30 PM ET | 04-27-2008

I really think there is the DNC and then the Clinton machine. I, as a Democrat always defended the Clintons, particularly Bill and I am really shocked during this campaign that the Clintons have so little class and are such "in your face" liars. She tries to bring Obama down to her level (and with the nudging of the media, who calls him spineless if he doesn't. Then she leaps on board and declares he is just another politician. I am hoping that the American people see through this and I think many do, as many just want this to be over. Perhaps when this is all over, primary rules should be looked at again --- too exhausting for the candidates and too expensive and look at the results -- chaos. And just when no one thought the Democrats could lose. Very discouraging. cathy

Sent by cathy byrne | 9:43 PM ET | 04-27-2008

Ard: It doesen't matter what Obama's position is, if indeed it is as you state. The fact is that two wrongs don't make a right, not for Obama and not for Hillary. One has to be either blind or extremely illogical to confound the issue at hand. And when you look at the whole picture, just as Kevin above says, it is astounding how anyone would even consider any Clinton -whether Bill, Hillary or their daughter- for anything but the national award for the best liars of the year. It is also befuddling how these people can make millions with their sophisms. Do they really believe everybody goes for them? Well, I suppose we are still in the land of opportunity, even for the dishonest liar.

Sent by Leonel A. Urdaneta, MD | 10:02 PM ET | 04-27-2008

Advisers take the cue from the top.

Michigan's party leaders were cautioned that if they break the rules, they will NOT be seated. And the democrats in Michigan - as well as millions of democrats in USA - CLEARLY understood what Michigan was getting into.

"The rules are the rules."

And Howard Dean knows that.
Dean, why make rules that you don't intend to enforce?
What happens in the future when more states unilaterally load the front of the primaries season?

Is the DNC ineffectual, irrelevant?

Should the rules be suspended only for Sen Clinton? If Sen Obama was trailing, would Dean be thus equivocating and backpedaling looking for a way of declaring him the winner?
What makes Sen Clinton so special that an entire political party is held hostage to her warped whims and desires?

Dean is a weak leader of the Democratic party - and that should NOT reflect on the ability of its nominee, Sen Obama, to be decisive and tough on crime.

"Bold Deceit and Bizarre Logic" / Hillary '08, WRONG for America

Sent by chokora | 4:04 AM ET | 04-28-2008

MR.HOWARD DEAN SHOULD UPHOLD HIS DECISION TO NOT COUNT MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA ON THE GROUNDS THAT THESE TWO STATES BROKE THE RULES. MR. MACAULIFFE SHOULD GET A TASTE OF HIS OWN MEDICINE, BUT MORE SO THE RULES WERE BROKEN AND BOTH CAMPAIGNS KNEW THE CONSEQUENCES.

Sent by DEANDRE BROWN | 6:29 AM ET | 04-28-2008

Unfortunately, old school politics is not about sticking to your convictions. It's a malleable and chaotic morass of populist thinking - what is good today is what I support. What I supported in the past didn't happen and how dare you question me on it.

McCain and Obama seem to toe the line of honor and integrity, McCain because it is in his military background, Obama because he is a first term senator whom still believes in the duty of the post.

Clinton on the other hand is no better than Romney, a chameleon about her beliefs and opinions. This is not even mentioning her "recollection" of events, voting record or her past life with a love for beer and guns when it became advantageous to pander to the only voting segment she will win. "Screw 'em" is a pretty good summary for how she operates, you're either with her or against her...until she jumps off the bandwagon in favor of the popular wagon of the day. While McCain would be a less desirable President than Obama, Clinton would be an unmitigated disaster for the country - the candor and rhetoric coming out of the Clinton camp is only a primer for what we would be in store for.

As Chokora said, Clinton '08, WRONG for America. Any candidate will develop experience, you cannot teach honesty and integrity.

Sent by James Cutler | 7:54 AM ET | 04-28-2008

Should the desires of the electorate be heard?
Michigan primary voters registering as a Demorcrat could vote for Clinton or non-committed. This was a result of the rules of the NDC and Michigan legislators.
Will the NDC rules committee pretend to know the preferences of Michigan Democrats if it decides to seat any of the Michigan deligates?

Sent by roger | 9:35 AM ET | 04-28-2008

Yes, rules are rules.

When the superdelegates decide in favor of Hillary, remember that.

Rules are rules.

Sent by deek | 12:19 PM ET | 04-28-2008

deek 04-28-2008:

Consider this: Your team has won decisively. The loosing team then insists that THOSE scores that were nullified (because of a violation of the rules of the game) must be reconsidered and allowed so that it wins the game.

What would you say?
Rules are Rules. And they must be enforced surely, swiftly and transparently.

You will readily adjust to saying "President Barrack Obama" and seeing Barrack emerge when "Hail to the Chief" is sung.

"Bold Deceit and Bizarre Logic" / Hillary '08, WRONG for America

Sent by chokora | 2:46 PM ET | 04-28-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.




   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs