The NPR News Blog
 
 

McCain's Gas Tax Holiday Runs Contrary to Other Positions

John McCain's economic adviser believes in price signals.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin spoke approvingly during a conference call Tuesday about how the Safeway supermarket chain lowered its health care costs by sending a strong price signal to employees. In order to encourage workers to take advantage of preventive care, Safeway made it free. No co-pays. No deductibles, for things like smoking cessation and nutrition courses.

Just as lowering prices helps to encourage healthy behavior, raising prices (with a cigarette tax, for example, or higher health insurance premiums for smokers) can help discourage unhealthy behavior.

"There's a good role for public awareness of what contributes to the problem," Holtz-Eakin said.

That's what prices do.

So it's a little puzzling that McCain wants to interfere with the price signal energy markets have been sending.

Since the beginning of the year, the price of crude oil has risen about $20 per barrel. And the price of gasoline has jumped about 50 cents a gallon.

Motorists got the message. According to the Energy Department, demand for gasoline fell more than 6% between January and February, and demand for all finished petroleum products dropped 8.5%.

Instead of simply allowing those market forces to keep working, McCain has proposed lifting the federal gasoline tax during the busy summer driving season from Memorial Day to Labor Day. And now Hillary Clinton has agreed.

Americans are addicted to oil, much of it imported. As McCain himself points out, this contributes to our trade deficit and some of the money we send overseas for oil goes to people who don't have the United States' best interests at heart.

The long term solutions to this are greater fuel efficiency and alternative fuels. The short term solution is to drive less.

So what kind of signal does McCain's proposed lifting of the gas tax send?

-- Scott Horsley

 

Comments (Send a comment)

Sen. McCain's (and Sen. Clinton's me-too) support for a tax cut on gasoline is typical of the extremely short sighted economic policy thinking that got this country into a recession in the first place. At least one candidate has the wisdom and courage to speak the truth.

Sent by Gary | 11:08 AM ET | 04-30-2008

The kind of signal that says "I will do anything to get elected"

Sad but simple. Even worse that Hilary has jumped on the bandwagon.

Sent by Tobias | 11:22 AM ET | 04-30-2008

It's like a car dealership putting one of those big inflatable dinosaurs outside their store to attract customers who don't need a new vehicle.

Sent by karen in texas | 11:42 AM ET | 04-30-2008

The sad part is many many American voters ARE short sighted and will totally fall for it!

Sent by chongita | 11:43 AM ET | 04-30-2008

this contribution nails it. absolutely the opposite of straight talk.

Sent by tim in exile | 11:51 AM ET | 04-30-2008

Granted, American's consume more oil than we should, but I live in southern Alabama where public transportation isn't readily available, the demand just isn't there. The junior college I'm attending doesn't provide dorms, I can't afford an apartment nearby, and so I'm forced to drive 120 miles weekly to and from my classes, and that's car-pooling with a friend. It's worth the expenses, but I believe it's more expensive than it has to be. Any break would be welcomed to those of us who can't yet afford the new energy-efficient cars or the outrageous prices of gasoline.

Sent by Trevor | 11:54 AM ET | 04-30-2008

He's been on several sides of several issues, so this shouldn't be a surprise. Clinton is the same way on gas tax holidays. As Mencken once wrote, a politician is an animal that can straddle a fence while keeping an ear to the ground on each side.

Sent by Sweetie | 12:00 PM ET | 04-30-2008

McCain supporters will have to wonder which McCain shows up at the oval office if he is elected. Will it be The McCain who winks and nods to the hard right wingers or the one who winks and nods to the media, moderates and independents? He was against the "permanant" tax cuts before he was for them. The straight talk has meandered quite a bit.

Sent by Mike Fleissner | 12:04 PM ET | 04-30-2008

This is as ineffective as Bush and his little tax rebate.My rebate is going towards bills.This money would get me an extra tank of gas.How about demanding autos that get 35 mpg or use no gas at all? How about a tax credit for purchasing said vehicles.How about a rebate check for dumping your suv.How about a tax deduction for having to travel more than 45 min.s to get to work.How about employers offering mass transit ride sharing programs.I could go on and on.But then so could anyone who is effected.

Sent by susan | 12:09 PM ET | 04-30-2008

Perhaps both McCain and Clinton realize that the pure market is not always a good thing. Our entire tax system, subsidies to many industries, trade policies that are not purely "free" are what America has been since the beginning. The fact that they wish to soften the blow of an expected $4 gal by $.18 gal is an American thing to do. We are all now getting a "stimulus" check which is no different. "Free Market" is news-speak...

Sent by Jim Franz | 12:25 PM ET | 04-30-2008

Maybe McCain&Clinton could offer free dishes,silverware with every fill up.This isn't a election process,its a circus-who shall we elect as ring master?

Sent by Kirt | 12:29 PM ET | 04-30-2008

just thinking that if this very bad plan goes into affect, what happens after the holiday, will we be hit with the tax PLUS an increase on fuel either by demand or profit makeup from the oil companies.
Every few years the Oil Companies show up on the hill and give grave performance, the elected fools listen and prove yet again that they are nothing more than paper tigers.
Also will the gas holiday result in any reduction at all?

Sent by Daly | 6:31 PM ET | 04-30-2008

I was just listening to NPR and heard that HRC showed up at a gas station with a convoy of large SUVs had gas pumped, paid for it and gave her speil of how the GTH (Gas Tax Holiday) would benefit folks. Honestly I understand the need for her to be in SUV but is this visual a good idea? Shouldn't we be encouraging that people use smaller cars, perhaps carpool, telecomute, bunch errands ect. Her photo-op sends the wrong message in oh so many ways.

Sent by Daly | 6:54 PM ET | 04-30-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.




   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs