The NPR News Blog
 
 

Obama Admits "Bitter" Remark a "Distraction" for Dems

In an interview with the editorial board of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Sen. Barack Obama admitted that his comments about residents of small towns in Pennsylvania being bitter about their economic situation and as a result clinging to guns, religion and anti-immigration sentiment "represented a distraction not just from his campaign message but also from Democratic efforts to overcome stereotypes that Republicans have exploited for decades."

"What I do regret is that in one quick statement that wasn't phrased properly I detracted from what I think has to be a genuine effort on the part of Democrats to speak to constituencies we haven't always reached out to," Mr. Obama said during a wide-ranging interview with the paper.

"The basic proposition, what I was trying to say is something I deeply believe, which is that people feel abandoned economically, they don't feel that Washington pays any attention to them. They have heard a lot of empty promises over the last two to three decades ... they're very cynical about the possibility of change.

"They then rely on those things that they can count on. They rely on faith, just like I rely on faith when times are rocky for me. They rely on traditions, like hunting that's been passed on through generation to generation to generation. When people are angry and frustrated they are also subject to being divided, and politicians will exploit those instincts about so-called wedge issues. Karl Rove explicitly targets those issues and made it an entire campaign strategy over two elections."

Meanwhile, the paper itself announced its endorsement of Obama: "Pennsylvania -- this encrusted, change-averse commonwealth where a state liquor monopoly holds on against all reason and where municipal fiefdoms shrink from sensible consolidation -- needs to take a strong look at the new face and the new hope in this race. Because political business-as-usual is more likely to bring the usual disappointment for the Democrats this fall, the Post-Gazette endorses the nomination of Barack Obama, who has brought an excitement and an electricity to American politics not seen since the days of John F. Kennedy."

 

Comments (Send a comment)

That's okay. Hillary will be endorsed by Mellon Scaife's Pittsburgh Tribune Review newspaper. He owes her one for helping him spread his propaganda about General McPeak and helping to keep Democrats divided.

Sent by Sweetie | 10:22 AM ET | 04-16-2008

The REAL propaganda here is this idea of a damaged Democratic party. If there is one thing Obama is really riding on, it would be this idea. An idea borne from fear. If the Democratic party can not abide two strong candidates running for the same office then, maybe it's time to fold. Other countries should be so lucky.
I see Mr.Obama running his campaign and gaining, very much the same way George Bush ran his. Rhetorical speeches, foot in mouth when he leaves his teleprompter, and wink and nod politics.
After taking a good long look, I can only assume that this is what America wants. My vote stays with Hillary, I'll take leadership abilities any day of the week.
As far as the Democratic party goes, it will be fine. Go take a nap Howard.

Sent by Misty Letts | 12:18 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Every NPR blog post on Obama/Hillary seems biased towards Hillary. I have this blog as one of my several political blogs in my RSS reader and I can always tell it's NPR without looking by the way headline seems to lightly criticize Obama or lightly promote Hillary.

Sent by anonymous | 12:31 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Misty, what you're not seeing is that it's not a problem for the party to have two strong candidates if their take on the issues is somehow widely different. But that's not what we have. The general policy approach stated by Obama and Hillary is similar. So what does the person who's behind do? Does she simply talk about the substantive positions? No, she kneecaps her opponent at every opportunity, even to the point of stating McCain would be a better president. In the process, she's using the GOP playbook, alienating newly energized people, and weakening the person who is most likely going to be the nominee, not to mention what she's doing by splitting the party base. That is not propaganda: it's the truth. Her downticket effect in purple to red states will destroy the Democrats' chances to pick up seats in the Senate, too, as Republicans turn out in droves to vote against her.

Sent by Sweetie | 1:08 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Man does he not get it or what? Now he's telling people that they don't even think their own thoughts and on top of that if they do, they are just "distractions" and that they would do well to listen to him and just nevermind. Amazing arrogance.

And so castles made of sand fall in the sea, eventually...

Sent by deek | 2:17 PM ET | 04-16-2008

deek, you unintentionally crack me up.

Sent by P. Shears | 2:37 PM ET | 04-16-2008

The Americans/Keystonians try to tell us by the polls that the 'bitter' krieg is an unwelcome distraction by a mainstream media that is full of themselves.

Hillary, 'the-ready-on-day-one commander-ess of Bosnia', wonders why these poor, bitter people are not outraged - even when the Hillary/McCain-Bush multi-millionaires' campaign train exhorts them to be! What is the world coming to when a millionaires can't command instant respect from these poor masses?

No wonder Hillary is angry. Bitter even. And SOME bitter people are known to seek out, nay, cling to the comfort of a local church and/or a local pub. Is it a wonder that Hillary is known to drown her bitter ego in bitters? Imported NAFTA-boosted ones to boot!
--
"Apr 12, 2008 ...Sen Hillary Clinton also visited a restaurant in Crown Point, Indiana .. Clinton stood by the bar and took a shot of (Canadian) Crown Royal whiskey. She took one sip of the shot, then another small sip, then a few seconds later threw her head back and finished off the whole thing."
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/clinton-takes-a.html
----
[Necessary Disclosure: Hillary's drunken swig of foreign bitters partly paid for by the $millions Bill brings home to Hillary as payment for his succesful (ex-president's fast-tracked, quasi-insider) work on deals [on behalf foreign governments ,such as Colombia and China, and foreign individuals] which is inimical to the survival interests of the beleagured American workers, struggling American companies and indeed our national security interests]

Sent by chokora | 4:01 PM ET | 04-16-2008


"And so castles made of sand fall in the sea, eventually..."

That is comforting, deek.
I just can't wait for December2008 when the uppity egos and castles of wealthy McCains and the Clintons would have met their watery fate of the "Flying Dutchmen" ..

Sent by chokora | 4:17 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Oh sometimes it's quite intentional.

Sent by deek | 4:27 PM ET | 04-16-2008

It looks like Obama is running into rookie hoof and mouth desease. That is OK, as all three candidates goof now and then.

Wow, if Bush would have had a shot and a beer on tv, he would have lost the entire base that got him in. What a great change it is to see some old broad throw one back. Touche to the neo con jackasses and other off-the-chart wacko new Republicans.

I guess our "fair-haired boy" from Illinois is learning to cover his gaffs but he isn't very good at it. Hill is much better at expaining her mis-steps, a much better public lair indeed.

I love seeing quasi-democracy in action and I hope those two Dems battle until the last day of the convention. Great theatre to watch.

Neater if none of the suiters would try to come off as in touch with the folk that work every day of their lives.

Love to all in Pennsylvania, they do not beat around the bush. Straight talkers.

Good luck America.


Sent by Dave Rosen | 4:44 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Go back to Sen. Obama's original statement. He was speaking to wealthy San Francisco doners about how working class people weren't supporting him because fear and bitterness made them xenophobic. No one likes to be patronized and now Sen. Obama is desperately trying to spin his way out of this. His campaign is based on the premise that words count, but he is very quick to divorce himself from the importance of his own words when convenient.

Sent by Susan | 5:19 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Susan:
" .. Sen. Obama is desperately trying to spin his way out of this..."

Tell us this: Sen Obama referred to "SOME" people in rural America.
1) Do you disagree? Would you deny that SOME people who have fallen on hard times are bitter?
2) Would you deny that when faced with economic destitution, deep despair and/or catastrophe/danger SOME people, nay most people in rural America fall back upon their faith and/or guns?
3) What are some the core grudges espoused by the hate groups in USA and do the groups turn violent?
4) Would the words 'angry' or 'indignant' or 'hurt' be more palatable to you than 'bitter'? Do SOME 'angry' , 'indignant' or 'hurt' or 'bitter' people seek their pastor or their guns?

Remember, you can't support your Hillary's "speeches and words don't matter" stance and at the same time, or whenever convenient, quibble about words. But then, maybe you can: Duplicity/Double-speak seems to be your Hillary's forte: The decorated 'Bosnia commander' would do anything and say anything as well as kneecap Sen Obama too for a win.

Sent by chokora | 6:00 PM ET | 04-16-2008

Chokora:
and the spinning continues.

Sent by Susan | 1:19 PM ET | 04-18-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.



   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
Tom Regan

Tom Regan

Blogger

 
 
 

About Us

This year's election cycle has been one of the most exciting in memory. At the NPR News Blog we'll do our best to bring you interesting, informative -- and controversial -- stories from our own reporters and bloggers, as well as the rest of the best of the Internet and blogosphere. And we hope you'll let us know what you think as well.

Want to learn more? Be sure to read our Frequently Asked Questions and our discussion guidelines.

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Search the blog

 
 

Email Tom

If you would like to email Tom privately, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs