Many Voters Won't Pay Attention Until '08 World Series
For people who've been following the two presidential nomination campaigns for several months now, and are looking forward to see what happens in Iowa and New Hampshire, the suggestion that many Americans won't even start to pay attention to who is running for president until after the 2008 World Series might seem wildly mistaken. But that what Charles Cook — the writer of the nonpartisan newsletter, the Cook Political Report, which has been analyzing national elections since 1984 — believes.
Cook made the remark as part of a speech he gave at Fordham University about the 2008 elections. He also called the current political environment the "weirdest" he has ever seen.
New York political consultant Jerry Skurnik, who went to hear Cook's talk and blogged about it on his website, Room 8. Skurnik says this notion of Cook's that people start to pay attention to politics at different times supports a theory that he has.
For people who follow everything in politics, there has never been a better time. Thanks to 24x7 cable, the Internet, broadcast radio, satellite radio, newspapers, magazine, etc. political junkies (apologies to Ken Rudin) can follow almost every door-to-door visit of a candidate in Iowa or New Hampshire.
But there is a dark lining to this silver cloud, Skurnik suggests. For people who don't follow politics, those many folks who don't pay attention until after the last pitch of the series, this is the worse time. In the past, when there were fewer choices, they would rely primarily on the evening newscast, or their local paper, to relay the latest political information the needed. But now, with the wide range of choices of media, many people don't regularly watch any newscast of any kind, or even subscribe to a paper.
So in the end, Spurnik argues, this section of the public is actually less informed that they were before, despite all the information available.
He writes that this difference in when people begin to follow an election could explain why some pundits make predictions that are decidedly off the mark, or miss some trend that ultimately propels a candidate to victory.
1:16 PM ET
|
12-17-2007
|
permalink
|
comments (5)
|
e-mail post