News & Views
 

Rev. Wright: Pariah or Prince?

description

For this latest installment of "Speak Your Mind," we have two submissions about Rev. Jeremiah Wright's reemergence in the media and political landscape. First up: graduate student Jarrod Loadholt, then we hear from columnist Mary C. Curtis.

Reverend Wright's full-throated defense of the Black Protestant Experience and the historic exploration of the roots of the Prophetic Tradition was illuminating and, at times, downright impressive.

Wright provided not only much-needed contextualizing of his most controversial comments but also a more balanced depiction of the tremendous work that Trinity United Church of Christ does in Chicago's Southside. It is my hope that at least some of the working press infers from Wright's depiction of his congregation a definitive answer to "20-year question" that has often been posed to Senator Obama.

Jarrod Loadholt

Jarrod Loadholt

Clearly, a man working as a community organizer would define the scope of and find value in a community-based organization on the scale of Trinity far beyond that of the occasional divisive rhetoric of its former pastor.

Despite Reverend Wright's impressive chronicling of the Black Church experience, I was profoundly troubled by what was, essentially, a respondent mischaracterization to the media's gross mischaracterization of Wright.

To depict the media's response on Wright as a wholesale assault on the Black Church is premised on a questionable assumption. Responsible commentators were not usually making stylistic critiques of Wright's sermons, and despite their de-contextualized and often ill-informed perspectives, their critiques were nonetheless substantive and not stylistic.

Further, the crux of Wright's argument assumes that the Black Liberation Theology and the Prophetic Tradition is the Black Church, when in fact they remain but particular schools of though within the Black Religious Tradition.

Oddly, Wright himself comments on the "multi-layered and rich tapestry of the black religious experience" and yet puts forth a unitary conception of the black church as predominantly one informed by Black Liberation Theology.

The "prosperity gospel", Black Liberation Theology and Black Evangelicism all occupy spaces within the multi-layered tapestry that Wright alludes to but oddly departs from.

Jarrod Loadholt, a native of Orangeburg, S.C., is a joint degree student in law and public policy at New York University's School of Law and Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.


Memo to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright: You need to stop talking -- now.

I know that's a tough thing to ask. When you've seen your service to your faith and your community ignored, and your life reduced to an inflammatory 30-second sound bite, you want to tell your story.

When you are called unpatriotic and un-American after years in the military, you want to challenge everything people think they know about you.
Mary C. Curtis

Mary C. Curtis

But although Barack Obama is the one running for president, you, Reverend Wright are the story.

For now, you have lost control of your message. It is not about the work your church does for the hungry and poor, for senior citizens and those with HIV-AIDS.

Every time you speak -- to Bill Moyers, the Detroit NAACP or the National Press Club -- news shows will rerun incendiary clips that have come to define you and threaten to define Obama, making him just what America fears -- an angry black man.

It's not fair, but it is America in 2008, progressing -- ever so slowly -- on issues of race and difference.

Hillary Clinton, John McCain and commentators will pile on and who can blame them. This is politics.

Lost are issues of health care, jobs and the economy.

Many of those in your pews have sons and daughters in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet your place center stage crowds out discussion of these issues you care about.

You seemed to dismiss Obama's condemnation of your fiery moments in the pulpit by calling him a politician. That showed far less loyalty to him than he showed to you when he refused to renounce you, his former pastor.

Now Obama is defending your right to talk about what you really believe in.

He won't tell you to go away for a time. I will.

This is a historic moment, but it doesn't belong to you. It doesn't belong to the black church.

You say you hope this controversy sparks a dialogue. That may be. But you are not the person to lead it.

Mary C. Curtis is a columnist for The Charlotte Observer. Curtis was a 2006 Nieman Fellow at Harvard University. In addition to writing her twice-weekly column, which is syndicated nationally on the McClatchy Newspapers wire, Curtis contributes to the Nieman Watchdog blog and offers occasional commentary on National Public Radio.


If you have a "Speak Your Mind" submission, leave us a comment and we'll contact you. Remember -- the range of topics is totally unrestricted. But all submissions have to adhere to our guidelines.

comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

Oh please, let the man exercise the first amendment. Of all people, African Americans want to shut someone up. It appears Reverend Wright got used by a charismatic brother. And African Americans will fall into the same trap unless we ask questions and hear all sides. Everyone that have commented here are obviously voting for Obama even if he get busted tapping on walls in the men's room at Ohare...You know Christ was poked...pushed...kicked...prowled.. pierced...nailed to a cross but his truth prevailed. If Obama can't stand this kind of heat Wright is bringing...what will happen when Putin's puppet Dmitry Medvedev step to incorrectly or Ahmadinejad, Sarkozy, Bashar, Mahmoud Zahar, Hugo Chavez, Said Siam or Talabani tell him to kiss where the sun doesn't shine or Kim Jong II for kicks decide to see if one of his nuclear warheads can reach Seattle....we need a leader that is strong...this whinny mess if a little too much...the surrogates and all you Obama supporters who haven't finish drinking your kool-aid need to let Obama man-up!

Sent by lois | 4:25 PM ET | 04-29-2008

Thank you Sister. Very well written; which brings up another point. It has always been the Black woman who has knocked sense into the knuckleheaded Brothers.

Now it is time for the Brothers to explain, if need be, to the Rev. or anyone else, the realities of the modern media in no uncertain terms.

The current task of all Brothers is to protect the President-Elect, not speak for him, not question him (yeah, Tavis i said it), and certainly not shine the light on ourselves at his expense.

As an ex-pat Black man sitting in Africa with an Americans Abroad for Obama sign on my office door, i can tell you this election is much more important world wide than any of us realize.

Every single one of us needs to take a chill pill, along with our hypertension meds, and as was said back in the day; Let the Brother do his thing.

Sent by audiodramatist | 6:56 AM ET | 04-30-2008

I agree that it's time for the Rev to forego the revery of big media eclat. But listening to all of this has prompted a nagging question for me: Why in the world does every press outlet ignore Philadelphia Mayor Ed Rendell's 1997 remarks welcoming Minister Farrakhan? How in the world can it possibly NOT be news -- significant news -- that one of Hillary's biggest backers was so unequivocally effusive about the minister, in view of all the stuff they're trying to stick to Barack?

The video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA

Andrew Sullivan, 21 Apr 2008:

"One thought that this video inevitably raises: what if Obama had ever said such a thing or been to such an event? Given what we know now about this campaign, would it not be the conventional wisdom that it would be the end of his candidacy? And yet, Rendell is still a pillar of the Democratic party, central to the Clintons' Pennsylvania strategy, and praised as a classic old-style white ethnic pol. I don't imagine his credibility or reputation will be affected one iota by this. Even if it were Rendell running for president this year, I don't think this video would have Hannity and O'Reilly and Steyn and Coulter in a lather.

What do we learn from this? That Obama has to be even more distanced from these things because he's black. That's all. Race matters. The double standard endures. And the MSM perpetuates it. As do the Clintons."


Sent by Nicky McCatty | 10:23 AM ET | 04-30-2008

Obama is born into greatness; Others like Jeremiah Wright hope to have greatness thrust upoon them. Because JW lacks the voice and character to embrace bigger-than-life issues, he resorts to matters of lower instincts: courting public attention at any cost. Meanwhile the actual reason behind this new found boldness is greed, envy, and jealousy. JW shamelessly put his friendship with the senator up for bid. Between now and Obama's final count, JW considers that he holds a golden ticket that opens doors to fame and fortune: what a waste of potential! JW could have been a "John the Baptist" to a great man. How one fails to value that and speak of Jesus at the same time leaves me in complete void and darkness.

Sent by Evelyn S. Myrthil | 2:17 PM ET | 04-30-2008

An unfortunate situation has been made worse by the human need for validation. The retired Pastor Wright has allowed himself to be manipulated and exploited by the media. In the pulpit, his messages are not taken out of context and his humorous comments and motions are probably well-received by his parishioner's. In the media, he has no control over which statements are played again and again, which jokes are taken out of context, or which facial expressions are frozen in time for all to see and misunderstand. However, I'm sure that pastor Wright is aware of this. He's also aware sarcasm has no place in this dialogue. My assumption is that he never intended to be shoved into the spotlight or to be used as a weapon against Obama (someone he most likely loves and respects). This is indeed a historic moment in time. The problem is it's Obama's moment not pastor Wrights. Unfortunately, if Obama loses, pastor Wright has made himself a likely target for blame. If he was hoping to protect and preserve his legacy with this recent media jaunt, he may have done the opposite and caused enough damage to negate his past achievements. This is an unfortunate consequence of the ego. As a man of God, I expected a different kind of response from pastor Wright (right)...

As for the media's response to pastor Wright: What happened to the separation of church and state? Aren't we to assume that Obama's religious affiliations would not determine or influence his governmental duties or decisions. Also, church membership does not mean that you are an active member of the church or that you are aware of each and every sermon topic.

There are no winners here. Obama felt compelled to give a strongly worded speech denouncing his former pastor. No one should ever have to do such a thing. And, pastor Wright felt compelled to defend himself to people who were only looking to use his words against him. Words, expression, and gestures are powerful and should always be used with care and consideration. Pastor Wright, guided by his ego was wrong, and Obama guided by his aspirations to lead our country was, unfortunately, disrespectful to a a minister. Only God can bring out the good in this situation.

Sent by Levette McDaniel | 5:23 PM ET | 04-30-2008

here we go again...push it harder the repeat button... you know the one that other folks have used and reuse on African folks time after and before the sands of time...--divide and conquer.. once again....

audiod-- i think you was quoting the staple singers up yonder from "respect yourself" [sic]- "if you disrespect anybody that you run in to
how in the world do you think anybody's s'posed to respect you
if you don't give a heck 'bout the man with the bible in his hand
just get out the way, and let the gentleman do his thing
you the kind of gentleman that want everything your way
take the sheet off your face, boy, it's a brand new day
respect yourself, respect yourself
if you don't respect yourself
ain't nobody gonna give a good cahoot, na na na na
respect yourself, respect yourself"

Aint gonna be no winners nor losers in the game if you all dont git out of the sandbox and stop free-basing on the divide and conquer rock...

Mr. Wright in context said some things that were quite spot on it as the British say... so, did and has Mr. Obama.. They are two separate African men with separate legacies and perspectives and views based on their lives to date...

It is really telling that the quest for power and appeasing a bunch of folks who dont even know nor respect anything about Africans in general and these two specifically has spawned a basically father-son/mentor/mentoree dissolution of relationship due to other peoples media and caring what other people think and being sensitive to their needs...well, mississippi goddamn them..[yeah mama Simone i am calling ya]


Let these two gentlemen do their thangs for this nation because they sorely need to come up to speed real fast by hearing all of it..No sequestering any of either parties views and no sugar coating them either.

And folks, need to cease with this angle of striving for acceptability from certain quarters and certain peoples because if they don't respect you for being human just as they are...well then all this other stuff is just a big waste of time. Even if Obama becomes President, do you really think the power elite that run the country are really going to let this gentleman do his thang? and his way... Whose really naive here? Imagine Obama as President and his second executive order would be to release all non-felon offenders who are brown or black...ok Now, imagine if the same executive order was to incarcerate all wall street individuals caught in corruption against the public...and/or present or past government officials likewise... ok.. Yeah right... watch what Bush does with Scooter Libby, et al.

Did they let Reagan rule? Did they Eisenhower? Step BLACK and put your darn grannies' thinking caps BLACK on...and read in between the lines and BLACKwards...

Sent by K MJUMBE | 2:30 AM ET | 05-01-2008

There is a time and a place for everything....Rev. Wright would have lost nothing by holding his tongue until the Democratic nomination was secured by either Barack or Hillary and he would have deprived the media and election machines any added opportunities to use his words and actions against Barack. Rev. Wright's failure and refusal to postpone his imflammatory rhetoric will be marked as one of political history's defining Judas-type acts and may in fact interfeer with the best csandidate getting the job at a critical moment when it is sorely needed. It matters not whether one agrees with Rev. Wright or not - there is simply a time and a place. Equally important if he loves his country as much as he claims - he would want the best for this country at such a critical time...."the best" would be for the entire country to be allowed to evaluate both remaining candidates without any artifical and imflammatory additives. Rev. Wright is proving that we blacks can be our own worst enemies...especially when there is an opportunity to be on television.

Sent by Whole9 | 12:56 PM ET | 05-01-2008

K. Mjumbe. African folks? You seem to miss the point that Africa is a continent & not a country. A veery diverse continent. Your reductionism does no good & it over-simplifies rendering your premise (whatever it is) mute from the beginning. Mainly because it's base on fantasy. And you insert African folk for ALL people with dark skin & Black Americans which is what real, actual (as opposed to a political abstraction) 'African folks' saw me as & referred to me as when I was in Africa.

Learn a little about human nature in the real world outside of a narrow construct.


Check out & follow what's been happening in Zimbabwe for a little real-world perspective.

Sent by Jon J | 2:22 PM ET | 05-01-2008

Black to Jon J.. i stated African folks. as i view all peoples of African descedant as African...doesnt matter to me what geographical locale on the planet they happen to be since their is shared history.. What is the difference for you between the slavery in the Americas and the the neo-colonist or colonist history on the continent? Leopold in the Congo and rubber vines, sugar and cotton in the Americas and Carribbean the contours are similar are they not?

I note only know that Africa is a continent..one of some 56 nation-states stretching from the Chagos in the east to Cabo Verde island in the west and from Tangiers to Cape Town but i also no that the old game of divide and rule has been practiced over all Africans globally from since before day one.

What's happening in Harare? Ian Smith is dead last i heard? Do you know who Ian Smith is? Do you know what he did and to whom? Given me a paper on Ian Smith and Rhodesia [as Zimbabwe was termed before 1980] and the British malfeasance and footdragging on dealing with Mr. Smith. Let us take it all the way back and break it forward to date...

and by the way, whose human and whose nature are you referring? maybe african human nature is different from latin is different from asian is different from european...is difference and variable for your environment and their times...what are you talking about and in whose "human nature" world?

Sent by K MJUMBE | 12:41 AM ET | 05-03-2008

this usa cultural critic looks forward to seeing & hearing more of the 'good right' rev wright --- broadcasted across the world to see...

without a doubt...

his 'immature & silly' views on diseases, educational practices & etc...

respresents the views of most usa blacks regardless of age, gender & educational achievement...

rev wright & most of the usa blacks who hold these views -- have the usa protected right to do so...

but as the world will see it -- and them as...

a little people
a dirty people
barbarous & cruel...

...priceless!!!

Sent by dirtyblues | 4:33 AM ET | 05-03-2008

Rev. Dr. Wright had the nerve to call Barrak Obama a "Politician"! Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that what the Presidential Canidate is? When Dr. Wright's comments are disecteted and not sensationalized, the man spoke the truth to power. That's what Black Ministers have done in this country for centuries. I cheered at my television screen when I saw Dr. Wright defend himself at the National Press Club. Dr. Wright was a Marine. A US trained killer. I'm not suprized that he defended himself aganist his critics. The media smacked him up, flipped him, and called him everything but a child of God for speaking the truth. Godspeed Rev. Dr. Wright.

Sent by Maurice Showers | 9:50 AM ET | 05-04-2008

What is the difference for you between the slavery in the Americas and the the neo-colonist or colonist history on the continent?

TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION: WELL...NOT BLACKS IN AMERICA CAPTURE & MARCHED SLAVES OFF TO THE COAST & SOLD THEM. THE WEST (BRITISH) ENDED SLAVERY LONG BEFORE AFRICA/ASIA & THE MUSLIM WORLD CAME AROUND TO IT.


but i also no that the old game of divide and rule has been practiced over all Africans globally from since before day one.

A STRATEGY FOR PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD NOT JUST AFRICANS.

What's happening in Harare? Ian Smith is dead last i heard? Do you know who Ian Smith is? Do you know what he did and to whom? Given me a paper on Ian Smith and Rhodesia [as Zimbabwe was termed before 1980] and the British malfeasance and footdragging on dealing with Mr. Smith. Let us take it all the way back and break it forward to date...

RAMBLE?

and by the way, whose human and whose nature are you referring? maybe african human nature is different from latin is different from asian is different from european...

NO THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE.

BY THE WAY THAT WAS A RAMBLING INCOHERENT, POST WITH NO TRANSITION???

Sent by Jon J | 5:28 PM ET | 05-06-2008



   
   
   
null


 

SPECIAL PROGRAMMING NOTE

 
 

About 'News & Views'

News & Views is the companion blog of NPR's news magazine show, News & Notes. It extends News & Notes' ongoing conversation about the diversity of the African-American experience. For more information, read our Frequently Asked Questions guide and our Discussion Rules.

 
 

Staff & Bloggers

Tony Cox

Host,
News & Notes

 

Nicole Childers

Executive Producer,
News & Notes

 

Christabel Nsiah-Buadi

Sr. Supv. Producer,
News & Notes

 

Geoffrey Bennett

Producer,
News & Notes

 

Geoffrey Gardner

Web Producer,
News & Notes

 

 
 

Search 'News & Views'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs