From Farai

Cartoonist Speaks His Mind on Obama Cover

The response to the New Yorker's cover, depicting as gleeful terrorist fist-bump-ers Senator and Mrs. Obama (or should that be Mrs. Obama, Esq., since she is a lawyer?) has been pretty unbelievable, here on our blog and, well, everywhere else.

Today we spoke on-air with Art Spiegelman, who has both been a critic of The New Yorker and one of their most famous and controversial cover artists.

The Kiss

hide caption"The Kiss" was another of Spiegelman's controversial covers

The New Yorker

His 1993 cover called, "The Kiss," showed a Hassidic Jewish man and a black woman kissing. It came after tensions between the two groups spurred intense riots in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn. We asked why he chose that image. Here's his response.

Art Spiegelman: "Huh. Well, lets see. Back then the wounds for that particular set of race riots were very raw still, and I felt as I was just entering The New Yorker with a mandate to see how my underground comic sensibility and The New Yorker's rarefied sensibility might meet. I offered this up as a Valentine's Day cover, because there's this thing called irony. You know if you show people who are murdering each other kissing, it makes one think about why they might have been killing each other. It opens some subjects up to discussion that otherwise were just taken as givens. And I think this cover managed to unite that community like nothing else, which they both hated me for."

I also asked if he thought The New Yorker's Obama cover crossed the line of propriety.

Art Spiegelman: "Of propriety? Perhaps, but I think it did so for an urgent and good cause, which is to blow this stupid calumny about Obama away once and for all. It travels as the subtext through all this polite conversation. I just um, as I was looking around today, saw some NBC report that was quoting a Newsweek poll, saying 50 percent of Americans believe that Obama is or was a Muslim and was sworn in on the Koran to a Senate seat and so on. Madness. And it seems to me that showing the fevered image directly will be a possible way of looking at and dissipating that image. I think, as a result, it's a fairly brave thing to do in which The New Yorker is fulfilling its function at its best which is to make people think and talk."

Finally, he had some thoughts on how the blogosphere is manifesting during this controversy.

Art Spiegelman: "You know, I think that what I've been seeing on the blogs which is kind of an impressive thing since there weren't blogs back in 1993 when "The Kiss" cover was there. All I got to see were sheets of angry letters of one kind or another. Here the letters are there before the ink is dry on the printing press, and there's relatively little reflection so one is sorting through this as it is sorting itself out, but what is happening is there is a discussion about something that need to be talked about, and The New Yorker helped that discussion happen. And it's one of the times when I feel 'hats off New Yorker,' they got it right, you know? This is not something that goes away by saying, 'but it's not seemly.'"

Do you agree with his overall assessment of the artistic and social purpose of The New Yorker cover? Do you think that this cover crossed a line the magazine would not have crossed with a white candidate? And why do you think this hit such a nerve?

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

unfortunately, I think yo missed the boat on this satire sir. I think if you wanted to poke a little fun at the folks who have these foolish notions about Obama, his wife and their affectionate fist bump, I could see a drawing of some guy in a wifebeater "T" shirt, belly out fist in the air about to pound on his wife. In the back ground a television set with Obama and the misses sharing a fist bump on stage, their sweet girls smiling up at them. Maybe that shows the ridiculousness of it all. What the New Yorker showed seems to validate the fears of people who are not smart enough to recognize a joke when they see it.

Sent by just commenting | 6:17 PM | 7-15-2008

This is the way I see satire: It must be funny and have a message. If you have to explain to people what you meant to say in the satire (when most folks are not laughing), then it is a POOR satire or poorly executed.

Let's be honest, how many Americans read the New Yorker? How many Americans get New Yorker's satirical views. I do. But I know most people around me don't read the magazine.

So for the New Yorker to go to drastic lengths after folks were already decrying the "terrorist fist bump," Michelle Obama being seen as the angry black woman, and her husband as a secret muslim. How does this cover do the editors' intended message any justice with the regular American(who doesn't read the New Yorker) but see such damning images on the newstands?

Sent by Moji | 8:10 PM | 7-15-2008

God, I hope we are smart enough to know satire when we see it. I guess, however, most Americans (as we have been dumbed down by successive administrations) do not know satire when we see it. Perhaps that is why the most popular "comedies" of today would make the Three Stooges blush. I wonder what so many who are objecting would think of Jonathan Swift..remember he advocated eating children. It is indeed a strange world, and growing stranger....

Sent by Robert Towers | 8:26 PM | 7-15-2008

I hope that Art Spiegelman's assessment is correct. I believe that it is better to be talking about this openly than it is to allow it to fester.

Sent by Stewart Urist | 8:46 PM | 7-15-2008

I am glad I let my subscription to the New Yorker expire. This cover is not humor. I resent it, and I am white.

Sent by Beverly Parker | 9:02 AM | 7-16-2008

Where are these people from? As a non christian person,Spiegelman thinks it is Ok to denigrate others.He needs to read the Bible...what you do to others DEFINETLY WILL COME BACK TO YOU.Hope he has his chicken coop ready.

Sent by dandre | 3:46 PM | 7-16-2008

I thought it was really funny. This is a free country and we have freedom of speach and if you don't like it, well there are other countrys that you can join that have many restrictions.

Sent by Funny | 2:19 PM | 7-18-2008

About

Support comes from: