News & Views
 

January 21, 2009

It Doesn't Matter That I Wasn't There

description

Beth Perry has this week's installment of "Speak Your Mind." The Los Angeles-based magazine writer says of yesterday's inauguration, "whether in the streets of Washington or the sofas of Westwood, it was impossible to deny the innumerable shift."

At first, I was so disappointed that I didn't want to watch.


Due to an overbooked hotel, a delayed cross-country flight, sold-out train tickets and an all-access pass that turned out to be unusable, my plans to witness President Barack Obama's inauguration firsthand fell apart.

And so it was with a measure of dejection and frustration that I turned on the television at 7 yesterday morning to watch the festivities from 3,000 miles away.

I saw clusters of hooded faces stretched for what looked like miles behind the Capital. I watched Aretha Franklin power her way through a feathery rendition of "My Country, Tis of Thee," festooned with a giant grey-knit-and-rhinestone bow that rivaled the mammoth Bible Jill Biden held as her husband took the vice presidential oath.

I marveled at the showmanship of a coatless Yo-Yo Ma, wielding his bow like a majorette's baton, smiling widely even as the 20-degree chill turned his face maroon. And then I saw the future First daughters, dolled up in double-breasted coats, ribbon sashes and puffy gloves, careful not to touch their freshly curled hair. I thought of myself on childhood Easters, covered in ruffles and struggling to focus during seemingly interminable church services.

Barack and Michelle Obama

President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama walk the inaugural parade route in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2009.

Charles Dharapak, AP Photo

I saw Michelle Obama, a vision of French silk and Swiss wool lace, standing tall in her ivy kitten heels cradling a Bible that existed when her great-great grandparents were slaves. She beamed at her husband, all curves and confidence, not a hair out of place, and I thought of my mother, a no-nonsense physician who integrated her tiny Ohio grade-school when she was six.

When I saw Barack Obama -- proud, poised, and presidential -- strolling down Pennsylvania Avenue a few feet away from a replica of the city bus Rosa Parks rode in 54 years ago, waving at the world with one hand and faithfully holding his wife with the other, I thought of my grandfather, who spent his teenage years taking my grandmother to movies in the "colored" part of town.

I was with him on election night when, dying of lung cancer that had spread to his brain, he woke up from a nap, heard that Obama had won, and said simply: "I knew this was possible." I thought of the blind fear my father felt as a child riding in the backseat when his family drove through Mississippi and remembered the day, shortly after I'd been named valedictorian of my Tennessee high school, that I stopped in a suburban ice cream shop and a 7-year-old boy called me a n-----.

When I saw our new president clap his hands in the parade reviewing stand and laugh as our new first lady bounced her shoulders to her high school's marching band, I lost my breath. Suddenly, the most powerful family in our nation reminded me of my own. Was this possible? My culture, my undeniably black experience of pin curls and pantyhose, of edge-ups and electric slides had become presidential.

President Barack Obama's daughters

President Barack Obama's daughters Sasha and Malia watch the inaugural parade in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2009.

Jae Hong, AP Photo

The pillars of a happy, loving, unadulterated, successful black family had morphed into unrivaled cultural icons. With a touch of swagger in his gait, Barack Obama had stepped squarely into the annals of history, bringing the consciousness of every person of color with him. I was immediately struck by a visceral sense of validation, an intangible feeling of belonging, when before that moment I hadn't realized I'd felt like I didn't belong.

I am not, as they say, drinking the Kool Aid. I realize that like all before him, President Obama is a politician. The systemic cesspool facing his administration will not be easy to fix; some promises will not be kept, and some supporters will be disappointed. But yesterday, as he made "hang-ten" gestures and she two-stepped to Stevie Wonder, when the girls pressed their noses to the bulletproof glass and giggled without self-consciousness, when all of a sudden the public face of my country actually looked a little like mine, none of that mattered.

The great James Baldwin once wrote that "there are people in the world for whom 'coming along' is a perpetual process, people who are destined never to arrive." On Jan. 20, whether in the streets of Washington or the sofas of Westwood, it was impossible to deny the innumerable shift, the core feeling that after two centuries of coming along -- of getting better and then falling short, of learning from our mistakes and then repeating them -- that our country, our wonderful, vibrant country, had in some fundamental way finally arrived.

-- Beth Perry is a magazine writer living in Los Angeles.

comments () | | e-mail

 
September 10, 2008

What John McCain Could Learn From Omar Little

description

Our online series, "Speak Your Mind," continues: What do Sen. John McCain and Omar Little of HBO's The Wire have in common? Nothing ... and that's not necessarily a good thing, writes R. Corey Richardson, an advertising account planner from Austin, Texas.

Read and respond.

John McCain and Omar Little

Sen. John McCain and "Omar Little"

Composite: Getty Images and HBO

If you're like me and were an avid fan of HBO's series The Wire, you're no doubt familiar with the character of Omar Little. For those unfamiliar with the show, Omar was creator David Simon's anti-hero in a sprawling pastiche of flawed individuals.


He was a trench coat clad and shotgun-toting homosexual man who made his living robbing Baltimore's drug dealers and, occasionally, dispatching of those who would attempt to do him harm. Hardly the type of character you'd think to invite into your home every Sunday, and even more uncommon a character for people to root for.

But, amidst all of his contradictory character flaws, there was something about Omar Little that made him admirable ... he had a code. He never cursed, never raised his gun to children or anyone not involved in selling drugs, didn't work on Sundays, and even made it a point to take his grandmother to church every week. Beyond the not so nice qualities that made him a thug, there were these few qualities that made him honorable.

I wish John McCain watched The Wire.

Not because it would give him a better sense of what's going on in urban America, or because it would give him a better grasp on law enforcement, school, or other municipal services that are suffering in our inner cities. Not even because it was just a really good show. No, I wish he had watched it to learn the lesson of Omar Little and what life is like for a man with a code.

I saw John McCain's new campaign ad today, where he attacks Barack Obama on his stance on teaching sex education to kindergarteners. The image is, to put it quite bluntly, jarring and to expound, perverse and disturbing. The screen juxtaposes the smiling image of a black man beside the emblazoned terms KINDERGARTEN and SEX as if to send the subliminal subtext that the happy Negro on the screen is some type of hypersexual creature waiting to come after your children or children you may know.

It is, in some senses, the most base level and disgusting political ad I've seen since Lee Atwater introduced the world to Willie Horton in 1988 (and yeah, I was only 10 back then and I knew it was f*cked up.).

This is the politics of 51/49 that we have been subjugated to and manipulated by for the past 15 years. A politics of identity and division where citizens are pitted against citizens to curry the government to address their individual needs; where we can't use the hyphen in our Americaness (African-American, Italian-American, Arab-American) to connect us, but rather, to divide us. It's the same tool the master used against the slave to keep them servile, and it is the cudgel that is used now to keep us fighting over the crumbs instead of asking where the cake is at.

But I digress.

When this campaign began, John McCain promised that he would run an honorable campaign based on the issues that the American people could be proud of, a civilized debate of the matters facing our nation, and a departure from the Karl Rove tactics of the past that even he had been a victim of in 2000. I believed him because I believed in the John McCain of 2000 ... But I was wrong.

John McCain, you have no honor.

Let me break it down 'til it can no longer be broke...

The Mafia has a code.

Gangbangers have a code.

Dope dealers have a code.

Even prisoners have a code.

Out in the streets and in the annals of the underworld that most people never see, there are rules and laws that dictate one's behavior, and they are predicated on the most primary tenet of one's character: The ability to keep one's word. You say what you mean, mean what you say, and that which is said is your credit on your name. That's all you got. That's the currency you trade on.

Back to Omar.

Omar lived by his code and stuck to his word, which made him a respectable, although not always likeable, individual. The police knew where he stood, the streets knew where he stood, and so when a question arose about what he did or did not do, he always had his word and his code to fall back on -- until he was blinded by anger and avarice and went from being a man of righteous purpose to a man of selfish vengeance. He crossed his own line and shortly thereafter, he was dispatched -- ironically enough, by one of those he would have not turned his gun on based on his own honor.

So when John McCain chooses to disregard his own word, betray his own code, and negate his own honor, he only sets himself up to become a victim of his own tactics.

I'm not espousing violence or fomenting disproportionate retribution here, people (for the feds that might be reading my thoughts). I'm just drawing a parallel based on our generation's closest thing to a Greek tragedy.

The moral of the story is: When you betray the thing you love by betraying your promise to it, that thing will destroy you.

The same can be said for Jimmy McNulty as it can be said for Bill Clinton. It can be said for Stringer Bell as it can be said for Karl Rove. You can't be yourself by not being yourself and not suffer the consequences of your actions.

I hope someone in the McCain campaign has some time to check out The Wire and can let ol' Johnny know how these stories end.

Probably not.

And probably, like The Wire, this story won't end the way I want it to and instead we won't see real change, but just the perpetuation of the same by new faces of the same faction.

I hope I'm wrong, but I'm usually not.

-- R. Corey Richardson

comments () | | e-mail

 
September 1, 2008

An Opportunity To Teach the Panderers A Lesson

description

Our online series, "Speak Your Mind," gives you a chance to sound off on the issues you care about.

News & Views reader James Swain of Miami, Fla., offers this latest installment, titled, "Hard Working Americans Need to Get to Know Each Other Better."

"This election presents an unprecedented opportunity for Americans to teach the panderers a lesson," he writes.

Read and respond.

description

Courtesy James Swain

During the Democratic primary campaign, Hillary Clinton asserted a superior ability over her Democratic rival, Barack Obama, to reach "hard working Americans ... white Americans." This mini-debate really bugged me and, now that the primary is over, it still looms large over the coming election. So I wanted to share these thoughts with you.


Her statement, and the dust devils of opinion and comment that followed, foreshadow what we are likely to see over the next eight weeks. Even now, the political party machines, their surrogates and handmaidens have made it plain that they see and intend to recast voters, the American people, as demographic interest groups with differences to be exploited.

We can expect appeals to the worst in all of us as the pandering and fear mongering begin. We can look forward to voters being characterized as "working class white" and "working class black" and "male" and "female" and "young" and "old" and "rural" and "urban" and "suburban" and "native born" and "immigrant" and on and on. The idea being that we are one or the other, and that we are either with one demographic or against another. The politicians and 'talking- heads' who would divide Americans into these manufactured camps, should be ashamed of themselves.

This election presents an unprecedented opportunity for Americans to teach the panderers a lesson.

Continue reading "An Opportunity To Teach the Panderers A Lesson" »

comments () | | e-mail

 
July 25, 2008

Chorus of Voices Needed to Drown Out Ignorance

description

Areva D. Martin has this week's installment of "Speak Your Mind." Her op-ed titled, "It Takes a Chorus of Diverse Voices to Drown Out Ignorance," is focused on the recent incendiary comments of radio host Michael Savage.

Martin is an attorney based in Los Angeles.

On Wednesday, July 16th, AM radio talk show host Michael Savage, whose weekly show, Savage Nation, reaches an audience of eight million Americans via 350 stations across the country, attacked minority children and their families for falsely claiming to have asthma so that they can get "the extra welfare ...and ...extra help in school."


He called their ploy "...a money racket." Savage punctuated his commentary with fake coughing to demonstrate how easily the crafty minority children fool school nurses.

Michael Savage

Michael Savage

So far, the reaction from the mainstream media has been overwhelmingly consistent -- rampant apathy.

This is in stark contrast to events in 2007, when less than eight days transpired between radio shock jock Don Imus' equally racist comments about Rutgers University's female college basketball team and his official firing from CBS Radio.

In the week and a day that lapsed between the initial "nappy headed hos" incident and Imus' termination, a number of prominent journalists and community leaders called for Imus to step down. Their voices were joined by outraged basketball fans, advertisers who pulled their support of Imus' show, and thousands of everyday Americans who rallied to the cause.

The cascade of Imus protests that eventually pulled the shock jock into the vortex demonstrated the power of an outraged coalition of diverse voices -- a diversity noticeably absent from l'affaire du Savage.

Continue reading "Chorus of Voices Needed to Drown Out Ignorance " »

comments () | | e-mail

 
May 27, 2008

The 'Racism Vs. Sexism' Debate Revisited

description

Moji Oderinde is back with this week's installment of "Speak Your Mind." Oderinde hails from Oakland Park, Fla., and blogs at AfroAmerica Writer. This week, she writes about the perceived sexism and racism in the Democratic race for the White House. Take a look and share your thoughts.

Moji Oderinde

Moji Oderinde

I'm loving this brand of theater called the election season, especially that of the Democratic Party. The two main characters, the hero and heroine of this play, are Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton respectively.

The hero was a new brand of post-racial candidate, who generated the main question last year of whether he was "black enough." But recently his blackness is left unquestioned due to a certain Rev. Wright fiasco. What a difference a year makes!

The heroine has been a highly visible figure in the national and international scene for almost two decades. The fact that she is a woman was just an added bonus, but now she laments she might not get the destined prize based on a bias against her gender.

So the plot thickens, and I wonder which of these characters has the biggest hurdle to overcome: the racism or the sexism block.

Unfortunately, this is not theater. It is real life, and millions of voters are banking on changing the direction of the nation with their votes. It is sad (though inevitable) that the media will reduce this historic election season to just race and gender when key issues like the economy, education, and -- the elephant in the room -- an over five-year old war with no exit strategy remain unresolved.

Have I experienced racism? Absolutely. What about sexism? Definitely. As a black woman, I identify with both debates. But I will never say one issue is greater than the other like Gloria Steinem's controversial op-ed for the New York Times, defending the cause of sexism over racism. Nor will I be like Geraldine Ferraro, chiming the same sentiments last March and recently on the Today Show. Now Sen. Clinton joined her supporters in Steinem and Ferraro to voice the Media's "moments of gender bias" in a recent Washington Post interview of how her nomination went from a sure thing to a steep mountain.

Here's the deal about me: One of my pet peeves is with folks seeing hidden racism or sexism in everything. I think such moves could be a cop-out for a fundamental reason why a person might not succeed in a venture, in this case, a presidential nomination.

So as I watched some TV pundits highlighting different scenarios of sexism against Sen. Clinton, I wondered if they quickly forgot some scenarios that could be called racism against her opponent. But I digress.

The perceived sexism aside, could it be that the media or some voters are not against supporting a woman for president, but not this particular woman they see in Sen. Clinton? What about how she ran her campaign?

Let me count the ways: First, she announced herself as the most experienced candidate when the nation's pulse for almost two years has been about change. Second, the inconsistency in her message: She started out as the most experienced before the primaries, found her voice in New Hampshire, became "Rocky" in Philadelphia, and now being the most electable among "hard-working white Americans." Finally, she did not have the strategic foresight to campaign in caucus states or plan for any contingency especially in the area of raising money just in case the primaries ran longer than Super Tuesday.

What does sexism have to do with the missteps of this campaign?

-- Moji Oderinde

Flashback: Speak Your Mind -- Defining Blackness

comments () | | e-mail

 
May 16, 2008

White Valedictorian a Matter of Pride or Validation?

description

Amid news of Morehouse College graduating its first white valedictorian, this week, we have a submission from blogger Kyle "Scoop" Yeldell. Yeldell, a Morehouse graduate and writer for Finditt.com, takes issue with what he calls the "media attention and slant to [valedictorian Joshua Packwood's] success."

Kyle

Kyle "Scoop" Yeldell

Spike, Martin, Samuel, shoot, even Mukasa could be the face of dear old Morehouse.

It's been circulating that for the first time in Morehouse's 141-year history that she has a white valedictorian.

Joshua Packwood is a valedictorian that had a holistic college and social experience, one who excelled in the classroom both and abroad. Josh earned the right to be both valedictorian and wear the title "Morehouse Man."

However, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution titled their article on him with a preposterous question: Is he the face of Morehouse College?

Continue reading "White Valedictorian a Matter of Pride or Validation?" »

comments () | | e-mail

 
April 29, 2008

Rev. Wright: Pariah or Prince?

description

For this latest installment of "Speak Your Mind," we have two submissions about Rev. Jeremiah Wright's reemergence in the media and political landscape. First up: graduate student Jarrod Loadholt, then we hear from columnist Mary C. Curtis.

Reverend Wright's full-throated defense of the Black Protestant Experience and the historic exploration of the roots of the Prophetic Tradition was illuminating and, at times, downright impressive.

Wright provided not only much-needed contextualizing of his most controversial comments but also a more balanced depiction of the tremendous work that Trinity United Church of Christ does in Chicago's Southside. It is my hope that at least some of the working press infers from Wright's depiction of his congregation a definitive answer to "20-year question" that has often been posed to Senator Obama.

Jarrod Loadholt

Jarrod Loadholt

Clearly, a man working as a community organizer would define the scope of and find value in a community-based organization on the scale of Trinity far beyond that of the occasional divisive rhetoric of its former pastor.

Despite Reverend Wright's impressive chronicling of the Black Church experience, I was profoundly troubled by what was, essentially, a respondent mischaracterization to the media's gross mischaracterization of Wright.

To depict the media's response on Wright as a wholesale assault on the Black Church is premised on a questionable assumption. Responsible commentators were not usually making stylistic critiques of Wright's sermons, and despite their de-contextualized and often ill-informed perspectives, their critiques were nonetheless substantive and not stylistic.

Further, the crux of Wright's argument assumes that the Black Liberation Theology and the Prophetic Tradition is the Black Church, when in fact they remain but particular schools of though within the Black Religious Tradition.

Oddly, Wright himself comments on the "multi-layered and rich tapestry of the black religious experience" and yet puts forth a unitary conception of the black church as predominantly one informed by Black Liberation Theology.

The "prosperity gospel", Black Liberation Theology and Black Evangelicism all occupy spaces within the multi-layered tapestry that Wright alludes to but oddly departs from.

Jarrod Loadholt, a native of Orangeburg, S.C., is a joint degree student in law and public policy at New York University's School of Law and Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.


Memo to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright: You need to stop talking -- now.

I know that's a tough thing to ask. When you've seen your service to your faith and your community ignored, and your life reduced to an inflammatory 30-second sound bite, you want to tell your story.

When you are called unpatriotic and un-American after years in the military, you want to challenge everything people think they know about you.
Mary C. Curtis

Mary C. Curtis

But although Barack Obama is the one running for president, you, Reverend Wright are the story.

For now, you have lost control of your message. It is not about the work your church does for the hungry and poor, for senior citizens and those with HIV-AIDS.

Every time you speak -- to Bill Moyers, the Detroit NAACP or the National Press Club -- news shows will rerun incendiary clips that have come to define you and threaten to define Obama, making him just what America fears -- an angry black man.

It's not fair, but it is America in 2008, progressing -- ever so slowly -- on issues of race and difference.

Hillary Clinton, John McCain and commentators will pile on and who can blame them. This is politics.

Lost are issues of health care, jobs and the economy.

Many of those in your pews have sons and daughters in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet your place center stage crowds out discussion of these issues you care about.

You seemed to dismiss Obama's condemnation of your fiery moments in the pulpit by calling him a politician. That showed far less loyalty to him than he showed to you when he refused to renounce you, his former pastor.

Now Obama is defending your right to talk about what you really believe in.

He won't tell you to go away for a time. I will.

This is a historic moment, but it doesn't belong to you. It doesn't belong to the black church.

You say you hope this controversy sparks a dialogue. That may be. But you are not the person to lead it.

Mary C. Curtis is a columnist for The Charlotte Observer. Curtis was a 2006 Nieman Fellow at Harvard University. In addition to writing her twice-weekly column, which is syndicated nationally on the McClatchy Newspapers wire, Curtis contributes to the Nieman Watchdog blog and offers occasional commentary on National Public Radio.


If you have a "Speak Your Mind" submission, leave us a comment and we'll contact you. Remember -- the range of topics is totally unrestricted. But all submissions have to adhere to our guidelines.

comments () | | e-mail

 
March 25, 2008

Take Care of Children in Need

Speak Your Mind

This week's installment of Speak Your Mind is actually a Get My Vote submission from novelist ZZ Packer. She says the party that best tends to children in need is the party that will earn her vote.

What is Get My Vote? Get a refresher here.

Do you agree with Packer? What would it take to get your vote? Sound off!

comments () | | e-mail

 
February 26, 2008

An Apology to Black Women for Gay America ...

description

Speak Your Mind is back! This week, we have a submission from blogger and News & Notes contributor Jasmyne Cannick. She writes about the "serious race issues still at play in gay America."

description

Courtesy Jasmyne Cannick

At this year's State of the Black Union, Dick Gregory apologized to President Bill Clinton on behalf of Blacks for our role in allowing Clinton to believe that he was Black.

In that same spirit, I feel compelled to apologize to Charles Knipp on behalf of gays for allowing him to think that he's one of the Black women that he unsuccessfully tries to emulate. I also want to apologize to Black women on behalf of gay America for Charles Knipp.

Knipp's latest cry for help involved (Note: Graphic Image) superimposing my head on some other Black woman's naked body and then tactlessly posting it on his website for my continuing to expose his constant mockery of the Black woman.

Continue reading "An Apology to Black Women for Gay America ..." »

comments () | | e-mail

 
October 25, 2007

Calling for Autonomous, Black-Owned Film Companies

description

This week, we have a submission from blogger Tambay Obenson. He's a filmmaker based in Brooklyn, New York, who also hosts a weekly podcast on black cinema called "The Obenson Report." He says blacks should take ownership (literally and figuratively) of their on-screen depictions.

Tambay Obenson

Courtesy Tambay Obenson

Since the early days of cinema, when the Lincoln Motion Picture Company and Oscar Micheaux existed, we haven't seen an autonomous black-owned and operated film entity in this country, akin to the likes of the Hollywood-based studios and their subsidiaries.

As a black filmmaker, I once empathized with the cries of black voices working within the studio system, criticizing it for its lack of diversity. However, the song has become stale, as people like myself, existing outside the system, struggle to understand the apparent lack of vision that some of our well-paid, powerful, influential voices display.

Continue reading "Calling for Autonomous, Black-Owned Film Companies" »

comments () | | e-mail

 
October 16, 2007

For Light-Skinned Only?

description

This week, we have a submission from blogger and News & Notes contributor Jasmyne Cannick. She writes about the age-old complexion tensions in the black community.

description

Courtesy Jasmyne Cannick


The "Light Skin Libra Birthday Bash," which was to take place at Detroit's Club APT, was the brainchild of a self described "dark-skinned" African-American Detroit DJ and party promoter. The party was intended to let "light-skinned" black women into a downtown club for free. In his defense, Ulysses "DJ Lish" Barnes, said that he had plans for "Sexy Chocolate" and "Sexy Caramel" parties too. The good news is that the parties have been canceled after much criticism and calls for boycotts and lawsuits.



There are no words for some of the ignorant (insert four letter word that starts with an s, rhymes with hit), that we do to ourselves. But let me give it a try.

Continue reading "For Light-Skinned Only?" »

comments () | | e-mail

 
August 27, 2007

The Class of 2011: More of the Same?

description

Our online series, "Speak Your Mind," gives you, our listeners and readers, a chance to sound off on the issues you care about.

With schools set to reopen in a few weeks, this latest installment about the country's failing education system comes from "News & Views" reader James Swain.

Read and respond.

description

Courtesy James Swain

When you consider our wealth as a nation, the sorry state of basic education in large sectors of our society is inexcusable. It is a disgrace that for all of our scientific advances, our business acumen and our claim to a common ethos that truly values education and learning, we can't do what it takes to make sure that all of our children successfully graduate from high school. Is the goal of an educated population out of reach for America? No, of course it isn't. We know enough to meet this challenge, but we need to act, and demand that our leaders act, with a sense of urgency.

According to a recent article by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, 15 percent -- or about 2,000 -- of the rural and urban public high schools in America are responsible for over 50 percent of the nation's dropouts. Other data tells us that we lose almost half (40 to 50 percent) of the kids who are not going to graduate high school, in the ninth grade. These studies point to various associational risk factors. There's the predictable linear relationship between failing schools and poor communities; the lack of adequate preparation for high school in the lower grades and; most poignantly, the fact that 40 percent of those lost in the ninth grade were left back, at least once, in earlier grades.

We don't need to recount the high statistical associations with negative outcomes (especially incarceration and continued generational poverty) awaiting adults with no high school diploma. We know all too well that a high school diploma is an indispensable prerequisite to successful, independent adulthood.

But this knowledge begs the question. Is anyone responsible for solving this problem? Is anyone accountable for the shameful failure of these schools? Is anyone out there up to the challenge of ending this blight? How much could such an effort cost? How much would it be worth if it succeeded? Is it more than the price we are paying for our continued failure?

I know, I know: politicians and government leaders can't solve the problem alone; throwing money at the problem won't solve it; you have to start earlier than ninth grade if you want to make a difference; it starts in the home; parents need to step up to the plate; the children have to want to learn; we need to resolve the high stakes testing dilemma first; we need to forget about public schools and go private or charter or voucher; we need to change how we fund public education; it's the media; it's the unions; it's the politicians; it's the bureaucracy ... and on and on and on.

For years, the constituencies for and against these ideas have battled it out on talk radio shows and in the legislatures, on school boards and in administrative agencies, in think tanks and at universities, and elsewhere all over the country -- to the point that these battling mantras have become nothing more than excuses for our inaction.

One thing is certain, the longer we wait to end this disgrace, the more children we will lose. As we speak, the class of 2011 is entering the ninth grade in some 2,000 troubled high schools across the country. If we continue to do nothing, the odds are that less than half these children will graduate. -- James Swain

(Cited article: Closing "Dropout Factories" (Balfanz & Legters) Education Week, July 12, 2006)

If you have a submission, leave us a comment and we'll contact you. Remember -- the range of topics is totally unrestricted. But all submissions have to adhere to our guidelines. So help us help you "Speak Your Mind."

comments () | | e-mail

 
July 30, 2007

Defining Blackness

description

It's time again for our recurring series, "Speak Your Mind," where we invite our listeners to weigh in on the issues and news that matter most to them.

This entry comes from "News & Views" reader and frequent commenter Moji Oderinde of Oakland Park, Fla.

description

Courtesy Moji Oderinde

"I watched the CNN /YouTube debate. I must admit it was nice to see a different format with individuals in the comfort of their surroundings posing questions to the Democratic presidential candidates. But with any new thing, the novelty soon fades, and that was how I felt when I heard the couple of questions from an individual posed to Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The questions were how Clinton would answer those doubters who feel her gender makes her unqualified for the presidency; and to Obama, what he would say to those who think he is not black enough. "Not again," I said to myself. I wasn't surprised about the gender question, and it will keep on being asked until America finds the courage within herself to vote for a woman as the president. But isn't it strange we convey a country as a female possession but have a hard time seeing a female at the helm of the land's highest honor? It is just a thought, but I digress.

The second question about the sufficiency of Obama's blackness was what got me riled even into the next day, when my aunt asked for my opinion on the debate. I told her I was really glad that holding a public office is not my lot or desire in life because I wouldn't have to show how "black enough" I am by defending the fact that I am born to African parents or have lived in other parts of the world as a kid -- because Obama is just like me.

This question is sounding like a broken record. Various many media outlets have featured commentaries about his so-called "blackness" -- or lack thereof -- during the past five months. I was impressed that he answered the question with a sense of humor, while expressing his belief in the "core decency of the American people." However, I have to say that Obama's answer was also good "politician speak." He avoided the issue because just like the many others who have asked this question in the past, the poser of that question on YouTube was African American.

Finding the answer to this peculiar question is an exasperating process because we (as blacks) have no concrete response to defining the ambiguous term called "blackness." After all, we were the ones who dubbed Bill Clinton "the first black president," making him one of "us." On the other hand, we have a black Supreme Court judge in Clarence Thomas, who denies that affirmative action had anything to do with his own success. So through his perception of being a self-made man, Thomas keeps making court rulings that make you wonder if he ever was one of "us." Not only that, we have whites who think they are black for wearing cornrows as hairstyles or black designer threads!

Imagine my surprise reading an article last week regarding a documentary by Paul McKenzie titled "Black like Beckham." You have got to be kidding me. If David Beckham is black, then I'm the soccer messiah. But we give the real brother (Obama) a hard time about his blackness for reasons that are beyond me: his mixed heritage, world travels and Ivy League education. Isn't this the same brother who took civil rights cases as a lawyer and made an uncommon decision to not support the Iraq war while his counterparts did? If you ask me, those actions give credence to the content of his character; and in my eyes that makes him black enough." -- Moji Oderinde

If you have a submission, leave us a comment and we'll contact you. Remember -- the range of topics is totally unrestricted. But all submissions have to adhere to our guidelines. So help us help you "Speak Your Mind."

comments () | | e-mail

 
July 11, 2007

When a Word Is More Than Just a Word

description

We continue this series with a submission from News & Notes contributor Jasmyne Cannick. She takes the popular entertainment Website TMZ.com to task for its description of Beyonce's performance at the recent BET Awards.

description

Courtesy Jasmyne Cannick


We just can't seem to escape the word ho. It's everywhere we go. It's blaring from the speakers in the cars that pass us by on the street. It's coming out of the mouths of the kids that walk past our homes and offices. Occasionally some white shock jock uses it to refer to a group of women basketball players and then there's the Internet and infotainment media.

In its recap of the BET Music Awards held in Los Angeles, popular Internet site TMZ.com described recording artist Beyonce's choice of outfit as "roboho," and this was among other things.

The website posted the following comments in regards to Beyonce:

"From Beyonce's roboho performance getup to Eve's streetwalker chic, check out why it's time these artists hired new stylists and put the hip back into hip-hop!"

And while I tried to shake it and chalk it up to TMZ.com just being TMZ.com, I can't.

Continue reading "When a Word Is More Than Just a Word" »

comments () | | e-mail

 
June 27, 2007

description

Starting this week, we're handing over the wheel and letting you -- our faithful readers -- write about what's on your mind in a new series called (appropriately enough) "Speak Your Mind."


Inasmuch as the Web is an open democracy, the range of topics is totally unrestricted. But remember, all submissions have to adhere to our guidelines. So help us help you "Speak Your Mind."

We start the series with Dan Tres Omi (a.k.a. "Brother Omi") of Norfolk, Va.:

description

Courtesy Dan Tres Omi

"My wife and I have plenty of single male and female friends. The number one complaint we hear is "there aren't any good black men/women around." Of course we find this notion to be absurd and unfounded. What disturbs me however is the sheer rudeness we display towards one another. Despite the fact that I was born and raised in New York City, I still greet people I pass on and off the street. Of course when I return to my home town, people look at me as if I just arrived from Mars.

Being stationed down south has opened my eyes to the idea that it is okay to greet people. Yet each day I notice that in the small city of Norfolk, Va., which I now call home that people are breaking the wonderful habit of greeting one another. Yet let me take it to another level. When I greet a sister with the word "peace," I am usually rebuffed by looks of disdain. When I hold the door open for a young lady, I am not even acknowledged. I am pelted with rude looks and proverbial rolling of the eyes. When I give a sister a compliment, I am treated as if I was trying to flash her. Sometimes I can hear teeth being sucked. I will admit that I am no Denzel Washington and never claimed to be. I have to point out that my flirting days are way over.

Continue reading "" »

comments () | | e-mail

 


   
   
   
null


 

SPECIAL PROGRAMMING NOTE

 
 

About 'News & Views'

News & Views is the companion blog of NPR's news magazine show, News & Notes. It extends News & Notes' ongoing conversation about the diversity of the African-American experience. For more information, read our Frequently Asked Questions guide and our Discussion Rules.

 
 

News & Notes Podcast

NPR PodcastsListen to the News & Notes podcast for a look at fascinating issues and people from an African-American perspective.



» Get the Podcast

 
 

Staff & Bloggers

Tony Cox

Host,
News & Notes

 

Nicole Childers

Executive Producer,
News & Notes

 

Christabel Nsiah-Buadi

Sr. Supv. Producer,
News & Notes

 

Geoffrey Bennett

Producer,
News & Notes

 

Geoffrey Gardner

Web Producer,
News & Notes

 

 
 

Search 'News & Views'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Contact Us Privately:

Have something you want to say to us directly? Write Us!

 
 
 

Related News Feeds

 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs