Vox Politics
 
 

The Expectations Game

Setting expectations is a tricky business for politicians. You want to appear confident, because it makes you look strong and intimidating...but not TOO confident because then you seem cocky and risk publicly falling short of your goals.

So at a press briefing today, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), the respective heads of the committees working to elect (and re-elect) Democrats to the Senate and the House, were endeavoring to toe that line. While they touted their party's unprecedented field operations, vastly improved early voter contact strategy, solid fundraising, and progress in the polls, Van Hollen warned against "irrational exuberance" among House candidates and Schumer cautioned that the Senate map is one of the "reddest...in a very long time" -- i.e. many of the contested seats are in majority-Republican states.

Nonetheless, Schumer's assessment of the Dems' chances were pretty darn optimistic. He repeatedly speculated that while it would be "very hard," Democrats have a chance of achieving a filibuster-proof majority of 60 Senators. (They currently hold a slim majority of 51, including two Independents who caucus with them.) It's a pie-in-the sky idea that Schumer cast as being about as likely as picking up 6 Senate seats was in 2006. Which, you'll recall, they did.

Schumer also gave a remarkably candid breakdown of where those pickups might come from (of the 35 Senate seats at stake this year, 23 are currently held by Republicans). His calls:

Likely Dem Pickups: Virginia, New Hampshire, Colorado, New Mexico, Alaska
Close/Even Contests: Oregon, Minnesota, Mississippi, Kentucky, Maine, North Carolina
Possible Pickups Under The Right Conditions: Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Georgia

You can compare Schumer's assessments with those of NPR's political soothsayer Ken Rudin on our interactive Senate map.

-- Evie Stone


comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

I would murder for a president who was just earnest, and wasn't trying to get my vote or maintain some image.

In rebellion, I'm not voting for a 'first party' candidate. It doesn't matter if one or the other gets elected.

Sent by Jody Sol | 6:38 PM ET | 07-23-2008



   
   
   
null


 
Evie Stone

Evie Stone

Blogger

 
Michael Olson

Michael Olson

Blogger

 
Thomas Pierce

Thomas Pierce

Blogger

 
Sean Bowditch

Sean Bowditch

Blogger

 
 
 

About Vox Politics

NPR's producers, reporters and editors follow the latest developments on the campaign trail. For more information, please visit our discussion guidelines.

 
 

Political Rewind

Politcal Rewind podcast icon.Listen to the best political stories of the last few days in one podcast, including the latest from the battleground states and analysis from NPR.



» Get the Podcast

 
 

NPR Politics on Twitter

    Subscribe to nprpolitics on Twitter
     
     

    Search 'Vox Politics'

    Search for the word(s):
     
    Patchwork Nation
     

    Contact Us


    If you'd like to contact Vox Politics privately, please use our contact form.

     
     
     

    Related News Feeds

     
     

    Browse Topics

    Services

    Programs