Vox Politics
 
 

Palin's Teen Daughter Pregnant

GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin has announced that her 17-year-old daughter Bristol is five months pregnant and will marry the baby's father.

The statement comes in response to blog rumors alleging that Gov. Palin faked her own most recent pregnancy to cover for Bristol.

Here's the statement from Palin and her husband:

We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us. Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support.


Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media to respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the tradition of children of candidates.

According to Reuters, John McCain knew about Bristol's pregnancy before he selected Palin as his running-mate. He decided "it did not disqualify the 44-year-old governor in any way."

-- Evie Stone

comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

As a Democrat, I hope my fellow Democrats will not use this story of a child having a child to be cruel. She has a tough enough road ahead of her. I wish her the best of luck.

Sent by Sarah Fleming | 12:34 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin states: "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby..." Isn't it wonderful that we live in a country in which Bristol (and perhaps Levi, too) had the right to make this decision, rather than have the rest of us, through our government, make that decision for them?

Sent by Phyllis Hall | 12:47 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I can't help but wonder what the Republican attack machine would do with this if it was happening to Biden's daughter. I think it would be both ugly and cruel...

Sent by Olivia Powers | 12:58 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Hummm...five months, she must be showing. Got to protect that Rep. sanctity of marraige thing.

Sent by Tigger Tampa | 1:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is an issue. I am sure that the Pahlin's consider themselves the best of parents and families rooted in the teachings of Christ. This shows that a purely abstinace based approach to teen pregnancy prevention does not work. Even in the "best" families sons and daughters will experiment with sex even if we wish they would not. A purely abstinance approach is a nice ideal but highly impractical. Pahlin's shares Bush's evangelical zeal that has created a foreign policy where Aids prevention in Afica is not allowed to teach safe sex because it hurts evangelical sensibilites back home. We can't expect African teens to be less interested in sex than our own.

Sent by Nick Brown | 1:07 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Call me old-fashioned. Is it really great that tennagers get preganant and get married? How do you really expect teenages to support a family and raise a child? You really want your kids to have minimum wage jobs, possibly forever? Or maybe being a VP will get them good jobs? Sarah, I like you. But could you take care of your kids better? Do not tell me you are proud of a teenage preganancy. (I am a mom of two and I work full time.) I am sorry that I cannot trust my children's future in your hand.

Sent by Erica L. | 1:07 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Time and time again - conservative Christians who are public officials fail to live up to the moral standards they want to force the rest of us to live up to.

Sent by hmj | 1:08 PM ET | 09-01-2008

What an election.

Sent by George | 1:08 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a Democrat I hope we use this story. By any means necessary!

Sent by Meyer, William | 1:14 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a Democrat who is very saddened to hear about Bristol Palin's pregnancy. It is a very unfortunate situation which represents family communication breakdown among the Palin family.There will be enough blame and questioning to go around as this story develops regarding Ms.Palin's pregnancy. Teenage pregnancy happens to anyone no matter who you are.

Sent by Adrian DeVore | 1:15 PM ET | 09-01-2008

classic.

Sent by gia | 1:17 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Proof positive that abstinence only education is the way to prevent teen pregnancies! Good plan, Sarah, glad to see it's working for you guys.

Sent by Leah | 1:19 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I wonder if Bristol was allowed to make her own decision-- or if this was chosen for her.

Sent by kjt | 1:20 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This may not disqualify her for VP, but in my opinion, her shot at Mother of the Year is over. What kind of mother puts her child into the global spotlight at such a time? Sorry, Sarah, but you need to take care of your own family - leave mine alone.

Sent by Sharon in Atlanta | 1:20 PM ET | 09-01-2008

You can bet if it had been Biden's daughter, the reps would have a field day about our loose morals, etc.

Sent by cris | 1:21 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Regardless of political viewpoint, Saturday Night Live is going to have a field day with this script.

Sent by Curt Burich | 1:21 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is private and between the young woman, her boyfriend, their baby, and their families. The people of the country need to extend kindness and respect. I trust that these folks will see it through with love and be there for one another and the baby.

Sent by Connie Bazil | 1:22 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Well, she has a good start, by Sarah's age Bristol might be able to have 10 or even 20 children. Its great that she is from an affluent family and not one of those welfare teenage mothers that the GOP wants to cut off funding for. Im sure Rush Limbaugh is celebrating the impending arrival of another rich, white, Christian baby with a double dose of Oxycontin while he comes up with a spin for this.

Sent by ironicus doublestandardus | 1:25 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Here is a clear cut example of where a woman's right to choose has paid off for a conservative right wing Christian. Bristol got the right to choose to have her baby!...Or did she?

Sent by J. Hardwick | 1:29 PM ET | 09-01-2008

In the National Rifle Association handbook does the safe firearm use and handling section come before or after the one on shotgun wedding etiquette?

Sent by aubrey lehigh | 1:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

That Sarah's daughter is pregnant is the Palin's private affair. But, I cannot understand why they had to publicise this to squash the other rumor about Sarah's last child. All, Sarah had to do was release medical records, pictures, videos to prove that the child was indeed hers, that is if it bothered her that people were talking about it. I feel sorry for Bristol, hope the Palins are more supportive than throwing her out in public like this and hope that Bristol is not being forced into a wedding.

Sent by A Portlander | 1:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm a Dem and think Obama/Biden are what our country need.I am an Alaskan and love Sarah Palin, but her stance on not teaching sex ed in the schools, and no abortion for any reason, sets woman's rights back 50 years. Her views on the environment support the greed of big oil. The issue of her daughter being pregnant is PERSONAL and let's keep it that way.

Sent by DMG | 1:32 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm cynical, but I believe this will work very well for McCain. Think how many more people will identify with Sarah Palin now? The whole point is that she is not Mother of the Year...who among us feels we are? Very few, and that insecurity will make her irresistible to many women, struggling mothers or not. Because she is not a single mother herself, but nother to a young girl who has made the classic "mistake", she will earn the empathy and respect of many who might not have warmed to her otherwise.

Sent by Jennifer Whitehead | 1:35 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I agree with Erica that teen pregnancy is nothing to be proud of. Stupidity and lack of impulse control, which this represents, are a plague on the human race. However, it is very unfair of hmj to claim that this is another example of conservative Christian public officials' hypocrisy -- Palin is the official not her daughter.

Sent by Kevin L. | 1:36 PM ET | 09-01-2008

If all things were the same - BUT Palin was black - she would never be VP on either side

Sent by kelly | 1:36 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Before this, I was somewhat skeptical of the rumors that Palin's fifth child actually was that of her 17-year-old daughter. This now throws that rumor into the realm of strong possibility.

Sent by bruce | 1:37 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Is it too late for Sen. McCain to just say no?

Sent by Jerry | 1:37 PM ET | 09-01-2008

For any parents the pregnancy of a their teenager is an unplanned and difficult period to go through. I wish Gov. Palin and her family all the best while she deals with this unexpected event.

Sent by Rev. A. D. Kelly | 1:39 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Of course John McCain knew ahead of time.

Sent by Harry | 1:39 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a registered democrat and an undecided voter, I am pretty depressed by some of these posts....hatred does not further the cause folks. I thought we were the party of compassion....oh, I forgot, that is only for our own.

Sent by jmellett | 1:42 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Of course, if Bristol was named Tamika, from the south side of Chicago, you can bet she would be fodder for Limbaugh & Co., carrying on about "personal responsibility," "can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em," and so forth.

Sent by George | 1:42 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Governor Palen is turning out to be the best Veep choice that McCain could have chosen....for we Obama supporters! A higher power is trying to send the America's voters some important messages this Labor Day weekend. How amazing that, at the start of the Republican National Convention, Hurricane Gustav is threatening the same city the Bush administration failed so miserably at helping three years ago to the day. And now, that same higher power is trying to tell us that McCain's VP choice has failed to administer her own family values while at the same time dictate ours as vice president. God is a Democrat afterall!

Sent by Rich W. | 1:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Oh, of course..

Sent by -S Witt | 1:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This can only illustrate the failure of social conservatives' abstinence only education plan.

Sent by Jennifer | 1:44 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Could there be anymore drama during this election season?!!!?

Sent by Lorna D | 1:44 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Shot gun wedding with Creationist VP officiating.... it's just too rich....

Sent by Lee | 1:45 PM ET | 09-01-2008

People who like her will like her more, people who don't like her will think she should stay home and take care of her own "special needs" baby, and grandchild.

Nobody's mind will change. Americans stopped thinking beyond party lines decades ago, and stopped considering any policy or competence considerations, at all

Sent by George Bishopric | 1:45 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This cracks me up - of course if it was a democrat we'd hear no end to this. But instead Republicans say please respect their privacy. Why don't we just call it what it is - her daughter went out and had premarital sex - it happens but heaven forbid if we listen to Sara we can't teach sex education in the schools or birth control. That should be taught in the home! And now her daughter is pregnant at 17 yrs old. Not a situation any family would be happy or proud of! Great parenting skills and good republican spin, eh? But please respect her privacy - her mother only wants to be the next VP of the U.S. and push her "values" and leadership skills on the rest of us.

Sent by Jimi | 1:45 PM ET | 09-01-2008

She could have said to McCain, "No thank you John, I'm flattered, but my husband and I have to put our family first given we have a months-old Down's baby to take care of, a pregnant teenage daughter, a young son going to Iraq as part of 'the Surge,' and two other children who need our attention." These children seem like political pawns. I feel sorry for them all. And she has time for running marathons, hunting, fishing, and governing a state? Am I supposed to trust her judgment?

Sent by Rob | 1:46 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Dick Cheney had a daughter who was a lesbian, and in the public spotlight, he avoided any commentary and would have preferred to sweep it under the rug. Controversal or not, Gov. Palin's 17-year old pregnant daughter could be a blessing, but should be a curse, according to Republican's stance on family values. I hope the Democrats win from this kind of hypocritical example of parenting instead of the Republicans getting sympathy.

Sent by Phan Tm Bear | 1:47 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I wonder if, like her mother, she'll take an eight-hour plane flight while in labor and return to work 3 days after her child is born (a child with Downs, no less). Sarah Palin embodies and lives the ridiculous Republican notion that "pro-life" begins and ends with not having an abortion. Pro-life, in my book, also means giving every child the love and nurturing needed to get a healthy start on life! If, at 44, her mother is not mature or selfless enough to provide this for her infant, I sincerely doubt 17-year-old Bristol will do much better.

Sent by Hilary | 1:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

In the National Rifle Association handbook does the safe firearm use and handling section come before or after the one on shotgun wedding etiquette?

Sent by aubrey lehigh | 1:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

dying of laughter! thank you.

Sent by adam schaeffer | 1:53 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Please leave Bristol Palin and her fiance alone, but please do not relieve Gov. Palin of the need to answer some specific questions: Did she know her daughter was sexually active, and if not, how does that impact her opinion that parents should be the only source of sexual education information for youth? Does this change her opinion about offering medically-based sex education in school? Would she rather that her daughter had had access to safe and effective contraception -- thereby allowing her to finish her education and grow up some before having her first baby? We are often implored to "condemn the sin but love the sinner." Can she publicly condemn her daughter's behaviour without feeling that she is condemning her daughter? What about young women in the same situation who do not have family that support them --should the public provide financial support while they get on their feet? Does she feel she is successful as a mother? How would she define a successful family? Gov. Palin's past policy positions and current role as VP candidate of the Republican Party make this private issue a matter of public interest. If she can't step up and discuss this, could she deal with the strain of being President?

Sent by Kathleen Barry | 1:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I thought that due to the storm, we were supposed to forget about politics for a few days and focus on the Gulf Coast. Funny how the McCain/Palin campaign has decided to capitalize on the storm's coverage as the perfect time to make the announcement in order to bury the story. Why not wait until next week to announce?

Sent by Dylan | 1:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm just so glad that Palin and her daughter had the option of choosing to have their babies. It is a private matter between the family. Too bad that kind of respect can't be offered to women's RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

Sent by Arlene Gilmore | 1:57 PM ET | 09-01-2008

How long until the father of the child is arrested for statutory rape?

What, he won't be arrested?! Why not?!

Oooooh, that double standard thing...

Sent by wow | 2:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Kathleen Barry--your questions should go right in the hands of the next reporter to interview Sarah Palin. Great insights!

Sent by Hilary | 2:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I wish Bristol all the best too! But, is the reason she cannot marry the father until after the baby is born because of staying on health insurance through her parents? Let's expose the insurance systems flaws in this area.

Sent by Laurie Gallagher | 2:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It goes without saying that Sarah Palin isn't the best V.P. pick for our country...but the more I learn about her, the more I think even the Christian Right could have done better!

John McCain wants Obama to be president!

Sent by Sandi from Ada, MI | 2:02 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Wow, Kathleen! Excellent questions.

Sent by Phyllis | 2:03 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The mother makes the decision not to educate the daughter about sex and now the daughter has to face the consequences.
The mother is against abortion and now the daughter has to face the consequences.
The mother decides to choose the most public live possible and now the daughter has to face the consequences.
Preach water and drink wine.
Sad, very sad. I hope this does no get used in politics.

Sent by Dirk | 2:04 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I wonder just how many votes is Bob Barr gaining every day from the unraveling of the McCain campaign....

Sent by Tim | 2:06 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Ditto - classic. First thing I said to myself was, "this figures."

Sent by Linda | 2:07 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Yep, abstinence works. But only if you actually practice it. Ok, who here has practice abstinence....
...I thought so. Education is the only way to good decision making. They teach sex education in my daughter's school, but they don't teach protection from pregnancy. Go figure.

Sent by Patricia | 2:09 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Sarah Palin has let her ambition cloud her judgement. To my mind there is a direct correlation between Sarah's pregnancy and that of her daughter's..It is socially irresponsible for an over 40 right to life advocate to risk pregnancy,esp.when you won't be the one caring for him...Did she think her other children, esp. her eldest daughter, would be delighted about caring for a Down's child?. We now see the sad results....pride, indeed!

Sent by Jean M. | 2:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Just another case of my colleagues, the hypocritical, double standard, phony facade Republicans, sinking in their own lies and falshoods. Squeaky clean?

Sent by Thomas the Evangelical | 2:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I feel for Bristol Palin. Pregnancy is no easy thing, I can't imagine being a teenager and being pregnant, add to that being in the public eye, and probably feeling that your pregnancy has some bearing on your parent's career. Awful. But this does illustrate a point, that we have to find some way as a society to come to terms with the fact that teenagers do have sex, and they do get pregnant and that this has been true since the human race was invented. In the past we just married our teens off , sometimes before they even got an inkling of sex, but we don't do that now. So, what will be do instead?

Sent by Leslie | 2:11 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Hope the Democrats use this story to their advantage as much as possible. Rove wouldn't hesitate. How many times have the Democrats taken the high road only to pay the price with the American people. Expose the Christian family values hipocricy!

Sent by Hank Missenheim_Jr | 2:16 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I for one am glad Gov. Palin and her family chose to share this the American public. To me it shows unwaivering commitment to her country by not hiding her personal life while thrust into the whirlwind of this race. It's so predictable that a large number of Democrats will take the opportunity to judge Gov. Palin on an issue that is so irrelevant to what this election is about. Get a grip! And for God's sake show some real compassion.

Julius Bach
Independent

Sent by Julius Bach | 2:16 PM ET | 09-01-2008

My question as the father of two daughters emerging into teen-hood, is where was Bristols father during all this fraternizing? Too busy being an Iron Man on the Iron Dog trail? You have to train for that stuff. You cant always be home helping to rear your children.

And, how long will it be before theres another pregnancy in the Pailin family? Will the mother be home to guide her tribe through the thickets of life? Probably not, because contrary to her claim that she has not sought these political offices, she actually is a woman of intense ambition that is willing to sacrifice her family to meet her ambitious goals.

And, finally, this is a news subject that McCain knew about and went ahead with Pailin has his vice president selection. What does this big decision making screwup say about McCain's addled brain?

The whole thing is turning into an absurd fiasco. What kind of example does it set for all those teen girls out there who are vascilating over the decision to have sex with their boyfriends or not.

What matters anymore in this world of consumeristic glut and egotistic extremes?

Tony Gillotte
Vacaville, CA

Sent by Tony Gillotte | 2:17 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Who ever heard of a candidate with a four month old child wanting to run for VP? Who's going to be taking care of the baby? Family values? Hah

Sent by Sharon Larson | 2:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

A 17-year-old girl relies on the information given to her by older, wiser adults when she gets pregnant. I can't imagine the conversation between Bristol and her mother was allowed to even mention the unmentionable ("abortion"). If Bristol were a free thinker and told her mother she wanted an abortion, there's NO WAY Sarah would be the Veep nominee. McCain wouldn't have picked her. This was all decided months ago. What a joke. What hypocrisy. Bristol's privileged life will allow her to be a pseudo-parent, while teenagers all over this country have to figure it out for themselves, with very little support from their parents or the Republicans. Palin should be ashamed every time she judges a teenage girl who seeks abortion, without the money and privilege and family support that her daughter will enjoy. Proud, my ass.

Sent by Susie | 2:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is a soap opera, not an election.

Sent by Pat | 2:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

So much for faith-based contraception. Maybe Bristol can be Secretary of the Interior.

Sent by Charles | 2:20 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It will surely take some Immaculately Conceived spin to Birth any positive outcomes from this revelation.

Sent by Biff | 2:21 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It is reported that Palin gave this response to the following question: Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools? Palin: "Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support." As Martin Luther King, Jr. observed: "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." or, as observed in Matthew 15:14: " If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

Sent by WBS | 2:22 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Being a struggling 40 yr old parent of 2 boys (4 & 2 yrs.) I can not help but feel sorry that any 17 year old has to grow up so fast. It saddens me when any child looses thier childhood. On the other hand children are a wonderful gift. Nurturing and raising the little angels is a true blessing, the benefits of which can never quantified.

Sent by Marc | 2:22 PM ET | 09-01-2008

One word: wow.

Sent by Linda | 2:24 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am a proud Obama supporter, and think that this pregnancy issue is a personal matter. But I have to agree with previous postings, that had this happened to Biden's family, Republicans would have made a big deal out of it. Democrats don't get low and dirty like the Reps, and sometimes that costs us an election, given how easily American opinion can be molded by unfair attacks. On the other hand, I do think Palin's got her hand full with her own family. I don't think she's got any time to possibly run the rest of the country, not to mention that her ideology is aligned with the extreme right.

Sent by Vincent | 2:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palins whole family seems like nothing but white trash - oldest boy "don't need no fancy learnin'" so off to the Army instead of college - high schooler knocked-up. Shouldn't the children of a governor be doing something with their lives that enriches the whole of society?

Sent by barky | 2:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Kathleen Barry's comments really resonated with me.Whenever Democrats talk about how important it is for us to provide a first class education for our children, they must also note that in order for them to take advantage of that first class education, they must also be getting first class sex education classes that includes everything they need to know to keep them on the path of getting that first class education.

Sent by rita f | 2:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

leave her alone guys. i DO NOT care whether palin is pregnant or her daughter is pregnant or what the hell even if palin's hubby is pregnant.

i am sick of cheney and his assistant bush's 8 year regime.

america has become a huge zero in these 8 years. wherever human rights are there - sudan, burma, nigeria, tibet - america is all but absent.

in the fake iraq war we lost what we have earned in past 100 years.

palin is just a side show. the focus remains the same. enough is NOT enough. 8 years seems to be like 8 centuries. we need 'WE ARE DONE with this entire republican administration' more than enough.

Sent by american | 2:27 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I see Bristol Palin as a victim in this family circus. Although she will be able to further her education and carve out a nice life, it will be so much harder to do in the public spotlight. Her mother on the other hand, gives motherhood a bad name. She has all the core conservative values, but she is missing an important element in her personality makeup, it's called nurturing. The way I see it, she refuses to give her daughter any kind of education regarding birth control, but when the daughter finds herself in a troubling situation, MOM says, hey I'm going to run as the VP, get married and you are on your own. Good luck to you. I won't even go into her young son's future. It doesn't look that promising.

Sent by Vicki | 2:29 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This was obviously a preemptive strike. Someone threatened to out Bristol, and to take s semblance of control of the situation, they decided to release a statement.

Sent by Leslie | 2:33 PM ET | 09-01-2008

We also learn that James Dobson,the pioneer of the Focus on the Family and the same guy who asked people to pray it rains in Denver so that Obama speech in an open sudium could be disrupted,is a spiritual advisor for the Palin family!

Sent by george Nganga | 2:36 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Here's another vote for Kathleen Barry's questions. Let's hope the media have the guts to ask them of Sarah Palin -- and leave Bristol Palin alone.

Y'know, I wish I didn't know about this, since it's none of my business. But Sarah Palin has made it the nation's business, so she can't very well plead for privacy, at least her own privacy.

And if the religious right is going to respond by saying "we're all sinners, so let's be compassionate," then they'd better extend that to every teen mother, not just the "nice Christian girls" with nice Christian mothers.

Sent by janet | 2:39 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Let us not make a big issue about this. This should not be part of our quest for a good president and VP. Our country has been messed up by the Bush administration. Let us all concentrate on who is the best qualify candidate to clean up the mess and put this country back on the right track. Sarah's pregnancy is a private issue for the Palins. As a country, we have more important things to worry about.

Sent by Prince B-Hamilton | 2:42 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Did she know her daughter was sexually active, and if not, how does that impact her opinion that parents should be the only source of sexual education information for youth? Does this change her opinion about offering medically-based sex education in school? Would she rather that her daughter had had access to safe and effective contraception -- thereby allowing her to finish her education and grow up some before having her first baby? We are often implored to "condemn the sin but love the sinner." Can she publicly condemn her daughter's behaviour without feeling that she is condemning her daughter? What about young women in the same situation who do not have family that support them --should the public provide financial support while they get on their feet? Does she feel she is successful as a mother? How would she define a successful family? Gov. Palin's past policy positions and current role as VP candidate of the Republican Party make this private issue a matter of public interest. If she can't step up and discuss this, could she deal with the strain of being President?
Sorry, Sarah, but you need to take care of your own family - leave mine alone.

Sent by Jorge | 2:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Mrs. Palin should stay home and take care of her kids, especially if she preaches against "sex ed" in the schools. She is a part-time mom and a full-time politician. Shouldn't her children come first? I guess she thought her childrens' governess would teach them about abstinence. I believe this event tarnishes Mrs. Palin's ability to lead. If she isn't there for her children, will she be available for her country if the going gets tough? It is obvious that her ambitions and ego mean more to her than her Christian values. I read someplace that Mrs. Palin herself had an abortion when she was a teenager. At least she was given the right to choose. She wouldn't have been able to be where she is now if she had been a teenage mother. Or perhaps her wealthy family could have hired a nanny for the baby and Mrs. Palin could have continued NOT taking care of her childrens' needs before hers.

Sent by Cynthia | 2:45 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Perhaps if her religious wingnut parents and their cronie supported some type of education other than abstinance only she might not be standing there 5 months pregnant.

But hey - the social consevatives will forget the who thing because she isn't having an abortion (which I am not advocating - I am happy she is having it).

One could make the argument though - "How many 17 year olds are going to fare well married with a kid?" Not a lot of them. No one mentioned adoption? I guess when you have wealthy parents (a governor or potential VP) life gets a bit easier huh?

Hey, I guess they are just happy none of them are gay!

Sent by boredboydotcom | 2:46 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Bristol Palin should not be the object of any Democratic attack - Sarah Palin should be. And Sarah Palin, in less than three days, has effortlessly initiated a national dialogue about her values and policy positions. This looks like something that has the potential to divide America again along values lines - Republicans won't mind. Watch the spin: the Palin family is a real American family with values reflective of mainstream America. I didn't know hypocrisy was a mainstream value?

Sent by a Proud Democrat | 2:46 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Any hope for privacy ended when Palin accepted the VP position. Her judgement is certainly flawed and it would probably be best for her and her family to withdraw from this circus and return to Alaska. I think the country would appreciate it (as would her family).

Sent by Jonathan Drews | 2:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The fact that Sarah Palin's unmarried teenaged daughter is pregnant has no direct bearing on whether or not Sarah Palin should be vice president. Like all such teen pregnancies, though, it does expose the folly and hypocrisy of the abstinence-only, anti-contraception approach to dealing with the sexuality of young people-- the same approach Governor Palin advocates. What's worse is that it's likely to deflect national attention from the real issue, which is that while Sarah Palin may have been a good small-town mayor, she has virtually no qualifications to be vice president, or, God forbid, president of the United States.

Sent by Gary Cooper | 2:53 PM ET | 09-01-2008

What 17 year old doesn't know about condoms? Maybe the father said..."just once without?"

I guess the Dem's would like to distribute condoms, lubicants, and the rest to our high school children.

The first "choice" was to mess around without protection. And, maybe the condom failed?

Sent by Kris in AL | 2:54 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This should be a reminder that the difference between the Republican pro-life position and the Democrats pro-choice position is that this is a very private family matter between the young woman, her boyfriend, their families, and doctor. However, the Republicans and Palin believe that the government should make the decision, and criminalize women and doctors if they happen to make the hard choice of having an abortion.
This is also a glaring example of why abstinence only education is a failed policy for even the most conservative and most religious families -- girls and boys have no option for "birth control" and no protection against venereal disease.

Sent by kyra | 2:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It is hard for me to reconcile the image of a woman so devoted to family values and having a special needs infant and accepting a post as hectic and demanding as the Vice-Presidency, to say nothing of the top job should that be neessary. Does anyone believe that this mother will actually be doing the raising of her baby? Ms. Palin and her family truly are lucky to be able to pay for someone else to care of their baby. For those who don't have an income matching that of a Govenor, it is irresponsible and cruel to force a pregnancy on someone who has no way to provide for a baby. I also sincerely hope that Ms. Palin's daughter is in love with her baby's father, and not being married off to smooth over a politically messy situation.

Sent by Molly Tobin | 2:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I was raised as a Catholic from a very zealous mother.Very soon I realized that many over religious people preach well but behave... oh not so well!!! Who knows what skeletons the Palin family is hiding, all for the sake of appearance. Adherence to strict and unyielding rules often promotes dishonesty... you just can't look bad!!
All these speculations about the baby and the teen pregnancy to keep or not, would not have taken place had this family been more accepting of "other" decisions about life, birth control, and how to raise their family. So now I am curious about the real story about that baby...is it really hers? or the daughter's? I wouldn't put it past them to try to pass it... appearances come first! But at the end, everything does come to light (remember Bill???) better tell the truth now. Just my two cents worth.

Sent by Dali | 2:57 PM ET | 09-01-2008

First of all, good luck to Palin's family, with what will seem like the 6th child, for practical reasons. I hope the White House has enough bedrooms to accomodate grandchildren. Second, Palin says in her statement that "we're proud of Bristol's DECISION to have her baby". So does that mean Bristol actually had a choice of abortion if she wanted to? If you're pro-life, you do not make a decision to keep your baby. You have no other choice. The truth is she didn't have a choice. If her mama's running as the conservative voice that she is, Bristol had NO choice but keep the baby. You can only be proud of someone's decision, if there were choices at all. I don't see any choices available here.

Sent by John | 2:57 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I want Obama to win because of his policies and not because of these baby scandals

Sent by Ed | 3:00 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Again, John McCain displays poor judgment. Had Sarah Palin revealed this before her selection, Senator McCain could have announced the "Wonderful News" at Friday's rally.
Given the method and timing of this press release I'm left with the conclusion than this information was withheld from the candidate. Not the best way to start a working relationship. Not the best selection in a runnig mate. Not the best judgment.
If Gov. Palin did not withheld this information before her selsction, someone is guilty of a lie-of-omission. I'll leave that discussion to the media.

Sent by Dan from Milwaukee | 3:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As an American I fully support Bristol in her upcoming endeavor however, that being said I find ironic how democrats are constantly attacked on our moral values, but this just goes to show everyone that we are all on an equal playing field. We are all Americans and we all live in the same environment so to say someone is better morally than someone else is just crap. Republicans would jump on this given the chance if it was a Democrat, but I hope Democrats don't do the same. Let's take the higher road here people. Everyone and I mean EVERYONE makes mistakes.

Sent by Levi | 3:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Living proof that good old Christian values aren't the solution to all of society's ills.

That being said, I feel awful for the girl. To get pregnant as a teenager, and have everyone across the country would be devastating. Also, you have to wonder how many of her choices (keeping the baby, marrying the father) were influenced the future of her mother's career.

Sent by Laura | 3:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

If my teenage daughter were pregnant and my 4 month old baby had Down's Syndrome, I would make the difficult and harsh assessment that my family was under stress, if not at a crisis point.

I would then seek the support and guidance of my husband, trusted friends and perhaps outside help (pastors, counselors) to figure out an appropriate plan of action for the health and welfare of my family.

I just have to question this woman's judgement. If she is all that the Republicans want us to believe -- charismatic, dynamic, corruption fighter -- her time would certainly come around again. She is only 44. She has years to still meet her goals.

When we are in crisis, we try to maintain the status quo, not heap more stress on an already stressful situation.

Sarah, what are you thinking??

Sent by Maggie | 3:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

If i was Palin I wouldn't have accepted the position to run for VP at the expense of her daughter who is going through pregnancy. Her daughter's life will never be the same now that her mother is running because the press will most likely be following her every move. Plus this whole story is yet another distraction in politics away from the many important issues we need to be focusing on as a country. I believe this was a very poor choice on the republicans end.

Sent by lea | 3:03 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is so totally amazing. What kind of person is McCain, to put this woman (Governor Palin) and her family through this. How can these people ever enjoy a normal life after being thrust into the spotlight like this? I am not a fan of Governor Palin's but I am suddenly finding myself feeling very sorry for her and her family. I can only imagine the heartlessness that McCain's operatives must possess to do this. They knew about the pregnancy before they trotted her out and yet they didn't blink an eye. McCain pointed out that it "was a private family matter." Well it's not private any longer and I do not think the Palins have any idea what their lives are about to become.

Sent by Scott | 3:04 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Hmmmm. I wonder if she had real sex education class or that Republican just say no/Abstinence class. This is the party that says NO to child care, NO to child health care,NO to real sex education, NO to helping struggling parents (young or old, NO to equal education, and of course NO to a women's choice over her own body. How is that working?

Sent by joy | 3:05 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Folks say that Bristol Palin's pregnancy is her own problem to solve. The issue is that her mom thinks she should say how everyone else solves their problems.

Sent by Dennis | 3:06 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The Palin family are a bunch of hypocrites! What right does a 44 year old woman have to abandon care of a 4 month old infant with special needs to someone else (who?) to accept the responsibilities that go with the vice presidential nomination?

Is Sarah Palin happy her daughter is pregmant? Did she preach abstinence at home? Did she even mention S-E-X to her children when she got pregnant herself or is it something children are supposed to suddenly find out about on the day they get married? If so she failed pretty badly!

And where is Sarah Palin's husband and father of her children in all this mess? Is he taking care of the 4 month old special-needs infant so mom can go off campaigning? Where was he when their daughter was screwing around with her boyfriend? These are the people we are supposed to accept as being an aging heart-beat away from the presidency?? I think not! I'm sending Obama some money today!

Sent by Linda in Tallahassee | 3:06 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As an independent, I couldn't care less.

Sent by Jim | 3:09 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Why are people saying this family is "Privileged"? Yes she a state Gov but that doesn't make them wealthy or privileged. Her husband took a lower paying position at work to avoid a conflict of interest because they needed to make money. Maybe should call Hillary and Bill and ask how to invest in cattle and real estate. Then they would be privileged. Congrats to McCain for realizing she would still be an asset to his campaign. He could have taken a safe course when most people didn't know who she was.

Sent by Chris | 3:09 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Shame on Sarah for subjecting her family to scrutiny at this time- She's made it our busineess.

Sent by Brian | 3:09 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is so totally amazing. What kind of person is McCain, to put this woman (Governor Palin) and her family through this. How can these people ever enjoy a normal life after being thrust into the spotlight like this? I am not a fan of Governor Palin's but I am suddenly finding myself feeling very sorry for her and her family. I can only imagine the heartlessness that McCain's operatives must possess to do this. They knew about the pregnancy before they trotted her out and yet they didn't blink an eye. McCain pointed out that it "was a private family matter." Well it's not private any longer and I do not think the Palins have any idea what their lives are about to become.

Sent by Scott | 3:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Old enough to have a baby but not old enough to speak for herself? Double standards there.

How any woman with a tiny Downs Syndrome child can leave it with anyone else is a mystery to me - they of all children need to be loved and cherished. Wikipedia says of Downs Syndrome: "Health concerns for individuals with Down syndrome include a higher risk for congenital heart defects, gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent ear infections, obstructive sleep apnea, and thyroid dysfunctions" - so presumably the nanny watches for these things then?

Sent by Sandra | 3:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The "facts" don't add up. Was Bristol taken out of school 8 months ago? When were the pictures of a pregnant Bristol taken? This isn't about a teenage pregnancy or Bristol. It's about her mother, Sarah. Is this a coverup?

Sent by A. Muhs | 3:13 PM ET | 09-01-2008

...According to Reuters, John McCain knew about Bristol's pregnancy before he selected Palin as his running-mate." As a mother of 2 girls, I am shocked that any parent would choose to accept this nomination, knowingly exposing her daughter in this vulnerable time, to all the public scrutiny that invariably comes with a nomination like this. If this is how Palin treats her own children when her own needs come first, then what chance does the country have if our interests ever diverge from hers? Candidate Palin is either too self-centered to represent this country or too stupid -- if she didn't anticipate this hoopla beforehand. Either way, I feel terribly sorry for that poor girl and terribly nervous for the rest of us.

Sent by iowa mom | 3:15 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Ah, yes, the conservative Christian right... such moral, upstanding folks! This is certainly going to be the most entertaining final two months of a presidential election EVER.

Sent by Patsy | 3:17 PM ET | 09-01-2008

what will sarah palin teach america parents about family values and teenage pregnancy when she is a failing her own by saying she is proud of her teenager pregnancy i was to vote for them but no more she is no role model .who would want to leave their down syndrome infant who needs special care for the sake of politics she has nothing i can admire from her.

Sent by ann | 3:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a mother of four, all I can say is Sarah Palin, clean up your own house - not only do you have your own infant with special needs, but now your teen is having a baby. Drop out of the race for one reason only - I think your kids need you now!!!!! I am not kidding here. You have five children - take responsibility for them. That says more to me than anything else about the kind of person you are. Who was next in line for VP?????? Get them on the phone pronto!

Sent by Here in Cali, taking care of my kids | 3:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Governor Palin's ambition and ego are boundless. When approached by the McCain campaign, she should have declined, citing that: a) she really doesn't have enough experience; b) she has a new infant who has special needs that will require a great deal of care, especially during his first 3 to 5 years; c)she wouldn't want to put her daughter through the criticism and scrutiny that will surely happen now. This is a woman who puts her own ambition ahead of all children -- hers and yours.

Sent by Jane | 3:18 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The fact that Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant rightly shouldn't have been a reason for McCain to exclude her as his running mate, although her decision to accept makes me question her judgement. In order to protect her child(ren) and to actually be able to support her in the next few months I love this country, but I would never put it before my children's needs. Consider Colin Powell's decision to not run for President after consulting with his wife and family. I wonder if Palin's children had any voice in this matter.

Sent by Meg | 3:21 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Michelle Obama should make a statement to all democrats to NOT attack Sarah Palin on this issue. We democrats are better than this!!

Sent by Michael Santiago | 3:22 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am enocuraged by the intelligence of MOST of these comments! Sure, keep ' poppin out' those babies, & let someone else raise them for you!
Marc, how can an infant be a "gift" to a 17 old yr. who is still a child herself?

Sent by rivian | 3:23 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Even Geo. Bush has better judgement.

Sent by Daniel | 3:29 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I know were not supposed to discuss class in the USA, but i just can't help myself...

As a new father who has a hard time paying for childcare, I envy those who make enough money to have a nanny or at least reliable, nurturing day care. Palin's brave decision to keep her Down's Syndrome baby was based not only on her morals and views on abortion- they were also informed by her privileged economic position, which allows her to keep working and hire someone else to take care of a baby that will require an incredible amount of attention.

Since Palin advocates abstinence instead of sex education, a discussion of her daughter's teenage pregnancy is 100% relevant to the question of her candidacy. But again, this is a family with an economic status that makes her daughter's decision (if it was her decision) to keep her baby much easier than for many. Bristol knows that she won't have to work a full time job and take care of her new infant at the same time. Many, many pregnant teenagers face a much more difficult future, and thus, a very different decision than Bristol faces.

Sent by Daniel | 3:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a woman who became a grandmother under the same circumstances, my heart goes out to Bristol. By choosing to run for VP her mother is placing her in the world spotlight at a time when she is under a lot of pressure and fear. I find this all as ironic as so many other people do and I also feel strongly that we cannot condemn Sarah for pursuing her goals. However, I have long felt that women can have it all, but not all at the same time. There is a time and a place for everything and being the mother of a Down's baby and a pregnant teen has to take priority over political ambitions. I want Barack Obama to win this presidency by taking the high road that he has tried to maintain. It is my hope that they will not use Bristol for political gain even though her mother may not be making the best decisions for her family.

Sent by Linda in New Hampshire | 3:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Well, that completely changes my vote.

Sent by J. Adam Moore | 3:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Sorry that we have to focus on family matters, and not the important things, like our country's issues. It is a private issue, as it should be for any of our families. I want to know what these politicians can do for the country. Lets stop focusing on legislating morality, and just because a family member doesn't meet all of our expectations, that doesn't make the Mom or Dad the problem. Lets get back on track and make the USA a compassionate, strong, and environmental leader to the world. I am tired of the focus on the what ifs, and lets get people into the government offices that will do what is best for the country, Not personal agendas.

Sent by samantha | 3:31 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Sarah can't even manage her teen-age daughter. How will she make time to manage a VP POSITION? Premarital sex? What an example! A Christian can't vote for her.

Sent by William | 3:32 PM ET | 09-01-2008

how can someone run a govt, if that person can not run his/her own household?

Sent by S | 3:32 PM ET | 09-01-2008

My heart goes out to Bristol. It is outrageous that Governor Palin and Senator McCain have made this conscious and ill-considered decision to ignore the needs of this child and the child she carries, and to consiously subject these innocents to international media attention.

Bristol and her unborn child are evidence that Governor Palin has favored her own personal and political ambitions over the needs of her five children for much longer than it took to reach the international stage. Senator McCain's decision to offer Governor Palin the Vice Presidential candidacy in view of her situation is an attrocity.

Studies show that the strength and closeness of the parent/child relationship seems to be the best protection against teen pregnancy. How on Earth is Palin going to campaign for, and serve in, the White House, while caring for a Down Syndrome infant AND a pregnant child?
Governor Palin should re-visit her convoluted priorities before one of her other children is affected.

Senator McCain should choose a running mate who is free to focus on this country's needs.

Visit wwwthenationalcampaign.org

Sent by Cooper | 3:33 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I understand that we must respect the privacy of Bristol and Palin's rest of the family, but this is an amazing opportunity for Democrats and the Obama Biden campaign. Here we have a perfect example as to why Abstinence Only Education does not work. Palin deprived her daughter of an important education on sex and contraception, and as a result, her daughter is now pregnant (before marriage). And yet, Palin still sticks to her guns about her position on abortion and sex education. Now, I am happy that Palin's daughter did decide to keep the baby (or rather, I'm sure her parents decided that for her unfortunately), but as we all know, there is a very good chance that the pregnancy could have been prevented; through valid and informative sex education in school and at home.

Sent by Sara Pettingill | 3:35 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Her daughter's CHOICE was to have the baby? So now the family is PRO-CHOICE?

Sent by Pamela | 3:39 PM ET | 09-01-2008

it seems as if this situation in the end will benefit the republicans. the so called "liberal" press will have a "field day" once the hurricane/gop convention news cycle is over...

subsequently the gop will use the "attacks" on palin and her family as fodder to fuel the fires against the democrats etc.

we've seen it happen a million times, to think it will happen otherwise, that people will vote on issues and what's actually best for the country is foolhardy...

sadly i think it is exactly because of issues like these that the democratic party has not been successful on positively spinning and capitalizing on that the gop will again be successful...

and the third party people, barr, nader, mckinney... just picked up a lot of undecided voters with this news also further splitting the vote...

scary times... but predictable nonetheless....

Sent by zuul | 3:44 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is a clear example of the success of abstinence - abstinence of intelligence and compassion from both McCain and Palin. Family first unless it interrupts your professional agenda.

Sent by Rich | 3:45 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a mother I hope to never have to stand in Gov. Pahlin's shoes. But I agree with Rob and Kathleen, and question her judgement to expose her young daughter to the "flesh eating media" at a time when she needs all of the love, support & time a family can give. When I hear of a pregnant teen from a "good christian family with high profile & ambitious parents", I immediately think: lack of communication,education and supervision. While Gov. Pahlin was going thru her high risk pregnancy her daughter was having sex, a behavior that's not that unusual in family therapy circles. Maybe she should have kept the housekeeping staff at the governor's mansion, every family needs help and support especially when both parents work outside of the home. This notion that she is a portrait of the woman who has it all,and balances family and work perfectly, is just a facade. She's no different than anyone else, so VOTE THE ISSUES, she flawed just like the rest of us. The only question is what's her position on policy issues that impact young girls like her daughter & their children...education, health care, and keeping them from falling into the "hell" of poverty. Or does she believe that "hell" is your jjust reward for living a life of sin?

Sent by georgianna | 3:47 PM ET | 09-01-2008

What ever is done in the dark, will surely come to light. Gov. Palin knew of her daughter's pregnancy long before she was chosen to a the VP candidate for McCain. Republicans like us to beleive that they are God's chosen people. Life is what you make jack.

Sent by Clarence | 3:47 PM ET | 09-01-2008

if there are any producers from any media outlets reading these comments, short of hiring her to do your job... please see and utilize the brilliant questions of ms. kathleen berry which can be found above:

Sent by gozar | 3:49 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palins daughter pregnant?yes that is why even if you think other peoples kids have not been taught well dont cast the first stone??

Sent by John | 3:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Everyone is talking about Palin's judgement and her ability to run this country..we already know that something isn't right. When I heard the news about her being McCain's VP choice...I almost felt as if some natural disaster had occurred. I was walking around all day just in shock..I really couldn't get passed the notion...just seemed really strange to me. Maybe she does represent the average family who may be going through similar situations, but when we choose our leaders, we do want someone that we can identify with, but at the same time we hold them to a higher standard. If every leader was just an everyday Joe Schmo..then what makes their ambition to hold the highest office in the world that big of a deal? Apparently, just like the California's gubernatorial race was a joke when Grey Davis was bounced out of office, and everyone from Gary Coleman down to porn stars were running for elected office; this is exactly what McCain's candidacy has been reduced to. I don't get it! McCain's judgement should be the one that is questioned. They say he shoots from the hip...well, this decision definitely came from the hip. On a personal level, I respect this family and whatever decision they make, but as I read earlier, I agree that Palin should have turned down the offer. She just has too much going on. Yes, we women can do it all, but there is a such thing as doing too much. No one's political ambitions should override family needs, afterall, isn't that the republican's stance..."family first". One last thing...Palin IS NOT experienced. Alaska's population is less than 700,000...MOST cities in America have a greater population (and those cities are ran by Mayors)than the densely populated state of Alaska. Palin is just an over-hyped Mayor. Executive experience in her second year as governor is a wash, and the republicans should be ashamed of themselves. The republicans scare me...really.

Sent by befuddled | 3:51 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It's not impossible for someone who gave birth in April to be into their fifth month right now...I have cousins who are exactly nine months apart in age. What's unfortunate is that because her mother's conservative views, Bristol has not only blown the abstinence issue wide open, but is subject to a "shotgun wedding because her mother can't hide this one. Palin has a lot on her plate without having to worry about running for vice president. She should resign.

Sent by Iris M. Gross | 3:51 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Pack it in Senator McCain. It's over!

Sent by Jay | 3:51 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Casting aspersions on ANYONE's character would be evil, no matter how good it might feel for a moment; let us deal with our own defects and shortcomings. I personally don't give a s___ if a woman has a baby in or out of wedlock, if she so chooses for moral reasons. I do want Gov Palin to reflect on how this would destroy the life of someone living in poverty without casting aspersions on the character of people living in poverty and rethinks her stance on sex education and abortion in the first trimester. Everyone deserves a second chance.

Sent by redd | 3:54 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I think it was smart for McCain and Palin to address this right away, before the media or certain vicious Democrats run away with it. I must wonder, however, if Bristol wanted to keep the kid... Of course she would have absolutely no choice, given the circumstances-- her mother would never let her publicly admit to seeking an abortion. I feel sorry for her, because she has no choice, no matter what she really wants.

Sent by Liz | 3:54 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I agree with Senator Obama that family matters should be off limits...period. It is fair, however, to ask about the process of due diligence that was undertaken as part of the apparently very brief vetting process that was enacted. If the Republican Party sought to create buzz and excitement in their ticket, especially as regards their "base", I'd say they've blown this opportunity and risk hypocrisy of the highest order if any attempt at using a family values argument against the Democrats is being considered.

I feel no sympathy for the McCain campaign here, and only wish the Palin Family the best as they prepare to welcome the newest member of their Family in a few months. To the extreme left...please back off the issue, and let the Republican's judgment be the topic, not an all too common occurrence that potentially confronts ALL families, regardless of political stripe.

Sent by WilKo | 3:56 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is most definitely an issue. And it is a national, a public issue; not a "private" one. It ceased to be a private issue and turned into a public issue the moment "ordinary hockey mom" (and soon to be grandmother) stepped into the national stage. We are asked to vote for the "values" and the policies that flow from those values. Then, this is fair game, and an important issue to keep in mind when casting a vote.

Sent by Ece Batchelder | 3:58 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The 'Smart Maverick' John McCain, chooses as his running mate a person, he'd only met once before choosing her, with so little experience she makes Obama look like FDR; who stated that she doesn't know much about intl politics because it never interested her and she has an unmarried pregnant teen daughter. Hmmm..If this shows you that John McCain has great decision making capabilities, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn located on some swampland I'd like to sell you.

Sent by Claire Straughn | 4:00 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I guess Sarah was at a hockey game and Dad was working late that day. I was a teenage Mom at 17 also it's a HARD road even with good family suport (I had lots also). I wish her luck but this bunch needs to stay put in Alaska and that Mom needs to keep on eye on her other daughter...

Sent by Phyllis Walters | 4:00 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I can't believe how few of you can get past party lines and act like human beings.

It's like the only legitimate way to discuss the future of our country is Jerry Springer style.

If you're the future, we're screwed.

Sent by Dan | 4:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Two scenarios: McCain's camp knew about this and still chose Palin; really shines a light on McCain's decision making capacity. McCain's camp was surprised by the news; begs the question just how ambitious and what kind of ethical void does Palin live in to screw the presidential contender.

Sent by Monica | 4:02 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The family was already in the public eye. Remember Palin has more ELECTED service than Obama, but that is a different story. As a governor the family is still in the public eye.
I hope you hypocrites keep squawking about her because that is sure to make them sympathetic figures. Remember McCain only needs about a 5% swing of women voters to him in order to win. Hoorah

Sent by Chris | 4:06 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm sure we'll see Bristol divorced in a few years. Unfortunately, many parents in the limelight have views that don't translate to their families because they aren't with their families. Bristol probably didn't have a choice and will be a divorcee when many young women are enjoying college, sororities, and GROWING up.

Sent by Wendy | 4:09 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Quote from Sarah Palin: "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby..." Does that mean that she advocates a woman's or, in this case, a child's right to choose abortion, since it was "Bristol's decision"? People sure can tie themselves in verbal knots when having to deal with reality, instead of their childish ideologies. Welcome to the real world, Sarah. Will you make a fine mother of five while trying to be Vice President at the same time? It appears to me that neither job will get done very well.

Sent by Wyoming Bob | 4:11 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Two brief points:

1) The GOP chose to wait until the very day Gustav made landfall to release this story. This suggests that they were hoping to use the storm as a distraction. Cynical manipulation. The fact that the storm is sort of a dud may backfire on them. Millions of americans at home on a holiday watching the news. I suspect the GOP was hoping for another Katrina.

2) If the shoe were on the other foot here and the Democrats had a VP w/ a pregnant, unwed teen daughter, the Republicans would be all over it. "If you can't manage your own children, how can you manage the nation?", etc.

Sent by surfcow | 4:14 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Now how can a family that is staunchly pro-life say that she made a "decision" to keep the baby? Guess the Palins recognize a woman's right to choose more than they let on.

Sent by Bryan | 4:20 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Why did McCain and Sarah both agree to sacrifice Bristol's privacy at such a dangerously vulnerable time for her. Seems like neither of them were thinking of the little girl's needs.

Sent by brian | 4:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

come listen to a story 'bout alaska's gov...
sex only after marriage for a boy and girl in love
but don't let your kids
learn about sex ed in school...
so next, shotgun weddings by the ceement pool...

Sent by db | 4:35 PM ET | 09-01-2008

A consistent thought through this thread and others is what the Republicans would have done if a Democratic candidate was in the same position - they would have jumped all over the issue with self righteous hyperbole. This incident reinforces that a right-wing religious state that is the dream of right-wing Republicans doesn't free your family of reality and won't take our country to some mythical, puritanical oasis. The only outcome of the *true* Repulican vision is a diminished standing in the world, less freedom - not more, and a highly divided class state.

Sent by James | 4:35 PM ET | 09-01-2008

We should not be surprised about the news.What do somebody have to do in Alaska than bring kids in the world ? 700,000 people living an island,what do you espect ?

Sent by frantzbernier | 4:36 PM ET | 09-01-2008

McCain has the great advantage of this little scandal to misdirect our attention from the real scandal-- his record on war profiteering and corporate greed (and lobbyists....etc.) McCain will have the advantage of a full flung soap-opera before the public to distract us from the continued dismantling of the Constitution.
This reminds me of how bad Bush is at choosing apropriate people for appointments. Is McCain interested purely because of her religion, and gun toting, oil drilling ways? Or that she has two X chromosomes? I can't figure it out. If the Republicans can impeach Clinton for a little sex on the side, do they have a double standard when it comes to someone toeing the party line?

Sent by Bitherwack | 4:38 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Having a child at seventeen is not a blessng. The child is a blessing because it comes from God. For a mother to say it is wonderful for her daughter to marry is only covering for her political career. The only thing this marriage will bring is a divorce at a later age then not only is the newborn child harmed, but so is the seventeen year-old mother and the soon to be husband. It would have been better for Sarah Palin to say my daughter is pregnant and we have chosen rather than harm the lives of two children we will place this child up for adoption.If Bristol wants to keep her child then Sarah should allow both children to grow-up before adding a marriage, which no teenager is emotionally or pschologically prepared. Sarah, having a child out of wedlock is no longer a shame but compounding that with a marriage is a shame. A marrige is to be entered into by two consenting adults, not two children, and a mother with political motives.

Sent by concerned | 4:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

He knew about Ms. Palin's pregnancy and still chose her mom as veep. He still chose her mom as veep knowing she has less (national) experience than Obama. He didn't postpone the convention until after the hurricane in order to capitalize on media coverage. Conclusion? John McCain is secretly a HUGE Obama supporter, but he still has in image to uphold.

Sent by Rob in Key West, FL | 4:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

HUmmmmmm, I Just wonder what Rush Limbaugh is saying now... Based on how he chastised Jamie-Lynn Spears when she was 17 and Pregnant. He claims she was not a good ROLE MODEL for Teenagers.

I honestly don't thing either the mother of John McCain really knew she was pregnant until recently. I think the McCain camp is not telling telling the truth about when he knew. If they had known before they would have told the public before the media got involved..... I would how old the father of the child is... I hope he is not over 19...

Sent by drea | 4:46 PM ET | 09-01-2008

As a staunch liberal, I do echo the views of others, this election is not about attacking the children of Gov. Palin or anyone else. I wish her the best, but I do believe that this will not help the McCain/Palin ticket, go Obama/Biden

Sent by Brooks Dozier | 4:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'd bet that the Republican leaders will not let the convention let her in....why loose over a small time egotist?....way too much bad laundry following that woman! Rove, you better take over NOW!

Sent by bob | 4:56 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I can't imagine a mother exposing her daughter to this kind of media attention
which she had to know would happen. Unbelievable!

Sent by Kathy | 4:58 PM ET | 09-01-2008

So it's okay to drag your whole family up on stage when you give a speech, but it's not okay for the voters or press to ask any questions about those people on the stage? Republicans proudly present Palin as a "mother of 5", but we apparently nobody should talk about those 5 people. I don't think it's the democrats who brought Palin's children into the campaign limelight. If Sarah Palin wants privacy, there is one good way to get it - step down from this nomination. How dare she request votes for Vice President of the USA and, simultaneously, ask for privacy! Jobs like that don't come with a privacy guarantee. Whatever problems affect here will affect over 300 million Americans if she gets elected, not to mention billion of people in the other countries. Is this really the best the Republican party could do? She seems like a competent governor, but she's not ready to be Vice President, and certainly not President.

Sent by davem | 5:00 PM ET | 09-01-2008

She has more to fear from the conservative base than the Democrats.

Sent by tomvons | 5:02 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin should have thought of her family first before accepting the vice presidency. Not only does she have a son who will need her attention and love, now she has a teenage daughter who will need the same. In four months, Palin will have yet another baby that will need her attention. Shame on her for accepting the nomination before her family. Her family needs more than just "a whole lotta love."

Sent by Lillie | 5:04 PM ET | 09-01-2008

One week ago nobody would have known who Bristol Palin was. Now she is a teenage pregnancy story. SAD! I agree if the tables were turned the Rep.'s would have a hay day with this, but Obama will not. He himself comes from a teenage mom who chose life over abortion -- he turned out to be a darn great human being . . . Happy to hear Bristol is keeping the baby and her parents are accepting.

Sarah was one month pregnant when she married Todd . . . so I am sure she is understanding as to what Bristol is going through. (Son turned 19 in April . . . Just celebrated 20th Anniversary on Fri.). This is why it is so hard for me to understand why Sarah would take the VP position. At a time when she not only has a special needs infant . . . she has a teenage daughter that needs her love and support. If Sarah would have continued to decline the request to become VP her daughter would be able to be pregnant without so much attention. Teenage pregnancy happens all the time . . . just not always under the public spotlight. Look how the media has ridiculed girls like Jamie Lynn Spears . . .

As a mother I do not understand . . . family first . . . in 4 or 8 years if Sarah is as good as the Republican's think her to be . . . she would still be available. Sarah''s son would be a toddler and her daughter would be a young woman . . . right now her family needs support. I would expect a man candidate to do the same . . . I agree with other posts . . . she will not win the parent of the year award!

Lastly . . . McCain's new slogan is Country First . . . how can we trust a campaign that struggles with putting Family First . . . seems like it is all about Ego First . . . everything else follows.

Sent by FamilyFirst | 5:06 PM ET | 09-01-2008

To all who commented on allowing this issue to be a private matter: Normally, I would agree. However, republicans have been dictating our personal lives through public policy for decades: Abstinence only education in schools MY tax dollars run, meddling into the personal decisions of women across the country through anti-abortion movements, telling people of the same gender they cannot have the same marital rights as others. I'm sorry, Sarah. But I will only stay out of your personal life once your party stays out of mine.

Sent by Markita Landry | 5:08 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Most of these posted comments have been outragous, self-serving, and cruel. Thanks for validating why I no longer contribute to NPR. You people should be ashamed of yourselves. In a comment to Kelly (posted at 1:36 PM), if Gov Palin were black, you are right, she probably would not be a candidate for VP. She probably would be a candidate for President, and would win by a landslide.

Sent by L Antignano | 5:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

McCain wants to compare Barack Obama's celebrity to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Well, didn't Britney Spear's younger sister just have an out-of-wedlock baby? So aren't we to presume Bristol Palin is no different than these celebrity delinquents by GOP standards?

And what of the fact that, according to Newsweek, the Palins decided to "lie" about Bristol's pregnancy by keeping her out of school the last 5 months, saying she had mononucleosis? A cover-up! Insignificant, no doubt, but no better than Bill Clinton's, dealing with a sexual indiscretion, and the GOP tried to impeach him! How can we accept McCain (and his past indiscretions) and Palin with her poor judgement? I say no mercy. Let them choke on their own moral ambiguity!

Sent by Phan Tm Bear | 5:24 PM ET | 09-01-2008

to Chris: WE are not the hypocrites. We liberals do not demonize sexuality outside of marriage. We encourage medically-based sex education so that young people know how to prevent pregnancy. The conservative belief system deems this young girl's sexuality as something shameful. By accepting the nomination, Palin has thrown her teenaged daughter into the spotlight to be shamed. Yet, it is Palin and her like-minded community that has made sexuality a shameful thing in the first place.

Sent by Lori | 5:24 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am a Obama voter and I am a Christian! I am also proud to say that I am a democrat. This is what I have to say. James chapter 2 verses 1 through 10 says. "My brothers, as belivers in our glorious lord Jesus Christ, don't show favoritism. Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, "Here's a good seat for you," but say to the poor man, "You stand there" or Sit on the floor by my feet," Have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen my dear brothers: Has not god Chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong? If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, "Love your neighbor as yourself," you are doing right. But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers. For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. God bless you and go Obama!

Sent by Niral Sheth | 5:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Another classic example of the Republican party and the Evangilical Right Wing Christian holier than thou attitude and head in the sand mentality - fast forward 8 years and let's talk about what the Republican spin machine would be saying if this were one of Obama's daughters. Scary

Sent by S. Brown | 5:29 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Get ready for other shoes to drop.

Sent by C. Walker | 5:33 PM ET | 09-01-2008

EXCELLENT succinct comment re: Markita Landry | 5:08 PM.

We will take the high road on this matter, as we should, but we KNOW had it been a Democrat issue there'd be mud slinging, chest thumping and soap boxing galore.

Sent by angela | 5:33 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I thought Republicans were the party of the hands on mother and all that June Clever stuff.Oh well,some body might want to spend less time at the office and critter hunting and more time teaching her children how to conduct themselves.

Sent by Tychalla | 5:34 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This poor young girl. She is in my deepest prayers. Unlike Karl/Rush, I would not cast a stone. But I will cast a stone at Sarah. Are "family values" just a slogan with you? In what way are you putting your family first? Your family is not "bad" or "wrong," but they ARE in crisis and they need a mother. (Dad's help is great, but nothing replaces a mother, sorry.) Now your daughter's life, and her child's, will be some kind of a cruel punchline, if not in the MSM, then all over the internet and on the street. No, it's not fair, but it's true, and you HAD to know that. If this is how you treat your own daughter, then how should I expect you, as V.P., to treat mine?

Sent by Mike from Ohio | 5:40 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I think the nation/news media should not make anyone's family, children especially a part of politics. And the daughter should not be forced to marry at 17 because of politics. I say stay focused on the issues to rebuild our nation.

Sent by Raycene Weaver | 5:42 PM ET | 09-01-2008

It happens all the time, but hold up... Palin is a supporter of abstinence-only education? Well someone should have let her "beautiful daughter" Bristol in on the meaning of abstinence.

Sent by SQ | 5:44 PM ET | 09-01-2008

well, there they go again...those republicans! If Hillary was vp choice and if her daughter was unmarried and pregnant, that would have been "it" for Obama's chances to be elected. hhhhmmmm?

Sent by marcus | 5:44 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I empathize with the Palin family during this time. But I would say as one who became pregnant as a teenager, mother of two, wife, engineer and business leader that we must put our family first. Palin should consider stepping back, swallowing her pride and ask for a withdrawal.

Oh, BTW I'm a DEM and a strong Christian that believes, America issues are bigger than abortion and gay rights. I believe that our next President needs to focus on health, technology advances, education, employment, community, foreign affairs, etc. And use their political party to the better of the whole.

This is another example of feeble humans who stand up as being "RIGHTEOUS" and merciless in face of the many trials and tribulations that our nation faces has to eat crow.

I believe that Palin must account for her stance on the issues that she hold so sacred and make her election very clear.

Sent by DEM-for-Sure, Phoenix, AZ | 5:53 PM ET | 09-01-2008

First, I have to say a family's crisis is not about making jokes, but I have to say I read some responses on here by, more than likely a few repubs, and it's funny when the shoe is on the other foot how the cast us down for being so judgemental. It's not about being judgemental, it's really about the facts. The facts are McCain has poor judgment and his hockey mom VP choice seems to be more of a liability than a "maverick" choice. This isn't about party lines, this is about running the country. Bad move, McCain and Kudos to Obama for being the voice and the leader this country needs by responding the way that he has on this issue. We should follow his lead.

Sent by Becky | 5:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

What choice did Levi have? Did he have any, or is this a shotgun wedding in the original sense of the term? Let's not forget that Bristol may not be the only "victim" of her mother's failed religious right views.

Sent by Mimi | 5:55 PM ET | 09-01-2008

These people are really out of touch. Do they not get satellite signal over in Alaska? Surely they must've known that people were going to dig. McCain couldn't have known, no way! If he did know this, he wouldn't have chosen her, would he? And, if he did know why on earth would he make this decision? I am conservative and I find this hard to believe. I'm thinking about crossing the aisle myself.

Sent by Kady | 6:04 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The best thing Sarah Palin can do is to reconsider and withdraw. This is the only way to show that she does not just pay lip service to her conservative principles and that her family is more important than her political aspirations.

Sent by Leon | 6:07 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin seems confused about the media's "tradition" of leaving the candidate's children out of the news. She probably read with glee the attacks on Chelsea Clinton's appearance during Bill's campaign though the drunk Bush girl's were spared the coverage they deserved. No, a pregant teenager in the White House is everybody's business. Thank God she is white and does not need food stamps, educational assistance, child care or state subsidized pre-school.

Sent by Catherine Flynn | 6:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am sickened by the hate spewing forth from the party of compassion. You people should be ashamed of yourself. I feel like I am talking to people at a Michael Moore film festival.

You are not in the head of their daughter...you do not know the details behind the choices or circumstances relating to the decisions made by daughter, the father of the child, or the parents of both teens. If you were employed by your great and mighty leader, Obama, he would have fired you by now. Read again what he says about this and get a clue...and have some heart.

Sent by David Child | 6:15 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Could this be called a "Juno-eruption"?

Sent by Itrii | 6:23 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This is them being honest, because the baracuda press would ruin her life if she had kept it a secret. Before Sarah became the VP nominee, the nasties were writing lies about her son Trig's birth.
You who throw stones at this family better be careful for your own. By the way, there is no proof that sex education prevents pregnancies one way or the other. If we knew every secret about every candidate, none of them would be suitable as far as one side or the other is concerned. By the way, all of the women's rights people ought to be applauding this mother/professional woman. She has done and is doing what all of you say women should do. You might say she is weak if she was a stay at home mom. Shame on you for such judgemental attitudes. All babies are gifts no matter how they are conceived.

Sent by Eliza | 6:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I hope and pray people finally wake up and see that ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION DOESN'T WORK. I'm all for teaching abstinence to teens, but we also need to give them tools to protect themselves if they do choose to have sex.

If Palin supports this failed plan to teach our children, which obviously didn't protect hers, I can not trust her to make decisions for all of American's children. Hoping people see this is as HUGE warning sign!!

Sent by Kris | 6:27 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This situation illustrates the way republicans have been raping and plundering everyone for years by giving unconscionable entitlements that benefit only the ultra-rich but impoverish the rest of us with a deficit we can never repay and a failed banking system likely to bring us world wide depression. They have distracted us by claiming "family values" and "tax and spend," but all of that is a smoke screen for socialism for the rich. Vote them all out this time.

Sent by Ceril | 6:32 PM ET | 09-01-2008

MCcain, in his best judgement, chose this woman who is so neglectful of her own children that she cannot even get them to live the moral life she stumps from the pulpit--to be second in command of the whole country? God save us all...

Sent by Jenni | 6:57 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin's girl was 16, not 17 when she got pregnant.
Was this the first time?
How old is the father of the child? (statutory rape may be a factor--is he a teen? or older man?)
Was the Gorvernor "too busy with work" to take care of the guidance of her own children?
Did Sarah Palin also have a teenage pregancy?
If this woman expects to run on the moral high road she ought to be expected to live by it herself!

Sent by Sarah P. | 7:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Does anyone else besides me think that a 17 year old having a baby and getting married BECAUSE of it is DELUSIONAL?

Sent by sandy | 7:01 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Interesting that within three days we hear from the Palin family that, twice, a "choice" has been made regarding reproductive rights. Isn't it nice to have a choice? As a physician, it got me thinking -- How did Governor Palin know that her child was going to be born with Downs Syndrome? Typically, this information is only obtained (e.g. via blood test or amniocentesis) when a family is planning to make a choice about proceeding or terminating a pregnancy. A little curious from a candidate who is against abortion in all cases.

Sent by adam | 7:12 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Befuddled/3:51/09-01-08
Yes to your conclusion in a lengthy argument.
Monica/4:02/09-01-08
Both scenarios lead to ugly conclusions and more "lies-of-omission" in the future.
Drea/4:46/09-01-08
You must be aware of Alaska's "Statutory rape laws". In Wisconsin a high school kid would be in cuffs, placed on a list, and forced to register with the local police for the rest of his life. Alaska has a three year age differential clause. (16-19 ok, 16-20 no-no)

Sent by Dan from Milwaukee | 7:27 PM ET | 09-01-2008

i agree with the bloger about a 40 plus oman getting pregnant in the first place knowing the risk at having a not normal baby. i also assume she believes in some form of birth control for herself, since she only had 4 children at time of conception, and is not catholic.i was sweating my last pregnancy at 39. and let me no talk about my first pregnancy at 13. pregnant at 13 gave birth at 14,in 1974.my mom my school my friends here all in shock. that as 34 years ago. my son now is a great man, happily married and very successful.in the past 30 plus years i have learned why i became sexually active at such a young age. i was looking for love, that i did not have at home.i have come to realize from college and my life experinces is that teenage girls are looking for love exceptense validation. and i feel that that 17 year old daughter of palin as lacking something in her life, that she south from this kid levi.i have nothing but sympathy for this young girl but i ask palin where in the hell were u and your husband?

Sent by karen | 7:27 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Mendacity, mendacity, mendacity! Let's be sympathetic to this young girl, but let us never forget her mother's exclusion of fact and cover-up of the truth, all the while keeping the face of a hard-core conservative!

This is not about bearing children, being a grandmother, working mothers, etc. My parents were married 29 years. I'm one of 7 children, my youngest sister has Downs Syndrome, my mother worked a 40 year career as a professional nurse, and my younger brother got his high school girlfriend pregnant at the age of 17! And my mother supported us in everything without shame or lying. My mother would make a better Vice President... shoot, she would make a better President than McCain.

But in all of her trials and tribulations, she covered-up nothing!

My Mom for president... but if not, vote for Barack Obama!

Sent by Phan Tm Bear | 7:27 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am a supporter of Obama. I was also pregnant at 18 and being of the age that I am, had not real "choice". But life is about choices and if you choose to have your baby, that child is your responsibility to raise and care for. If a special needs child, even more so - a huge commitment. As 90% of these comments have stated, Sarah needs to go home and care for her children. They need her. Also did you know that she only received +- 114,000 votes by Alaskan voters to become governor? It is not a large state.

Sent by Family First | 7:28 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Mr. Knopf, a 17 year republican from Dubuque? Golly, growing up in Dubuque I knew it was a strong democrat town, but now the republicans are sending kids? Wow. Couldn't stand the first week at Senior or Hempstead, or (gasp) Wahlert?

Sent by Grutz | 7:40 PM ET | 09-01-2008

We shouldn't worry about Bristol's not having much of future as a teenager starting a family. Alaska has the most lavish welfare program of any state in the union. Too bad that our other states are held hostage by big oil while Alaska receives "bribes for everyone."

Sent by Melinda | 7:42 PM ET | 09-01-2008

david grow up it is not her daughter we are worried about it is her mother that absentise policy has not even worked in her own home, where was the governor when her daughter was getting pregnant where was her father? most american teens dont have the luxury of having both parents in the home. wake up and when u become a woman, and are raising your kids by yourself then you will be allowed to speak. u dont understand anything that is going on in america, as does your leader john mcain. wake up get out of the transe smell the coffee. live cannot remain the same as it has for the last 8 years we are dying, stragled by republicans. help us see the kight again as we did with bill clinton.

Sent by karen | 7:43 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm a Republican and was so excited by Sarah Palin being chosen for VP. Then again, I grew-up in Wasilla, Alaska so it's hard not be out-of-my-mind excited for her! It's such an incrediable feeling that there is a woman who I can personally identify with so completely, finally on the VP ticket.

Issues regarding a candidates children should be off the table, but that is often where we all love to judge the hardest. It's sad too that no matter what is done, not everyone will agree and many will be down right mad.

In fact, even my own opinion is quite critical of Palin in this regard (based on the "facts" I know) but even Obama (to my delight) had the sense to leave it alone - so will I.

I think if I could say anything to Sarah it would be to remember that nothing comes of any good, if God, family and work are not given proper respect in that order.

Regardless of what comes of all of this over time, I certainly wish Sarah all the BEST, as her enthusiasm and love for her country can not be denied! =)

Sent by Oregon homemaker | 7:51 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am glad that only God can know the heart. You people for the most part are utterly appauling in your behavior and judgemental attitude. When I was pregnant over 40 I was pushed to have all of the tests, and chose not to. Having tests does not mean you would or would not end a pregnancy. The tests can prepare, however and give a heads up if the child might need immediate unusual medical care. As a doctor, I would assume "adam" would know that. The blood tests are only "screenings" and are not dependable. But bottom line; a baby was born, not killed-- One that will be a productive, loved and cherished person of value.

Sent by Eliza | 8:10 PM ET | 09-01-2008

ok im a teen my self i love this politics thing im not routing for these people but i would like to say this:

palin is a repectable woman yes . but is it her decision to make the two teens to get married i think not .. all though it religious or if it is .. is ur daughter really ready for marriage or is the young man ready??/ or it is just a politics game just to make ur rep loook good?? its a tr ue fact u just made a baby now ur daughter are u ready for the nation and ur 2 children n still a grandchild.. and planning an under age marrage?? i think not let them live their lives and if they get married in the future let it be if not accept the fact...

Sent by shayzzz | 8:22 PM ET | 09-01-2008

How perfect...the GOP has now "shored up" the independent, female, evangelical, gun-toting, or single mom votes they were worried that McCain would not get. They are true masterminds!

Sent by Aimee Wagner | 8:24 PM ET | 09-01-2008

so what. CNN should get it. Why is the press even talking about this?

Sent by makom | 8:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

those wacky conservative born-agains! always letting us know that we are beneath them cuz we do not behave and follow god's word. funny but for them it's always the 'do as we say not as we do' thing. palin's underage and UNMARRIED daughter is five (5) months pregnant. unmarried sex gets you into LOTS of trouble with god....oh wait, god's rules do not apply to them cuz they are forgiven asap.
same thing with the toe-tapping larry craig, republican chief of staff eric feltner pleading guilty to showing pornography to a 13-year old girl; republican philanderer and hypocrite
newt gingrich cheating on his
wife while denouncing President Bill Clinton's extramarital affair; republican activist matthew glavin,
who preached family values, was caught
masturbating in public and fondling
an undercover park ranger; and of course pastor ted haggard, president of the
30-million member national association of evangelicals (born-again christians), denounced gays and illegal drugs but was later exposed
as a gay Crystal Meth user. the list goes on and on. they are better than non-born-agains...or so they ALWAYS say. go to armchairsubversive.org for the BIG list of conservative 'do as i say not as i do' losers.

Sent by Mike Delgado | 8:36 PM ET | 09-01-2008

well isnt it ironic, Ms pro lifes 17 year old unwed daughter is knocked up. How perfect. Is this Bristols choice to have her baby or her mother telling her she has to? The bigger question is if they are such good Christians & so family oriented then why is her 17 year old daughter having sex to begin with? Wheres the parental supervision here?Was this girl not on some kind of birth control or is her mother so pro life she would rather her teenage daughter have babies? What kind of an example are you sending here Mrs. Palin? Hope the 15 year old daughter learns a lesson from this. See Mrs. Palin this is whats called pro choice!! I'm not trying to be mean here, i have been a life long dem but was considering voting for McCain this time because i like him, and i appreciate all his service to this country & i believe he has enough experience & brains to move this country in the right direction but i'm not so sure about Mrs.Palin. Yes i am glad McCain picked a woman but not sure if its the right woman for the job. As a woman i believe 100% its our choice if we want to have a baby not the federal goverments & i certaintly dont ever want that right to be taken away from woman. I think the dems should use this if the shoe were on the other foot??? I mean its out there now, they made the choice to make it public so why not??? If this offends people well so sorry but this is America & i have the right to voice my opinion, so there you have it!!!

Sent by texas chick | 8:57 PM ET | 09-01-2008

what about the fact - Sarah did not look pregnant during her last pregnancy and gave the birth in very strange unusual and murky circumstances? Her daughter did not attend her school during Sarah's alleged pregnancy either. Nobody answered these questions - which are part of rumor allegations. But the official response and revelation was done only to respond to the rumor allegations. Is this again another republican lie covering up even a bigger lie.

Sent by george | 8:59 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I'm sorry this happend to her. I actually like both candidate teams. I think the country will be in good hands if either team wins. We need to focus on the rift between rich and poor in this country. A strong middle class is what made this country great. Both sides need to recognize this imortant fact. Our govt should focus on how we can compete in the futre with China, India and Russia globally. Leaders who speak to this issue will have my ear. Multi-national companies no longer have allegiance to this country or its citizens. Their main ally is the bottom line; whether it enriches China, India, the Middle East or india...it doesn't matter to them. If you reading this, let's please begin imploring our politicians to address this very important issue. Our survival as a world superpower depends on it.

Sent by Arthur Moore | 9:41 PM ET | 09-01-2008

I am a teacher who is concerned about teenage pregancies. We are going to send a fine message to all teenagers by being 'supportive' of a teenage pregancy just because it is the VP nominees daughter! For heavens sake let us face reality and recognize Sarah Palin for what she is. A mom who could not even take care of her own daughter by giving her the right advice in terms of practicing safe sex. Imagine if every woman in America had 5,6, 7 even 10 children. This is not progress for women or for our country. Remember even 5 kids per woman will send the population of USA into competition with China and India. Is that the kind of competition we are looking for. If so, lets say congratulations to Sarah Palin for her family values and rejoice in her nomination!

Sent by Monali | 9:48 PM ET | 09-01-2008

What about taking the trip back to Alaska after her water broke in TX - was she not putting the baby, herself at risk and also the people on the plane if something had happened? What is this saying of Palin's judgement? Also 3 days and back at work? Something is amiss.

Sent by Family First | 9:52 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin: When Personal Choice intersects public policy...

I would like to hear Sarah Palin's views on preventing unwanted pregnancies. Does she advocate birth control (the pill, condoms, etc.), or does she advocate abstinence education? What are her views on public policies that might be instituted to would reduce the rate of unwanted pregnancies in this country?

Thanks

Sent by Chris Craft | 10:12 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Well, she is the perfect example of the woman who "does it all -- badly". Let's face it parenting a couple of kids and working is tough. How about parenting five kids (one of whom is a special needs baby), governing a state while running for VP? Do you think she could be short-changing any of her commitments?

Sent by Kwelsh | 10:19 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Focus on the Family has come out commending Bristol on getting pregnant and having the baby. It seems to me that Dobson is an incredible hypocrite! I pray for Bristol, and the Palins. And I hope we can all being to learn that teaching sex ed is about honoring life! Sex education is Pro-Life... all life.

Sent by Leigh S. | 10:23 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Cynically, this was announced during the hurricane -- did they think it would "wash" the story away?

What else is being hidden from voters?

It's not the pregnancy (that's a family issue), but the lack of truth and accountability.

In some states, impregnating a girl this young is statutory rape. What is the case in Alaska? How old is the father? Are there political connections with the family of the father? This is important, given how Palin appeared to break the law to "get even" in the "Troopergate" investigation.
Palin is totally unvetted. Obama went through 25 debates and endless scrutiny.

This isn't fair to our country, or even to Palin.

Sent by Quin Dwyer | 10:30 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin advocates abstinence only sex ed, promotes the denial of abortion to victims of rape, yet apparently can not communicate responsible behavior to her own child. THIS is a vp candidate? Palins daughter has the right to chose yet Palin would deny that right to others. This Palin person and her "family values" is an utter joke.

Sent by nahiku888 | 10:49 PM ET | 09-01-2008

If they want to keep this a private family problem then why did they make a public announcement? Sarah Palin threw her daughter's privacy under the bus for her own political gain.

Sent by Joe Schmoe | 10:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The tone of these comments are often very mean-spirited. Credibility comes into question when you start talking about these conspiracy theories. It's probably too much to ask everyone to stick to facts and separate public policy from things that should be a private family matter. Even though this is a private matter involving an underage girl (and boy) going through tough times, there are important public policies that need to be debated. Like most Americans, Sarah Palin opposes abortion. The debate over abortion will be eternal, but doesn't it seem like we can get broader agreement on controlling unwanted pregnancies? If you stop unwanted pregnancies, that will automatically eliminate abortions. This seems like a place where everyone should be able to find common ground. We should start by asking Sarah Palin about her position on birth control and abstinence education. If she's going to be in a policy setting position, it's fair to press her on these points and I think we can do it without being obnoxious, and without dragging her teenage daughter into the debate.

Sarah Palin's daughter is not really going to "pay the price" for her mistakes. She is not likely to suffer the fate of most teen mothers. She has family that will probably support her instead of making her fend for herself. She will probably finish High School (unlike many teen mothers). She will probably go to college (unlike many teen mothers). She will probably get married to the father of her child (unlike many teen mothers). She will probably enjoy the support and love of her family, and she will probably thrive (unlike many teen mothers). I wonder if her mother will recognize that she's not like most teen mothers, and a public policy that works for her probably won't work for most teen mothers. Sarah Palin's daughter will not truly "pay the price" for her actions. Not in the same way that most teen mothers do.

Sent by Chris | 10:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

The point is this: Palin pushes abstinence and yet she fails to instill those values in her own teenage daughter? Yet another example of a right wing hypocrite. I'm voting for O'Bama.

Sent by Layne | 10:54 PM ET | 09-01-2008

If McCain had picked a first-term governor from one of the smallest states, who had virtually no foreign policy experience or knowledge, and who happened to be a man, imagine what the reaction would have been.

His first presidential decision was a cynical and irresponsible ploy undertaken by the candidate who claims to put 'country first.' He should not now be surprised that his unvetted choice is already backfiring.

Sent by David | 10:58 PM ET | 09-01-2008

if you can't teach your kids the right thing or keep your eye and hand in their life how can you think you can run this country.. and then to ask for privacy is crazy if you want your privacy stay out of public life

Sent by Dan Canale | 10:59 PM ET | 09-01-2008

...if Bristol were a poor Latino, republicans would be relentless in their pursuit of moral castigation. Once again, based on Obama's comments we see who has genuine Christian values.

Sent by Dietrich | 11:26 PM ET | 09-01-2008

"Time and time again - conservative Christians who are public officials fail to live up to the moral standards they want to force the rest of us to live up to."
Uh... HMJ, The Gov's daughter is pregnant. What your point?

Sent by Barry | 11:28 PM ET | 09-01-2008

Palin and her husband, as parents should devote more time for their children as this is their principle priority besides their work outside. As a teenager, their daughter should be prepared both emotionally and physically to be exposed to the heavily responsibilities that motherhood entails. One only has 24 hours in a day to devote to work, raising children etc.etc. As a working mum, Palin has just that for the time being. Palin pales in comparison to Hillary Clinton. HC is a legacy by herself and she has set her own standards. No one can step into her shoes.She has completed all her commitments ie to herself, her child, her husband, her community etc. etc. She was a good mum to her teenage daughter when she served as the First Lady. Now she has all the time for her country, hence her decision to stand for the Presidency. Palin can only do so much, within the 24 hours and as a mother to her 5 children, she just does not have the time to give her 100% commitment to serve the country. It is not fair to burden her with such an enormous responsibility, when she is not ready for it. She needs time, her commitment should be to her family first and when her responsibilities towards them are over, then she should set her sights to serve the nation.

Sent by Ratha | 11:50 PM ET | 09-01-2008

This lady is not a liberal nut job that got in the position we are in people need to go back to school and learn how goverment works. Lets face it she is human leave her daughter out of it I think she is what we need in office. Rather than the leftest Obahma nut cases that never were proud of our country until now.Wake up people and look whats going on around you the dem have always caused trouble then the republicans dig us out remember this saying ITS NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU ITS WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY KENNEDY would be considerd a republican now. WAKE UP AMERICA

Sent by Chad Strohecker | 12:04 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Before Palin can play pretend to manage the national affairs of the White House she needs to practice at running her own household affairs.

This a sad day for Republicans, No matter how hard they try to cover it up
'If it smell like.. and it feels like.. and tastes like excrement, than it must be excrement"
I now know Obama will win this election, McCain is a slithering snake in my book now.

Sent by Sandra | 12:15 AM ET | 09-02-2008

so when palin was giving birth to the 5month the daughter was getting busy sounds like trailer park in Alaska -hit to meSo the proof must be in the pudding!What is this saying for our vp it's just like watching the soaps new -hit revealed everyday!

Sent by giles diamond | 1:09 AM ET | 09-02-2008

It is interesting reading the condemnation of Sarah Palin because her daughter is pregnant. Questioning whether she can manage the VP position if she can't manage her own daughter. I expect the same could be said of Hillary...how can she control the country if she can't even control her husbands exploits (in the Oval Office at that).

And as an aside to the comment Rich W. presented....The fiasco of Hurricane Katrina lies squarely on the shoulders of the inept mayor of N.O. Ray Nagen which the voters (showing their own ineptitude re-elected). Secondly, it falls on the shoulders of the then Democratic governor of Louisiana. Only partial blame lies with the federal governments response. Or do you think that we should blame the federal government for tornadoes and earthquakes too?

Sent by Mike Cloghessy | 1:36 AM ET | 09-02-2008

As a 20 year old young woman I am sympathetic toward Bristol Palin's pregnancy. To be so young and forced to live the life of an adult, is not only unfortunte, but disheartening. A teenager should not be forced to bear a child she is clearly not ready to raise as well forced to marry a man she perhaps barely knows and who is incapable of supporting a family. A life of uncertainty, struggle, and defeat beginning at the mere age of 17. No one should attack her or her family, they are only human, but perhaps Palin will think twice about advocating no sex education in schools ( abstinence only programs) because clearly teens, including her daughter, are having sex. Perhaps if teens, including her daughter, were better educated on the matters and practice of safe sex, America might see a decline in teen pregnancy.

Sent by Keri Wolfrom | 1:52 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Apparently, according to his Myspace page, Levi Johnston isn't interested in getting married. (Maybe he's changed his mind. I hope the "relationship" he says he's in is the same one we're all talking about. Sounds like he'll be a fantastic Dad.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/levi-johnston-bristol-pal_n_123089.html

Sent by Cooper | 2:21 AM ET | 09-02-2008

I believe this is a chance for America to show how we are a country filled with compassion and love. Let's leave out debates and partisan bitterness and encourage a 17 year old with understanding and non judgmental reporting. We should all support the Palin's, a family that although not perfect, has good values and shows their children unconditional love. Just about 2000 years ago another unwed mother welcomed life and we all are better off for it. Her son was wise in saying he who is without sin cast the first stone. May Americans be open to God's gifts, whether convenient or not, and respect Bristol's choice and condition. What 17 year old deserves to be in the national spotlight for having a child?

Sent by David F. Anderson PE | 2:22 AM ET | 09-02-2008

This is not about attacking a child. Can Palin (help) run the country or should she focus on the mess in her home? What about adoption? Who would encourage a 17 year old to choose a life partner? This is the 21st century, is she saying a woman (child) is not a capable mother unless she is married?

Sent by Brownnie | 3:00 AM ET | 09-02-2008

If some unforeseen incident should happened to John McCain if he is elected president of the United States of America, I certainly would not want Sarah Palin, with her 'skills' running this beautiful nation of ours. Quit now!

Sent by Sharon | 7:47 AM ET | 09-02-2008

I am saddened by the comments I read here regardless of your politics. Comments made regarding so many things that you cannot possibly know and yet made none the less. I guess this very difficult time for that family is an opportunity to make it tougher. Obama says the story is off limits; perhaps not to his followers. Thanks NPR for getting on the bandwagon!

Sent by Bill | 8:29 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Imagine what Dobson of Focus on the Family would be saying if it was Obama's or Biden's child! Obama's response to this development is to leave private family matters out of the discussion. I wonder what McCain's response would have been had the tables been turned? It's amazing that when the Right is wrong, it's right! One would have thought that after getting caught with their pants down over and over again, the, 'do as we say, not as we do' moralistic bombasts of the right would have finally learned to shut-up!!! It's a long fall off their lofty perch and the bottom will eventually come up to meet them.

Sent by Voting for Obama-Biden 08 | 8:35 AM ET | 09-02-2008

So, they are a normal family, wouldn't want that in Washington!!

Sent by Paul | 8:48 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Palin was a sloppy choice, Alaska is a sloppy state, Her family life is sloppy , right wing nut jobs=pigs in slop

Sent by N.T.Sloppy | 9:06 AM ET | 09-02-2008

I was amused to hear McCain's communications director call for the media to respect Ms.Palin's privacy, just as the Republicans have respected the privacy of others. Talk about chutzpah!

Sent by Rob | 10:09 AM ET | 09-02-2008

So many, many IMPORTANT issues in this campaign reporters might question the candidates about. The credit crisis, bolstering Social Security, the embarrassing status of our nation's health-care situation, how we're going to end the war. Instead, editors make reporters waste time on this NON-ISSUE.

While we're at it, I suppose we ought to question the candidates on their thoughts about Lindsey Lohan. . .

Sent by Bob Kirby, program director, High Plains Public Radio | 10:25 AM ET | 09-02-2008

This is not news. It's a personal family matter. Let it go. It offends me to hear NPR continue to report it in sensational terms. FYI, I'm a pro-choice liberal Democrat.

Sent by cynthia macdonald | 10:26 AM ET | 09-02-2008

It's always sad to hear of teenagers taking on the responsibility of parenthood at such a young age, but think how many of us are here today because of young love. The Vice-Presidential candidate's 17-year-old daughter chose to keep this pregnancy, and I wish them well. Truthfully, the matter will have little effect on my life. Maybe this child will grow up to be president someday, or someone else whom society can be proud of!

What concerns me much, much more is Barack Obama's history of cocaine usage. Now that he is officially a candidate for the Presidency of the United States, I feel that this is the discussion we should be having. Even though he has admitted to such usage in his first book and over a year ago in some interviews, most Americans frankly had their attention elsewhere and are still unaware of this.

I don't recall the media doing much digging into this matter. 18 million of us voted for Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama. The media writes this off to being some sort of feminist phenomenon. They should seriously be asking why there are so many of us who would never vote for Barack Obama. If he is still using drugs do you really think he is going to openly admit this? How has this affected his reasoning ability? Is this why his scripted speeches are so different from his impromptu comments? Will he be vulnerable to blackmail? This is a more serious matter to us than adultery, and look at the honesty record on that!

Sent by Barb | 10:52 AM ET | 09-02-2008

When an unmarried 17 year old girl comes up pregnant on the South Side of Chicago, Republicans don't make it sound like a beautiful thing. They call it tragic and a moral failure, and blame the teen's parents, or lack thereof. I guaranty you if the Obama's had a teenage daughter that was pregnant the headlines would read something to the effect of "another black baby without a father" and there would be no media coverage of her planning to get married. The fact that the alleged father of Palin's future grandchild is 26 years old constitutes statutory rape, does it not?

Sent by Just Asking | 10:56 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Folks are missing the point in the issue of the pregnancy of Governor Palin's daughter. What does it say about Governor Palin's judgment and her true family values when she would subject her daughter, the young man involved, as well the baby itself to such national scrutiny. At 17, this young girl has to be able to deal with her personal situation but wouldn't it be easier for her to handle this in privacy. Governor Palin is young enough that her opportunities are boundless and she could have passed this time in favor of her daughter's needs at this time.

Sent by pam tetreault | 10:56 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Instead of concerning ourselves with the VP candidate's 17-year-old daughter, we should be concerning ourselves with the now presidential candidate Barack Obama's "youthful indiscretions." Old habits die hard.

Sent by Barb | 11:13 AM ET | 09-02-2008

The real story is that on the stump, Sarah Palin said, "I told Congress, thanks, but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere." But Alaska received all of the money anyway, and used it for other transportation projects. You can verify this by going to the Anchorage Daily News, Sunday, August 31st. Let the baby rest, as Barack said, candidates children are off limits, and let us look at real issues.

Sent by kathy trump | 11:56 AM ET | 09-02-2008

Would right-wing social conservatives be just as "proud" of a 17 year old woman's decision to "have her baby" if she was from a lower income family and had to drop out of high school and go on welfare in order to support her child? Palin's daughter's personal situation is a private issue. It's ironic that the Republicans are the ones who have made it a public issue for the past 30+ years.

Sent by ng | 12:44 PM ET | 09-02-2008

I may be mistaken but I do not believe that Obama's parents were married when he was conceived. So Democrats need to step back and rethink their criticisms and Obama's campaign might just talk about Obama's "illegitimacy". Also, I found it so interesting that the video on Obama left out his living in Hawaii!! It's such a joke how he and his crew are presenting him. He does not have the experience and he does not have the credibility. He does not have my vote.

Sent by Karen A Duncan | 12:46 PM ET | 09-02-2008

RE: the above reference to Obama trying cocaine while in high school....Palin is quoted as saying that, "I can't claim a Bill Clinton and say that I never inhaled." She's the darling of the legalize marijuana campaigns, just google.... Now she's the darling of the "Teenagers, its okay to have sex without protection" campaign....

Sent by gia | 1:19 PM ET | 09-02-2008

Stop saying that Obama is bringing this issue to the table. Here is his statement in the press: "Senator Obama, who has said family is off limits during the campaign, noted yesterday that "people's children are especially off limits". "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be," he said, of earlier rumours about Bristol being pregnant. "And if I ever thought that there was somebody in my campaign that was involved in something like that, they'd be fired."

Bottom line is that rank and file Dems understand that her judgement and policies are an issue; just as rank and file Republicans are running for cover and blown away by the poor judgement of their "mavarick."

Senator Obama also noted his late mother had given birth to him when she was only 18.

Sent by Gina | 1:29 PM ET | 09-02-2008

If I had known premarital, underage sex was a family value, I would have enjoyed high school a lot more. Who knew!

Sent by Elizabeth | 1:40 PM ET | 09-02-2008

Had she taken the route of abortion, it would have exploded the GOP. The reason Mcain choose Palin AND her family is quite simple. Having been proven lame, disfuntional and selfish, the GOP needed a distraction as a rally cause. Given the political conditions, the GOP have literally nothing else but to try and keep the focus on this issue. The Family. The Values, (hardy practiced by religeous folk; note the last eight years) and so on. Those things are something we can all agree upon (family values). It is just that people feel the need to focus on the change that this country needs, NOT the interfamily relations of a a family that deserves its place on the Jerry Springer show.

Sent by Carson Rhodes | 1:53 PM ET | 09-02-2008

I have to question Mrs Palins' sanity. Most young teenagers facing this type of problem would die if the whole world found out. If she knew she was pregnant why would she put Bristol in the spotlight and hope no one would find out? Her career should have come second and she should be concerned about what affect this very public outing will do to her. You never consider throwing your kids to the wolves to move up. If it where a disney superstar like Miley Sirus the conservative would be wagging their fingers at the parents and writing in to the network. Who is she kidding?

Sent by Wendy Mealy | 1:54 PM ET | 09-02-2008

"I may be mistaken but I do not believe that Obama's parents were married when he was conceived. So Democrats need to step back and rethink their criticisms..."

Why do Republicans keep claiming Democrats are criticizing Bristol Pahlin's illegitimate pregnancy? For the 100th time on this blog alone, the criticism is not directed toward this unfortunate pregnant teenager. Here are the top criticisms of Democrats (and some others) who've made comments here: 1. Sarah Pahlin's views concerning abstinence-only education in light of this pregnancy, or 2. her ability to be a national leader when her own family has so much to deal with now, or 3. the way the Republicans want to spin the pregnancy to support their own anti-choice issues. Why you have problems with the way "his crew" is presenting him, I really don't understand. With Obama, as hard as the right has tried to prove otherwise, what you see is what you get. He's not being presented to be something he's not just because a video left out the fact he lived part of his life in Hawaii. That's not exactly something the "crew" was trying to hide.

Sent by Elizabeth L. | 2:02 PM ET | 09-02-2008

this is sick

Sent by william | 2:13 PM ET | 09-02-2008

What kind of mother would put her daughter through this? Put her in the international spotlight and then vie for a position where she won't be available? Is that really standing by her? I wouldn't have done that to my daughters.

Sent by Martha F. | 2:23 PM ET | 09-02-2008

BACK OFF DEMOCRATS....DON'T YOU HAVE ANYTHING BETTER TO TALK ABOUT I CAN SEE YOU ENVIOUS FACES AND BRAINS TRYING TO ATTACK THE TEENAGER WHO IS NOT RUNNING FOR VP...WHY DON'T YOU LOOK ONTO YOUR BARACK HUSSEIN AND HIS LACK OF EVERYTHING, MOSTLY EXPERIENCE AND PATRIOTISM, HIS HATE TO AMERICANS THAT HIS OWN PASTOR ADMITED TO HIS FACE AND TO DATE HE STILL DID NOT RESPOND, SO DON'T TELL ME THAT YOUR DEMOCRAT CHOICE IS BETTER THAT AN RELA AMERICAN TEENAGER DAUGHTER OF A PROUD WOMAN IN POLITICS....BACK OFF DEMOCRATS... AND GET A LIVE! NOW IS OUR TURN IN THE NEWS SO BACK OFF

Sent by Julie | 2:46 PM ET | 09-02-2008

Perhaps Sarah Palin should have pulled a Hillary Clinton and blamed this whole thing on a "left wing" conspiracy rather than just tell the truth.

Sent by Mike Cloghessy | 2:49 PM ET | 09-02-2008

THE DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF EVEN RAISE A QUESTION ON A TEENAGER WHO IS PREGNANT WHEN THEY ARE THE MOST FAMOUS FOR CHEATING ON THEIR WIFES STARTING WITH PRESIDENTS JOHN KENNEDY, BILL CLINTON WHO WERE PRESIDENTS, WHICH AFFECT DIRECTLY NOT THE RELATIVES, NOT COUNTING WITH MOST RECENT CHEATERS LIKE THE GOVERNOR OF NY, AND THE SENATOR JOHN EDWARDS, SO GIVE A BREAK DEMOCRATS AND GET REAL...DON'T TALK ABOUT FAMILY ISSUES WHEN YOU ARE THE FAMOUS CHEATRES IN THE WORLD, I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISE IF LATER WE FIND OUT THAT YOUR OBAMA IS ALSO HIDING SOME GIRL SOMEWHERE THAT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME AT ALL.

Sent by Julie | 2:54 PM ET | 09-02-2008

My question is, what public services will Bristol Palin and her boyfriend use after they start their nice little teenage family? I've never known any family to turn down such freebies as WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) that provides free food and baby formula; food stamps; welfare money; and Medicaid to pay for the birth and the baby's care. Is the Palin family goig to refuse all these resources and completely support Bristol, her boyfriend and the baby? I kind of doubt it. Meanwhile, Republicans scream for the dismantling of the welfare state that supports TEENAGE MOMS! If you're anti-abortion, fine, then have the baby--but then give him up for adoption so you don't have to be supported by the taxpayer while you get your life together.

Sent by Lynne Ricotta | 3:06 PM ET | 09-02-2008

We still may not be getting the full story. Remember that Bristol's pregnancy was only announced to counter speculation that Trig Palin is not Sarah Palin's son (but is Bristol's). See Vogue cover photo of Feb '08 in which Sarah Palin hardly appears 5 months pregnant. Why would Palin not announce her pregnancy until 7 months? Why continue out of state travel engagements up to delivery and be caught in Texas when water allegedly broke, and why then fly back to Alaska to deliver? Recklass or did she need to get back to Alaska for baby's birth to maintain appearance it was hers?
Why accept VP nomination and put her family through all this (if the current story is true)? Would have been more admirable to decline. This is all rather suspicious and we should not be so quick to believe what we are told.

Sent by Derek in Seattle | 3:46 PM ET | 09-02-2008

Fascinating reading. Conspiracy theorists and fingerpointers alike. I am a "scary(according to the left) Evangelical, right-wing conservative, soccer mom" who happens to agree with Barack Obama on this one, though I won't be voting for him in the fall(I lived in his home state when he was in government there and was not impressed and highly-taxed). This should not be an issue in this race and takes the focus off of what we should be getting to know about Sarah Palin. P.S. Anybody out there have a teenager or been one? As a parent of four children, I know that I have talked to them about drugs, drinking and sex, and we believe in abstinence before marriage as well, but am also not nieve enough to think just because we impart our experiences and knowlege to them, they will always listen to and heed our advice. Can any of you out there claim you never made a mistake as a kid(teen), and always took the advice of your parents? We all make mistakes and generally there are consequences that go along with that. Love the hypocrisy on the left on this one.

Sent by Wendy Harp | 4:28 PM ET | 09-02-2008

"You who have no sin, cast the first stone". And yes, as an evangelical I believe this should apply to all women (girls) who find themselves in this situation. Frankly, public sex education is over-rated(two of my children as well as myself have gone through school talks about sex and contraception). Children (teens) can have all the education in the world and still make bad choices. I can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink. If my child chooses to have sex before marriage (protected or unprotected), underage drink (huge problem in this country), or do drugs (just like a young Barack), they will, and pay the consequences of that decision. I don't personally know Sarah Pallin, but I think she deserves the benefit of the doubt. None of you "know" anything about what she taught or talked to her kids about in regards to sex, and again, who are you to cast the first stone?

Sent by Wendy Harp- back again | 6:51 PM ET | 09-02-2008

it's about time we have a person who can
say they have walked a mile in our shoes.

Sara you have my vote.

Sent by Todd Griffitts | 7:19 PM ET | 09-02-2008

Last week Sarah Palin touted the fact that he son is entering the military, is going to Iraq, as support for her ability to lead in the executive office. Across various media spaces I read this fact beside pictures of Sarah Palin standing, pointing machine guns beside men in camouflage. Sarah Palin said to the country: I can be VP because my son is in the military.
This week, Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant, teenage and single. And now the country is supposed to ignore her family?
Sarah Palin brought her family into this. If she doesn't like it when things don't go her way, she'll have to get her family out of this.

Sent by Jon Sommers | 8:57 PM ET | 09-02-2008

dont worry, Barrack has told his people that families & especially their children are off limits!! way to go Obama

Sent by lorrie | 10:10 PM ET | 09-02-2008

How is it that the Republicans fail to see the relevance of their own lives in making public policy? Vice Prez. Cheney has a gay daughter, but won't support legalizing gay marriage. Vice Prez. nominee Palin has a pregnant teen (17 now, 16 at time of pregnancy) and yet won't support sex ed in schools or choice for women. Cindy McCain is the product of a divorced family and won't acknowledge her half siblings. I could go on. The money that Republicans politicians have must insulate them from the repercussions of the life circumstances that others with fewer resources have to face. So much for compassionate conservatism!

Sent by Stacey Kellar | 11:44 PM ET | 09-02-2008

No one seems to be questioning Palin's choice to accept the nomination knowing full well that it would certainly turn her teenage daughter's private crisis into a national scandal. I guess she wanted to be VP more than she cared to protect her family and their privacy. She HAD to know what would occur when the announcement was inevitably made. This is clearly not the time to subject your children to an international microscope. She should have passed on this personal political opportunity - just as a father in her role should have, in lieu of meeting her obligations to protect her children from harm. Mow that poor child and the baby's father will be defined for life on the national scene. Could Sarah have become governor if her parents subjected her to national scrutiny at the age of 17?

Sent by Liesel Reinhart | 11:51 PM ET | 09-02-2008

I know God is so disappointed in all of you demo judges.

Wow!!!!!!!!! Glass houses.

Sent by Dee | 12:25 AM ET | 09-03-2008

Why would Gov. Palin allow her daughter to marry without getting an education first to support this child is beyond me. I knew a few teenage mothers who were not forced to marry, because it was the right thing to do, but chose an education first, and made a decision later and became very successful. We can also assume who will be paying the hosptial bills. How can Palin put "Country First" when it looks like her family needs her more at this time. I'm very pro women in Politics, however, in the "Christian Religion" it's (God,family,work etc.)McCain may have wanted a women to run with him, but could have chosen a Woman with less turmoil at the moment.

Sent by SO | 2:14 AM ET | 09-03-2008

Well I couple this news of teen pregnacy with photos of Bristol posing with friends and alcohol...weave in Levis' MySpace quotes from his webpage and you have all the ingredients of a home out of control. Its now officially pertinent and a story coming from a person who would be willing to impose a "Christian Values" upon all along with other "extremist" far right wing policies. It all smells of hypocrasy.

Sent by Brian S. | 7:15 AM ET | 09-03-2008

Is it time for the 'United' States to return to a separation of church and state? Theocracies have a bad reputation around the world and 'god forbid' we continue down this divisive pot-holy than thou path.

Sent by Separate Chuch & State in 2008 | 8:45 AM ET | 09-03-2008

I questions Palin's motives when she is willing to let her pregnant teenage daughter be put through the scrutiny of a world media event all to further her political ambitions. It seems like a rather harsh punishment for pre-martial sex.

Speaking of which....I understand Mrs. Palin is a firm believer in Abstinence only education...I think this is proof positive that it doesn't work!

Sent by Shelly Tarin | 10:12 AM ET | 09-03-2008

I was undecided about Senator McCain until he stated he chose Gov. Palin to be his running mate. I am now a strong McCain supporter. Now I'm having a problem being a supporter of Public Radio. Yesterdays broadcasts were centered on the Governor's daughter. Do you people have so little respect for family that you have to dwell on a child who made a mistake? I also could not believe some of the women whom you interviewed. What part of the last century did they appear from? You can spend your whole life raising wonderful children and mistakes still happen. There is a verse in the Bible about throwing the first stone, maybe we should all go back and read it. Leave the children out of your stories, they did not ask for this. Stick to the candidates and the candidates only!

As for Gov. Palin being able to raise her children and still have a career; I'm a single mother who has done that with no help. It's possible and Governor Palin will have help when she needs it. Senator Obama has children, are you asking him if he can raise his children and still have a career -- gee, no you are not.

Sent by Jessie in Troy, VA | 10:43 AM ET | 09-03-2008

i think that all this mess about palin`s daughter is private buisness pertaining only to that family but because of her decision to accept the vp slot alongside mccain she opened her life up to the media and the world but she has,will and will keep dealing with this situation in an apropriate manner.I think that she will make a great vp she has a good head on her shoulders and i believe that she can make good decisions and as for her mistakes who hasnt made them "let those who are without sin throw the first stone"

Sent by shayna morell | 10:50 AM ET | 09-03-2008

DOES EVERYONE REMEMBER GEORGE BUSHES TWINS- THEY WERN'T LILLY WHITE EITHER- BUT THEY WERE NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. I HAVE RAISED 7 CHILDREN IN THESE PASSED 49 YEARS AND HAVE SEEN MANY MISTAKES FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE. MANY STATES RECOCOGNIZE A 17 YEAR OLD AS ABLE TO MARRY WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION. NO WONE HAS SAID THIS GIRL WILL BE FORCED TO MARY ANYONE- YOU CANNOT MONITOR YOUR CHILDREN EVERY MINUTE- IT TAKES THREE MINUTES TO GET PREGNANT. - I AM SURE HER DAUGHTER KNEW SHE WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC EYE WHEN HER MOTHER CHOSE TO RUN FOR VICE PRESIDENT- I SUPPOSE THIS DIDN'T KEEP HER FROM TELLING HER MOTHER NOT TO RUN. ALSO I AGREE WITH THE - PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULD THROW STONES-

Sent by D. O. | 12:22 PM ET | 09-03-2008

My main concern is that McCain selecting a relative unknown as his VP choice, followed by revelations that rival any soap opera, obscure if not entirely obliterate crucial issues our nation faces with the economy, enviroment, military aggression (ours and others'), and restoring America's integrity. I have to wonder if this isn't all intended at some level; an Orwellian attempt to put the attention of the masses on anything but the real agenda. I am an independent who supported McCain in 2000. Obama will get my vote in 2008, but why all the histrionics and moral indignation on both sides? What's really going on, America?

Sent by Irene in Asheville NC | 12:28 PM ET | 09-03-2008

I hope the media will not shy away from the story of the pregnancy of Palin's 17-yr-old daughter. The Republican Party says, give them their privacy. And of course, the 17 yr old herself should have privacy. While the Replican Party would like nothing more than for this to go away, I have a right to know more details about this pregnancy event, because how it is being handled speaks directly to the judgment of the v.p. candidate. Here are some questions: why is the 17 yr old getting married? I'm afraid it's because she's forced into the decision to satisfy her mother's expectations. She could give the child up for adoption, instead. Also, why was the daughter in a situation that allowed the pregnancy to happen? Was it due to poor supervision at home? How long did she know the father of the child? I know the Republican argument: it's noone's business and "there but for the grace of God" go we. Well, no. Since we know nothing about this candidate, her handling of this crisis is one of the key ways we get to know if she's qualified to run the United States were it necessary. Thank you.

Sent by Laura Burke | 12:35 PM ET | 09-03-2008

The White House is not just any house.... but anyways, I would not disparage Sarah's daughter at all. It is a private matter.

However, Gov. Palin is fair game, and it's very telling to note her remarks: "We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby..."
'Decision'? Isn't her stand on abortion that a woman HAVE NO decision?? If so, her "pride" in her daughter's "decision" is hypocritical.
"Bristol's decision" that they're so proud of, would be a prime example of a young woman's right to choose, (which right now, any woman ALREADY has that right), although for Bristol, I doubt that was the case.
I'd wager her choice actually was, "You're gonna be a mommy." If so, all Gov. Palin could rightfully say (without sounding hypocritical), would actually have been, "we're PROUD that she's having a baby."
Just the kind of leadership we Americans apparently love to have in the White House, eh?

Sent by Mr. Soapbox | 12:54 PM ET | 09-03-2008

Hope Bristol's boyfriend wasn't 18 when she became pregnant!

Sent by Jean | 12:58 PM ET | 09-03-2008

Like mother - like daughter? Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Sarah pregnant when she herself eloped/got married?

Sent by W. D. | 2:51 PM ET | 09-03-2008

It never ceases to amaze me how the Republican "Religious Conservatives" put such "positive" spins on their shortcomings (in God's eyes, PRE-MARITAL SEX IS A SIN!!!) as being only human and forgiveness is God's gift to us; but Democrats or anyone else is not granted this gift. They are "religious" as were the Scribes and the Pharisees that God spoke about for us not to become. I am tired of the hypocrisy of the Republicans. GOD IS INCLUSIVE OF ALL AND NOT EXCLUSIVE TO SOME. I hope one day they will realize this and show more compassion and forgiveness to others when mistakes are made.

Sent by Darren L. Cole | 5:35 PM ET | 09-03-2008

Where is the doctor's statement that she is really pregnant? What doctor delivered Sarah Palin's baby? These are fair questions regarding the character of the VP candidate. If she's telling us the truth she should be giving us a doctor's name to confirm both pregnancies otherwise she's suspect.

Sent by Mark | 7:04 PM ET | 09-03-2008

It was a great speach wasn't it? Here is a true American success story of a smart, hard working woman with a loving, imperfect, family. Keep up the attacks, you are letting your mask of compassion slip to show the anger, hate and corruption underneath. Hope and change? Do you see the hope and happiness in the faces Sarah and her family even while being savaged by supposedly compassionate left. If only she had some community organization experience, she could be the top of the ticket. Life is Sweet.

Sent by Jerry | 9:44 AM ET | 09-04-2008

Media in this Country needs a reality check. Time to turn off you Bloggers, Couric, Fox, CNN, Brokaw, MSNBC and send all you lackwits packing. Biased lies is all we here day in and day out. Keywords, buzzwords, all the baloney journalists use day in and day out. Time to turn you all off.

Sent by Gary Fliss | 9:48 AM ET | 09-04-2008

It seems Palin's life is closer to the average americans life than any other politician. Is it possible we may have a real person? Compare the photo of a young woman with a babe on her chest content and comfortably sleeping. To the photo of the Stepford Wives Laura and Cindy...Are they Live or Memorex? I believe it to be criminal to vote for either party, which will be 4 years with the same as the old criminal boss. I along with thousands of others will write in Ron Paul. True Patriots will do the same. To chose a lesser of two evils in not Patriotic. However, back to Palin, she is the closest to Real I've seen in forever....

Sent by Zani | 2:21 PM ET | 09-04-2008

Seems to me that Bristol's pregnancy has been turned into an issue by the media. Okay, so teaching abstinence isn't the best and brightest thing. How many of us heard "just say NO" from our parents and ended up getting information elsewhere?

I have a friend who realized that her daughter was determined to have sex at a young age. Telling her to SAY NO obviously wasn't going to work. My friend got her daughter on the Pill because she wanted to be realistic and do the right thing. The girl got pregnant at 17 anyway. The reason? She "wasn't good at taking a pill every day."

Of course if Bristol and Levi had realized what a media circus would have been created around their sex life they'd have kept their pants on. No teenager would want this information trotted out in front of the nation.

Obama and Biden have been classy enough to NOT bring the Palin family's private business into the campaign. It's the media that insists on publicizing it. I have to wonder what the media has to gain. Aren't there people dying, wars, hurricanes, and so on that really need publicity and the help it could bring?

Sent by Aurora | 1:43 AM ET | 09-05-2008

Strong moral values for our children and the future genertions is what we need in our leadership. What does Sarah Palin and her husband have against higher education and what is yur son running from at home is it the same diciplin your daughter Bristol is lacking? You might be a good speaker of lies or been very good at repeating verbatumly what you have been told to say. Sarah you don't want SEX ed. in schools, is it because you don't have the time to teach it in your own home? YOU NEED A CHANGE IN YOUR OWN HOME LADY before you try to lead our country. What kind of leadership and example will you and your family will be setting for me and my family, after all, you and yours will be in the WHITE house. Don't you think you should be the tough hocky and BULL dog mom with or without the lipstick in your own home first. America has lost ii's place in the world because of George Bush we are like a bad case of dog fleas which no one wants to be around and you and John McCain is bringing more of the same. Sarah for (GOD)sake go home and take care of your family first, get your house in order first unless it's Sarah first and to hell with the rest. This is not good for our country.

Sent by Millicent Howell | 11:02 AM ET | 09-05-2008

Bristol Palin's pregnancy is relevant to the presidential campaign because 1) teenage (and/or unwed) pregnancy is a national problem that contributes to the poverty rate and strains budgets for social programs, and 2) Sarah Palin comes from a branch of the Republican party that opposes both sex education and distribution of birth control information (as well as supplies) in public schools. Abstinence-only is obviously a method that has failed the Palin family and we should not allow the same ideology to be imposed on the rest of America.

Sent by Rex Edwin Robards | 2:38 PM ET | 09-05-2008

Well, I am convinced. You have all led me to the following conclusion. I am voting for McCain/Palin. I am now determined to do everything I can to help them be elected.

Sent by Eliza | 7:27 PM ET | 09-06-2008

In my opinion, Sarah Palin is an irresponsible parent and a hyprocrit. I cannot imagine holding a demanding job like governor or vice president and adequately raise my young children. I believe her husband works as well, so just who is raising the Palin children? How much time has she spent with the children over the past 2 years? How much time will she spend with the them, including her special needs child, as vice president? Family values? Regarding abortion, I would like to know how Sarah Palin plans to take care of the 4,000,000 unwanted new babies that would be born to this world every year should abortion be illegal, when she cannot take care of the 5 she brought here.

Sent by Porter | 7:27 AM ET | 09-07-2008

so that mean she's human, shes one of the millions who face situations like this every day, she knows what its like to be a pareant to has to help raise her grandchildren. makes me want to vote for her more. Shes a mother, a grandmother who faces everything we do, she'll be an asset to the middle and low income families, families that need better health care, lower insurance, better schools, child protection. etc etc.

Sent by ozark | 12:02 PM ET | 09-07-2008

NO MERCEY - Imagine if one of the Dem's children were prego - It would be relentless.

Sent by cdoright | 12:13 AM ET | 09-10-2008

Obama's mother was unwed and 17 when she became pregnant with him. She became 18 in late Nov., had him in early Aug. You do the math.

Sent by marsha | 1:19 AM ET | 09-11-2008

I believe there is a Problem here I raised two Daughters on the South Westside of Chicago and I spent time with my Family teaching them Morals.
Apparently this was not done in her house hold because if two Girls can resist temptation living around temptation there is no excuse for her daughter to be pregnant except for the parents not allocating the proper time with there child the put other things above there child and we want her as V.P. Unbelievable. P.S.one Daughters 23 no children and the Other one is 21 no children.

Sent by Bob Gaf | 8:59 AM ET | 09-18-2008

ok i think that its great that she is keeping the baby. her parents support is so importnant rite now, palin is a great person is what i think but i also say we dnt all have to b abstenent if we dnt choose. yes its the way of god but it is are life and it efects us not yall. learnin bout sex in school does help kids though sothey know how to have safe sex and not get prego. but thats my opinion

Sent by cassidy payge | 11:21 AM ET | 09-25-2008



   
   
   
null


 
Evie Stone

Evie Stone

Blogger

 
Michael Olson

Michael Olson

Blogger

 
Thomas Pierce

Thomas Pierce

Blogger

 
Sean Bowditch

Sean Bowditch

Blogger

 
 
 

About Vox Politics

NPR's producers, reporters and editors follow the latest developments on the campaign trail. For more information, please visit our discussion guidelines.

 
 

Political Rewind

Politcal Rewind podcast icon.Listen to the best political stories of the last few days in one podcast, including the latest from the battleground states and analysis from NPR.



» Get the Podcast

 
 

NPR Politics on Twitter

    Subscribe to nprpolitics on Twitter
     
     

    Search 'Vox Politics'

    Search for the word(s):
     
    Patchwork Nation
     

    Contact Us


    If you'd like to contact Vox Politics privately, please use our contact form.

     
     
     

    Related News Feeds

     
     

    Browse Topics

    Services

    Programs