Where's the Pelosi story from Talk of the Nation? You're painting a picture of some kooky lady who travelled to Syria to make mischief. You've taken a story about one of the leaders of a co-equal branch of government doing her job, put it through the dishonest prism of White House propaganda, and made it sound like an episode of I Love Lucy.

Thank God there's a person in government with courage to face our adversaries, who is impelled by noble motives. (That would be Speaker Pelosi, a name, by the way, you never use for her. It's always Miss Pelosi, like a kindergarten teacher. May I suggest calling the President Master Bush. Now there's an apt name.)

Sent by Bob | 2:32 PM ET | 04-05-2007

Yes, the Congress should do their part of oversight in legislation, hearings, making of laws, etc.

But to Usurp Foreign Policy under the guise of an "equal branch of Government" because certain members and the speaker "don't like the President's Policy " is absolutely unconstitutional ! Perhaps we should now ask the third co-equal branch and send over a "few Supreme Court Justices" because "they are pretty smart people and maybe they can also be helpful." Somehow I think most Americans know this is NOT the right way to conduct Foreign Policy!

Congressional junkets to "ascertain facts" have been common, but Congress should BUTT OUT of conducting Foreign Policy. As it turned out, she didn't get the message right, but the press will spin this and suggest we give her a pass because she was "trying to be helpful." She is not trained as a Diplomat or Foreign Policy Expert, but is more like most Congressional representatives, merely higher grade political hacks. She should stay in Washington and "mind her knitting."

Sent by bob | 2:59 PM ET | 04-05-2007

WANT AD:
Wanted: CEO to Conduct USA Foreign Policy and be Commander in Chief.
Requirements: Bring along about $100 million dollars, and be prepared to be on call 24/7 for the next 13 months during a campaign process.
Selection Process:
The American People will let you know by February 2008 if you made the cut. Serious candidates who expect to win must be active through Nov 2008.

Serious Candidates may express ideas, but are not authorized to conduct Foreign Policy or be Commander in Chief until elected.
If you have questions, kindly refer to the written job description, which can be found in the Constitution of the United States.

Sent by Bob | 3:35 PM ET | 04-05-2007

As a US citizen currently working abroad in Vilnius, Lithuania and before this in East Jerusalem and in Germany, I find that many foreign nationals expect me to defend policies and practices with which I do not agree, some of which I find immoral and unconstitutional. Foreign nationals certainly understand that one can disagree with the policies of one's own government--they often do themselves, but I then have to explain that I may disagree with our policies, but that I also believe in the political process and take my role in that process seriously. Unfortunately, our Embassies abroad are among the least welcoming places with very burdensome security measures. These may be necessary as there are terrorist threats, such as the recent on in Athens, Greece that are often missed in the US media, but it leaves a very negative impression of what our country is about.

Sent by Robert Jones, Vilnlius, Lithuania | 6:08 AM ET | 04-06-2007

I think there is value to the work that private citizens do abroad. E.g. The Liberian Education Trust, a project of the Phelps Stokes Fund. The Phelps Stokes family played an active role in the foundation of Liberia and continue to be involved in a lot of education projects there.

The State Department says it supports business and academic leadership by identifying clear action steps that the private sector can take to suppport and improve U.S. diplomacy. From my experience with the government sector, this probably reduces the independence of the "non government" sector with a series of instructions and caveats.

p.s. I have no connection with the Phelps Stokes Fund. It was mentioned to me by a friend from Africa.

Sent by Bhuvana | 9:38 AM ET | 04-06-2007

Isn't Nancy Pelosi next in line to take over the government should fate remove and/or incapacitate Bush and Cheney?

So why shouldn't she have talks with leaders of foreign nations? At least she'd be better prepared to do the job than the current occupant of the White House is.

Sent by David Dunn | 10:03 PM ET | 04-06-2007