Keane

As President Bush prepares for a news conference this AM -- he will reportedly have a statement on War Funding -- our timing couldn't be better. Dumb luck -- we'd scheduled Gen. Keane for last week, but he had another appointment and we had to postpone. In any case, the President can be expected to hammer the Democrats again to "support the troops" and threaten to veto any funding bill that contains deadlines. He can also be expected to follow up on the visit to the Baghdad market over the weekend by Sen. McCain (R-AZ) and others -- Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) remarked that it was like a summer stroll through a market in Indiana -- and argue that the Democrats want to hamstring the commanders in the field just as their plan to secure Baghdad is showing signs of progress. A story in today's New York Times cites merchants in that market as saying that the area is far from safe, pointing out that the congressional delegation was accompanied by 100 US troops, rooftop snipers, and attack helicopters hovering overhead. Worse, one pointed out that whenever any one thing is touted as a sign of progress, it immediately attracts an attack.

After considerable thought, we decided to have Gen. Keane on by himself to take your questions about the troop build-up in Baghdad and Anbar ... Is it working? Can it work? If the goal is to provide a breathing space for politics, is the Iraqi government taking advantage of it? Aren't attacks just shifting elsewhere? Are the Shia militias, the Mehdi Army in particular, just lying low, waiting, and letting the US loose against its internal (renegade Shias) and external (Sunni insurgents, Al Qaida elements) rivals? And what's all this doing to the Army and Marine Corps? Post your questions here, if you'd like, or call in or email during the show.

 

Comments (Send a comment)

Please ask Gen. Keane what Pres. Bush means when he says if we leave Iraq now the enemy will follow us home. Who is going to follow us home? I know there is some al Queda involvement in Iraq, but isn't most of the killing between Iraqi factions vying for power?
Also, how come millions of Iraqi civilians have fled their country and left the fighting to us?

Sent by Joyce | 11:44 AM ET | 04-03-2007

I want to reiterate part of a comment that I made through this blog last week. I offered some obvious words that no one seems to be saying:

We won the war. It took the US military some thirty plus days to completely overwhelm Iraq. The war was over once the Iraqi military collapsed.

What we have been involved in for the past four years is not a war but rather an occupation. Four years is nothing for this type of action.

Following World War II the occupation of Germany took far more then the four years it took the defeat the German armed forces. The observation that has become popular of late, comparing World War II to Iraq, is a complete fallacy. The occupation and restoration of the German society took decades. In fact, we still have troops on the ground in Germany more then 50 years later.

Now here is my question: In Gen. Keane's opinion, are there enough US troops (or will there be enough following President Bush's "surge") to successfully occupy the entire country, suppressing violent uprisings long enough to allow cooler heads to prevail and the new Iraqi government to succeed? Or, is force being concentrated in Baghdad to suppress violence only long enough to allow President Bush to save face and pull US troops out, touting success and leaving the country in ruin?

Sent by Matthew L. Parets (pronounced: per - ets) | 12:31 PM ET | 04-03-2007

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.




   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 

Bloggers

Neal Conan

Neal Conan

Host,
Talk of the Nation

 

Scott Cameron

Scott Cameron

Editor,
Talk of the Nation

 

Sarah Handel

Sarah Handel

Associate Producer,
Talk of the Nation

 

Barrie Hardymon

Barrie Hardymon

Assistant Editor,
Talk of the Nation

 

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

Recent Comments

  • Matthew L. Parets (pronounced: per - ets) on Keane
 
 

About Blog of the Nation

Blog of the Nation is the official blog of the NPR talk show Talk of the Nation. For more information about the blog, the show and everything else in between, please be sure to read our show's Frequently Asked Questions guide and the discussion rules.

 
 

Related News Feeds

 
 

Contact Us:

Want to contact us privately? Write us!

 
 
 

Search the Blog


 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs