Yesterday, an attorney for the federal government presented the details of its case against Bruce Ivins. The evidence against him is circumstantial, mostly.
At the end of our second hour, we'll focus on the legal case against Bruce Ivins. How strong is it? How might the lawyer for Ivins, Paul Kemp, defend it?
What questions do you have about the legal side of the anthrax case?
Tags: Bruce Ivins | anthrax | law
1:56 PM ET | 08- 7-2008 | permalinkComments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.
NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.
Blog of the Nation is the official blog of the NPR talk show Talk of the Nation. For more information about the blog, the show and everything else in between, please be sure to read our show's Frequently Asked Questions guide and the discussion rules.
