Debating What to Cover, How to Cover it
So here I was, last night, getting ready to leave, all happy with today's show because we were FINALLY going to talk about some things that have been percolating for a while -- the Iraqi refugees in Syria and Jordan, the teddy bear story out of Sudan, the story of the rape victim in Saudi Arabia and important new leadership at the World Bank (most Americans only think about the Bank once a year when demonstrators descend to hurl abuse at their annual meeting, but this is an incredibly important institution in the developing world). Plus, more diverting stories ... Edward Ball, who wrote about his discovery of his family's slave-owning past, has a new book. He discovered some locks of his family members' hair and had them tested ... and more on genetic testing with a man who specializes in those of African ancestry.
And what the heck happens? Some guy shoots up a shopping mall in Omaha. YIKES. Of course, my first thought is: how awful. How terrible for the families. Then my second thought is ... what do WE do?
By WE, of course I mean Tell Me More. Do we switch around the show? What do we dump? ... What do we keep? Who can we get/what can we add?
I have to tell you that our first instinct is almost always ... change the show. But then we ask ourselves a second question, what can we uniquely offer? What can we share with you that you will not have heard elsewhere, even in our own newscasts. That is often why you will not find breaking news on the program, other than in the newscasts that begin each program. Our principal is: what can we tell you that you didn't just hear?
Today, though, tested that resolve ... so many great stories -- the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran (the intelligence agencies, as a group, say IRAN is NOT building a nuclear weapon, after all ... a total change from just two years ago), the news from Omaha, a terrible, yet remarkable story out of Detroit (a very young girl is shot six times while trying to shield her mother from a gunman, yet both manage to survive).
What do we change, what do we add?
We decided this morning to take the long view, that the stories we covered are stories with lasting meaning and long-term consequence -- often pushed to the back precisely when more dramatic stories grab the headlines.
We hope we made the right decision. Let us know if you agree...
6:22 PM ET | 12- 6-2007 | permalink


