Tell Me More
 

Michel's Rules for Racial Dialogue

Diversity photo iStock

People, people, people. Thanks so much for weighing in on my commentary yesterday. I appreciate the kudos, and the occasional brickbat.

But some of you folks just make me go, huh?

Let's go back to Michel's Rules for Racial Dialogue ...

RULE 1: When black people mention race, it does NOT mean they are calling all white people racist, or some white people racist ... or even any particular person racist. (Now, some people are racist. Can we all just admit that?) But the point is that race sometimes has implications and effects that are unconscious, or unintentional, but which are, nevertheless, deeply rooted and ongoing. And those effects have consequences for some people that they might need or want to talk about.

Think of it this way: breast cancer attacks people of different races at different rates, and the mortality rates are different. Does it mean that cancer is racist? Does it mean that all blacks who get cancer are victims of racism? More to the point, it's a question and it's a problem. So one wants to ask, what's going on to cause these different outcomes?

The fact that folks might wish to consider race as an issue does not mean they are drawing a conclusion, but often, rather, raising a question. Do we have to get so defensive?

... Which speaks to the next rule.

RULE 2: White people belong to a race, too, which means that white people should be included in conversations about race. They are allowed to notice things. They have a right to their perceptions, and their perceptions are relevant.

I know it's a source of irritation, and perhaps pain, to many minorities that for most whites in this country "the race conversation" feels optional, and minorities don't feel they have that "luxury." But, that's another issue. It is what it is. You can't become what you can't abide, which is someone who is deaf to other people's reality.

RULE 3: A fact is a fact, and an opinion is an opinion. Know the difference, and own your own stuff. This means if something's your opinion, you're entitled to it. But not your own facts.

RULE 4: Sometimes we don't know what we don't know, which means there are aspects of other people's life experience that we are not always going to understand.

Let's do each other the honor of asking and the favor of listening.

RULE 5: Civility always works. Need I say more?

Speaking of facts, there's an intriguing piece in The Washington Post that caught my eye. It offers an explanation of why blacks and whites so often see race issues differently. It suggests that whites tend to have a much rosier picture of the circumstances of blacks than blacks do, but when whites are presented with more information their point of view changes. It also cites research showing that whites and blacks tend to use different yardsticks to measure racial equality, but when they are asked to use the same yardstick they arrive at similar conclusions.

So, that's what I have to say, thanks for letting me know what you have to say.

As for the people who are writing in to say that this program is tilted toward one candidate or another, I just have to laugh. I know this is a hard fought campaign but really, people, really.

We've had on Sens. Hillary Clinton AND Barack Obama. We've tried getting Sen. John McCain many times, but you'd have to hear a whole conversation about the politics of who gets to have on which guests at NPR to understand why we have not had our chance. Plus, we have balanced political conversations every week in our political chat.

Some of our newsmaker guests have included: former Counselor to the President, Karl Rove; former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (a Clinton supporter); former Secretary of the Army Cliff Alexander (an Obama supporter); Sen. Debbie Stabenow (a Clinton supporter); Rep. Xavier Becerra (an Obama supporter) Rev. Hershel York (a Huckabee supporter) and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele (now head of GOPAC, which works to elect GOP candidates).

As it happens, most of our guests have not endorsed a candidate (that's why we invite them as our guests).

So please, these assumptions are lame, as is the complaining by some listeners when we have on guests whose opinions differ from theirs. Sorry, it does not work that way. We cannot exist as an echo chamber.

And, finally, did you check out my beat box lesson?

I know, keep my day job.

 

Comments (Send a comment)

Well put, as always Michel. I also loved your commentary yesterday. It was eloquent, well-stated, and provided your view on the issue of race.

Sent by ernise | 10:48 AM ET | 03-28-2008

The only race I belong to is the human race. Sure, you can say I have a different wrapper than you might have, but...honestly....every person on earth has a different wrapping than I do. Why is it pertinent? I am a recovering addict and a molestation survivor. That doesn't mean I assume that no one else knows how it is to walk in my shoes. The same applies for any other form of discrimination, repression or abuse.

Race is ONLY an issue to those who desire it to be an issue. My wrapping is different from your wrapping? BFD!

It isn't racism...it's merely fear and ignorance.

Sent by Dan-in-PA | 11:24 AM ET | 03-28-2008

Michel,

I cannot begin to express my enormous pride in your commentary and appreciation for someone finally saying what I have felt in my heart but couldn't find the words to express.

Thank you for sharing the transcript.

I love your program and look forward to it daily.

A Detroit fan

Sent by Judith | 2:09 PM ET | 03-28-2008

I listen to your provocative and interesting program regularly. I especially appreciated your closing comments the other day in which you related a personal racial slight you experienced during college in the company of "liberal" friends who passively and silently tolerated it. Your comment to the audience to "Please spare me the moral outrage over Barak Obama's behavior of silently tolerating Wrights offensive remarks" was on point. As you so aptly described, there are many examples of otherwise well meaning people who silently and passively tolerate racial and other offensive remarks or behavior in polite company. I was driving at the time of your comment but shouted my approval and agreement with that thought. As a white retired senior citizen I have certainly done just what you described and I am not proud of it. You were correct to remind your listeners of such lapses of moral courage and thereby put Obama's behavior in perspective. For that I say THANK YOU

Sent by Lee Tuveson | 9:34 PM ET | 03-30-2008

You've really hit the nail on the head with these "rules!" I hope people in charge of leading conversations on race (diversity trainers, residential staff at colleges, and of course OTHER JOURNALISTS!) would see them. Really, most people who work or live in multi-racial communities could all use a dose of this (un-)common sense.

But what can we do about "rascism without racists" like the rascism of cancer rates? Obvously, asking people to search their subconscious minds for vestiges of prejudice is completely irrevelant here. But that seems to be the go-to move in almost all "conversations about race."

Sent by Michael E | 9:40 AM ET | 03-31-2008

"When black people ..." is a phrase I consider to be generalizing without the facts, or even statistics, to back up the statement. Our American English language is capable of much more; we can identify individuals and express their unique thoughts and ideas, actions and abilities, in colorful and entertaining ways while informing the listener with new facts. We can speak the truth as we have experienced it, and allow for interpretation. An example would be, "The black people that I have spoken to, (clarify your domain by location and size of population) and asked this direct question replied:..."Otherwise it leads the reader to drawing conclusions that are just not true.

Sent by shirley | 6:41 PM ET | 03-31-2008

THANK YOU MICHEL! Too often we want to be seen as polite, apathetic, pretend not to hear or just plain afraid. We do not want to be seen as "angry" when confronting sexist, homophobic, anti-islamic comments. I have confronted folks for making homophobic comments only to be asked "why do you care, you're not gay?". That is not the point. I have made a conscious deciscion that I can be a better person by the choice of my words and the reaction to those of others. I am not saying that I am perfect but my voice is rising. Keep up the great inspirational work Michel.

Sent by Lori | 5:54 AM ET | 04-03-2008

I do believe that the old concepts of race are fading and new perceptions are evolving in the younger generations. As a white woman married to an Indian man and about to have a baby the concepts of multi-racial are on the forefront of my mind. I was happy to find a name that is both Indian and Irish giving him the ability to choose and mold his own identity.

I would like to point out that merely looking like a certain race does not get rid of the other parts of who are, no matter what you look like and one should have the space to proud of all those parts. So, I asked myself aren't all Americans ultimately to some degree mix-race? As, I am jewish, american-indian, german, english, and irish. All of these components make up who I am for better or for worse. But, it was my multi cultural upbringing that caused me to questions of others background out of want of understanding, not a need to pigeon hole.

I love listen to your show, as it pushes us all to rethink our own perspective in a positive way.

Let us all celebrate and share our difference so that we learn from each other and begin to see each other as individuals who got to be who we are through the mix of who we came from, "fitting in" should come from the content of our character.....right?

Sent by Adria | 11:46 AM ET | 06-11-2008

SENATOR OBAMA, PLEASE LET AMERICA IN ON YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS CONCERNING THIS US JUDICIAL INJUSTICE ???


LETS ALL HOPE OUR MEDIA FRIENDS ALSO SHOW AN INTEREST IN REPORTING ON THIS AMERICAN HORROR FACING THESE (TENS OF THOUSANDS) FORGOTTEN AND TRAPPED POORER AMERICANS, AND HOW THIS POSSIBLE FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDER HANDLES THIS VERY SERIOUS ISSUE FACING LATINO AND BLACK AMERICAN COMMUNITIES ????

**WITH 80% OF THE BLACK AMERICAN VOTERS SAYING THEY SUPPORT SENATOR OBAMA IN THIS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, IT IS ONLY FAIR FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW PRIOR BEING ELECTED OUR NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HOW THIS DEMOCRATIC SENATOR TRULY FEELS ABOUT THIS AMERICAN JUDICIAL HORROR CONTINUING TO INFLICT GRAVE HARM ON THE BLACK AMERICAN FAMILIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES NATIONWIDE ??????

*** WHEN GOD'S FACE BECAME VERY RED ***
THE US SUPREME COURT GAVE ENEMY COMBATANTS FEDERAL APPEAL HC RIGHTS LAWYERS AND PROPER ACCESS TO US FEDERAL COURTS,AND POORER AMERICANS (MANY EVEN ON DEATH ROW) ARE DENIED PROPER FEDERAL APPEAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION TO OUR US FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEAL, AND ROTTING IN AMERICAN PRISONS NATIONWIDE ?????????

**** INNOCENT AMERICANS ARE DENIED REAL HC RIGHTS WITH THEIR FEDERAL APPEALS !
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE $LOWLY FINDING OUT HOW EA$Y IT I$ FOR MIDDLE CLA$$ AND WORKING POOR AMERICAN$ TO FALL VICTIM TO OUR U$ MONETARY JUDICIAL $Y$TEM.

****WHEN THE US INNOCENT WERE ABANDONED BY THE GUILTY ****
The prison experts have reported that there are 100,000 innocent Americans currently being falsely imprisoned along with the 2,300,000 total US prison population nationwide.
Since our US Congress has never afforded poor prison inmates federal appeal legal counsel for their federal retrials,they have effectively closed the doors on these tens of thousands of innocent citizens ever being capable of possibly exonerating themselves to regain their freedom through being granted new retrials.

This same exact unjust situation was happening in our Southern States when poor and mostly uneducated Black Americans were being falsely imprisoned for endless decades without the needed educational skills to properly submit their own written federal trial appeals.

This devious and deceptive judicial process of making our poor and innocent prison inmates formulate and write their own federal appeal legal cases for possible retrials on their state criminal cases,is still in effect today even though everyone in our US judicial system knows that without proper legal representation, these tens of thousands of innocent prison inmates will be denied their rightful opportunities of ever being granted new trials from our federal appeal judges!!

Sadly, the true US *legal* Federal Appeal situation that occurs when any of our uneducated American prison inmates are forced to attempt to submit their own written Federal Appeals (from our prisons nationwide) without the assistance of proper legal counsel, is that they all are in reality being denied their legitimate rights for Habeas Corpus and will win any future Supreme Court Case concerning this injustice!

For our judicial system and our US Congressional Leaders Of The Free World to continue to pretend that this is a real and fair opportunity for our American Middle Class and Working Poor Citizens, only delays the very needed future change of Federal Financing of all these Federal appeals becoming a normal formula of Our American judicial system.

It was not so very long ago that Public Defenders became a Reality in this country.Prior that legal reality taking place, their were also some who thought giving anyone charged with a crime a free lawyer was a waste of taxpayers $$.

This FACADE and HORROR of our Federal Appeal proce$$ is not worthy of the Greatest Country In The World!

***GREAT SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT PROTECT EVEN THEIR INNOCENT, BECOME THE GUILTY!

A MUST READ ABOUT AMERICAN INJUSTICE:
1) YAHOO AND 2) GOOGLE
MANNY GONZALES THE KID THAT EVERYONE FORGOT IN THE CA PRISON SYSTEM. ** A JUDICIAL RIDE OF ONES LIFE !

Sent by DOUGLAS FIELD | 7:26 PM ET | 09-04-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.



   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 

E-mail Updates from the Tell Me More Blog

Enter your e-mail address to receive a daily update when new items are posted to the blog:



Delivered by FeedBurner

 
 
Get My Vote promo

Share Your Story

What would it take to get your vote? Share text, audio or video.

 
 

 
 

'Tell Me More' with Michel Martin

"Nothing is assumed." That's the unofficial motto of Tell Me More, the new Monday-Friday talk show with host Michel Martin. Grounded in lively interviewing and compelling storytelling, the program seeks to present diverse new voices, cross borders, challenge conventional wisdom and discover how other people think.

 
 

'Tell Me More' Podcast

Tell Me More PodcastListen to NPR's Tell Me More as a podcast every weekday.



» Get the Podcast

 
 

Related News Feeds

 
 

Discussion Guidelines

Read the discussion guidelines for our blog.

 
 

Search 'Tell Me More'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Contact Michel

If you would like to submit a general comment to Michel and the Tell Me More staff directly, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs