America

10 Years Later: Was The Supreme Court Right On 'Bush V. Gore'?

Dec. 11, 2000: The scene outside the Supreme Court.

hide captionAs the Supreme Court debated, protesters gathered.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

To some it may seem like it was even longer ago:

Ten years ago today, five Supreme Court justices issued a "stay" to halt Florida's recounting of votes in the presidential contest between then-Vice President Al Gore (the Democrat) and Texas Gov. George Bush (the Republican).

Three days later, on Dec. 12, the same five justices "stopped the recount once and for all," as The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin reminds us. Bush, with Florida's Electoral College votes now in hand because he had been ahead in the state's count, would become the next president.

The five who came down on that side: Chief Justice William Rehnquist and justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

Scalia has become known for telling those who object to what the court did to "get over it." Toobin argues in The New Yorker's latest issue that the decision "didn't just scar the court's record, it damaged the court's honor."

Cornell University's Law School has the Dec. 12, 2000, Supreme Court writ posted here.

Ten years later, we wonder what everyone thinks:

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Support comes from: