America

Enron's Jeffrey Skilling May Be Negotiating An Early Release

Former Enron Chief Executive Jeffrey Skilling outside of the Bob Casey United States Court House in Houston in 2006.

Former Enron Chief Executive Jeffrey Skilling outside of the Bob Casey United States Court House in Houston in 2006. Johnny Hanson/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Johnny Hanson/Getty Images

Jeffrey Skilling, the former Enron executive serving a 24-year prison sentence for his role in the energy company's collapse, may receive a shorter prison term.

According to Reuters, the United States Department of Justice notified victims of Enron's fraud that they are currently in negotiation with Skilling.

Reuters adds:

"It is unclear how much Skilling's sentence could be reduced, and a Justice Department official said no agreement has been reached. CNBC, the television business channel, said prosecutors and Skilling's lawyers have been negotiating a shorter term.

"Skilling has maintained his innocence, and according to court filings has been pursuing a new trial.

"He is scheduled to leave prison around February 2028, assuming good behavior, according to federal prison records."

Skilling has served 6-1/4 years of his sentence. If you remember, Skilling was convicted of 19 counts of conspiracy in 2006. He became the poster child of Enron's illegal business deals and creative accounting tricks.

The New York Times reports Skilling has appealed his conviction and with some success. The paper reports:

"Mr. Skilling's appeal gained traction with his argument that the government had relied on a dubious legal theory that Mr. Skilling deprived others of his "honest service." In 2010, the Supreme Court called the use of the awkwardly written "honest services" law unconstitutionally vague and said his conviction was "flawed."

"But a federal appeals court subsequently ruled that the conviction was not tainted by the use of the theory and said there was "overwhelming evidence" that Mr. Skilling had conspired to commit fraud. Last year, the Supreme Court declined to hear Mr. Skilling's appeal of the appeals court ruling."

The AP reports that in 2009, the appeals court ruled Skilling had to be resentenced because the judge "improperly applied" the sentencing guidelines.

Update at 6:39 p.m. Justice's Goal Is Appropriate Punishment:

A Justice Department official cited the 2009 appeals court order, but said "the Department's goal is, and has always been, to ensure that Mr. Skilling be appropriately punished for his crimes, and that victims finally receive the restitution they deserve."

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.