John Ridley's Visible Man
 
 

France's Best Olympic Moment

Former French tennis player Arnaud Di Pasquale reacts as he carries the extinguished Beijing Olympics torch in Paris on his way to place it in a bus for safety amid pro-Tibet protests. Patrick Kovarik/AFP/Getty Images

Former French tennis player Arnaud Di Pasquale reacts as he carries the extinguished Beijing Olympics torch in Paris on his way to place it in a bus for safety amid pro-Tibet protests.

Patrick Kovarik/AFP/Getty Images

I don't really have anything against the French except that, as an American, I've been bred to despise them with the same zeal as soccer and Renny Harlin films. But I've got to hand it to the French for having the guts to do what should have been done long ago: extinguish the Olympic torch.

During Monday's Olympic torch relay through the streets of Paris, angry Parisians (as opposed to the other kind) protesting human rights violations in Tibet forced Olympic officials to douse the torch and eventually load it on a bus for the reminder of the route.

Good job, France.

Though, note for future protests: pelting the wheelchair-bound torchbearer with bottles and fruits kinda runs counter to the whole "human rights" thing.

But beyond that, I say along with the torch, it's time for the Olympic concept to go on a permanent vacation. If the Olympic Games ever served a true altruistic purpose, they have long since outlived it. Yeah, the pursuit of athletic excellence, sportsmanship and international goodwill is plenty noble. But the modern Olympics are at best a vehicle for agitprop; at worst, a scandal magnet. It's the exception, not the rule, that individual competitors or whole nations don't use the games for political purposes. Sometimes it's for good — Tommie Smith and John Carlos' raised fists at the 1968 Mexico City games; protesting South Africa at the height of apartheid at the '76 Montreal games. Sometimes for absolute evil — Berlin.

The boycotts led by the USA and the USSR at Moscow and Los Angeles, respectively, fall somewhere in between.

There was Munich, and the Centennial Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta.

There have been scandals both high and low. The 2002 Winter Olympics bid scandal. Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan. Which is high, which is low are dealer's choice.

Worst of all, for all their pageantry and flag-waving, the Olympics have become nothing more than a big, fat corporate cow that's carved up among official sponsors and supporting partners before being trotted ad nauseam across the NBC multiverse of television outlets (GE as a corporation, which owns NBC Universal, is looking to rake in at least $600 million in Olympics-related deals).

Enough.

Enough with the boycotts and protests and pro athletes moonlighting as amateurs. Enough with the official airline and automobile and (fill in the blank) of the U.S. team. Enough with the Ben Johnsons and the Marion Joneses and dual gold medals for pairs figure skating.

For once, let's follow the lead of the good, rude people of France and douse the light that failed forever.

 

Comments (Send a comment)

such an extremist view. i agree with many points in the article, but to throw the baby away with the bath water is foolish. economics on such a large scale is bound to drive criticism. anywhere there is an audience, a statement will be made; this is no reason to remove the platform for communication. dealing with these issues is part of the complexity of life - removing the olympics will not solve the problems that it accents.

Sent by andre acevedo | 5:20 PM ET | 04-08-2008

I whole-heartedly agree!
Well said!

Sent by RL Hodnett | 7:01 PM ET | 04-08-2008

First off, once again, the status quo is restored and I think you're off the beam. The Olympics are one of the few chances we have as a world-wide community to do something together, peacefully, even if competitively. No matter who "wins."

There are other ways to protest China besides terrorizing the Olympic torch and its bearers.

These people have worked for their moment in the sun. While I don't really care who does what in the competition, it obviously means something to them.

The Olympics aren't going away any time soon. I think the best we can hope is that politicians and those who would politicize the games keep their noses out of the competition and concentrate more on what matters in the big picture.

The Olympics isn't what really matters here. That's just treating a symptom. Let's not focus our anger over Tibet on the Olympics.

Sent by Wolf | 7:18 PM ET | 04-08-2008

Sadly I agree with you. Not so much as to the French people, although I understand your feelings, but more so the whole corporate concept behind the games. And when coupled with the political/ideological platform for hosting governments and the athlete/management scandals that have plagued the organization, I too wonder if the Olympic Flame (and games) should be doused.

Sent by Tom Fool | 8:21 PM ET | 04-08-2008

I'm glad to see you hedge your praise of the French protesters by acknowledging their inherent rudeness.

How exactly is harassing the guy with the torch helping Tibet anyway?

Sent by Herb | 11:17 PM ET | 04-08-2008

why does it matter if they are in wheelchairs or not? to treat them differently, as if they are overly-sensitive and need to be treated with kid-gloves, is more offensive than pelting them with food just like you would anyone else.

Sent by lucy | 6:51 AM ET | 04-20-2008

Your point would have been more successfully posited had you not framed it with such banal stereotypes of the French.

Sent by Wesley | 3:08 AM ET | 04-22-2008

I got the same feeling as you did. We here in the U.S. associated the French with being rude. But seeing the French protests for Tibetan human rights, I admit that I gained more respect for them. This ranks pretty high along with giving the U.S. statue lady liberty.

Sent by Leo from Reno | 1:40 PM ET | 04-30-2008

Send a Comment

Comments are reviewed and edited by NPR prior to display. All comments will be read, but not all will be posted.







 (privacy policy)

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.




   
   
   
null


 
E-mail this page Print this page
 
 
 
John Ridley.

John Ridley

BLOGGER

 
 
 

About Visible Man

For seven years, John Ridley's award winning and distinctive commentaries have been heard on NPR's Morning Edition. Now, his intellectually aggressive take on the intersection of politics and pop culture appears twice weekly on NPR.org.

When he is not projecting his voice through NPR's megaphone, Ridley is often busy writing books. He is the author of seven published novels, including The American Way and What Fire Cannot Burn.

If you'd like to know more about John and his Visible Man blog, please consult the FAQ entry.

 
 

Discussion Guidelines

Read the discussion guidelines for John Ridley's Visible Man.

 
 

Comment Privately

If you would like to send private comments or questions to John Ridley's Visible Man, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Search 'John Ridley's Visible Man'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs