John Ridley's Visible Man
 
 

The Airlines' Big Meltdown Is Our Gain

Exhausted from traveling, Johnny Sigmon waits in line after his American Airlines flight to Las Vegas was canceled on Wednesday at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. Rick Gershon/Getty Images

Exhausted from traveling, Johnny Sigmon waits in line after his American Airlines flight to Las Vegas was canceled on Wednesday at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport.

Rick Gershon/Getty Images

It's one of those weeks when you should be happy to be you. 'Cause you could be this guy. Or you could be one of the thousands of displaced refugees formally known as American Airlines passengers (or passengers of a few other airlines, including Delta and Alaska).

As a (too) frequent flier of American Airlines myself — way to go three-for-three trips losing my bags! — my heart goes out to all the stranded travelers. Though I'm sure the airline's automated phone systems and overworked, underpaid employees are doing everything they can to make it seem as though they can actually do something for you.

By the way, AA CEO Gerard Arpey says he takes "full responsibility" for failing to meet FAA inspection standards, which caused the cancellations. So I'm sure any minute now he's going to break off a piece of his reported 2006 compensation of $10,201,059 to help pay for the mess. Any minute.

But while you wait...

If you travel with any regularity, you know that aside from the cancellations mess, this is a crappy time all around for the airline industry.

ATA, Aloha Airlines and Skybus stopped flying within days of each other. With oil topping $110 a barrel and fuel the single biggest expense of airlines, a few more may be crushed shortly. Add to the mix the safety issues with American, Southwest and other airlines. And add to that the Airline Quality Rating survey conducted by the Aviation Institute at the University of Nebraska at Omaha and Wichita State University, which found that customer complaints over issues like lost bags and delays are up 60 percent year to year.

It pretty much seems like air travel as we know it is done.

Thank God.

It's not that I believe this meltdown is the horrid end of getting from here to there by plane. I think what's happening now is more like a self-cleaning oven, in that you're not really sure what's going on inside the thing, but you know when you open the door in the morning, all that crap that was there before is gonna be gone.

And when the crap is gone — "crap" being airlines that can't compete — I think there will be fewer carriers carrying fewer people.

Fewer flights would mean less fuel used, less pollution, less congestion in the air and less noise and traffic around airports. With an antiquated system that carried 769.4 million domestic and international passengers in 2007, fewer flights also could mean better service, more accurate departure and arrival times and, hey, know what? Your bags might even get there when you do.

What would we lose? Convenience. There might not be the flight you want leaving right ... NOW! But even that might just be a "paper" loss. If the airlines can reduce the number of delays and the number of people bumped from overbooked flights, then you might actually get to where you're going when you're supposed to be there.

So, luck to you stranded American passengers. And know that next week Tuesday when you eventually get where you're going, the beginnings of a better air transport system might actually be waiting for you.

comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

Fewer carriers yes, but fewer people? In an era of globalization this makes about as much sense as going back to horse-drawn buggies because the cost of fuel is too high. Unless the nation builds as much rail per area as Europe, or scientists discover the mysteries of teleportation, Americans are going to have to rely on flying. That means more passengers, not less.

Sent by Shashvat Prakash | 3:31 PM ET | 04-14-2008

"Fewer carriers yes, but fewer people?.. going back to horse-drawn buggies"

On the other hand we do have too many cars. The fact that we have so many cars is a want of convenience rather than out of an actual necessity.

John's point, if I did not misunderstand, is that reducing and improving the institution of passenger flight would result in a change of culture where we fly more out of need instead of whim. That we would essentially wait longer and in trade, we would get less pollution and etc. and get more reliability in flight.

Sent by Prashvat Sakash | 1:03 PM ET | 04-18-2008

Awesome comments about the airline industry. How much the ceo of aa makes?
Shamefully and sickening! I too will fully accept responsibility if I make that much mulla in a single year, particulary that once admitted the responsibility there is no consequence, back to business as usual. Shame, shame.... I got to stop, got to go vomit.

Sent by hugo ramos | 12:11 PM ET | 04-30-2008



   
   
   
null


 
John Ridley.

John Ridley

BLOGGER

 
 
 

About Visible Man

John Ridley is an Emmy Award winning commentator and writer for Esquire and Time magazines as well as a contributor to CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, and NPR.

He is the author of seven published novels, the most recent of which is What Fire Cannot Burn. Collectively, his works have been chosen as editor's picks or "best of the year" by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, Entertainment Weekly and the Baltimore Sun.

Ridley is the Founding Editor of That Minority Thing, a nonpartisan Web site that provides news and opinions in support of a wide range of voices, including ethnic, racial, religious, disabled, gender, and sexual minorities.

If you'd like to know more about John and his Visible Man blog, please consult the FAQ entry.

 
 

Discussion Guidelines

Read the discussion guidelines for John Ridley's Visible Man.

 
 

Comment Privately

If you would like to send private comments or questions to John Ridley's Visible Man, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Search 'John Ridley's Visible Man'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs