John Ridley's Visible Man
 
 

Belgians Buy Bud. Things Could Be Worse.

A Budweiser sign sits atop one of the buildings at the Anheuser-Busch brewery in St. Louis.

The Belgians own Bud. What's next?

Jeff Roberson/AP

As a native of Milwaukee, Wis. -- the beer capital of America -- and as a former employee of the Miller Brewing Co., I think I can unilaterally declare I have a unique perspective on InBev (could it sound more Belgian?) buying up Anheuser-Busch (could it sound more American? I mean, really, for this piece I wish it sounded more American).
Satirical, hyperbolic headlines aside -- and apart from my belief that guys named some variation of Bush always end up smelling like a rose -- the $52 billion InBev/AB deal, while massive, is about the least consequential thing going on in the world that doesn't involve the Jonas Brothers.

Seriously, does it matter who's "controlling" -- the media's throwing around that word a lot -- the beer Bubba chugs while he's getting sloshed at the infield of a NASCAR ... race, meet, game ... whatever it's called while screaming, "I love you, Travis Kvapil! I loooove you!" And, no, I'm not an arrogant elitist.

Still, the mortgage crisis continues. The war in Afghanistan is heating up. Favre may come back to the Pack. But with all that going on how much you wanna bet the day won't pass before some junior representative from Missouri introduces a non-binding resolution condemning the sale of our good American beer to those Belgians. Were they even in the Coalition of the Willing, or did they just let us go off and fight the War on Terror(ism) while they plotted to make an international beer run.

Again, satire.

Except for that non-binding resolution part.

I swear by my flag lapel pin somebody's gonna make this deal into a populist war cry, mount up some Clydesdale and ride to economic war to protect "the little guy" from having his brew stolen. I can imagine Lou Dobbs slipping into his chain mail now.

It ain't pretty.

Now, AB isn't the first major American brewery to get snatched up by "foreigners." Over the years Miller's been swapped around like an empty can among South African Breweries before finally teaming up with some Canadians to form a joint venture called MillerCoors. Now, recall ... this past July 4th, was your patriotic binging at all affected by this multinational distribution of booze power, or did you just come around to an all-American Mother of all Hangovers?

So, go on Mr. Small District government representative. Go on and get your 15 minutes of C-SPAN fame blustering on this one. But save your truly righteous indignation for something worthy of ... getting indignant about.

One day they will come for our Lunesta. That is when we will have to stand and fight.

comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

Your point is correct that there are greater concerns at the present moment, but one you have overlooked is the blow to the local economy of St. Louis by this action. AB is a great philanthropic machine for our community and they are good to their employee's. InBev has no vested interest in our community therefore economically things will suffer for us. It might seem like a small-fry situation, but for the St. Louisans it is very apparent.

Sent by Monica | 11:09 PM ET | 07-14-2008

Right on Mr. Ridley! Not that there is much pain involved for the Bud powers that be, but the buyout seems poetic justice to me for a company that beat up on a small Czech brewery (Budvar) many years older than Bud...

Sent by Bruce Elder | 11:38 PM ET | 07-14-2008

IT AMAZES ME TO NO END THAT, WHEN A "EUROPEAN" COUNTRY BUYS AN "INSTITUTION" OF AMERICA THERE'S NOT ONE BIT OF PROTEST. HOWEVER, IF CHINA OR JAPAN WERE TO HAVE MADE THE PURCHASE ALL HELL WOULD SPILL OUT OF THE BARS ACROSS THE NATION!! AS THE LATE GREAT GEORGE CARLIN WOULD HAVE SAID TO ME, "THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'RE "WHITER"!!! AH, DON'T CHA' LOVE AMERICA!!!!!

Sent by STEVE MATSUMURA | 12:39 AM ET | 07-15-2008

If a company is owned by an overseas conglomerate, the profits from that company eventually go overseas, too. Isn't that, to some extent, true?

Sent by duende_71 | 11:18 AM ET | 07-15-2008

Cool, I can now afford Belgian beer !

Sent by J Smith | 3:12 PM ET | 07-15-2008

Being from Milwaukee, you should understand the importance the brewery has on local economy. With this buy out St. Louisans are concerned about their jobs. AB is one of the largest employers in the city, and not only are blue collar plant workers concerned about their futures, so are just about every ad agency in St Louis.

Sent by Bill | 3:29 PM ET | 07-15-2008

It's not just about who owns the company but what the company has done for the people of St. Louis. AB donates enormous amounts of money and supplies a multitude of jobs to residents of St. Louis. The real question is not about who owns the company (who cares); but instead will InBev/AB continue carry on the AB legacy as a company that cares about the people almost as much as it's beer.

Sent by Daniel Thornberry | 5:04 PM ET | 07-15-2008

I agree with you this does not need a congressional inquiry. The problem I have is with the people who own AB. They are selling out hard. They are hardly asking the advice of their customer base if its all right to sell out . As far as I know, it's not even a merger; they are flat out selling the whole thing to InBev , not even trying to do what Coors and Miller did. I feel for the people of St Louis. In its early days AB did a lot for it's home town, and from the view of someone who doesn't live there, was proud of doing so. I don't drink Budweiser. I've never liked any of it's products. But even though I don't drink the stuff ,I have a weird sense of pride that it is a symbol of America. After this stunt, If I did use any of their products, I would boycott them. That would hurt them where they live. Even though AB is worldwide, Americans still use the majority of their products. But I don't see it happening.

Sent by Kirk Van Irvin | 6:27 PM ET | 07-16-2008

because we all know that only NASCAR fans drink and do stupid things...

Sent by Nate | 11:04 AM ET | 07-20-2008

How is InBev going to deal with the Trademark infringements of using the stolen "Budweiser" name in "esk Bud" jovice's backyard - AB has never had the rights to market under that name ?!?

Sent by marcus | 1:09 PM ET | 07-28-2008

The only problem i have ever had with AB is that their beer tastes like piss. Once you've hit bottom, there's only one way to go...

Sent by JLC | 12:51 PM ET | 07-29-2008

Companies in China don't buy abroad, they get permission to invest.. from the Chinese Government.

Sent by PacoStLawrence | 5:11 PM ET | 07-31-2008



   
   
   
null


 
John Ridley.

John Ridley

BLOGGER

 
 
 

About Visible Man

For seven years, John Ridley's award winning and distinctive commentaries have been heard on NPR's Morning Edition. Now, his intellectually aggressive take on the intersection of politics and pop culture appears twice weekly on NPR.org.

When he is not projecting his voice through NPR's megaphone, Ridley is often busy writing books. He is the author of seven published novels, including The American Way and What Fire Cannot Burn.

If you'd like to know more about John and his Visible Man blog, please consult the FAQ entry.

 
 

Discussion Guidelines

Read the discussion guidelines for John Ridley's Visible Man.

 
 

Comment Privately

If you would like to send private comments or questions to John Ridley's Visible Man, please use our contact form.

 
 
 

Search 'John Ridley's Visible Man'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs