Getty Images
Okay, so I was thinking more about my mix tape list of falsetto singers and how I declined to include Michael Jackson. While it's great to celebrate the former king of pop (who just turned 50 BTW), I ultimately didn't include him because, as a new dad, I find the way he invited children over to sleep in bed with him to be creepy, at best -- criminal, at worst.
But does that mean "Billy Jean" is still not a great song or that you should deny that it's an even cooler video? What about his work when he was even younger, like "Human Nature?" Surely he wasn't doing anything weird back then (that we know of). I mean, I can still enjoy The Jackson 5, right? When listening to that great song "ABC" that's so catchy, should I feel guilty about what he did later as an adult? He was just a kid when he sang that, so I think that should probably still be kosher.
What about that Gary Glitter song "Rock and Roll Part 2"? It's a known fact that he's a convicted paedophile, but sometimes that one side of my brain that's very aware of that forgets to tell the other side that gets the song stuck in my head. I find myself tapping along to catchy tunes such as these -- but should I separate the song from what the singer does in their personal life?
When thinking about this topic, the band Milli Vanilli comes to mind as well.
Now I clearly remember a time back in elementary school when a sizable contingent of my class saw Milli Vanilli in concert and said they had an amazing time. But when it came out that they were frauds, it wasn't just Rob and Fab who became big losers, but their song ""Blame it on the Rain" took a hit as well. Hey, I slowed danced to that song! Nowadays, you almost never hear it on the radio, which is a shame.
This really goes to a larger idea of whether it's possible to like a piece of art, but have issues with the artist.
Continue reading "Can I Still Like Michael Jackson?" »
9:46 PM ET
|
09- 3-2008
|
permalink