The Not So Random Coin Toss

Mathematicians Say Slight but Real Bias Toward Heads

Listen Now: [7 min 45 sec]

Real Media|Windows MediaExplain these links
 
Statistician Persi Diaconis' mechanical coin flipper.
Susan Holmes

Statistician Persi Diaconis' mechanical coin flipper.

 
 

All Things Considered, February 24, 2004 · Flipping a coin may not be the fairest way to settle disputes. About a decade ago, statistician Persi Diaconis started to wonder if the outcome of a coin flip really is just a matter of chance. He had Harvard University engineers build him a mechanical coin flipper. Diaconis, now at Stanford University, found that if a coin is launched exactly the same way, it lands exactly the same way.

The randomness in a coin toss, it appears, is introduced by sloppy humans. Each human-generated flip has a different height and speed, and is caught at a different angle, giving different outcomes.

But using high speed cameras and equations, Diaconis and colleagues have now found that even though humans are largely unpredictable coin flippers, there's still a bias built in: If a coin starts out heads, it ends up heads when caught more often than it does tails. NPR's David Kestenbaum reports.

*Note: In football's inaugural kickoff coin toss, the coin is not caught but allowed to bounce on the ground. That introduces an extra complication, one mathematicians have yet to sort out.

 

Related NPR Stories

 
 

Share this page using one of the following services:

  • Del.icio.us
  • Digg
     

    What is this?

     



       
       
       
    null


     
    E-mail this pagePrint this page
     
    Share this pageGet a transcript of this story
     
     
     
     

    Web Resources

     
     

    Search 'All Things Considered'

    Search for the word(s):
     
     

    Browse Topics

    Services

    Programs