Magnetic Tape Recording: Forever?

Editor's note: Figure 1 mentioned in this paper was not reproduced in the electronic version, and EUonline is working with Bill Lund of 3M to rescan and include it as soon as practiable. We regret the omission.

Magnetic tape is such a significant factor in the retention of moving picture information. It has become, by default, the archival storage medium for many individuals and organizations. Television networks alone have literally hundreds of thousands of recorded programs, documentaries, and news stories that may be kept forever. Even individuals with their electronic cameras and VCR's have family recordings which they will never discard or erase as long as they are playable. There are those who have made recordings with the express intention of storing the information for archival purposes. It is no wonder that a considerable interest is shown in any information dealing with the probability of success or information that will help ensure the success of retrieving the recording after long term storage.

With that in mind, we will review what we know, what we think we know, and offer some recommendations for the long term storage of prerecorded magnetic tape.

Pertinent Tape Factors  |  The Magnetic Signal  |   The Binder System  |  The Backing |
Contamination Factors:Internal  |  Contamination Factors:External  |  Past Results |
Audio Tape Storage Results  |  Video Tape Storage Results  |
Storage Recommendations

 

Pertinent Tape Factors The magnetic tape consists of magnetic material in a binder system that is coated onto backing material. Assuming the tape and recording are in good condition to begin with, success in satisfactorily retrieving the recorded information after archival storage will depend upon how much the storage conditions and time will adversely affect the following:

1. The magnetic signal.

2. The binder system integrity.

3. The backing integrity.

 

The Magnetic Signal The magnetic particles dispersed in the binder system of the coating are the important memory elements in the overall tape construction. There are literally millions of these particles, and when the tape has been recorded, each particle may be considered as a small magnet with a north-south polarity. The polarities have been set in specific directions by the recording signal and, as a result, their combined magnetic fields will reproduce the original signal when detected on playback. Unless acted upon by some outside force, these individual magnets will retain their original magnetic strength and polarity indefinitely. However, there are outside influences that could change the polarities of the individual magnets, which would result in degradation of the overall desired signal. The outside influences that could be factors are: heat, magnetic fields, radiation, and physical stress. An important consideration then is knowing at what level these factors become a problem from a signal point of view.

1. The heat required to destroy the magnetism in a magnetic material is known as its curie temperature. The curie temperatures of the materials used as the magnetic media in tapes range from 250°F and higher. The lowest one being the chromium dioxide pigments at the 250°F level while the others are above 800°F. In either case, the other materials involved in the tape construction would be rendered useless before the 250°F temperature was reached. Basically this means, unless exposed to a fire, there is little danger of failure of the magnetic signal due to temperatures expected in storage conditions.

2. Obviously external magnetic fields can affect the signal on the tape or it never could have been recorded or erased in the first place; however, what is known as the tape's coercivity must be taken into consideration when trying to assess what levels would be a factor. The coercivity is a measure of the magnetic field strength required to affect erasure or polarity reversals in the magnetic material. Coercivity is expressed in oersteds. Virtually all commercially made video tapes have a coercivity of 250 oersteds or higher, with current day video tapes being 500 oersteds and above. This means an external magnetic field of 50 oersteds or less will have very little erasing effect on the tape.
Because the strength of a magnetic field falls off by the square of the distance from the source, the mere spacing between the tape and the source offers considerable protection. Examples of some field strengths for reference purposes are as follows:

               The earth's magnetic field 0.6 oes.

               The field strength directly on the case of an electric hand drill 10.0 oes.

     The field strength 3" away from a 1500 oersted bulk deguasser under 50.0 oes.

Even after long term exposure, the signal deterioration effects from the stray magnetic fields likely to be found in a tape storage area, or on a home user's shelf, would be negligible.

One signal stability problem, resulting from magnetic fields, is one that could be called an unwanted signal gain and is more commonly referred to as "print through." This is a phenomenon whereby the long wavelength recordings, as found in the audio recording portions of the tape, will cause magnetic particles to become magnetized by the recorded signal on an adjacent layer. In effect, the recording on one layer is imprinted onto the adjacent layers in the tape pack. Although of low level, the effect is noticeable on playback as a pre-echo or post echo. This can happen because within the tape pack are some magnetic particles with a coercivity lower than the average value, and as a result they are more easily magnetized by weak signals from the other layer. The level of the "print through" signal is dependent on the number of low coercivity particles, distance between layers (backing thickness), recorded wavelength, and time. The ratio of the wanted signal level to the print signal level with time is known as the signal to print characteristic of the tape. The higher the number, the better. The signal to print characteristic of a typical video tape is shown in Figure 1. As you can see from the graph, there is about a 2 to 3 dB loss per decade of time. With the tape shown, the print would not be considered objectionable until well beyond 100 years and still very usable out to 1000 years.

3. Based on tests that have purposely exposed magnetic recordings to microwave radiation and X-rays, the intensity levels below those that adversely affect a human being will have no adverse effects on the recorded signals.

4. A magnetic tape when exposed to high mechanical stresses can exhibit signal losses, but the stress level that could be reached in a storage situation would have no more effect on the signal retention than that experienced by one playback pass on the machine.

From a pure magnetic signal retention point of view, the probability of success after long term storage is very high and puts very little restriction on the storage environment.

 

The Binder System In addition to the magnetic particle design, the video tape binder system involves very sophisticated chemical technology. The binder must be receptive to fully dispersing the small magnetic particles in a uniform manner, maintain firm anchorage to the backing material, remain flexible, and still be strong enough to withstand the buzz saw action presented by the high speed rotating heads. The formulation of the binder system is a closely guarded secret by each tape manufacturer, but it is safe to say that most systems contain resin type material, plasticizers, and lubricants as necessary. The end result is a strong, flexible, lubricated piece of plastic.

The strength of this plastic comes from the design of the individual molecules making up the heart of the material. These molecules may be considered long chains of atoms that give the molecule a rope like shape. If the binder material could be seen with the naked eye, it would probably look like a bunch of long intertwining spaghetti. Like most plastics, this material is very stable and will weather the tests of time, but unlike the permanent siding on a house, this application requires that the material maintain an integrity beyond mere looks.

The binder material is hygroscopic, which means it will absorb or attract moisture from the air. When this occurs to a large enough extent, a hydrolysis action begins to take place. This means the binder molecules will react with the moisture, and at some point the long chains of spaghetti will break down into shorter chains, thus losing some of their strength. The degree to which this happens is dependent upon the moisture level, temperature, and time. When degradation has proceeded far enough, the tape will be susceptible to shedding and head clogging during playback on the machine, and at some point could reach a stage of complete breakdown to the buzz saw action.

The time and tolerance levels that will ensure complete protection are not theoretically clear due to many variables involved, but the studies that have been done in this area, relative to magnetic tape, have been valid enough to offer advice on setting some guidelines. These studies indicate that from a pure binder integrity point of view, the exposure to relative humidities below 50% RH and temperatures below 70°F will afford a very high probability of successfully retrieving the recorded information after very long term storage.

 

The Backing Since the inception of coated magnetic tape, there have been three types of backing materials used in its construction; namely, paper, types of acetate, and various forms of polyester. The paper backings were dropped shortly after 1948, but acetates are still being used today along with the polyester. Although polyester is the predominant backing in most magnetic tape, some audio recording applications such as mag film are still primarily using the acetate for its cut and tear characteristics. All video tapes, past and present, use a form of polyester.

The polyester is a plastic material made from resins with, most likely, some additives; and, as with the binder, it also is hygroscopic in nature and subject to degradation due to high humidity arid temperature. This degradation reduces the strength of the backing and, along with the binder deterioration, could increase the potential of adhesion failure (separation of coating from backing). Again, with temperatures below 70°F and relative humidities below 50% RH, the probability of successful long term storage is very good from this point of view.

Another factor that must be taken into account is the dimensional stability of the backing. In the manufacture of the backing, the polyester is put through a stretching process in arriving at its carefully controlled caliper. This produces a memory effect that, along with the thermal and hygroscopic expansion characteristics, is an important factor in what the dimensions of the tape will be after long term storage. When the backing is exposed to higher temperatures than that found in manufacturing, the material will tend to shrink with time and the result is not reversible. This dimensional change is of little consequence before a recording is made; but, after recording, a dimensional change could cause tracking or timing error problems upon playback. This is particularly true of helical scan formats.

As a result, 3M incorporated a stabilizing process into the manufacturing of all their helical tape backings which significantly improves the tolerance to time and temperature effects. Thus, there are two types of backing that may possibly be encountered in the field; namely, stabilized and non-stabilized. Based on laboratory tests conducted at 72°F over a 10-month period in comparing the two backings, the non-stabilized backing tapes reached a 0.03% dimensional change in the 10 months, while it is projected that the stabilized tapes will not reach that level until after 100 years. The combination of times and temperatures that will result in giving the same 0.03% dimensional change on the stabilized backing is shown in the following table:

  80°F or 27°C after 10 years
 90°F or 32°C after  1 year
105°F or 40°C after  6 months
125°F or 52°C after 24 hours
150°F or 66°C after  1 hour

The degree to which this phenomenon will affect the information retrieval after long term storage is dependent on the recording format and the machine's designed-in ability to handle tracking and time base errors. In the quadruples format this presents no tracking problem, but will increase head banding effects. In the 1 " and other formats with auto scan tracking and time base correction, this should not present a problem.

 

Contamination Factors

Internal Contamination All magnetic tape contains a certain amount of unavoidable contamination as the result of by-products in their manufacture. They are present in both the coating and backing to various degrees. Fortunately, the quantity of this undesirable material is very small due to design and manufacturing controls, but their presence should not be ignored. After long periods of storage under conditions of high humidity and temperature, the internal contaminants will migrate to the surface of the tape and manifest themselves as dropouts.

If the quantity released is higher than normal, possible head clogging and noticeable ruboff could occur. In either case, it is important to recognize that no deterioration of the tape occurs with the exudation of this material, and simply passing the tape through a cleaning device will restore normal playback. High humidity and temperature storage should be avoided in order to prevent this situation; but, should it occur, the chances for recovering the recorded signal is still very high.

 

External Contaminants The most familiar and often discussed form of contamination is the dirt and debris in the operations environment that usually finds its way into the tape pack. This is worth mentioning again under the subject of long term storage because the effects from this debris will be greatly accentuated as tension in the tape increases with high temperature or high humidity storage. Under these conditions, the wound-in debris causes impressions in multiple layers of tape and results in significant drop-out growth.

At temperature and humidity conditions above 75°F and 70% RH, the chances of fungus growth developing on the tape during storage is very high.

While contamination may not prevent the future recovery of recorded information, it will most certainly affect the quality.

 

Past Results Magnetic tape recording is a relatively new means of information storage when compared to stone carvings, written matter, printed matter, paintings, and even photographic film. Magnetic recording in general is less than 100 years old, magnetic tape recording less than 60 years old, the first commercially available audio tapes and machines are 40 years old, and the first commercially available video tapes and machines are just over 30 years old. Although the time period is relatively short when considering archival storage, some of the known successes and failures that have occurred on stored audio and video tapes deserve mentioning.

 

Audio Tape Storage Results In the 1970s there were some glowing reports of a few audio tape recordings made in 1938 that played back with amazingly good quality. It was judged they may have even sounded better than when first recorded due to the improvements in playback heads and electronics.

There have been reports of some audio tapes made with acetate backing that were considered unuseable after 10 years storage due to the backing becoming brittle and cracked. The storage conditions were known to have been very dry for most of the period. A few tapes, known to have been under extended periods of 80°F and 80% RH or more, exhibited blocking (sticking between layers) and adhesion failures (separation of coating from backing) when taken out of storage after 15 years.

Adhesion and blocking failures in the areas of physical splices have been reported on some tapes that presumably had been stored for approximately 25 years in good environment.

Actual signal measurements on tapes before and after many years of storage are difficult for reasons of accuracy, and are often in question as to whether the heads, the electronics, the test equipment, or the tape itself has changed. However, when two signals of the same frequency are measured for level changes between them after a long period of storage, the results are meaningful. This is the case when making signal to print measurements. Several reports of the print through levels found on tapes after long term storage have confirmed the initial tests used for predicting the time vs. print characteristic.

The random subjective testing done at 3M over the past several years has included reel to reel tapes recorded in the early 50's, 60's, 70's, and 80's. The results indicate the quality after storage to be very near the quality when first recorded, at least as far as critical subjective evaluation is concerned. The testing has also included cassettes recorded in the 60's and later with the same result.

 

Video Tape Storage Results In mid-1970 a survey of television broadcast operations was conducted for the purpose of assessing the general quality of pre-recorded video tapes after time in storage. The only tapes involved were the 2" quadruplex type. The age of the recordings ranged from 7 to 14 years, and the reported storage conditions were temperatures of 50°F to 85°F along with humidities of 30% RH to 70% RH. The evaluations made were strictly subjective in nature. The overall conclusions reached were positive, as the reports indicated the quality of the recordings after storage were acceptable and were said to be nearly equal to the quality when first recorded. The reported problems that could have been attributable to the storage time, but not necessarily so, were drop-outs, audio print level, shedding, time base errors, and head clogging. The percentage of these problems were small and none of them prevented the useability of the recordings. Presumably this was helped by the use of a tape cleaning device when necessary.

Storage reports received from various operations since that time, involving pre-recorded quadruplex tapes ranging in age from 10 to 20 years, have been similar in nature and most have involved color recordings. Of course, the magnetization on the tape cares less whether the recording is in color or black and white.

Early 1 " tapes, utilizing non-stabilized backing and recorded on one of the older 1 " formats, exhibited a relatively high percentage of time base error problems after only 2 or 3 years of storage. The storage conditions were believed to have exceeded 80°F on occasion and the resultant time base error was beyond the machines ability to correct via the tension control. This prompted 3M to take corrective action. This led to their introducing the stabilized backing in the early 1970's.

Pre-recorded U-Matic tapes over 10 years old have been evaluated at 3M and judged to be of acceptable quality with only minor problems. Numerous 1 " Type C recordings up to 8 years old have also been evaluated and found to be of high quality with virtually no problems that can be attributed to storage.

The random observations made on older Beta and VHS recordings would indicate they are capable of holding up quite well under proper storage.

 

Storage Recommendations One of the most important factors in realizing the long life capability of magnetic tape is the care and attention provided before storage. The guidelines offered in the SMPTE recommended practice RP-103, when followed by a tape recording operation, will offer the best chances for achieving the longevity expected. With proper compliance to RP-103, along with technical competence, the tape should exhibit the following conditions when placed on the storage shelf:

1. Recorded with a quality meeting the machine manufacturer's specifications and complying with the appropriate standard.

2. A smooth, even, and full length uniform wind at proper machine tensions.

3. No bad edges.

4. Free from excessive moisture absorption.

5. Free from external contaminants.

6. In the case of reel to reel tape, the end properly secured with hold-down tab material.

7. In its original clean container or equivalent.

8. No visible physical distortion in the tape pack.

9. In the case of cassette tape, a properly functioning and clean cassette.

10. Proper labeling and identification.

11. No physical splices.

In order to meet some of the conditions just outlined, those tapes that have been exposed to considerable usage and have been in suspect environments should be given a cleaning pass through a properly operating tape cleaning device if possible.

Having arrived this far, there is one big advantage working in everyone's favor; the tape merely has to sit there. The only further attention needed is controlling the atmosphere in which it will rest. We recommend one of the following be adopted, depending on the situation:

1. If only video tape is to be stored, and in an isolated area where no access to the area is expected or required during the life of the storage, we recommend maintaining a reasonably constant temperature and humidity below 70°F and 50% RH.

2. If video tape is to be stored along with mag film, photographic film, or any other type of media, and no access to the area is expected or required during the storage life, we recommend maintaining a reasonably constant temperature below 70°F and humidity between 30% RH to 50% RH.

3. If the storage area is to be made available to frequent access, we recommend the temperature and humidity be maintained within the same limits recommended for the operations area; namely, 70°F plus or minus 5% and humidity 50% plus or minus 20%.

One further consideration is the video tape machine itself. With the rapid development of video recording technology, the possibility of the current machines being readily available in 50 to 100 years is highly unlikely. It therefore requires the archivist to store and maintain the machines necessary for playing back the recorded format. The particular machine manufacturer involved may have recommendations in this regard, but the same storage and operating conditions outlined in item 3 should also suffice for the machines.

Perhaps magnetic recording forever is stretching the point; but certainly when given the proper attention, it is a very viable archival storage medium.

Return to the 3M Index Page

Return to the EUonline Home Page