Rehnquist on Criminal Law:

Dickerson v. United States, 2000

Rehnquist had previously opposed Miranda warnings, arguing that the court's decision to uphold them was a misinterpretation of the Constitution that would help criminals go free. But in the 2000 Dickerson case, he reversed this earlier opinion, siding in favor of the warnings.

Whether it was correct when decided, he wrote, Miranda must be respected as a major precedent that "has become embedded in routine police practice to the point where the warnings have become part of our national culture."

Close Window