NPR Ombudsman
 

DOES THE WORLD NEED MORE NEWS OMBUDSMEN?

 
“"The public likes to know there's somebody there listening to their criticisms," said PBS Ombudsman Michael Getler. "An Ombudsman makes news organizations live up to their own standards. An editor is too close."”
 
 

STOCKHOLM -- The "Readers' Editor" for The Observer of London was sightseeing here last week when his cell phone rang. It was a Kenyan journalist asking how his newspaper company might create the role of a news Ombudsman.

In the last decade, Kenya has enjoyed a surge in press freedom, a trend that's paralleled the opening up of Kenya's political system. One of the best testaments is the phone call from the editorial director for the Nation Media Group, who wanted an Ombudsman for his papers in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and two other countries in East Africa.

Another journalist from Kenya visited NPR this week and made the same point. "Media in Kenya is not restricted in any way," even following the recent violence, said Nairobi radio journalist Tole Nyatta. "You can criticize the government. Seven or eight years ago, the government would threaten to close you. But now we are very independent and very robust."

As the link between the public and the newsroom, the Ombudsman plays a key role in ensuring a news organization upholds its own standards as well as making sure audience concerns are taken seriously.

Kenya is not the only place where the press is becoming more free and where news organizations are considering adding Ombudsmen. In Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, and Latin America, there is a greater interest in the position, according to a meeting last week in Stockholm of the Organization of News Ombudsmen (ONO), which I attended.

However, in the United States -- where press freedom is taken for granted, even when it's under assault -- the number of Ombudsmen at news organizations is declining, largely for budgetary reasons. Just a few years ago, 40 news organizations employed Ombudsmen (sometimes called "public editors" or "reader representatives.") That's not many, considering the United States has some 1,500 daily newspapers, three broadcast TV networks, several national radio networks, scores of cable networks, and thousands of local radio and TV stations.

Today, there are only 34 U.S. news ombudsmen, most of them at newspapers.In broadcast, only NPR, PBS, ESPN and WJAR-TV in Warwick, R.I. employ someone to act as a liaison between the newsroom and the audience. In the last year, four newspapers killed the position.

Worldwide, there are only 100 news Ombudsmen for newspapers, TV, radio and the Internet, according to Esben Orberg of the Danish Union of Journalists, who researched the role and gave a report at the ONO conference.

"Ombudsmen are growing in parts of the world where a free press is starting to assert itself," said ONO President Pam Platt, the public editor at the Louisville Courier-Journal in Kentucky, the first paper in the U.S. to create the position.

Estonia is another country now enjoying press independence after decades of dictatorship. In 2004, Estonia joined the European Union, an important symbol of its new freedoms. Last year, the government created the position of Ombudsman for its public radio and TV. The first to hold the position, Tarmu Tammerk, writes internal criticism four or five times a week and has a monthly radio show where he shares his views publicly.

Tammerk sees great potential for other news Ombudsmen in Central and Eastern Europe because communist-state censorship is gone.

"These countries - the new member states in the European Union - have been able to build up free and democratic media systems for the past fifteen years," said Tammerk. "There's an even bigger potential for media Ombudsmen in the former Soviet republics, which are still struggling with how to turn former government broadcasters into public broadcasters, which would be journalistically independent."

In Bogota, Columbia, two private television stations have Ombudsmen, who each produce weekly 30-minute TV shows critiquing their employers. "There's definitely interest in Latin America," said Consuelo Cedpeda Cediel with RCN Channel.

Brazil has two popular Internet sites, each with their own ombudsman, iG and UOL (Universe online).

Why have an Ombudsman?

Having an Ombudsman is a form of self-regulation by a news organization that the public should find heartening. An Ombudsman can point out publicly when a news organization is not living up to its own written standards and ethics. Having an Ombudsman indicates that a news organization is confident enough in its journalism to be publicly criticized by someone on its payroll.

While it may seem self-serving for me to say so, an Ombudsman also lends credibility to a news organization -- as long as the person is contractually independent and cannot be fired for her comments. The role encourages self-criticism within the news organization, something that editors and reporters often don't have the time, or the appetite, to engage in. Think of it as quality control.

"Reporters and editors have a tendency to brush off criticism," said Michael Getler, PBS' Ombudsman. "If you have an independent Ombudsman who says, 'You are wrong. You violated your own guidelines,' that definitely makes them think."

Getler knows. After 21 years with the Washington Post as a foreign correspondent, reporter and editor, he spent five years as the paper's Ombudsman before joining PBS in 2005.

While it is true that some news organizations, especially in the electronic media, have editors for 'standards and practices,' the role is largely internal and doesn't involve dealing directly with the public.

"The public likes to know there's somebody there listening to their criticisms," said Getler. "An Ombudsman makes news organizations live up to their own standards. An editor is too close."

Meanwhile, the editorial director for Kenya's Nation Media Group has asked ONO for help in writing a job profile so he can hire an in-house critic. Considering the dozens of polls that repeatedly tell of the media's loss of credibility in this country, it is unfortunate that more U.S. news outlets aren't willing to take this same step toward regaining public esteem.

-30-


comments | |

 

Comments

View all comments »

Add a Comment

Please note that all comments must adhere to the NPR.org discussion rules and terms of use. See also the Community FAQ.

NPR reserves the right to read on the air and/or publish on its Web site or in any medium now known or unknown the e-mails and letters that we receive. We may edit them for clarity or brevity and identify authors by name and location. For additional information, please consult our Terms of Use.

Does the world need another ombudsman? Prolly not if she only posts once a week and doesn't answer questions.

Sent by kent strock | 2:03 AM ET | 06-07-2008

One simple role of an ombudsman could be to hold interviewers accountable when Republican guests refer to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party or Democrat primary etc..

I have NEVER heard an NPR person correct a person who uses this Orwellian language trick, propigated by Frank Luntz and Rush Limbaugh. I think that the role of an ombudsman would be to address this BASIC journalistic standard. If people began to refer to the Republican Party as the Republican guard or Republic party people would be very pissed or mostly confused.

Sent by kent strock | 2:18 AM ET | 06-07-2008

wow...once post a week with lame commentary...ya..what is the role of an ombudsman?

Sent by kent strock | 2:29 AM ET | 06-07-2008

No, the world does not need more Ombudsmen. From my limited experience, the Ombudsmen are positive spin for damage control. The Ombudsmen is firstly public relations.

PBS's Getler hopes to make a "news organizations live up to their own standards. An editor is too close." The Public Broadcast Systems' Ombudsman aspires for "their own standards." What about public standards? Does anyone actually claim we have a free market of ideas? Getler antidotal assertions on Moyers and Rev Wright (http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2008/05/post_13.html) seem less than objective.

"Am I my brother keeper?"

Sent by andrew hennessy | 12:25 PM ET | 06-07-2008

I don't know if the world needs another ombudsman, but I wish the one at NPR would do her job.

Try addressing questions about editorial bias. Is it appropriate to state as a fact that a certain presidential candidate is "ordinarily a straight talker" while not covering his frequent misstatements and changes of position? Does NPR have an imbalance of right leaning commentators? Given that so few progressive (especially anti-war ) commentators are asked to appear on television compared to conservatives, shouldn't NPR strive to provide those points of view at least to the extent that professional polling shows the American people support those progressive points of view? Shouldn't people like Juan Williams and Barbara Bradley Haggerty be identified as conservatives? Is NPR's political coverage in general tainted by its inside the Beltway attitudes and slants, and thus prone to making the same mistakes the for profit mass media outlets make?

At the very least, you could acknowledge emails and questions you receive, even if you would rather not address them.

Sent by Kevin Farrell | 3:49 PM ET | 06-09-2008

Dear Mr. Strock: Thanks for taking the time to write. I post one reported column a week on this site. Every day I deal with dozens of emails from listeners, answer phone calls from listeners and also appear on NPR member stations answering questions. We get between 30 and 50 emails a day, and about a dozen phone calls. But I'm always open to suggestions on how to do the job better.
Alicia Shepard

Sent by Alicia Shepard | 4:07 PM ET | 06-09-2008

Miss Shepard:

That you "post one reported column a week on this site" is true if you ignore at least two weeks that I know were skipped. That is just a fact; you select to overlook it (much like other facts at NPR).

To start to do your job better:
1. In your further columns address the concerns of the people that are attempting to communicate with you.
2. Stop trying to steer NPR to the "mainstream" (as stated in an interview I heard with you). I asked you to define "mainstream," but I was ignored.
3. Stop trying to protect and defend NPR.
4. Have a couple town hall meetings.
5. Actually respond to people when they write to you with valid points and examples.
6. Clear up the contradictions in your office.
7. End the appearance of censorship here: http://www.npr.org/ombudsman/2008/05/why_hasnt_my_comment_been_posted.html#commentSection
8. Nothing personal, you should resign. The members and/or listeners of NPR should elect the NPR ombudsman. Otherwise the office seems a less than legitimate.
9. Kill them with kindness and have a good day.

Sent by andrew hennessy | 7:11 PM ET | 06-09-2008

Mr. Gordon. This sounds like an interesting issue for me to look into. Thanks for drawing it to my attention. I will need more information, as you might imagine. I don't know what you mean when you say that BBH is a graduate. I'd like to know more about the Institute.
Should NPR journalists not speak at Georgetown since it's a Jesuit University?

Sent by Alicia Shepard | 11:05 AM ET | 06-12-2008

Mr.Farrell -- I am acknowledging your email. I've been traveling and taking time off.

In regards to Juan Williams, he is a commentator for NPR. You may think he's conservative, but I can promise that I get an equal number of emails claiming he is too liberal. He is paid to give his analysis.

As for BBH, she is an NPR correspondent who covers religion. I don't know what her views are, but I know she's a strong, fair reporter because I pay attention to her work and that's all that matters -- does her work meet NPR's code of ethics on fairness and balance? Here are NPR's statement of principles: http://www.npr.org/about/ethics/#principles

Labels often do not tell us anything about someone; the quality of their work does. --Alicia Shepard


Sent by Kevin Farrell | 3:49 PM ET | 06-09-2008

Shouldn't people like Juan Williams and Barbara Bradley Haggerty be identified as conservatives? Is NPR's political coverage in general tainted by its inside the Beltway attitudes and slants, and thus prone to making the same mistakes the for profit mass media outlets make? At the very least, you could acknowledge emails and questions you receive, even if you would rather not address them.

Sent by Alicia Shepard | 3:41 PM ET | 06-13-2008

For the readers of this comments section:

Being an ombudsman is a tough duty. They are supposed to both defend and spank their employers.

I, along with many others would like to see less defending and more spanking... but I don't think it's fair to diss the concept of ombudsman. It must be an incredibly hard job to live up to the principles of.

I am neither defending nor dissing Ms Shepard. I will tell you that once I was able to actually speak with her, she sounded like a pretty good person.

There can be a problem with communications being short-circuited at NPR. As you know there have been staff cuts, and a position where the person is supposed to be able to spank Kevin Klose probably does not get a lot of funding... or respect.

Do the best job you can, Alicia. And please go buy a big paddle!

We want to hear about the spanking, OK?

Sent by Fred Milton Olsen III publicradioactivist (at) g mail (dot) com | 3:56 PM ET | 06-17-2008

Thank you Mr. Milton. My job is to pay attention to the editorial content at NPR -- not the executive branch where Mr. Klose resides -- and try to make sure that NPR stays true to its own standards. I appreciate the support.
ACS

Sent by Alicia Shepard | 5:39 PM ET | 06-17-2008

Gosh, there are a lot of cranks that post here....

Does the world need more Ombudsmen? YES!
Sometimes we need watchmen for the watchmen. Since NPR's shareholders are the taxpayers, there absolutely needs to be someone who can be there to call into account what NPR does. As a human institution, it is imperfect. But, I appreciate someone who is filling the role; let's hope that the powers-that-be aren't too threatened by what you are doing.

Sent by Matt | 10:59 AM ET | 06-23-2008

Matt

Why would the powers that be feel threatened by the ombudsman? The powers that be say "harsh interrogation" and NPR says "harsh interrogation." Pick your term; there are many other examples.

Sent by Andrew Hennessy | 8:49 AM ET | 06-25-2008

Mr. Strock, it's not the "Democratic Party", but the United States is a "Democratic Nation" or "Representative Republic". Learn the difference.

Sent by Stacey Hanrahan | 7:51 AM ET | 06-28-2008

Since NPR is tax-payer funded, it serves the public interest that the day-to-day operations of NPR and PBS are being scrutinized by an ombudsman. Otherwise, the public interest isn't being met if NPR and PBS are allowed to become a cheerleader or megaphone for one ideology over another.

Sent by Stacey Hanrahan | 8:05 AM ET | 06-28-2008

The world needs more news. Real repoting (without a hidden agenda)
is very powerful. It allows intelligent people to make a judgement based on the facts.
Robert Buchanan

Sent by Robert Buchanan | 8:13 PM ET | 07-26-2008

The role of an ombudsman is very interesting and beneficial but to a point. An ombudsman can go only so far before attacking the hand that feeds him or her. The inherent conflict of interest thwarts complete objectivity. This is akin to a police department and its Internal Affairs division. For example, if the Rodney King beating wasn't video taped and left to the LA IA, would the policemen have been tried? That's highly doubtful.

Having said that, I believe more ombudsmen should be employed and effectively used. Objectivity in journalism is good in theory. I rely more on journalists employed by competitors to shed further light on news coverage.

Sent by aTypicalProgressive | 11:51 AM ET | 08-01-2008



   
   
   
null


 

Questions & Comments:

Listeners can call the Office of the NPR Ombudsman at 202-513-3245. Send us your thoughts »

 
 
 

Subscribe to the NPR Ombudsman via E-mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 
 

Related News Feeds

 
 

Search 'NPR Ombudsman'

Search for the word(s):
 
 

Browse Topics

Services

Programs