Can the Affordable Care Act expand Americans' health insurance choices without sabotaging employer coverage? The Obama administration is still working to get the balance right.
The latest tweak from the Internal Revenue Service essentially prohibits employers from giving workers tax-free subsidies to buy policies in the online public marketplaces created by the health law. The New York Timesfirst reported the rule. But the headline on the story, "I.R.S. Bars Employers From Dumping Workers Into Health Exchanges," overstates the case.
Nothing stops employers from canceling company plans and leaving workers to buy individual policies sold through the exchanges — as long as the companies pay the relevant taxes and penalties, said Christopher Condeluci, a Venable lawyer specializing in benefits and taxes. Those would vary according to a company's size and circumstances.
If an employer has fewer than 50 workers, there is no penalty under the health law for dropping coverage or never offering it. Larger companies that don't offer coverage may be liable for fines of $2,000 and $3,000 per worker starting next year. (The employer mandate doesn't kick in for firms with 50 to 99 workers until 2016.)
Nor is there anything stopping companies from giving workers raises to buy individual policies on the exchanges as long as the money is taxed as income.
"If an employer wanted to give additional taxable cash to employees, without regard as to whether the employee used the money to buy coverage on the exchange or not, the IRS doesn't seem to care," said Edward Fensholt, director of compliance for the Lockton Companies, a large broker and benefits consultant.
The IRS statement reinforces a ruling last year essentially prohibiting income-tax breaks for money used to buy health insurance that isn't routed through a conventional company plan, lawyers said. It doesn't affect the fast-growing private exchanges, in which employers give workers tax-free money to shop a variety of plans on a company web site.