NPR logo You're Only A Rogue If You Lose Money

You're Only A Rogue If You Lose Money

I'm late to the UBS rogue trader story (I was away from the blog yesterday), but the WSJ's Marketbeat blog points out a fact worth repeating: You only hear about "rogue traders" when they lose money.

In fact, the rogues often say they were rewarded for breaking the rules before their trades went bad. From Marketbeat:

Then there is Jerome Kerviel, the ultimate rogue trader who lost $7 billion at Societe Generale in 2008. Kerviel claims he exceeded his credit limits regularly and that when he made money for the bank in 2007, he received a $416,000 bonus for $60 million in profits for SocGen.

Ultimately, the difference between trading floor rogues and royalty is how their bets pay off, not whether they take extreme risks. As [a rogue trader who was busted in the 1990s] said, there's no excuse for not catching rogue trading today or even 18 years ago: "a very simple check would have exposed it."

On a related note, Kid Dynamite writes:

I, as someone with extensive trading experience in varying roles on both sides of the Street, cannot comprehend how a trader can lose billions of dollars without anyone else knowing about it.

The rest of Kid Dynamite's post has lots of technical details about why this is so.

Article continues after sponsorship

For a broad overview of what just happened at UBS, see this Bloomberg story.