NPR logo Media Mischief On April Fools' Day

Media Mischief On April Fools' Day

In the annals of journalism, there is a long tradition of newsfolks — reporters, writers, broadcasters — pulling April Fools' Day tricks on readers and listeners. Sometimes the prank prevails; sometimes it fails.

Mickey Mantle was the subject of a newspaper hoax in 1961. Here he is that year taking practice swings at Yankee Stadium. AP hide caption

toggle caption
AP

Mickey Mantle was the subject of a newspaper hoax in 1961. Here he is that year taking practice swings at Yankee Stadium.

AP

For instance, the Long Beach Independent reported in 1961 that the newly minted Los Angeles Angels had acquired Mickey Mantle — star outfielder of the New York Yankees — for a million dollars, a half interest in a local radio station and a passel of other players. It was a hoax. In 1978, an outdoors writer at the Erie Times-News in Pennsylvania reported that monofilament fishing line was being banned because it was fatal to fish. It was a hoax and he was fired. In its April 1, 1985, edition, Sports Illustrated concocted the story of imaginary pitching phenom Sidd Finch. The hoax is held up as a classic sports story.

In recent years, the Internet has become an incubator for hatching April Fools' high jinks. The Huffington Post, which chronicled some prominent pranks of 2014, also participated in the shenanigans with a fake story about parenting. Even NPR has gotten in on the act multiple times. In 2014, for instance, we April Fooled Facebook habitues by posting this headline: "Why Doesn't America Read Anymore?" Those who clicked on the headline on Facebook were whisked to an NPR page that explained the inside joke: Sometimes people who comment on articles have not read them.

Article continues after sponsorship

Doctored newspaper photo of a submarine in the Tar River, April 1, 1961. The Daily Reflector of Greenville N.C. Joyner Library at East Carolina University hide caption

toggle caption
Joyner Library at East Carolina University

Doctored newspaper photo of a submarine in the Tar River, April 1, 1961. The Daily Reflector of Greenville N.C.

Joyner Library at East Carolina University

News organizations need to be careful. "If you knowingly set out to trick or deceive your audience," says journalism ethicist Jane E. Kirtley of the University of Minnesota, "there is the inevitable question of whether you will do it again, or have done it before. Maybe that is primarily a problem for the critics who don't like you anyway, but I don't think it is irrelevant even with devotees."

She adds: "Credibility is one of the most important things we have, and it should not be endangered lightly."

Loof Lirpa

Still and all. The tradition of pranking news consumers on April 1 goes way back. Back to when it was sometimes called All Fools Day. The practice was so much a part of American journalistic tradition by 1903 that the Pittsburgh Post reported on March 29 of that year that "it was the habit of newspapers some years ago to observe the day by perpetrating some hoax upon their readers."

The Post enumerated several such pranks, such as the story of a Cleveland newspaper editor being fooled by his own paper into thinking a politician would be appearing at a local hotel on the first of April. The appearance was imaginary; the hotel — the Kennard — was real. The "canard," get it?

Research also reveals an occasionally recurring motif in April Fools' Day fakery: the wink-wink pseudonym "Loof Lirpa" — which is April Fool spelled backwards — in many stories.

A Listory

Here are some incidents from the past:

  • In the April 1 issue of the Iola, Kan., Register in 1898, readers were encouraged to visit Hershberger's Barber Shop to see an old tomahawk "with the name of the famous old Indian chief Loof Lirpa who made things so disagreeable for the early settlers of Iola carved in the handle." Another newspaper picked up that story as well — and the original publication had to explain the joke later in the month.
  • For its April Fools' edition in 1933, the Madison Capital-Times in Wisconsin ran a fake photo of the state capitol in ruins. Time later reported: "The accompanying story claimed that the building was felled by a serious of unusual explosions caused by hot gas produced by the 'verbose debates' in the chambers. Readers weren't amused by the trick."
  • Two reporters for the Daily Facts of Redlands, Calif., dreamed up a good-news story in the spring of 1942, during World War II. The story, with Loof Lirpa as the byline, announced a new $30 million vitamin manufacturing company to be built in Redlands. The secret ingredients were to come from the city dump. Some readers — including an executive at the Southern California Gas company in Los Angeles — believed the story. The reporters, writing about it in 1970, said they spoke with the gas company and explained the hoax.
  • In Pennsylvania, the Warren Times-Mirror ran a story in its April 1, 1973, edition reporting that the nearby Kinzua Dam was scheduled to be demolished in the near future. The newspaper, according to the Uniontown, Pa., Morning Herald, "said the demolition work would begin Sept 1, 1979, to coincide with the Seneca Indian ancient holiday of Lirpa Loof." The Times-Mirror's story "threw a scare into its readers and set off a flurry of queries.

Sophomoric Humor

Campus newspapers have been perennial perpetrators of April Fools' hoaxes. Watchdog Jim Romenesko keeps tabs on his website. Sometimes the satire backfires. In 1955, the Troy New York Record reported, the entire editorial staff of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute weekly newspaper was asked to resign after publishing an April Fools' story saying that Easter recess had been canceled — and students would be quarantined — because of a widespread infectious illness.

Some city newspapers eventually decided that April Fools' Day tales were just too sophomoric. Over the years, certain readers of the Bennington, Vt., Banner began to look forward to the paper's April Fools' fabulism — stories of buried treasure or comical municipal appointments. But on April 2, 1969, the paper explained to its readers that it had decided not to publish a made-up article the day before because the real news "seemed so dire that April Foolishness was somehow out of place. Perhaps it's a sign of the times, that the state of the world is so negative that a bit of foolishness is considered inappropriate."

In the end, does first-of-April tomfoolery strengthen — or weaken — the bond between a news organization and its constituency? Ethicist Kirtley says that the tone of a story is the key. "I would just caution that if you are going to do it, it had better be good. You want your readers or listeners to laugh with you, not feel as if you are making fun of them."

(This blog has been updated to reflect that the Kinzua Dam is in Pennsylvania.)


Follow me @NPRHistoryDept; lead me by writing lweeks@npr.org